How to balance the sexual marketplace, a hypothetical utopia (credits to /u/gstvtrp)

I was inspired by this comment from /u/gstvtrp to expand on the idea he had.

A law should be enacted to limit the number of different female sexual partners a man can have over the course of a year. In order to mostly negate our species’ inherent biological tendency towards female hypergamy, this cap will most likely have to be very low, probably just 1 per year.

The specifics of whether this is possible to monitor and regulate successfully are not important right now as this is just a hypothetical thought experiment exploring the potential effects on the sexual economy.

Effects:

1. Males no longer are willing to fuck below their league, even the top males go for their looksmatch, and those who cheat are removed from the dating pool (penis removed). This gives men who still have penises even more advantage in the dating market.

2. Women no longer cuckold their looksmatch significant other for a superior male. That superior male is no longer willing so the option does not exist. There is technically no limit to how many men a woman can fuck but she could most likely only get her looksmatch or lower, and it would be pointless to cheat on a man for another man who is not superior. In fact with this law enacted women would have to fuck lower on the attractiveness scale if they wanted casual sex instead of a relationship.

3. Men seek out monogamy. If they have sex with a woman who won’t have sex with them again then they can’t have sex for the whole year with anyone. Men will only want long term relationships, which will mostly prevent the creation of “female Chads” who fuck many men without committing.

4. NO MORE INCELS. Any man can now get sex at least once a year and most likely a LTR due to a more forgiving sexual marketplace.

Reasons this could gain support:

1. It helps the majority of men. Only Chads are hurt by this, and they are only hurt in that they are moved closer to equality with the rest of us.

2. It hurts the majority of women, but they will be too stupid to realize that. Women simply don’t have to mental capacity to think all this out, and will not consider the effects on the sexual marketplace. Many of them do not even understand the concept of a sexual marketplace and would laugh at the term. Since it doesn’t technically restrict them from having sex with many men and it restricts their boyfriends from cheating on them women will think it favors them. Ideas like forcing them to have sex with incels more obviously go against their interests and reduce their privilege, so they would oppose those.

Reasons this could not gain support:

1. Chads hold a disproportionate amount of power in the world relative to their small numbers, and they want as much degeneracy as possible.

2. As a wise incel once said; “Incel ideology never took root because the normies see themselves not as exploited beta providers, but as temporarily embarrassed Chads.”

Several retarded normie responses that I already know will be made:

1. “This is misogynistic!!!” Nope actually this law doesn’t govern women at all. It only punishes men for fucking multiple women. I’m sure some feminists will be able to complete the necessary mental gymnastics to turn this into patriarchal oppression of women like they did with sex bots, but that is only because of their privilege-warped minds and addiction to outrage.

2. “This violates our basic rights/this is oppressive!” You are not entitled to sex, and when moving closer to equality looks like oppression to you, that means you are PRIVILEGED.

3. “This will never happen/impossible to enforce” Who knows, not relevant. This is a thread about hypotheticals. However, many things we take for granted in our current society were once thought impossible.