Nonsense, antibiotics were around a long time before Darwin. For example Arab horse boys used "penicillin" to treat saddle sores on horses for a long time. If anything give them credit for antibotics, not Darwin. Evolution had nothing to do with it at all.
26 comments
More wisdom from JohnR7 on the same page
You are correct that Creation Science has their Dictionary that Comes from God. Evolution Science has their dictionary that is destine to be destoryed in the fire at the end of this age. All things will be purified with Fire. Just as all things were cleansed with water in Noah's day.
[...]
So what about you? Are you going to be in the 1/3 that make it, or the 2/3 that will be cut off. That is 1/3 will die in war and 1/3 will be cut off by plague.
The clock is ticking and people only are given a limited amount of time to decide.
I always say don't blink your eyes because it may all be over with sooner than you think.
Penicillin? Before Darwin? While it is true that ancient Greeks used molds to treat infection, they had no idea why it worked, and it was by no means 'penicillin', an isolated compound.
Huh? So now he thinks that Darwin is credited with other major scientific accomplishments as well? What next, credit Darwin with heliocentrism and relativity theory? What is he trying to do, pretend (or even actually claim) that "Darwin" is just some kind of synonym or pen name for ANY scientist of note?
The ravings of JohnR7 continue to baffle and amaze me.
~David D.G.
Nonsense, antibiotics were around a long time before Darwin.
I think this is one of the only true statements I've ever seen from JohnR7.
For example Arab horse boys used "penicillin" to treat saddle sores on horses for a long time.
Mould, perhaps. Not penicillin, which wasn't isolated until world war 2.
If anything give them credit for antibotics, not Darwin. Evolution had nothing to do with it at all.
No. Don't give either credit for antibiotics, as neither discovered them. However, many bacteria have evolved to many antibiotics.
"If anything give them credit for antibotics, not Darwin. Evolution had nothing to do with it at all."
He may be referring to the fact that mold
evolved the ability to produce pennicillin
to hold off the bacteria that were competing
with mold for food. When he heard the word
"evolved" it got replaced in his
mixed up mind with the word "Darwin" and so
Darwin invented pennicillin.
Flemming discovered penicillin in the 20's, long after Darwin recited his theory. What they used for the horses was a kind of ointment, whose name resembles. Antibiotics are, in case you´re wondering, you stupid moron, anti-biotics(bio=life, that is bacteriae), not saddles, because saddles are just the product of too much trottering.
JohnR7 been featured here a lot, he's got this stupid and unsupportable bias that all science and knowledge derive from the Bible. That all scientific goodness is God-Inspired.
His evidence? Real weak shit like the Bible suggest you wash your hands, hence germ theory and not of course rotting flesh being known to be ill making or cultures surrounding them having fresh water and sewage infrastructures. He will ignore thousands of years of documented history to claim Biblical foreknowledge and of course to slam any threat to it's claim, even Christians like Darwin.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.