Any Christian that is embarrassed by Gods deeds in either the NT or the OT is not a real Christian.
18 comments
It's easier to ignore God's crimes against humanity, as portrayed in bible stories. If you're an even "more real" Christian, you can rationalise and justify God's acts such as genocide, or being a bloodthirsty bastard. Then again, you could be a logical thinker and realise that this God just doesn't exist.
It's easier to ignore God's crimes against humanity, as portrayed in bible stories. If you're an even "more real" Christian, you can rationalise and justify God's acts such as genocide, or being a bloodthirsty bastard. Then again, you could be a logical thinker and realise that this God just doesn't exist.
This is the first time I agree fully with a fundie!
We all know that a True Christian can rationalize any of BibleGod's atrocities, no matter how repulsive, by saying that the people he killed deserved death because they were sinful. I guess that includes all the babies and children who died in the Noachian flood, too.
My father says the OT is the worst ethical piece of writing ever written. Still, he is a pretty decent Christian. Hint: Jesus was, at least to you, Christ. The OT doesn't mention Christ. I think you can figure the rest out yourself.
The basic Christian message is good, but I smelled the poisons in the bible at a very young age. Thereafter, I eschewed it, regarding it as a malformed mutated corpse of a fever dream...
Any Christian who is not embarrassed by even one of God's deeds in either the NT or the OT is a heartless, soulless, brainless, ass.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
