@hydrolythe

Show post

Ahreeman X #fundie iranpoliticsclub.net

Democrats are the most corrupt political party in history of America. They do anything to cling to power. The founding fathers plan for America was for the patriots to go to the capital and serve their terms by serving the people. Once their terms were finished, to go back to their businesses, farms and trade. The Founding Fathers had no intention for these cock roaches to become career politicians and remain in the congress for decades, some over 30 years and suck the blood and livelihood out of their districts’ constituents!

These leeches get rich off of insider trading at Wallstreet, bribes by lobbyists, sweet deals with foreign governments and kickbacks by corporations. Take a good look at the hundreds of millions of dollars made by the corrupt politicians such as Clintons, Obamas, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters, Elijah Cummings, the Black Caucus and the rest of the Democrat Bosses. These cock roaches live in six million-dollar mansions while their constituents in their districts live in the rat-infested housings or are flat-out homeless! Look at San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Jose, Baltimore, Chicago or any other Democrat run urban area of the large US Cities!

GOP Establishment is no better. They cling to power like leeches. These rotten moving corps, never retire, unless they die (like John McCain) or they rot (like Nancy Pelosi)!

Today’s Democrat Party is not the party of JFK but it is a Liberal Socialist Party with hardcore Marxist ideological core inherited from the Marxist Professors who have been indoctrinating the kids in the universities for over 30 years! Throughout all of these indoctrinations, the GOP has been silent! Do you know why? Because the GOP of Pre Trump, was not a Conservative Party, yet it was a “Globalist Republican” party.

Show post

Admin #transphobia #kinkshaming feministwiki.org

The word TERF (or terf) is a slur that is used predominantly by transgender activists and their allies against people who criticize the transgender movement on the basis of feminist concerns. Since the slur is used for people with feminist concerns, the main target tend to be women. As such, it's usually understood to be an anti-feminist, sexist and misogynist slur.

The word was invented as an acronym for Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist, where the "trans-exclusionary" part referred to those holding roughly the position that transwomen should not be included under a feminist definition of womanhood, and the "radical feminist" part was meant neutrally, i.e. for people who would indeed describe themselves as radical feminists in the true sense. Over time, the acronym pretty much became a four-letter word. Nowadays the capitalization is frequently omitted, and the already ambiguous original meaning ignored entirely. Still, users of the term tend to claim that it's a neutral description. The "trans-exclusionary" part may now refer to anyone who thinks transwomen should not have unfettered access to all female-only spaces (e.g. changing rooms), should not partake in women's sports where they have unfair advantages, should not be considered a natural part of the lesbian dating pool, etc. Although most members of the public would see these as rather sensible positions, considering a "transwoman" may have intact male anatomy, transgender activists nevertheless see all of these types of "exclusion" as unacceptable.

A closely associated term is SWERF, which is supposed to stand for Sex-Worker-Exclusionary Radical Feminist and is used for those who see the sex industry (prostitution, pornography, etc.) as highly exploitative and sexist. Like TERF, the term is almost always applied as a slur, and to misrepresent the political position of the person it's used against. Ironically, some of those who have to face the term most commonly are women who worked in prostitution and became anti-prostitution activists as a result of their own experiences as so-called sex workers.

Show post

GeorgeBergoglio #fundie reddit.com

Is the name "reverse mathematics" uninformative and relativistic?

angels can grasp truth immediately and luminously without syllogisms or ratiocinations (summa theologiae prima pars, question 58). So for an angel, doing human mathematics would be "reverse mathematics", finding whether a truth is provable in a system accessible to mere mortals like ZFC. So it seems like the term reverse mathematics is either endorsing relativism or denying the existence of angels. I suggest an alternative name would increase interest and avoid these errors.

Show post

Taylor Marshall #fundie taylormarshall.com

Americans, conditioned by our history, are very concerned about “our rights.” So before looking at what a Catholic America might look like, let us establish that all human rights are given to us by the Creator. As our Declaration of Independence rightly explains: “they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.”

Human rights, then, are not arbitrary but conform to what God has given and allowed. The right to life is one such right. Freedom of speech is a right, but it is limited so as to exclude blasphemy of God. God does not give us a “right” to acts which are contrary to His nature. He gives us a free will and we can sin with it, but He does not give us the protected “right” to sin. Nobody on Judgment Day will protest, “But I had the RIGHT to curse you and commit mortal sins!”

So then, God does not give us the “right” to curse Him, the “right” to kill innocents, nor the “right” to commit sodomy. The rights given by the Creator always conform to the law of the Creator.

With all this mind, what if America were a fully Catholic country, here is what it might look like…

* The newly elected president would recite his oath of office, not only with his hand on the Holy Bible, but kneeling before the Blessed Sacrament in a monstrance held by the Cardinal Archbishop of Washington, DC. within the Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in Washington, DC. In other words, the President would make his oath directly to Christ.
* January 21, the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, would be a perennial day of national penance.
* Holy Matrimony would be honored and recognized as the most fundamental unit of American culture.
* Large families would be encouraged and assisted through the US tax code.
* The White House would no longer have a basketball court or bowling alley, but a glorious and beautiful chapel where the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass would be celebrated daily by a presidential Catholic chaplain.
* Abortion, contraception, sodomy, euthanasia, and divorce would be illegal as these sins are contrary to the natural law. Of course, abused wives would be protected and assisted under law.
* Public blasphemy and the abuse of the most holy name of Jesus would be forbidden in film, television, and music. Think about it: why is not okay to say the F-word on TV but actors are allowed to mock and blaspheme Jesus? Which is worse, abusing God’s name in vain or the F-word?
* The United States would have the greatest foster care system in the world.
* The Catholic Church, not the State, would organize and perform the Seven Corporal Acts of Mercy (feeding the poor, clothing the naked, caring for the sick, etc.)
* US courtrooms would have both the Ten Commandments and a Crucifix of Christ on the wall to proclaim the Justice of God and the Divine Mercy of God.
* All Holy Days of Obligation would become federal holidays and Days of Obligation would not be transferred to Sundays since they would become holidays for all citizens. Ash Wednesday and Good Friday would also become nationally recognized holidays.
According to Saint Thomas Aquinas, the natural law prescribes that parents, not the State, are primarily responsible for the education of children. Saint Paul says: “And you, fathers…educate your children in the discipline and correction of the Lord.” It is the job of fathers, not the State, to educate. This truth of Saint Paul would be recognized by law and encouraged through homeschooling, educational co-ops, parochial schools, and locally governed public schools on the pattern of subsidiarity.
* Mary under her title “Immaculate Conception” is currently the patroness of the United States. She would become featured on our national seal and on our currency.
* Streets, landmarks, parks, national monument, and our currency would be marked by the names and images of great American saints (St Elizabeth Anne Seton, St Katherine Drexel, St John Neumann, St Francesca S. Cabrini, St Rose Philippine Duchesne, St Damien of Molokai).
* American foreign policy would conform to Catholic teaching regarding just war and prohibiting global policing and so-called “preventive wars.”
A cross would be placed on top of the Washington Monument.
* The solemnity of the Immaculate Conception would be a day in which the American bishops and all the faithful annually consecrated the nation to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
* Under the patronage of the Immaculate Conception, the United States would become known for its Marian devotion in a way that would rival medieval France and England.
* The principle of subsidiarity would apply to our economic and political arrangement – which would include things like the encouragement of local natural food, local water, local governance, etc.
* The sin of usury in form of credit cards, school loans, and other disadvantaging lending policies would be criminalized as contrary to natural law.
* Our immigration policy would be firm, merciful and just by including a clear and regularized process for citizenship.
* Pornography and even unwholesome advertisements and billboards would be outlawed.
* America would be known as a place where the dignity of women, especially motherhood, is celebrated.
* The bishops nationally or locally could ask civil leaders to appoint certain days as days of national thanksgiving or as days of penance or mourning.
* The clergy (but especially our archbishops and bishops) would not live like royalty in mansions as in previous years but would live penitent and poor lives like great bishops of old such as St Martin of Tours, St Francis de Sales, St Augustine, and St Bonaventure.
* The meetings of the Senate and Congress would begin with the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and with prayers and benedictions from the clergy.
* Red Masses invoking the aid of the Holy Spirit would be celebrated regularly to beg prudence for judges, attorneys, law school professors, students, and government officials.
* Those of different religions would be tolerated and by no means forced to convert to Catholicism. Conversion, as the Popes have taught, is an act of the will and people should not be forced through political coercion.

This is what I’m praying for and this is what I’m working for. Not by force, but by patience, penance, and kindness. As Saint Paul wrote:

Do you not know that God’s kindness is meant to lead you to repentance?” (Romans 2:4)

It’s not enough to be on defense. It’s not enough to “fix” the HHS debacle. It’s not even enough to overturn Roe v. Wade. We have to be like the early Christians. We have to think like Saint Paul who wanted to convert not only individual souls but the entire Roman Empire. As the Apostle once wrote: “To re-establish all things in Christ!” (Eph1:10), which much later became the motto of Pope Saint Pius X: Instaurare omnia in Christo!

Show post

kalidurga #wingnut #fundie en.kalitribune.com

Political correctness is rightly considered to be a vague term. However, this by no means warrants anyone to infer that it doesn’t exist and sway our lives to an enormous extent. The very point of deeming something inexistent by pointing out that it is vaguely defined is a tell-tale sign of the real root of what we call “Political Correctness.”

Namely, the idea that morality is purely a matter of strictly systematized application of language stems from the age old principle of what philosophers call nominalism, the doctrine that assumes that cognitive process is nothing but the apprehension and conceptualization of sense data.
While this process is at work in everyday experience, nominalists omit one extremely important – in fact essential – element inherent in human knowledge, namely: that things themselves have essences or “natures” which mold our notions about them.

By denying the necessary, or indeed: any, intrinsic substantial nature to beings, nominalism empowers it’s adherents to define and redefine them at will.

This is a true meaning of so-called “Occam’s razor”, a method named after a Medieval English Franciscan philosopher William of Occam, stating that, in paraphrase, “any multiplications of beings unnecessary to satisfactory explanation is false”.

Of course, nominalists are not prone to examine their own assumptions and they take for granted that what we see, hear, touch, smell or taste is all there is to know, not taking into account that very principles they profess cannot be based on this, because they are meant to apply to all conceivable instances.

If all knowledge is a cognition of perceivable individuals – of manifold chaos with no intrinsic unity – how can then anything be applied to all conceivable instances?

It can’t.

In the series of podcasts we hereby present, the political correctness is defined as an instance of extreme moral nominalism. Namely, there’s a one characteristic feature of nominalist minded people: while denying anything remotely spiritual in this world, they at the same time tend to deny all substance – even the matter itself, while making their own notions about reality absolute.

It’s a kind of magical thinking where words are considered to have a power over reality.

This is by no means surprising, because real knowledge is based on concepts and not on sense experience and if we cannot rely on our notions, we can really rely on nothing at all. Things we perceive are in eternal flux and if there’s no unity in them, then there’s no stability which could provide us with certain knowledge.

Like averybody else, nominalists want to have certain principles and moral rules they can rely on. But given that they deny the possibility that world itself provides us with them, they venture to make them up themselves.
And when they succeed at imagining them, they have a compulsive need to impose them upon the world and other people, because that is the only way left open for them to make sense of it.

The things have to conform to the labels nominalists paste upon their surface.
Sounds familiar?

Gender quotas, humanitarian bombing, redefining oneself’s sex, humans merging with the machines, sanctioning of all things possibly offensive, safe spaces in Universities … being called a bigot because you accidentally looked at someone sideways?

If it is, then you are on the right track because you’re not living under the rock. Political correctness is an inherently totalitarian system of moral nominalism, where words and labels are everything, because all else is deemed unreal. It is an utmost and to date the most perfect system of essentially denying the very possibility of morality.

Therefore, it is an elaborate, well thought out, system of evil.

In this three-part podcast, we’ll explore how moral nominalism functions, why is it always accompanied with the compulsive need for strict legalization of it’s principles and how it in effect serves to destroy the language.

A nominalist cookbook

In the first part we explore why is PC so hard to define and why no knee-jerk reactions to it are really valid. While standard fare PC phenomena irritate the hell out of people, when interrogated as to why they get so irritated by, say: legal proscription of three or more different gender toilet labels, they are usually at the lack to give a satisfactory explanation of their dissent.
This is one of the main strengths of PC, namely that it’s adherents can use slurs, memes and emotionally charged rhetoric, while the only weapon at the disposal of it’s opponents is an act of analytical discernment which can be very demanding and never provides one with flashy phrases and one-sentence answers.

We propose that the reason for this is nominalist principle of reduction of reality to utterly simple, atomic, facts that can only be reflected in simple language. Thence follows the famous Occam’s razor dictum that only simple answers are the right ones.
So, for instance, there’s no use to suppose that 9/11 was an elaborate operation, perpetrated by whole network of vested interests, because the idea that it was perpetrated by few amateur pilots of Arabian descent is much simpler and therefore true.
On the other hand, this approach allows promulgators and adherents of PC enormous freedom in defining their concepts which need not relate to anything but “atomic facts” of reality. We illustrate this point by example of Richard Dawkins and his statement that “there’s nothing morally reprehensible in eating human roadkill”.

As nominalism takes into consideration only atomic facts “roadkill” and “eating”, while “human” is only a subjective qualification on the same level as “animal”, there’s no difference in cooking and eating the dead animal and dead human.

All this stems from inability of nominalists to affirm existence of anything that is not based on simplest sense perceptions. And human nature, which is the thing forcing us to essentially discern animal from human, is something you cannot perceive by senses.

The result is that political correctness becomes moral system completely detached from moral reality which seeks to make itself absolute. In order to do that PC individuals are forced to seek it’s legalization, i.e. to turn their ever expanding principles into laws.

Show post

Kim Zigfeld #racist larussophobe.wordpress.com

On September 28, 2011, a perfect metaphor for the horror that is Vladimir Putin’s Russia appeared in The Independent, which has over the years been responsible for some of the toughest and most insightful reporting on Russia (hat tip: Streetwise Professor).

The paper wrote about how thousands upon thousands of stray dogs roam the streets of Moscow, how they have killed Muscovites in packs and how they pose all manner of serious health concerns, to say nothing of betraying Russia’s eternal poverty regardless of the propaganda the state may churn out. Yet Russians, idiots that they are, are fighting to keep these dogs on the streets, and do what they can to care for them.

Similarly Josef Stalin is beloved by Russians, even though he murdered more of them than any other person who ever lived.

And similarly, the proud KGB spy and murderer of Starovoitova, of Litvinenko, of Politikovskaya, of Yushenkov, of Shchekochikhin, of Girenko, of Klebnikov, of Kozlov, of Estemirova, of Markelov and of so very many others, known as Vladimir Putin, is being embraced as he declares himself president for life. Lenin, Stalin, Putin.

On April 2, 2006, we warned the world that it would be so.

We formed this blog, and for the next five years, five months and twenty-two days, we warned that Putin would never leave power, that he would consistently reduce Russian democracy and increase its neo-Soviet character until Russia was a fully realized neo-Soviet dictatorship. On September 24, 2011, we were proved finally, horribly, undeniably right.

There were those who said Russia could “never go back” to the dark days of the Soviet past. There were those who said Putin would never return to power, that he would fade into the background and allow Dima Medvedev and his successors to build a civilized democratic state.

They were lying. It was La Russophobe that was telling the truth, all along.

Russians will fight to keep stray dogs on the streets of their capital city, dogs which maul and brutalize them, but they will not fight to keep
Putin out of power. That really says all you need to know about the Russian people of the new millennium. They are, as Robert H. Boyle of Sports Illustrated magazine once called them, “desperately screwed up.

We are not the only ones to have made this prediction, of course. The brilliant Jeffrey Taylor of The Altantic magazine beat us to it by several years when he called Putin’s Russia “Zaire with permafrost” and “finished” in May 2001. The world didn’t listen to him, either.

Show post

Aborti0nIsMurder #sexist #fundie reddit.com

No, pregnancy isn't realistically a threat to a woman's life. Women have been doing it for millions of years. The entire female anatomy is built and fine-tuned to give birth, that is the only purpose of the female body, and it excels at doing just that in a very safe manner.

Our current advanced technology makes it even safer to give birth, as if that were possible. Stop demonizing the most natural and wonderful process of the female anatomy.

Show post

reg509 #sexist incels.net

Anti-incel commercial

This commercial really pisses me off!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWl-bfvPMKo

Whoever came up with this commercial was definitely trying to make fun of incels but failed because they have no idea what they're talking about. The fact that the guy's name is chad and the second girl's name is stacy can't be a coincidence. Where to even start. The notion that any femoid would turn down a literal chad, or the notion that chad would get rejected as badly as an incel would. The only thing this commercial got right was the femoid. Look how unapologetically rude and insulting she is in rejecting him. She doesn't just say no, she has to make it clear that she'd rather go over boring paperwork than speak to him. Typical self righteous c*nt who thinks she's too good for the world. That really makes me want to use your product. I'll bet a feminazi wrote this. Fuck this commercial, and fuck turbotax. I don't even know what their company is about and already they've made me pledge to never do business with them. If I ever need whatever service they provide I'll be sure to use their competitors out of pure spite.

Show post

LV Subramanyam #fundie #psycho newindianexpress.com

TIRUPATI: Taking a serious view of the reports of proselytization in Tirumala and also over non-Hindu employees working in the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Chief Secretary LV Subramanyam said those who were engaged in such activities should voluntarily give them up, so as not to hurt the sentiments of devotees.

He went on to add that they would not hesitate to conduct surprise inspections in the houses of endowments department employees to ensure that they were not practising any religion other than Hinduism.

Speaking to media in Tirupati on Sunday after a review meeting with TTD officials, the Chief Secretary said those who converted to other religions from Hinduism would not be allowed to continue in the service of the endowments department. “If anybody found working in the department, they would not be allowed to continue in important positions. If needed, surprise inspections will be conducted in the houses of employees to ensure they are not practising other religions,’’ he warned.

“Those non-Hindus working in the TTD should come out openly if they have the courage and leave the organisation,” he said. The antecedents of those who submitted a wrong declaration to conceal their religion for the sake of getting a job in the TTD would be checked and, if found violating rules, stern action would be taken. The Chief Secretary said printing advertisements to promote other religions on the rear side of tickets on buses to Tirumala was wrong and tantamount to serious lapse on the part of the APSRTC.

“Had the local management of the APSRTC been cautious, such incidents would not have happened,” he said and added that an inquiry was ordered into the entire episode. “Once the report is received, necessary action will be initiated,” he said.

To prevent recurrence of such incidents anywhere in the State, a State-level coordination committee would be formed shortly after discussing it with Chief Minister YS Jagan Mohan Reddy, the CS explained.

Subramanyam also reviewed the arrangements for the annual Brahmotsavams of Lord Venkateswara, scheduled from September 2 and the maintenance of TTD museums.

Show post

Randy Alcorn #fundie #psycho epm.org

Question from a reader:

Is there any consolation for me concerning my parents who both died without a personal belief and faith in Jesus? It is all very well for me to know that I have since been saved, but I still feel deeply upset about the outcome for my parents whom I love dearly. How can you not grieve in Heaven while knowing your parents (and anyone else for that matter) will suffer so terribly for all eternity?

Answer from Randy Alcorn:

Many people have lost loved ones who didn’t know Christ. Some people argue that people in Heaven won’t know Hell exists. But this would make Heaven’s joy dependent on ignorance, which is nowhere taught in Scripture.

So, how could we enjoy Heaven knowing that a loved one is in Hell? J. I. Packer offers an answer that’s difficult but biblical:

"God the Father (who now pleads with mankind to accept the reconciliation that Christ’s death secured for all) and God the Son (our appointed Judge, who wept over Jerusalem) will in a final judgment express wrath and administer justice against rebellious humans. God’s holy righteousness will hereby be revealed; God will be doing the right thing, vindicating himself at last against all who have defied him. . . . (Read through Matt. 25; John 5:22-29; Rom. 2:5-16, 12:19; 2 Thess. 1:7-9; Rev. 18:1-19:3, 20:11-35, and you will see that clearly.) God will judge justly, and all angels, saints, and martyrs will praise him for it. So it seems inescapable that we shall, with them, approve the judgment of persons—rebels—whom we have known and loved.

In Heaven, we will see with a new and far better perspective. We’ll fully concur with God’s judgment on the wicked. The martyrs in Heaven call on God to judge evil people on Earth (Revelation 6:9-11). When God brings judgment on the wicked city of Babylon, the people in Heaven are told, “Rejoice over her, O heaven! Rejoice, saints and apostles and prophets! God has judged her for the way she treated you” (Revelation 18:20).
Hell itself may provide a dark backdrop to God’s shining glory and unfathomable grace. Jonathan Edwards made this case, saying, “When the saints in glory, therefore, shall see the doleful state of the damned, how will this heighten their sense of the blessedness of their own state, so exceedingly different from it.” He added, “They shall see the dreadful miseries of the damned, and consider that they deserved the same misery, and that it was sovereign grace, and nothing else, which made them so much to differ from the damned.”

We’ll never question God’s justice, wondering how he could send good people to Hell. Rather, we’ll be overwhelmed with his grace, marveling at what he did to send bad people to Heaven. (We will no longer have any illusion that fallen people are good without Christ.)

In Heaven we’ll see clearly that God revealed himself to each person and that he gave opportunity for each heart or conscience to seek and respond to him (Romans 1:18-2:16). Those who’ve heard the gospel have a greater opportunity to respond to Christ (Romans 10:13-17), but every unbeliever, through sin, has rejected God and his self-revelation in creation, conscience, or the gospel.

Everyone deserves Hell. No one deserves Heaven. Jesus went to the cross to offer salvation to all (1 John 2:2). God is absolutely sovereign and doesn’t desire any to perish (1 Timothy 2:3-4; 2 Peter 3:9). Yet many will perish in their unbelief (Matthew 7:13).
We’ll embrace God’s holiness and justice. We’ll praise him for his goodness and grace. God will be our source of joy. Hell’s small and distant shadow will not interfere with God’s greatness or our joy in him. (All of this should motivate us to share the gospel of Christ with family, friends, neighbors, and the whole world.)

Although it will inevitably sound harsh, I offer this further thought: in a sense, none of our loved ones will be in Hell—only some whom we once loved. Our love for our companions in Heaven will be directly linked to God, the central object of our love. We will see him in them. We will not love those in Hell because when we see Jesus as he is, we will love only—and will only want to love—whoever and whatever pleases and glorifies and reflects him. What we loved in those who died without Christ was God’s beauty we once saw in them. When God forever withdraws from them, I think they’ll no longer bear his image and no longer reflect his beauty. Although they will be the same people, without God they’ll be stripped of all the qualities we loved. Therefore, paradoxically, in a sense they will not be the people we loved.

I cannot prove biblically what I’ve just stated, but I think it rings true, even if the thought is horrifying.

Not only in Heaven but also while we are still here on Earth, our God is “the Father of compassion and the God of all comfort” (2 Corinthians 1:3). Any sorrows that plague us now will disappear on the New Earth as surely as darkness disappears when the light is turned on. “He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, neither shall there be mourning nor crying nor pain” (Revelation 21:4, ESV).

This is God’s promise. Let’s rest in it.

Of this we may be absolutely certain: Hell will have no power over Heaven; none of Hell’s misery will ever veto any of Heaven’s joy.

Show post

Jim Stone #conspiracy 82.221.129.208

About the "FBI raid" on Little St. James

The FBI is there to make sure every last bit of evidence is expunged. This is VERY bad news. If you think having the "bleach bit smash them with a hammer and here, we'll help you do it" FBI showing up on Epstien's island is good news, you have it totally wrong, one thing and ONLY ONE THING will happen as a result - every last shred of evidence anyone independent could go there and find, or get with a drone, will be removed, incinerated, and scattered to the wind.

NO, TRUMP DID NOT FIX THE FBI.

Epstein is now being exonerated, the story will end with "forget about it, it was not what everyone thought" and in a few years, after hiding out in a resort with "five swimming pools and a lake" and having a few body mods, Epstein will go right back to life as usual, kids and all.

It is my opinion that anyone saying Epstein was removed so he could testify worse, or that he is dead, is OFF THEIR ROCKERS, Epstein flew El-Allolita to Tel Aviv where he'll be re-born totally new and that's the beginning, middle, and END of the story.

No camera video. Protocols not followed. NOT EVEN THE GUARDS WERE THERE, for three whole hours. How could anyone possibly overlook those problems, especially since it is obviously not even Epstein on the TWO (2) gurney picks, showing only forehead eyes and nose (and the wrong ones to boot) on one, and NOTHING on the other? The Hillary hearse picture on top is accurate, but NOT FOR EPSTEIN.

Look folks, I went on the story AS IT WAS before Epstein "killed himself".

BEFORE: Epstein was in solitary on suicide watch.

AFTER: Epstein's attorneys negotiated to get him out of solitary and off suicide watch.

THE BEFORE AND AFTER DO NOT MATCH which is why I never accepted the "after" version of events, which was simply framed to make the scenario "work", complete with jail maintenance and a nonfunctioning camera. Yep. I can believe all those coincidences were as stated.

Show post

John Ray #wingnut orthodoxytoday.org

It is a good comment on the dismal minds of leftists that they think that nothing can be accomplished except through compulsion. And accomplish a lot they have. And in the realm of eugenics, Adolf Hitler remains their most successful disciple.

Show post

Sans #conspiracy #psycho incels.wiki

BrazilianSigma, also known as BrazilianSmegma, BrazilianSoyma and a plethora of other names, is the most active member of the incelphobic Reddit hate group r/IncelTears. He is by far the subreddit's most prolific and most active user, and he is also a moderator there. For someone who supposedly, "isn't an incel", he has quite an unhealthy obsession with incels, as evidenced by the fact that it is not uncommon for him to amass over 40 posts on r/IncelTears in the span of 24 hours. However, anyone who points this out in the comments of his posts is downvoted fiercely by the IncelTears hive mind. His username "Brazilian Sigma" is possibly a reference to the Brazilian Fascist Integralist Movement which used the Greek letter sigma as its symbol.

List of Nicknames
The incelosphere has come up with many creative nicknames for BrazilianSigma, including:
* BrazilianSmegma
* BrazilianSoyma
* South American Smegma
* South American Dick Cheese
* South American Greek Letter
* BrazilianBeta
* Braziliancel
* BrazilianTruecel
* TruecelSigma
* BrazilianTism
* RobotSigma
* Sigmacel
* Favelacel
* Amazoncel
* UndercoverCopShootsManInFlipFlopsSigma
* CartelBeheadsManWithChainsawSigma
* Brazilian Watchdog
* Brazilian Centipede
* BrazilianCuckma
* BrazilianStigma
* BrazilianLigma
* BrazilianGetta
* BrazilianFaggot
* Brazilian "Get a Job" Sigma
* Brazilian "The Unemployed" Sigma
* Brazilian "40 posts in the last 24 hours" Sigma
* Brazilian "Reddit karma is the most valuable currency in existence" Sigma
* Brazilian "The Gears of IncelTears" Sigma
* Brazilian "The IT in REDDIT" Sigma
* Brazilian "Don't Spoil the Avengers" Sigma
* Brazilian "I want to be dominated by Amazon women" Sigma
* Brazilian "The Incelologist" Sigma
* Brazilian "The Celibatarian" Sigma
* Brazilian "Where is the joke?" Sigma
* Brazilian "Incel humor doesn't make any sense" Sigma
* Brazilian "Bro is my favorite word" Sigma
* Brazilian "/s" Sigma
* Brazilian "I'm not a loser" Sigma
* Brazilian "There is no such thing as soyboys" Sigma
* Brazilian "Making fun of soyboys isn't funny"
* Brazilian "I'm what they call Chad" Sigma
* Brazilian "Double Digits" Sigma
* Brazilian "All women are queens" Sigma
* Brazilian "The Code Breaker" Sigma
* Brazilian "There has to be a hidden meaning behind this" Sigma
* Brazilian "https://i.redd.it/0hmwc5fkzi921.jpg" Sigma
* Brazilian "Brazilian women like men without jobs" Sigma
* Brazilian "Posted 2 seconds ago" Sigma
* Brazilian "Spam refresh on Braincels like it's Mortal Kombat" Sigma

Show post

Kathleen Stock #transphobia twitter.com

Transwomen are male. Most have penises. Many fancy females. These too are facts. There are documented cases of transwomen harming females. If we legally allow transwomen into female-only spaces, SOME females will be hurt by SOME transwomen. It's utterly predictable.

Show post

humansources #psychoceramics reddit.com

UNIVERSAL BASIC OUTCOME
Universal Basic Outcome Program is a program that uses data primarily found through zip code residence identities throughout the United States to form algorithms to determine each individual’s relationship to the program.
Universal Basic Outcome would be a completely voluntary option for all individual females who reach the age of consent for their individual state and for a short period thereafter who have not produced any children.
Each participant will have their entire lifetime economic projected relationship outcome with society determined to obtain a one-time cryptocurrency payout directly to that individual woman, which would be a percentage of what the US government estimated cost of that particular woman’s projected immediate family would be.
In exchange, the participant would be given a week of counseling and education in cryptocurrency. If the participant shows competency and ability in both areas a hysterectomy would be performed and the agreed upon one-time crypto payout would be delivered to the participant’s address.
For instance, a child is born in a below poverty zip code. In this example things like cost to society for hospital birth, food, clothing, shelter throughout one’s entire life, continued medical care, cost of probable incarceration for a certain percentage of that mother’s siblings, projected size of first generation children to be born. All this and more would be used to determine a picture of a lifetime of projected cost of government; cost of society of a young woman’s projected family.
Zip codes of lesser income areas would generally pay-out significantly more than residency zip codes that have a higher family income.
In some areas, where individuals reach or surpass a point replace more wealth to society than they receive, there would be little to no financial incentive to participate.
Universal Basic Outcome uses the latest in technology and the characteristics of blockchain to go beyond the divisive issue of abortion to unite all political stripes in a modern, positive governmental program

Show post

Stephen Hicks #wingnut stephenhicks.org

From the perspective of the Germans, Napoleon was not only a foreign conqueror, he was a product of the Enlightenment. Where he conquered and ruled, he extended equality before the law, opened government offices to the middle class, and guaranteed private property. On matters of religion, he destroyed the ghettoes, gave Jews freedom of religion, and gave them the right to own land and practice all trades. He opened secular public schools, and modernized Europe’s transportation network.

Napoleon outraged many powerful forces in doing so. He abolished guilds. He angered the clergy by abolishing church courts, tithes, monasteries, convents, ecclesiastical states, and he seized much church property. He angered the nobles by abolishing feudal estates and feudal dues, by breaking up large estates, and generally by lessening the power of the nobles over the peasantry. He functioned, in effect from the Enlightenment perspective, as a benevolent dictator, as one who embraced many of the modern ideals but who used the full force of government to impose them.

His dictatorial impositions went further. He enacted censorship wherever he went, conscripted subjugated peoples to fight foreign battles, and taxed subjugated peoples to finance France.

Show post

MadhuPurnima Kishwar #fundie #psycho twitter.com

[On Nathuram Godse]
Sure he murdered Gandhi but he didn't hit & run. He surrendered & faced the trial with heroic courage & left a very powerful testament as to why he murdered Gandhi. I CONDEMN the murder but I admire Godse's courage in facing the gallows, staying firm on his version of patriotism

Show post

Dimitri Verhulst #racist demorgen.be

Because God has his favorites and his chosen ones need to have their privileges the Palestinians were driven out of their habitat in favor of God's loved ones. Mozes wrote it, the chosen people belonged there and nowhere else, thus it counted as an argument. For my money the UN might as well have abolished heliocentrism.

Original Dutch:

Omdat God zo Zijn lievelingen heeft en Zijn uitverkorenen hun privileges horen te hebben, werden in 1948 de Palestijnen uit hun woonplaatsen verdreven ten gunste van Gods dotjes. Mozes had het opgeschreven, het uitverkoren volk hoorde daar en nergens anders, dus dat telde wel even als argument. De Verenigde Naties kunnen net zo goed het heliocentrisme afschaffen.
Show post

czakal #sexist #homophobia #racist diversitymachtfrei.wordpress.com

Spain is bucking the euro trend of moving to the right for some reason. I have noticed increased feminist activity, LGBT activity (a record number of young spaniards – 15 % identify themselves as such, more than in many other euro countries), pro-immigration activity (large demonstrations in favor of migrants even though the country is under migrant invasion), a general move towards liberalism in society. Yes, there is Vox now, but that party is only getting 10 % support.

Something is wrong with that country. There is too much left wing activity, even though the country is under siege by migrants coming from Africa. This country is far from becoming another Italy.

Even before several years i knew that there is something wrong, and i wondered why is that. Social surveys indicated more liberal and pro-immigration views than in many other european countries.

Show post

George Reisman #wingnut mises.org

The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.

What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.

De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.

But what specifically established de facto socialism in Nazi Germany was the introduction of price and wage controls in 1936. These were imposed in response to the inflation of the money supply carried out by the regime from the time of its coming to power in early 1933. The Nazi regime inflated the money supply as the means of financing the vast increase in government spending required by its programs of public works, subsidies, and rearmament. The price and wage controls were imposed in response to the rise in prices that began to result from the inflation.