['do you honestly believe in a god whose ego is so fragile that without you conducting daily worship of his exsistence he would punish you? What kind of a god is that']
A just God is a God that tells you how to get out of a deadly situation. If he were unjust, he would force you to yield. But, he has given you the roadmap to eternal bliss and lets you decide which road you want to travel.
Free Will? That is a whole lot better than you have it here on this planet.
18 comments
Just Rick: Actually, no, I don't really see how that follows. Pre-known doesn't necessarily mean pre-determined (i.e. caused, decided, ahead of time). Pre-known doesn't mean forced to happen by the entity that knows about it ahead of time.
Say that I'm psychic, and I magically know what you're going to eat for breakfast tomorrow, because I can see the future. Did I cause you to eat one thing instead of another?
God could know what decisions someone is going to make, but the impetus for choice could still come from them. From the perspective of a person, they are free to make whatever choice they wish. From a perspective outside of the present, or linear time, they've "already" made that choice, and therefore which choice they made could be known by God.
I think the potential conflict between the idea of God and free will isn't because of omniscience, but perhaps because of omnipotence. Or omnipotence in combination with omniscience. I dunno. Just thinking it out as I type.
glyptodon, Assuming that a psychic can see all (and not be one of those fuzzy seeing, often wrong, television psychics) clearly, once they tell their customer of their future then they must have already seen themselves doing that. They would also be aware of what actions the customer is going to take based on the knowledge told to them. There is no possibility of change from what the psychic sees regardless of who or what they tell if they are truly "all knowing". No matter what they do the things that they see will come to pass (else they are not all knowing). It even strikes me that the psychic themselves are robbed of free will because there is nothing that they can do to change what they see for what they see IS what will happen. To allow for speculation, change, and interference breaks down the very concept of all knowing and free will.
I simply cannot see "free will" and "all knowing" co-existing side by side. One contradicts the other. Again, if god knows what I am going to do then it is impossible for me to make any other choice. If he knows I'm turning Right then it is impossible for me to turn left else I invalidate the "all knowing" portion of god - and if i cannot make a choice that differes from what god knows then that invalidates my "free will" to make any choice.
If you begin talking about "outside linear time" then even with the ability to go outside of it in some magical way, when you make your changes and come back into it that linear time must somehow arrange itself back to account for the changes you made and the people involved will now see a different reality. Although the reality is different and they are not aware of any changes they are still locked into this new path of reality. In effect to be able to make a choice of free will with an all knowing god you are destroying the universe and remaking it so that god will know your choice.
At first this seems like a sollution. God simply re-creates reality each time there is a conflict with our choice and his knowledge. But if you think about it, the very need to remake everything to get things back in line (he knows what you are going to do) means he didn't know the outcome in the first place and thus is NOT all knowing.
Admittedly this is getting a bit beyond me and to reflect further upon this I need a hit of acid to appreciate the proper perspective of it ;) Which is why I asked if I was right or wrong in my thoughts. glyptodon your explanation simply doesnt seem feasable to me so I will continue to believe that the 2 cannot coexist until shown otherwise.
The concept of free will and all knowing only works in a universal conception where every time an action is made, the negation(s) of that action spawn alternative, parallel universes. In that situation, it would be accurate to say that an all-knowing deity knows every POSSIBLE path the future may take, since every path WILL be taken. In that situation, you are but one possibility, and God would know every possibility that may occur. The fact that YOU didn't do something doesn't mean that it didn't happen; it merely means that one of your alternative states did it. And it isn't that God does or doesn't know which "you" is going to do it, since until the choice is made there is only one "you" (insofar as the decision tree is concerned). Of course, this argument is a bit hard to wrap the mind around, but it's the best one I've seen so far to try and explain it.
Glyptodon, your psychic thing isn't the same. AS I UNDERSTAND IT, psychics don't see everything- only snippets of the future, or vague things. And if you see something like a murder- and try to stop it, you could only end up causing it. Or if you see yourself getting money, you could end up acting as if you have the money already- only to cause yourself not to get it.
And also- since God is omnipotent as well as omniscient- he would be able to see what people are going to do and make sure they do it, which would remove free will.
It's sort of like the whole idea of 'destiny'. Some say you'll just stumble into it, others say that you can't escape it and will be guided to it, and still others say that you can change it if you so choose. The first allows for free will with a guiding force. The second view takes away free will to a degree- because you can't control it. And the third allows for free will- but also sorta destroys predetermined destinies.
I dunno, that's how I see it- anyways. With total free will, God wouldn't be able to know the future. With God knowing the future, and that being what'll happen- it sorta takes away free will because it's sort of like he's guiding you.
Like with test answers. If you know them ahead of time- it's hard to say if you got a 100 because you knew the material or just because you were told what to say.
That is a good point that makes sense ... however ...
by going by that rationalization I realize that I was putting the "all knowing god" into to small of terms. By saying all knowing also includes all possible alternatives then it would seem that that would satisfy the argument.
Until I stop to realize that even tho god may exist as one entity in all these variations and possibilities of reality, each "me" is individual in so much as being able to make a free choice in MY reality. So even tho an alternate me will make the opposite choice of going to the right, I am still locked into making my choice of going to the left because god has seen in MY reality that that would be the choice I would make.
In a sense you are saying that a rock has free will because in one reality it bounces left while in another it my bounce right.
With all these different possibilities you are no longer saying free will, but "forced will" as each itteration of me will experience the results of every possible choice - therefore again there is no possibility to make a choice as all outcomes are forced upon me (or the combined possibilities of me)and all outcomes are taken.
This is some heady stuff and I'm sorry if I sound like a nutjob, but I truly am trying to rationalize my way thru this to an answer that I can hold to. Thanks for inputs, everyone.
Just Rick: This is actually a major theological question, so it makes perfect sense to rationalize it. Omniscience as proof of predestination is an issue that any church espousing both must address (not the laymen, usually, but all the theological scholars that sit around in the Vatican or its equivalent).
As to your argument of identity, then TECHNICALLY, yes the "you" that exists right now had to take that route. The "you" that exists right now, however, is not forced into any action in the future (and, in a manner of speaking, are technically annihalated and recreated in multiple every moment of existence). This is because every action will occur, so you are free to choose whatever you feel like. Just know that some other "you" chose to do the other thing, too. It's a bizarre conception of the universe, but it does the best job I've seen of rationalizing.
As to the rock, the analogy has the same flaw as comparing planes to evolution; whereas life reproduces and planes don't, humans make choices and have the ability to act on those choices on their own power whereas rocks are merely acted upon by outside forces. In this rationalization, I must conceed that all animals, bacterium, etcetera, could be said to have free will, but I'm willing to make that concession.
Hope I was coherent, here. I'm a bit tired.
A just god would come out from behind the curtain and explain all that to people. He certainly wouldn't send out all those PR teams to do his work for him in churches, especially when they've splintered into thousands of Christian sects, and I dunno how many Muslim sects.
If god were god, he would hire the BEST PR guys, and brief them thoroughly.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.