Creationists, in my opinion, need to suspend science when it comes to debating Creationism; no matter how educated they are.
35 comments
He's technically correct (for once). There is no way to prove Creationism scientifically since it is unfalsifiable. Creationists should stop destorting science and just go with their faith.
(As long as they keep it to themselves, of course)
Creationists, in my opinion, need to suspend science when it comes to debating Creationism
So he finally admits that creationism isn't science. So why do fundies continue to insist it should be taught in science class?
And replace it with what? Chocolate pudding? How can you "debate" anything without a logical framework and some reference to verifiable facts about reality?
... Or do you just mean, "Swallow our ludicrous assertions without question, or we'll denounce you for being 'unfair?' "
"Creationists, in my opinion, need to suspend science when it comes to debating Creationism; no matter how educated they are."
Obviously you need to suspend science because creationism simply isn't science! Science has never argued for creationism and never will, simply because no evidence for it has been displayed.
Umm..I thought thats what they already did?
So I would be correct in assuming that you do not want Creationism or Intelligent design taught in science class?
Oh, yeah, you're just bullshitting some more. Gotta do everything to get teachers into the job of converting kids for Jesus now.
@Thinking Allowed
That's because the Creation had nothing to do with science. In fact, science hadn't even been created yet.
Think about it --- if you define science as the observation of the natural universe, then science didn't even come about until Day Six, with Adam - (unless you claim the angels engaged in science before that).
Creationists, in my opinion, need to suspend science when it comes to debating Creationism; no matter how educated they are.
Who needs education (in any field) when you have Creationism.
That must be a first; he/she makes a bit of sense!
You simply can't debate Creationism without suspending science. It has failed time and time again, even in court by the "best and finest" of creationists.
I've ran the leading Creationist "debaters" through my head and, except for Behe none of them have any scientific arguement. Behe's is even a bait and switch argument or half realized principals.
The others all lie about science and suggest the Bible is infallible.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
