Incels finally see the light in politics. Sorry cucks, the future is male!
image
Lol the USA is basically in a non-nuclear Cold War with China, and thinking the system will allow a Chinese-American to become president is a giga -- no, a teracope.
All he has to do is offer to use his Asian connections to promise all of the soyboys free soy sauce. Not that far fetched. Gigacope at most
The democratic machine cucked Bernie Sanders in favor of Clinton, even though he was more popular. They will absolutely do the same with Yang.
8 comments
The "cucks" are the real males, dolt. You whine-cels are not the future.
Only 45 MALES have been US Presidents, since its conception. Almost all have been white Christians. It's a very, VERY exclusive group. Women, despite what you "feel", make up half the population, and you haven't had a single woman president yet. Chinese-Americans are not (to my knowledge) 50 percent of the US population, so they are quite a bit down the list...
I fear to google "free soy sauce"...
Bernie Sanders is more controversial, that's why he was not chosen.
image
a non-nuclear Cold War
Lol the USA is basically in a non-nuclear Cold War with China
Which is exactly why Yang's victory would be a propaganda Godsend to the US. When a diverse/multicultural nation and a closed/ethnonationalistic one are in conflict what could possibly the diverse one do which would be more humiliating to it's rival than choosing a member of the latter's dominant ethnicity to lead it? The obvious impossibility of the reverse situation and the inescapable implication of the former's moral superiority would be very compelling to outsiders, and very irritating to the latter. In a world where soft power is increasingly important, an event like this would be invaluable to the US.
Sure, Trump's election kinda fucked up the US' claim to be an open society, but they still are much better in this regard than the Chinese:
Amid the travel ban, the inhumane treatment of children at the Mexican border and ever-more divisive rhetoric around immigration from the White House, a survey has found that the United States and Canada are the two most tolerant and inclusive countries when it comes to who the population see as one of their own that is “a real American” or “a real Canadian”.
The polling company Ipsos surveyed 20,000 people across 27 countries, looking at questions of religion, immigration status, the origin country of someone’s parents, as well as sexuality, criminal background and extreme political views. It found that Canadians had the broadest acceptance of who was a “real Canadian”, and that the US was close behind in second place. It suggests most Americans are at odds with the nativist position of the current administration.
In China, Serbia and Turkey, more people than not believe that you are not a real Chinese person, Serb or Turk if you were born and raised in that country but your parents are immigrants. This suggests a close link between ethnicity and a person’s status as a national in those countries, rather than a view based around citizenship.
Here's how I can see it going after the wannabe-gorilla gets kicked out and the Retard Central becomes the White House again. A white person wins, fine, in a still white-majority nation it was maybe inevitable, at least the Trumptard insanity is over and the racist policies reversed. A non-white canditate like Kamala Harris or Tulsi Gabbard wins? Awesome, all the benefits of sanity coming back, except with the benefit of actually seeming like embracing diversity, instead of just having some white person say that. Yang somehow wins? Fuckin' JACKPOT. All the benefits of the former plus every interaction about human rights etc. will low-key make the Chinese leadership look stupid. You have absolutely no chance to succeed at whataboutism in this area (as they have been doing so far every single time the US called them out on their racism etc.) while they have one of "your people" as their boss, while any similar situation is basically completely impossible in your country.
"The democratic machine cucked Bernie Sanders in favor of Clinton, even though he was more popular."
... Which is of course how she got 3.7 million more votes than he did. Because he was more popular. Riiiiiiiight.
In some respects, Bernie would have been a better choice. The problem was that he was, in some ways, out of touch when it comes to connecting with voters who were not white males. The small but loud and obnoxious subset of his fans known as "Berniebros" didn't help things - even though he denounced them, it still subtly tainted people's perception of him as "the candidate for obnoxious frat dudes, not regular people". In today's Democratic Party, that adds up to being a major popularity handicap, and popularity is a very important factor when it comes to winning.
So if you genuinely think he was "more popular", you're at least as out of touch as he is.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
