Quakers and Unitarian Universalists say publicly that they have nothing against homosexualls too. Especially the UUs:
image
However, unlike Frothy Mixture, they also believe that homosexual ACTS are the business of the adult, consenting people concerned, and not anyone else's. That is the view of these Christians who take the Bible infinitely more seriously than those who use said Bible to justify their bigoted attitudes.
So according to (P)Rick's logic, if people started being bigoted towards right-wing fundamentalist Christians, including him, therefore he must take the slings & arrows of outrageous fortune and like it, because - of what he says here - he has no right whatsoever to say word one about such abuse, nor complain about such.
After all, one can't consider themselves a True Christian, if they're not suffering exactly the same persecution as their J-man. Amirite?
Therefore you must STFU, (P)Rick. Lest your own bigotry justifies another - against you. Which you'll more than deserve.
Fundies always go on & on about how they & their so-called 'beliefs' are being subjugated by the state; 'Political Correctness', 'Hate Crimes', 'Thoughtcrime' etc. Funny then, that the Quakers, Unitarian Universalists, Buddhists etc aren't being 'persecuted', eh...? Now, I wonder why...?
...oh yes, that's right. Because they're not bigoted. 'Persecution' by the state? More like a self-fulfilling prophecy.
But then, that's the problem: any perceived 'persecution' (i.e. not being allowed to voice your opposition to those you don't like, via 'Hate Crime' legislation) you only bring upon yourselves, fundies. And you more than deserve everything you get. PROTIP: Not being allowed to persecute others =/= 'Persecution'. Deal with it; Romans 13:1-5, and all that jazz.
'The Puritans didn't leave England to escape persecution, but to find a country in which they could freely persecute others'
-Gore Vidal
Moral: Don't show tolerance for others, you have absolutely no right whatsoever to be tolerated yourself.