I can believe that the gov't would do something as extreme as killing its own people. I just never thought that it would be done on such a massive scale.
The one thing that i could never put together was how cell phone calls were made from an airplane. I know from experience that once your off the ground your service is gone. But the information was there, the recordings were there, so i made excuses to counteract what i was thinking just like they wanted me to.
The funny part about it all is that the evidence is all in plain site. The pentagon especially. A plane vaporizing on impact.....give me a break. At the time the "shock" of the US being attacked blinded the people from taking the time to look at the evidence. The US is no better than any other autocratic gov't. A country for the people....more like a country for the manipulation of people.
7 comments
There are these things called air phones.
I think there were only 3 out of the 9 calls that were confirmed to have originated from cell phones.
Depending on the proximity of cell towers it is very possible to make calls on a cell phone from an airplane.
Now please shut up and go away.
It is clearly possible to make cell phone calls from aircraft. The higher up you go, the better your range is, although at 30,000 ft you're going to be seeing many different towers and the resulting jumble of signals from different towers may eventually render the phone unusable. However, if your phone locks onto the strongest signal, it will use that tower. So it is possible, though the FAA forbids it. However, if your plane is being hijacked, who cares?
Regardless of whether or not cell phones work on board aircraft, what about all those people who claimed they lost loved ones on board the flight? Are they just paid actors?
The one thing I hate about conspiracy theorists is that they love to zero in one one thing and ignore all the massive other evidence which shows that they're wrong.
Actually depending on the cell and cell towers, it's quite possible to not only get a signal, but to get multiple signals from multiple towers which is the real reason you're not supposed to have your phone on in a plane. Or so I hear.
And the plane didn't vaporize, it was shredded into a billion pieces because we're talking about a plane made out aluminum and light weight materials slamming into a building made out of concrete and other strong materials at a few hundred miles per hour. Not exactly something they're designed for. I've seen racing cars get obliterated at 200 MPH and the only reason the drivers survive is the crazy amount of safety gear and the roll cage, something a commercial airliner notably lacks.
The real problem with trutherism is that these people have no fucking sense of scale or context. They don't know what a skyscraper collapse is supposed to look like. They don't know how thermite and destructive charges work. They don't know the sheer staggering quantity of thermite it would have taken, that no destructive charge can cut a steel beam horizontally, that thermite cannot be "detonated," or that it couldn't survive in those fires in the first place without going off.
What we see here is someone who clearly has no fucking idea whatsoever how 400 tons of aluminum, glass, steel, magnesium, carbon fiber, titanium, jet fuel and composites behaves when it crashes at Mach .89. No fucking idea what kind of colossal forces are involved, not even the slightest concept of what airplane crashes look like.
And yet people think that their "logical" speculations and idiotic "but what about this factor?" objections gives them carte blanche to decide what happened as if they were experts on the matter.
This is one of my single greatest pet peeves. I fucking loathe it.
Planes are mostly made out of aluminum to save on weight. Aluminum burns at very low temperatures. It's possible to burn up aluminum cans in a normal campfire in your back yard.
And seriously, the Pentagon is not a normal building. After the Oklahoma City bombing, it was almost totally rebuilt from the inside out to withstand a bomb attack. I remember seeing a documentary on the history of the building that included the reconstruction efforts before 9-11. That's why it sustained relatively localized damage.
There were parts scattered around after the crash at the pentagon, there are pictures you fucking moron, but you either been taught that the photos either don't exist or are doctored. Can't believe I used to be a truther, I mean there is no fucking way I sounded that dumb.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
