Uh, wrong. Ther's TONS of evidence for the exodus.
Don't lie, it's against your religion.
They found the Egyptian's chariot wheels in the red sea
I saw those. Not impressive. If your explanation for a few chariot wheels in the sea is that a magic man opened up the sea, what's your explanation for finding tires in Lake Michigan? And indeed, just like tires, you find chariot wheels in other bodies of water too.
and there's na Egyptian hierohlypic carving that shows that Pharaoh's son dying in the tenth plague.
[citation needed] Also, Biblical scholars can't even agree on which pharaoh the Bible is supposed to be representing and while the best match seems to be Ramesses II, that doesn't exactly match either. It doesn't help that he's one of the very few characters the Bible doesn't manage to get the name of, which is odd given how important he was to the story. To me that raises an instant red flag and makes it a strong possibility that the Hebrews didn't put in his name because they didn't know and the most likely reason why they wouldn't know would be because they got it from hearsay. Finally, a picture of a boy dying from a disease proves nothing as disease was common in those times. You have to demonstrate that it was specifically the tenth plague. I don't know how you're going to do that with a hieroglyph, but it's your claim so it's your responsibility to back it up.
Also, they found several ISraelite camps in the Sinai area, complete with tents, cooking equipment, and items used in ritual worship.
[citation needed]
They gave a talk on this and explained that the population of Jews that left Egypt was about the size of Rhode Island's population.
And where is all of the archaeological evidence from this massive nomadic movement? Also, are you aware just how much infrastructure is needed to maintain a population that size for 40 years? There's a reason populations didn't explode until people settled down in cities where building an infrastructure was possible. Point being there'd be a fuckload more than just a few tents (which you still must demonstrate to exist).
So this isn't a small historical event that can jsut be overlooked, the event is huge and obviously would have left a lot of evidence behind.
That's the point, it didn't leave enough evidence behind to be anywhere near as large scale as the Bible claims. Now, I have no problem with a small slave rebellion, but the evidence shows that if this happened it was nowhere near what the Bible claims it is.
So think twice before you go making claims like that, do a little research, ok?
I have spoken to respected historians who know what the fuck they're talking about and while I'm sure I don't know everything, I do know there are quite a few problems with the Exodus story.
Edit: I wanted to make it clear that I don't have a problem with some sort of slave rebellion happening or even this rebellion being mythologized (as events often were in ancient times), my problem is with the Bible's presentation of it. Nowhere in Egyptian historical records do we see anything approaching an event of this scale or anything about the fantastic plagues that supposedly befell Egypt. We do not see the sheer amount of artifacts that we expect to see given the large size of the movement. There's no verified historical record of any Moses. And the Bible even fails to mention which pharaoh it is that the Hebrews escaped from and none of the ones we know exactly matches the description given in the Bible. And if the best you can do is a hieroglyph of a sick boy, some tents, and a few wheels in the sea, you've got your work cut out for you.
