scientist actually calculated from facts that there is a 69.7564^256th power percent possibility that God exists. these were atheist scientists too. they were trying to prove that God does not exist. so if they come up with the opposite result for trying to disprove God, those that try to prove it will get better results.
the whole thing about faith is this, "Seeing is not believing, believing is seeing."
this means that we would not believe just because we can see, we believe because we cannot see. you cannot see light, wind, gravity, or a magnetic field. yet you can see the effects of them. this is the same with God. you do not need to see God to know that he is there, you merely need to see the effects of his presence.
64 comments
scientist actually calculated from facts that there is a 69.7564^256th power percent possibility that God exists. these were atheist scientists too.
Just by reading this, I know you are a liar. Do you want to know how I know?
there is a 69.7564^256th power percent possibility that God exists
Probability, which is the ratio of expected successes to attempts, can't exceed 1.0. You can't succeed 101 times in 100 attempts.
1st: citation needed
2nd: Richard Dawkins is an atheist scientist and he found God to be highly improbable. Ever read the God delusion? Anyway, the God Delusion is an actual book, and if one were to read it, they would find the explanation for the statement I made about Dawkins' findings. This is obviously a concept that is beyond your understanding.
"scientist actually calculated"
This must be bullshit.
"there is a 69.7564^256th power percent possibility that God exists."
That's over 9000. Percents stops at 100.
69.7564^256 is ~9.06816e471, taken then as a percentage would be...
9.06816e469
Which is 906,816 followed by 464 zeros...
One Googol is 1 followed by 100 zeros.
So that would be, roughly, ...
about as much Bull Shit as the average Creationist spits out in their lifetime.
First of all, huge mother fucking citation needed. Exactly who in the hell were these so called "atheist scientists"? How did they come to that number? And why does the second sentence of your first paragraph not make any sense? "Seeing is not believing"; got it. "Believing is seeing"; now you've lost me. If I believe, I'll be deluded and psychotic and see little demons running around everywhere just like you? No thanks, I've been there. I like my mind now. Now, this is what I want to know about: "We cannont see light". Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but, I have my desklamp on, and it's emitting this weird brigh colored, transparent, non-physical substance. See, I always thought this was light, but apparently I'm wrong. The whole, "we cannot see wind, we can only see the effects of the wind", was a popular argument used by Billy Graham in his crusades. It was stupid then, it's just as stupid now. Now, I can see the effects of his presence, if you mean a bad economy, poverty, hunger, natural disasters increasing, war, plague, disease, epidemics, greenhouse effect, etc. Yep, this is the result of the presence of a loving god. Shut the fuck up, prick.
Hey, give adrian a break. For those who believe loopy Bronze Age fairy tales to be literally true and applicable to life in the 21st century, any old gibberish you can make up is just as true as any other. In fact, if it's obvious nonsense, it's more likely to be Of God, as Tertullian opined. His evidence? Of a piece with the rest.
power percent? is he the strongest of the percent people?
Maybe you meant 69.7564%^256..
70/70% = 49%
49/70% = 34,3%
34,3/70% = 24
and suddenly .00000000001 chance
ah, but i can accurately measure light,wind, gravity and magnetism. i cannot measure this force you call 'God'
How could a probability quoted as a percentage be any more than 100%? How much more real will god get if the probability of his existence is over 100%? Will there be more than one of him/it? That alone suggests that the number quoted, along with the whole "calculation from facts" thing is a complete fabrication OR the work of the sort of "scientists" who'd be better off selling hot-dogs on street corners and leave the science to those versed in it.
How can you tell if a fundie is lying?
Check to see if his lips are moving (or fingers are on a keyboard, in this case)
What would be the containing criteria for such a formula?
I mean, can you put numbers or values to what you pull out of your ass?
scientist actually calculated from facts that there is a 69.7564^256th power percent possibility that God exists. these were atheist scientists too. they were trying to prove that God does not exist. so if they come up with the opposite result for trying to disprove God, those that try to prove it will get better results.
I'm afraid I'm gonna have to ask you to show your work. That should be easy if these numbers were not, in fact, pulled from your ass.
"scientist actually calculated from facts that there is a 69.7564^256th power percent possibility that God exists."
How the fuck do you calculate that sort of thing? The drake equation is an easier one to figure out.
If you're talking about 0.697564^256, the answer is 9.06816 * 10^-41, which is practically the same as zero.
If you're talking about 69.7564^256, the answer is impossible, since it goes far, far beyond one.
Either way, methinks the lady doth bullshit too much.
I think adrian was that idiot that sat in the corner of my stats class.
The one that didn't understand that -12 + 5 did not equal -17. Then again, how someone like that gets into a so-called university is beyond me.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.