Tall #fundie

Tall #fundie forums.worldofwarcraft.com

Okay, So to disprove evolution.....The Bacterium Flagellum.

Consists of several micro "peices" so to speak of, Each of these peices is an "irreducable complex" If evolution using the laws of natural selection were true, each one of these 40 some odd peices would have to be made slightly over time however if not all 40 of them were made at exactly the same time they would serve NO benefit to the organism and thus eliminated via natural selection.

How about the lack of any transitional form ever found in any fossil records. Darwin said it himself there must have been countless fossils of transitional forms or else my theory would be false.

How about the cambrian explosion?

How about the evidence against such "extincit" organisms like the Archaeptery, the Coelacanth and the Hyrax???

19 comments

old comment by FSMpirate

Irreducible complexity can be easily explained. Those "40 or so" pieces all changed (read: EVOLVED) together. Each one does something to support the next.

There are numerous examples of tranistional fossils. Please visit a nautral history museum.

The Cambrian Explosion came about because the Earth was very conducive to support life. It had millions of years to diversify. Plants, large reptiles (dinosuars) as you might recall reading about, even our tiny mammalian ancestors came into being. It was ended around 65 million years ago.

The Archaeoraptor (is extinct) was an example of a transtional fossil. The Coelacanth is an evolutionary throw back. It managed to remain in existance, as it was very isolated off the east coast of Africa. And hyraxes are still running around rocky places in the "holy land".

You don't need to come back and completely debunk yourself. I'd like to think it's taken care of.

“Okay, So to disprove evolution.....The Bacterium Flagellum.”
You read creationist sites that say it disproves evolution, huh? Ever read an evolution scientist’s response?

“Consists of several micro "peices" so to speak of, Each of these peices is an "irreducable complex"”
My sister had a complex. She tried therapy and she tried alcohol.
The science worked better because the guy applying it knew what he was talking about.

“If evolution using the laws of natural selection were true, each one of these 40 some odd peices would have to be made slightly over time however if not all 40 of them were made at exactly the same time they would serve NO benefit to the organism and thus eliminated via natural selection.”
Yeah, you’ve only read creationist accounts of the flagellum. Nice try.

“How about the lack of any transitional form ever found in any fossil records.”
We realize now that every single fossil we’ve ever found has been transitional.

“Darwin said it himself there must have been countless fossils of transitional forms or else my theory would be false.”
Darwin was a pioneer in science, not a prophet. We CAN say he was wrong and still honor is work.

“How about the cambrian explosion?”
Do you have any fucking idea just how long that actually lasted?

“How about the evidence against such "extincit" organisms like the Archaeptery, the Coelacanth and the Hyrax???”
You’re just repeating someone else’s talking points. Do you even know why the coelacanth was considered ‘extinct?’ Do you understand why it isn’t? DO you have any clue why this is not a problem for evolution?

Tall #fundie forums.worldofwarcraft.com

19 comments

Confused?