++"Just thought of something."
*check's the name* Liar.
+"Homosexuals claimed (stole) the rainbow as their symbol in order to show their "diversity", right?"
No, actually, they didn't. You didn't OWN a fucking natural occurrence. That would be like claiming that clouds are a Christian-owned symbol or concept. Hell, you don't even own the myth. Like every single other myth, symbol and ritual in your religion, you had to steal it from older, more interesting religions. At least in the older myth the name "rainbow" actually made some kind of fucking sense.
++'Well, wouldn't it make more sense for the rainbow to be the symbol for heterosexuality, considering there's more diversity in it?"
Not really, no. A monochrome flag would make more sense. Actually I think there's already one of those, though I believe that one is actually asexual-specific.
++'Whereas with homosexuality (homo meaning "same"), there's less diversity, because it's just the same sexes pairing up."
Oh wow. You really don't understand what that flag represents, do you?
++'So yeah, not only does the homosexual movement not deserve the rainbow"
No one "deserves" a naturally occurring phenomenon.
... well okay. Maybe you deserve to spontaneously combust but that's one little exception to the rule.
++because it belongs to God in the first place"
++" but they shouldn't have it because it doesn't even make sense."
Also false. It makes perfect sense. What doesn't make sense is your horribly mangled... "understanding" of the subject.