So now that pluto is not considered a planet then did it simply burst into a ball of flames? No. it didn't. Therefore, it being a star does not mean that its light isn't reflected light.
So it's clear that evolutionists have no clue where the light from stars comes from which is precisely why they think that attacking others makes them look more knowledgable. But it doesn't. It only shows their ignorance even more.
54 comments
wait a sec....did Carico just proclaim that the only two bodies in the universre are stars and planets?So now that pluto is not considered a planet then did it simply burst into a ball of flames? No. it didn't. Therefore, it being a star does not mean that its light isn't reflected light.
Why, yes, she really did. I am truly amazed at this. had she not been so busy trying to find a way to use astronomy to discredit evolution (a riot in and of itself) she probably would have noticed that Pluto is now a Dwarf Planet, and therefore not a star.
I know the hypothesis that Carico is a troll is pretty popular, but has anyone considered the possibility that she's a chatbot like Eliza? Carico is capable of using words, but she consistently makes errors like those in this post, demonstrating an inability to actually understand those words.
Don't be ridiculous, Carico. Pluto's a dog, just as it's always been. ;^p
O_o
So it's clear that Creationists have no clue where the light from stars comes from which is precisely why they think that attacking others makes them look more knowledgable. But it doesn't. It only shows their ignorance even more.
It gets worse! She claimed that planets and stars are the same thing! "Planet" is just a made up word because it isn't in the Bible, according to her. She says the light looks the same, even though I posted an image of pluto.
Oh, joy. More Carico goodness.
Pluto isn't a star, it's a dwarf planet.
You need to look to cosmologists and astrophysics to know where the light from star comes. It has absolutely nothing to do with biology, and even less to do with the adaptation of species to a changing environment, which is all evolution is.
To me it seems you are the one doing the attacking. What does that say about you, Carico?
Pluto is no more a star than Mt Everest is a marshmallow. Furthermore, and for the billionth time, cosmology has fuckall to do with evolution. How the stars formed is in no way connected to how you formed.
I see it as a very arrogant and ignorant mindset that an organization based solely on the supernatural and faith have the audacity to demonize a man (who died more than a century ago) because of his discoveries in the natural world and provable science that still hold up to this day.
when does the evolutionary theory mention pluto?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
