onemorequestion #fundie

onemorequestion #fundie christianforums.com

What political party dropped a nuclear bomb on the civiliam population of their enemy?

Which ideology introduced the killing of of hundreds of millions of unborn human beings for convenience sake?

Liberalsim has introduced every STD and drug plague that has ever harmed mankind. Liberals seem very much at ease with socialism and communism, which both limit freedoms of individuals in every place they are employed, and/or, kill off people in numbers that stagger the mind.

Conservativism is an ideology that has limits to what totalitarianism can do and conservatives have shown throughout history that they are willing to die for the freedoms of others. Liberalsim embraces an odd mixture of totalitarianism and unbridled excess full fold, which history has proven is thedeadliest form of implemented ideologies of all time.

Now, which is the most dangerous form of belief system?

When compared to stacked up dead bodies . . . how is liberalism not the most harmful belief system in history?

58 comments

old comment by dionysus

What political party dropped a nuclear bomb on the civiliam population of their enemy?

His name is President Truman and not every liberal agrees with that decision. So stop painting everyone with a broad brush.

Which ideology introduced the killing of of hundreds of millions of unborn human beings for convenience sake?

Hosea 13:16 (King James) Samaria will bear her guilt because she has rebelled against her God.
They will fall by the sword; their little ones will be dashed to pieces, and their pregnant women ripped open. What now?

Liberalsim has introduced every STD and drug plague that has ever harmed mankind.

I remember that, it happened at about a quarter past never.

Liberals seem very much at ease with socialism and communism, which both limit freedoms of individuals in every place they are employed, and/or, kill off people in numbers that stagger the mind.

Uh, actually liberals are opposed to communism. Just because Fox thinks they're one and the same doesn't mean they are.

Conservativism is an ideology that has limits to what totalitarianism can do and conservatives have shown throughout history that they are willing to die for the freedoms of others.

Bullshit. Conservatives try to CONSERVE (notice how the word conservative derives from the word conserve) the status quo. This means that it was not conservatives but progressives that fought and died for freedoms such as emancipation.

Liberalsim embraces an odd mixture of totalitarianism and unbridled excess full fold, which history has proven is thedeadliest form of implemented ideologies of all time.

That's a blatant lie as the word liberal derives from the word liberty.

Now, which is the most dangerous form of belief system?

When compared to stacked up dead bodies . . . how is liberalism not the most harmful belief system in history?

Simple, communism=/=liberalism and abortion is not murder. Your entire argument is faulty.

old comment by GigaGuess

Part 1

What political party dropped a nuclear bomb on the civiliam population of their enemy?
Granted. Now which party seems to get a hard on at the prospect of turning the Middle East into a vast expanse of glass? We may have dropped the nukes (assuming this isn't "It's bad, so a Liberal must've done it") but we also acknowledge that IT'S BAD, AND THE FACT THE THE STATES ARE STILL THE ONLY COUNTRY TO HAVE USED NUCLEAR WEAPONS TO DATE IS AN INCREDIBLE BLACK MARK.

Which ideology introduced the killing of of hundreds of millions of unborn human beings for convenience sake?
Yes, convenience like, oh...not dying during an ectopic pregnancy, or not being forced to carry a child you have absolutely no way to care for. Yeah, we can't have those Liberal Women and their immoral, free-wheelin' lifestyles, can we?

Liberalsim has introduced every STD and drug plague that has ever harmed mankind.
Oh, citation. Right now. Making the "Only liberals have pre/extramarital sex, so they must be responsible" is not only fallacious, but is downright insulting.

old comment by GigaGuess

Part 2

Liberals seem very much at ease with socialism and communism, which both limit freedoms of individuals in every place they are employed...
Oh, you mean like firing people for being gay? Hmmmm? Not to mention, just because Bill O'RLY seems to believe that every Liberal is really a closet commie doesn't necessarily make it so.

...and/or, kill off people in numbers that stagger the mind.
Inquisition. Salem Witch trials. The Crusades. Want me to continue?

Conservativism is an ideology that has limits to what totalitarianism can do and conservatives have shown throughout history that they are willing to die for the freedoms of others.
At one time, perhaps. Now, they seem hell bent on maintaining inequity wherever they can see it. Stan Smith put it best "I know! I hate how White Middle Class American Men only have most of the power instead of all of it!"

Liberalsim embraces an odd mixture of totalitarianism and unbridled excess full fold, which history has proven is thedeadliest form of implemented ideologies of all time.
So...we have both restriction and a lack of it...what?

Now, which is the most dangerous form of belief system?
Sure, you pick and choose events, and definitions, you can make anything seem pretty damn awful.

When compared to stacked up dead bodies . . . how is liberalism not the most harmful belief system in history?
Do you really want an answer, because I would say any Blind Zealotry is harmful, no matter the persuasion. Guess who's the zealot here...?

old comment by Fawful has seen God has a penis on top of a vagina.

"What political party dropped a nuclear bomb on the civiliam population of their enemy?"

It's true that the Democrats dropped the bomb. However, if they hadn't made it, Nazi Germany would've rushed. Even if Hitler was dead by the time they dropped it, it was fully tested BEFORE he killed himself. Also, there were proofs that the Reich was also working on one.

"Which ideology introduced the killing of of hundreds of millions of unborn human beings for convenience sake?"

Well, I don't know, but abortion is not being liberal. What if the baby poses a threat to the mother? Or both may die on the labor day? BTW, Nazism was highly based on Christianism. Hitler sent search parties to look for the Holy Grail.

"Liberalsim has introduced every STD and drug plague that has ever harmed mankind."

How exactly an ideology can make a bacteria is beyond me. Maybe we're gods that when thinking of something, we spontaneusly generate it. If I think of a baby, a baby suddenly appears, right? Maybe if I think you get tortured to death, will it happen? Let's hope so.

"Liberals seem very much at ease with socialism and communism, which both limit freedoms of individuals in every place they are employed, and/or, kill off people in numbers that stagger the mind."

It's true that the U.S.S.R. limited freedoms, but also your oh-so-glorious (piece of shit) country. Hippies in the 60's were treated like that, as were also the Civil Rights Movement and the Feminist Movement. Also, the idea that, for example, I say that a pencil is not mine, but everyone's is wonderful. That is socialism: Everyone owns something. The fact that the U.S.S.R. didn't quite follow that is another thing. The American brainwash made in the Red Scare is amazing, as it's also its consequenses that can be seen to this very day.

old comment by Fawful has seen God has a penis on top of a vagina.

"Conservativism is an ideology that has limits to what totalitarianism can do and conservatives have shown throughout history that they are willing to die for the freedoms of others. Liberalsim embraces an odd mixture of totalitarianism and unbridled excess full fold, which history has proven is the deadliest form of implemented ideologies of all time."

Once again, wrong. Liberals were not always dictators like you wish to put out. Benito Juárez was a liberal and he didn't make a dictatorship. Also, he implemented religious tolerance and a non-religious education, which proved VERY useful in Mexico, as we don't discriminate people just for their religion as often as Americans do.

Now, which is the most dangerous form of belief system?

Conservationism. Seeing many of the quotes you guys put here, you are:

Ignorant in every sense of the word. (http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2010/07/frickin_electricity_how_does_i.php)

Totalitarian. (The Bible is your Constitution and the 10 Commandments your Bill of Rights)

Represive. (You don't like people being openly gay and prefer them to be underground a la Nazi Germany Jew)

Intolerant. (homophobic, xenophobic [includes hate to other beleifs], racist)

When compared to stacked up dead bodies . . . how is liberalism not the most harmful belief system in history?

Well, for one thing, its adjective (liberal) is not an insult, and we tend to be more open minded and tolerant to others.

old comment by From the frozen North

Right, because every democrat is just like Truman.

Apparently a republican one because Harold Andrew Blackmun, an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court authored Roe V. Wade.

Why do I have this image of in a castle somewhere with a sign above the gate saying "The Liberal Agenda ", with lightning flashing overhead and inside a mad scientist laughing maniacally and shouting "I HAVE CREATED THE AIDS VIRUS! AND THE CLAP AND HERPES! HUH HA HA HA HA!".

At risk of committing an obvious Godwin... Hitler was a fascist. Fascism is conservatism taken to an extreme.

Any belief system can be dangerous if taken to an extreme.

So conservatism has no stacks of dead bodies anywhere...Really? See Hitler above.

old comment by Ratio

What political party dropped a nuclear bomb on the civiliam population of their enemy?

Which party has idiots saying that we should nuke every Muslim country that messes with us?

Which ideology introduced the killing of of hundreds of millions of unborn human beings for convenience sake?

Abortion existed long before Roe v. Wade, and it's interesting that you say "ideology" instead of "party." Either way, it was the Republicans, who are and were "conservatives" who supported the legalization of abortions throughout the US in much larger numbers than Democrats. The Republicans realigned after Roe v. Wade to attract larger numbers of Catholic anti-abortion voters.

Liberalsim has introduced every STD and drug plague that has ever harmed mankind. Liberals seem very much at ease with socialism and communism, which both limit freedoms of individuals in every place they are employed, and/or, kill off people in numbers that stagger the mind.

Oh yes, we created AIDS, gonorrhea AND syphilis. Syphilis was our masterpiece.

Some other bullshit

Oh for fuck's sake. Read a book.

old comment by Doubting Thomas

"What political party dropped a nuclear bomb on the civiliam population of their enemy?"

Um... none? As far as I know, the US military has control over all nuclear weapons, not political parties. But I shudder to think what could happen if the Republican party got hold of a nuke, if the comments I've seen from a lot of Christians are any indication.

"conservatives have shown throughout history that they are willing to die for the freedoms of others."

Unless those freedoms include freedom of religion, gay marriage, abortion, sex, pornography, music albums with explicit lyrics (freedom of speech), etc.

"Now, which is the most dangerous form of belief system?"

Probably the one which now uses ancient superstition as its platform and plans to restrict the rights of others based on that superstition.

old comment by katie5000

First of all, OP, you need to get out and meet more people. But let me ask you a few things:

Which ideology would not hesitate to drop a nuke on a civilian population now? And:

Which ideology consistently and regularly hinders and even outright prevents adequate knowledge of and access to contraception, to prevent pregnancy so that abortion doesn't become a consideration? Which ideology actively works to keep knowledge of matters sexual from those human beings beginning to mature and develop a sex life (teens and twentysomethings)?

Liberals are at ease with implementing changes to the current "status quo". That is, almost by definition, what "liberal" means. It's synonymous with "flexible". Being flexible, however, does not mean being devoid of a sense of ethics. No, "liberals" are not afraid to try and correct for certain problems like a lack of healthcare or education or even poverty by changing the way that we, as a society, do things. Government programs are simply the broadest way to reach the largest amount of people throughout the entire United States, and a federal program would be accessible to everyone regardless of the state they lived in. That's why there's always a push for federal programs (as opposed to just leaving it to the individual states).

old comment by katie5000

Comment, Part 2:

I would also like to say, in response to the first line of the OP - in what is CLEARLY a jab at the Democrats for Hiroshima - that the decision to do that was certainly NOT made lightly and that it contributes to a sense of regret that most decent Americans hold to this day. To be fair, the United States is the only nation in the world to have ever used a nuke on anybody anywhere. BUT, despite the fact that we still have the capability to do so, we have NEVER dropped another atomic bomb on anyone since that day. To use such an emotionally-charged issue to make a jab at a Democrat or even an American is a particularly heinous thing to do, and illustrates that you are a particularly ugly person who does not hesitate to hit below the belt (in b4 Headache, hopefully >_>).

old comment by David F Mayer

Had the President been a Republican, the SAME actions would have been taken. The situation, such as it was, seemed to require it.

It is easy to decide in 2010 what Harry Truman should have done in 1945. Monday morning quarterbacking is not difficult.

Actually, there were some Americans on the Manhattan Project (in particular, Oppenheimer himself) who believed that a mere demonstration of the nuclear bomb in an unoccupied location would have forced the surrender just as well. It is hard to say.

There were a few others, including Teller and Von Neumann who thought that the first bomb should include a sphere of lithium deuteride in the center of the fission core to boost its yield by several hundred percent. They didn't get their way either.

onemorequestion #fundie christianforums.com

58 comments

Confused?