Mechanism to stop females voting
Clearly if we are going to make any progress we need to stop females from voting. Since they are not going to vote for them to not be allowed to vote we need to just stop them. Good people need to either bar them from entering polling places or not count their votes.
It might be said that this is illegal, so a legal reason might be useful. There can be legal reasons to stop people voting, such as if they are convicted felons for instance. In the case of females it is obvious - that they have the moral and intellectual development of 7-10 year old boys (a proven fact) and therefore shouldn’t vote for the same reasons. Females wanting to vote would have to prove this was not the case and most wouldn’t be able to, so problem solved.
20 comments
My goodness, even an ignorant woman like me can see a few flaws. Let's start with the gross stupidity of Mr. Cornfed which calls his moral and intellectual development into question to the point that the men in white coats might be the ones to keep him from voting (unless he falls into the category of "convicted felon" first). While we are at it, we might examine his motives as well. What kind of "progress" do you think you need to make with the participation of just a fraction of half the population, and what is your ultimate goal? 'Cause I've gotta tell you, your chances don't look very good from here.
Um, it's not illegal for retarded citizens to vote, though. So even if it were true, it's not an excuse for illegally preventing their votes.
Did this confused little smegface just tell me that I have the "moral & intellectual" development of an 8 year old boy? My brain is perfectly capable of processing the words but I'm having difficulty accepting that a life form could be this mal-adjusted & still be allowed to walk around unsupervised. I love how he claims that my inherent stupidity is a proven fact, yet cites no sources or evidence to back up his rather unbelievable assertion. What a pathetic little twerp.
Besides, people with obviously mental disabilities are still allowed to vote. How else do you explain republican voters?
@The Crimson Ghost
Besides, people with obviously mental disabilities are still allowed to vote. How else do you explain republican voters?
As someone who has autism, I do find this to be rather offensive. You're basically insinuating that I'd vote Republican because I'm mentally disabled (I'm not even sure that I'd vote for anyone in the US. My voting tastes are well to the left of the Democratic Party, but perhaps I'd vote if a particular candidate turned out to be a member of the Democratic Socialists of America.). I mean, I don't like the Republicans either, but at least have the balls to admit that their voters aren't mentally malfunctioning.
Lastly, I've got to admit that the "Republican" schtick in mainstream politics is starting to annoy me. You've got the US Republicans, you've got the French Republicans, you've got the German Republicans, you've got the Turkish Republicans,... What does Republican even mean anymore at this point?
Poor little whinge-cel! You were born in the wrong century...
As for you, I'd say the 7-10 year old boys have MORE moral and intellectual development - as well as you being a little boy, in another sense.
It's hilarious how they never seem to realize any test that would accurately set a bar for emotional maturity would exclude them handily. It's depressing, however, that they are under the impression that women aren't actually used to fighting - in the case of suffragettes literally brawling with police - for their rights and would just roll over at any inconvenience as such meaningful history should not be so easily ignored.
@hydrolythe
I could say I'm offended at how you insinuate that autism is a mental disability, but I won't.
Mental disability means just exactly what the term says. Mental: having to do with the mind or brain. Ability: capacity to actually do something. Modified by dis-: as in not. That is, not mentally capable of actually thinking one's way through something. If you can't think your way through this process, that's not because you're autistic, it's because you're mentally disabled. If you don't understand the difference, please look back at your own life, and ask yourself how you so easily do some things that others struggle with. And also remember . . . that's everyone, not just those with autism.
Admittedly, apparent mental disability doesn't apply to all Republicans, but those who support Trump it obviously does, because they don't seem to grasp every time he tells a lie. They apparently suffer from a variation of object impermanence, because once he says something, and it's done . . . they forget it, so that when he says something the directly contradicts it, they absolutely refuse to accept that he has contradicted himself. That is a definite mental disability, not simply a difference in manner of thought. It is a lack of memory function, period. That, sir, is mental disability. Autism is not.
What???
Your post was without a doubt the stupidest fucking thing I'll read all day.
You can take as much offense as you wish; it's your choice. I never mentioned autism once in my post, so I don't where the fuck you got that from. I also never implied or stated that austistic people are mentally disabled, since the 2 are not the same. I was also unaware that you even were "on the scale", as I've heard it referred to as. Furthermore, if you had actually been paying attention to anything I post, you would know by now that I do not insinuate, since most people aren't smart enough to pick up on insinuations, which appears to include you. I don't have much else to add at this point, other than I have concluded that you may not be legally disabled, but unfathomable stupidity such as yours should be declared a mental handicap. And that sir or madam, is no insinuation.
If, at this point, you really need me or anyone else to explain what "republican" means these days, at least in the US, then you are truly hopeless & I'd encourage you to visit another website. The kind with bright colors & cute little cartoons, to distract you from your pettiness & that bizarre stick up your ass.
@K'Zhad Bhat
When you say mentally disabled you are basically defining it as "not being able to do something with your brain". I can see why it would work as a joke now, but I still really can't laugh with it simply because to a psychiatrist that has a pretty concrete meaning. A psychiatrist isn't going to call GOP-voters "mentally disabled" because he's in a position of authority and has the actual power of locking them up in a mental institution if so be it. When you have that kind of power decisions over who is or isn't "mentally disabled" become life or death questions (OK. Not that extreme, but you get the idea). Granted though, I may have to quickly assumed you were putting it in that context, hence my rage.
And how is autism not a mental disability? I'd love to hear because I constantly hear that it is one, again, from psychiatrists.
Lastly I'd say that Trump's voters being unable to see through his hypocrisy is a prime example of cognitive dissonance. That seems more adequate to me.
And I thought you'd be able to take a joke on how the term "Republican" has almost become devoid of meaning in politics, but apparantly I overestimated you. I guess that we all live in America.
@hydrolythe
If that's the definition of mentally disabled you want to use, guess what . . . with absolutely zero exceptions, every individual person on this planet is mentally disabled. There is always something that many people can do with their minds that many others, in fact most others, cannot. That's why that definition is such an awful failure.
A mental disability then has to be logically defined as an incapability to do something at a very basic level necessary to functioning in society, if not in life itself. A lack of object permanence is an example of those. If you lack object permanence, you have a clear mental disability. If you can't manipulate geometric objects in your mind, then you'll be slow at best, possibly even incapable of higher mathematics. So, grab an example of something that can be overcome, that is not a mental disability, rather a difference in way of thinking. If it cannot be overcome, and requires assistance from someone who is fully capable, in order to function at all, then that is a mental disability.
@K'Zhad Bhat
Fair enough, though, although if you read my post, that wasn't the definition I was going to defend either way. It was the definition I used because it would make sense reading your post that way. I was going to rather say that somebody is mentally disabled if and only if an authoritative figure (such as a psychiatrist) classifies them as such.
And you've just said that I'm mentally disabled, as I need help from a counselor to be able to do some things that might seem very basic to you (like cleaning my room, going to an event etc.). These are things I can't do in part because I'm autistic. So in the end you'd want that I vote Republican?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
