>Anonymous coward - nothing you say here makes any sense.
Per the eminent Jonathan Aryan Jafari: "Ah boy, here we go."
>I am useless about what ? Paying taxes for feminist causes that would ensure I remain lonely, had I listened to human manure like you?
I was a very committed feminist when I last interacted with your punk ass. I've drawn myself away from that gradually, but I still think misogynistic edgelords like you are full of shit. And this is another emblem of your trash ideology: you seem to think the government is out to get you and the entire male sex. That's... not the case. Yes, there are a lot of nutbags out there who screech slogans like "ban men," but they don't occupy positions of political power. Yes, there are a number of people occupying political positions of varying degrees of influence who identify as feminists, but they by and large aren't the crazies. Your insistence that roving mobs of feminists have governments the world over under their thumbs puts your post into clear CSTDT territory. A twofer and I've barely even read 2 lines in.
I don't think there's a single government in the world who wants to prevent you from experiencing sexual pleasure under the colour of feminism. In some cases, like the oh-so-incredibly-cucked-uber-feminist-beta-nation Denmark, the government even allows, taxes, and regulates prostitution, much to the dismay of some feminist groups (and the left-wing parties, which I mostly see eye to eye with on an a larger suite of issues but clash heads with on this specific one).
>Like those poor crazy ba starts on this site who do believe your crazy ideology, men stupid and crazy enough that they'd remain virgins than fuck even 17 year old girls but would let gladly let even toddlers be raped by blacks and other groups than can do not wrong on their minds ? That kind of "useless"?
I've got good news for you, then: the age of consent in my home state is 17, and in the state where I'm going to school it's 16. Hell, in Croatia it's 15! If you want to go somewhere outside Croatia where you can legally go to town with a teen, take a plane to NYC (or really most places around the world. Not many countries have ages of consent over 18). Just know that sexual relations between a 17-year-old and an adult 10 years older (which should be in the right ballpark in your case, if my memory serves me well) are frowned upon and usually tend to be abusive in nature, so if you are wise you won't do that. Hell, I'd say that sex between a 20-year-old and a 36-year-old is certainly within the creepy no-go zone, even though it's perfectly legal.
Also, although blacks are overrepresented among cases of sexual assault as with other similar crimes (I couldn't find any numbers specifically on statutory rape), most people who commit it are white, and the "other groups" (which I presume refers to everyone but whites and blacks) are actually underrepresented, so this point is stupid and you should feel bad. If you want to use the issue of sexual assault as a stalking horse for racism (and thus make this post into a trifecta), at least be candid and display it for the world to see so we don't have to go through the mental labour of parsing every one of your inscrutable statements to get to the bottom of what the hell you're trying to say.
>I am not useless to my friends and my parther, I am useless to scum like you, scum that wants whites massacred. And that kind of uselessness is just too splendid.
Seems you took my advice. You seem to think everyone who doesn't support your brand of hyper-chauvinism cum white nationalism is basically equivalent to Julius Malema. Wronfly, I would have to say. None of us wants whites massacred. Want to see how it's not the case? Go to the handy-dandy search function at the top of any page on this site, choose RSTDT under the "Archives" selection to refine your results, put in any of our user names into the "Fundie" box, and search away. See if you can find any statement made by any of us endorsing the wholesale murder of the white race. I doubt you'll find any budding Floyd Shivambus in this place.
>The rest is even more of a riot.
The rest of your post, or the rest of the post you're replying to? I have a sinking feeling in my gut that you MEAN the latter but that the former is true. Or maybe that's my poor diet.
>I never seriously attempted to do what you claim (read https://www.google.hr/amp/s/caamib.wordpress.com/2013/12/30/love-shyness-1-my-experience-with-love-shyness/amp/ to understand the context ). I have also never mentioned it since 2013 nor do I even see my parents for months at a time so what kindo of idiot would blabber about this time and time and again?
Are you referring to the "motherfucker" thing? For one, it's hilariously desperate, which is why it's hard for even the most staid and stoic of us to let you live it down. And for another thing, the fact that you considered it and took the time to write about it to bolster your crank theories is already hilarious enough. Fortunately for you, there's a statute of limitations on pedophilia in most states, but unluckily for you there's no statute of limitations on embarrassing yourself in the face of the whole internet--including such sundry sites as FSTDT, Encyclopedia Dramatica, and Kiwi Farms.
>Oh, this kind of idiot, as we see later on.
>Because only a hyper idiot would claim that I am somehow, according to you, not mentally read for am activity I've engaged in for more than 5 years. I can only laugh hysterically are that, but.... What isn't funny though is that vermin like you actually can apply this desire for control and judgement to young girls and trumatize them when they have sex, especially if they have sex with much older men (when that sex is much LESS traumatic if scum like you doesn't poke their disgusting pig nose in). There are many girls who actually are traumatized by vermin like you that sends prosecutors and such scum after their boyfriends with no regard to the wellbeing of these girls.
There's a lot of people in politics whose mental fitness for the job, I'd say, is questionable, and this includes people who've been in Congress for 30 years. Experience does not equal readiness.
As to the point about trauma and child sex, I'll readily concede that endless litigation, including on issues of sexual abuse can be emotionally draining. I can say that with specific examples in mind from those I know personally. But that is not always the case, and considering that you have not been sexually abused and have no professional experience, I don't think you're a reliable source on how traumatizing it is to victims. I can't say that for myself, either, but I know more than enough to cast doubt on your credentials.
>Anyway, keep making a damn fool out of yourself and blaming me due to fact nobody taught me that modern Western women want to have car tires strapped around their necks and set on fire. Because that's exactly what some boy at 12 would know with no guidance.
And we finally get the tetrad with the relatively new and long-awaited SSTDT (although I'm sure a lot of this post was misogynistic in nature, I waited for a clear-as-day example before slamming that hammer down on you. I'm actually a little surprised your post wasn't more sexist, considering that's your typical domain), completing our site's iteration of the Full Ginsburg. I don't think you've been around a lot of "modern Western women." Not even the most hardcore BDSM practitioners want to set themselves ablaze like that. My girlfriend is one of your feared "modern Western women," and even she isn't THAT kinky.
>Idiot. All you're good for is taking a piss on.
And all you're good for is taking the piss out of.
