(after claiming that only heterosexual couples should be allowed to raise children)
You cannot equate a woman who from some medical condition cannot have children to someone who choses a lifestyle that cannot produce children. If you want to at least come up with something comparable, then talk about a woman who, through acts of unprotected and irresponsible sex has had to have so many abortions that she is now barren. Do I think that woman deserves to adopt? No. Her lifestyle MADE her unable to have children. That was her CHOICE
22 comments
Barren? I haven't heard that word used in a while.
Dear Garrett,
Should a man who chooses at a young age to have a vasectomy then also be denied the chance to adopt? He made his choice so as to avoid pregnancy and the possible need for an abortion. Why punish him or anyone for that matter for past decisions regarding their own reproductive rights?
What about you, Garrett the Myopic? What if, because of your backward, primitive thinking, you are unable to attract an actual, living girlfriend?
No, the comparison was apt because homosexuality is NOT a choice. Did you CHOOSE to be heterosexual, Garrett, or did you just have heterosexual impulses that you never questioned? Well, it works exactly the same for gays, except in reverse -- and with society constantly forcing them to question their sexuality, so that when they DO finally accept it, it's because they have had to do a lot more introspection than any straight person ever has to do on the topic.
~David D.G.
What about women who have miscarried, and have lost the ability to have babies?
What about all those hetrosexual couples who adopt children, but then abuse them?Did they deserve to adopt children because of their 'lifestyle' choices?
Your comparison is hilarious. Let´s see in this perspective. Let´s suppose that due to an irresponsible driving, I collide and I become infected and I am unable to bear children, am I unable to adopt?, or let´s suppose that I have an early miscarriage because I am a little imprudent and I forgot to use the ladder. As a result, I can´t have children. Do you think that people are going to bother what you mean to "choose" a lifestyle?, in which measure have homosexuals chosen a lifestyle?.
Not getting any, eh Garrett? That's okay. Homophobic turds like you shouldn't breed anyway so I'd say this situation is rather welcome. As far as people's reproductive rights go, speak for yourself, dipshit.
It doesn't matter if it was her lifestyle or an accident that made a person uncapable of having children. Nobody is losing anything by adopting, both the parents and the children are better off, so why stop gays from adopting?
Yeah because the world is really running into a shortage of orphaned and adoptable children, make sure you are as strict as possible while creating strawmen and projecting ridiculous assumptions. That's a fucking brilliant plan to come up with. IF YOU ARE A MINIATURE COLLIE!
He calls himself great because that is the closest he is ever going to come to it.
I CAN equate a woman who, from some medical condition (like being "barren" from complications after abortion), cannot have children, with someone who, from some biological condition (like not having a womb], cannot have children.
You don't choose to be gay, stupid, any more than you choose to be tall or dark-skinned.
Women don't have a certain amount of pregnancies in them, silly. It's not the number of abortions that might turn someone "barren" but complications or mistakes, and it can happen after ONE abortion, done due to ectopic pregnancy or a severe birth defect in the fetus.
"Deserves to adopt"? What do you mean with "deserves"? Does Mrs Duggar deserve to have twenty-one children (or however many they are now)?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.