@ fschmidt
Could you please remember to close the cage to keep your pet parrot under control? The thing flits around day and night saying things that ought to embarass you. Or if the accumulated shit is a problem just set some ground rules for it so you can see once and for all if it can fit in with a society that actually expects it to do something other than squawk?
If you would be willing I'd be glad to discuss some of the frankly nonsensical things caamib has been saying on behalf of CoAlpha beliefs in a civil manner as trying to do so with your self-appointed apostle only results in a headache due to it repeatedly denying it has ever said anything that one could scroll up and confirm and the blasted thing keeps begging for my attention on top of it all.
I may find your views apalling in every possible manner but I have yet to see if you are able to make a solid point and defend yourself when challenged so I am willing to extend to you the chance to do so before I wash my hands of your ilk as being no better than the thing that speaks for you.
So Franklin Schmidt, I ask what commitment exactly is being referred to here? From all appearances the only commitment a man has to a woman in your view is financial but the commitments expected of women towards men are considerably more broad. For that matter the man's commitment comes with a threat of ruin attatched for the woman and no real consequence for himself if he decides to cut her loose even if she's entirely faithful in all things. From the unsettling insistence present in the rhetoric we've seen refusal to become a man's wife when he offers his "commitment" wouldn't even be a viable option. How one can demand a commitment of another they will not return and consider this to be moral? For that matter considering that Co-Alphas are purported (by your pet) to also want laws against both premarital sex and marital infidelity applied to women (exclusively) making it effectively illegal for a woman to indulge a man seeking extramarital sex how would you really expect that to work?
Women in your view should be discouraged from divorce with threats worse than death, discouraged or completely prevented from working for a living, and if widowed are generally too old and therefore "used up" by Co-Alpha standards and even if they aren't would be looking for another husband so they can continue surviving instead of offering their bodies to random men. This is all before I even consider the possibility you intend for premarital sex to extend to sex in between marriages for women making the whole deal entirely impossible from a purely legal standpoint short of licensing schemes that would be on the edge of impossible to track, support, or enforce, incredibly difficult to justify to a woman when their worth is determined by being a wife, and rather self defeating to the purpose of keeping women from being "sluts" if they can just get a license to have sex with whomever they desire and be done with it even if they're willing to live with all the trouble that would be sent their way.
If these are not your views then please clarify them or at least chastise the one who keeps presenting them to us as such so we might both be rid of the taint.
I give you the floor, but if someone else should take it in your stead that shall be on their head and your problem to deal with having ruined your chance to "educate" someone like me.
