"Well, that's exactly where you have it backwards. What I am saying is that a monkey has more logic than an Atheist. The biggest problem with Atheists is not that they believe in Atheism, but that they represent Atheism as some claim with significant scientific backing--which cannot be further from the truth. I have never seen a monkey ridiculously claiming the non-existence of an entity without a shred of proof. Have you? That makes monkeys more superior than Atheists in my book."
40 comments
To expand on Nathan's thought:
I have never seen a monkey ridiculously claiming the existence of an entity without a shred of proof. Have you? That makes monkeys more superior than theists in my book.
Fixed.
I love arguements that can be turned around with the deletion of 4 letters and a hyphen.
... dumbass.
Not believing in theism is not the same as "believing" in nothing. We're not affirming a positive. we're stating your claims are bullshit. There's a very big difference.
As for the scientific backing, once again, it debunks YOUR claims.
You freaks are the ones going around trying to get everyone to believe in your overly violent, hateful imaginary friends.
swap your gawd for any other, or the tooth fairy, or magnetic-stripped 2.8L twin-turbo UNICORNS, and you'll see how 'mentally deficient' (read: retarded) your little paragraph is.
Leaving aside for the moment gods in general, I do have evidence for the nonexistence of the God of Abraham. That evidence is called the Bible. Since believers in the God of Abraham presumably have evidence for the nonexistence of every other god -- otherwise they would be inferior to monkeys, right? -- we've covered all of the bases.
Monkeys are usually busy eating, having sex, and swinging around in trees. They don't have time to claim anything, really.
Also, you fail at logic. Burden of proof, bitch.
Um, monkeys can't talk. My goldfish has never claimed to believe in evolution, does that make him a christian? No, it makes him a fish with no speech capabilities.
Well, that's exactly where you have it backwards. What I am saying is that a monkey has more logic than a Christian. The biggest problem with Christians is not that they believe in Christianity, but that they represent Christianity as some claim with significant scientific backing--which cannot be further from the truth. I have never seen a monkey ridiculously claiming the non-existence of an entity without a shred of proof. Have you? That makes monkeys more superior than superior to Christians in my book.
They haven't been in church or being evangelist Christians, for that matter. Moreover, I've never seen missionaries trying to witness them. Why?, because everybody knows that animal are not and can't be religious. Therefore, they can't be atheists.
Actually, I think fundies claim that becasue religion came before science/evolution the burden of proof is upon US.
However, that would imply that
1) Fundies actually had some proof of their own.
I have never seen a cockroach ridiculously claiming the existence of an entity without a shred of proof. Have you? That makes cockroaches more superior than Christians in my book.
I think when a monkey and zigzagzoo12 were to square off against a quiz show, the monkey would win.
Let's say...1 vs. 100 ~~,
1 fundie vs. 100 monkeys...is it the fundie or the MOB? ~~,
Monkeys believe in Jeebus? Haha, I have my doubts. They're more likely to believe in King Kong, who, after all, died for their sins.
"That makes monkeys more superior than Atheists in my book."
Too bas it doesn't do the same thing in the real world, eh ?
By that token, if non-human animals never claim the existence of an entity without proof then all non-human animals are superior than Fundies. Even tapeworms and mosquitoes.
These idiots really do line themselves up like ducks in a shooting gallery, don't they?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
