Why no flood evidence as man expects it? Perhaps because in the different past rapid seperation of continents the evidence was mutilated! Uplifted, disturbed, moved, and such! No wonder we don't see some silly uniform layer worldwide! Goodness, how did we miss such a simple thing for so long!? Wonderful. God was right all along.
24 comments
Machine translations are imperfect. Single-tired-person translations may be equally flawed. Fundiebabble-to-English translator now engaged.
Except that, somehow, this "mutilated" layer was somehow disturbed in just the right way to be incorporated into other layers in a consistent manner worldwide, producing just the effects we would expect to find if the world was actually 4.55 billion years old, evolution happened, there was no flood, etc etc etc. Quite the coincidence, that. And to think, fundies often claim evolution and abiogenesis are improbable!
Perhaps if I ask questions in a Mr. Rogers-esque voice I can convince you that they're true! OF course! Gee-whiz, it is so obvious that the world was shaken violently like a sno-globe a mere 5000 years ago and we suffered not for it! In fact, in a spate of unprecedented wonder, men grew 70 feet tall, lived to be 900 years old, and the entire reign of the dinosaur came and went! Gracious me, it is all so clear now! Praise god, and praise this cough-syrup I've been drinking all day from my sippy-cup!
OK dad, see that's what happens when you take an absurd and ludicrous primitive superstition and work backwards trying to justify it.
"In the different past "? What the heck is that, alternative history?
Yes, in the alternative past, when Mickey Mouse and Spiderman were BAD GUYS, chocolate tasted like chicken, and the sky was pink and polka dot.
David D.G. saismust come up with even wilder crap just to try to explain the scientific inaccuracies and inconsistencies contained therein. And of course, the wilder the fundie explanation, the harder it is to read due to the poor grammer and spelling. This is an indication of their limited mental capacity for rational thought and understanding. And as NonHomogenized mentioned, it is amazing that the earth shows itself to be quite old and shows no evidence whatsover that anything in the BuyBull is correct. Yet it is the BuyBull they believe and not sciencific discovery. Amazing.
[sarcasm] I think he's absolutely right. This all happened "in the different past," that is, not in the actual past. It's so simple, I don't know why you can't follow it. It's "the different past" because it's different from the true past. [/sarcasm]
<<< Perhaps because in the different past rapid seperation of continents the evidence was mutilated! >>>
<<< he has a wilder imagination than most sci-fi authors, who for the most part try to stay at least somewhere in the vicinity of the plausible even when they're making stuff up. >>>some sense.
Once again, a fundie's desperate attempt to make the flood scenario fit into reality is a source of great amusement.
You'd think it would be much easier to accept that the flood never actually happened than come up with horseshit like this, but clearly not.
“Why no flood evidence as man expects it? Perhaps because in the different past rapid seperation of continents the evidence was mutilated!”
“Uplifted, disturbed, moved, and such!”
“No wonder we don't see some silly uniform layer worldwide!”
“Goodness, how did we miss such a simple thing for so long!?”
“ Wonderful. God was right all along.”
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
