To the so called atheist's out there, can one person give me an explanation as to how it all began ? At what point did baboons transition into humans and how did this happen? Man can only come from man. A horse can only come from another horse not a chicken. Big bang, talk about a fairy tale. There had to have been a creator
43 comments
To the so called atheist's out there,
Why so-called? Oh, that's right, we're not really atheists (note the lack of an apostrophe) as far as you're concerned.
can one person give me an explanation as to how it all began ? At what point did baboons transition into humans and how did this happen?
If you're truly serious about learning, I'd recommend "The Ancestor's Tale" by Richard Dawkins. I will warn you, it's not an easy read.
And Chihuahuas can only come from Chihuahuas, so they can't possibly have a common ancestor with Great Danes. Only they do.
Differences accumulate over time until there comes a point, where two descendant populations of a common ancestor population are sufficiently distinct from one another that it is no longer possible for them to interbreed. There is no sudden point where a Homininae gave birth to the first Homo, but a gradual divergence into the ancestoral humans and the ancestors of the other apes.
What is interesting is that the fossil record of human evolution shows such clear evidence of this that even creationists disagree over whether particular examples are "apes" or "humans". How much more transitional can you get than a fossil that even those people who do not believe in transitional forms are split over whether to classify it as one or other form.
You're too stupid to even honor with an answer. Why don't you fucking search around YouTube? There are a million videos that answer all your questions. I think your problem is that you're either too dumb to understand said videos, or you'd rather get into a debate with someone who isn't equipped for it, so you can feel superior.
each athiest has their own individual beliefs as to how the universe came into existance. some prefer the big bang, some the big bounce and others a litany of other plausible theories and hypothesis. thus, one persons explanation cannot be taken as the universal athiest explanation. Can you explain to me why their HAD to be a creator (regardless of whether or not their was.) what evidence do you have to prove this necessity for a creator?
Plenty of people could give you very sound hypotheses but you would never listen to any of them because you already have your mind made up and are just looking for an excuse to spout off about chickens and "fairy tales". You imagine that you are somehow making people who do not believe in intelligent design look foolish but you are the one behaving and looking like a fool. I hope you are happy with that, because it's the only thing that is going to come of this.
Let's list the retardations in this post:
You know for all my Atheism, I don't have a problem with people who beleive in a creator. It doesn't make sense to me mind you, but I still have no problem with it. Heck a lot of them say he created the universe in the ways suggested by science, God guided "evolution", natural forces etc, they beleived in them all.
They make their god look interesting, you make your god look dumb and limited.
The comments here are the win, but I love the stupid in the post. It burns like hot curry.
Who the hell told you that humans evolved from baboons? They're not even a member of the Hominidae family. And even if you're confusing them with either chimps or orangutans, no one says we evolved from those either. We share a recent common ancestor with all members of the Hominidae family. The species from which all modern apes evolved is extinct.
Plus, I suspect that chimps and orangutans would be a bit insulted to be confused with baboons. :P
Int the beginning there was absolute nothingness. There was no God to prevent it from splitting into positive and negative energy, in accordance with the rules of Quantum Mechanics.
What the fuck?
What the fuck does "so called atheist" mean?
Who thinks baboons became humans?
Did you bother with any form of education?
Evolution -- of which you have no knowledge -- doesn't address "how it all began." At the moment we prefer the Big Bang theory and science is extremely close to providing a definitive answer to your question. You, on the other hand, have never been close to an answer, and never will be.
Nobody thinks that baboons became humans or that chickens became horses. Evolutionary theory suggests that they have a common ancestor (more recent in the case of humans and baboons, very distant in the case of chickens and horses) and none of this has anything to do with how it began anyway. Evolutionary theory doesn't strictly require life to have a beginning - it would just as valid if life had always existed - but logic tells us that there must have been a definite origin of life (possibly more than one) as the Earth is only 4.6 billion years old. The Big Bang is different again. What is it about fundies being unable to tell one scientific discipline from another?
"At what point did baboons transition into humans and how did this happen?"
And at what point did a man made from dirt (containing mainly silicon) become a carbon -based lifeform, and why wasn't this little (but ultimately extremely important) detail pointed out in the Bible?
"Big bang, talk about a fairy tale. There had to have been a creator"
And who created the creator? And that creator's creator? And so on & so forth ad infinitum...?
Now you know why Atheism exists.
Oh, so now we have to say that a black skin
Horses don't come from chickens, therefore God.
Is that REALLY the best your pea-sized, shrivelled up apology for a brain can come up with?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
