“Chad's pleasurable experiences should be taxed just like wealth.”
And what does Chad get from this tax?
I mean, merchants pay tax so the military will protect lines of product from piracy, so they can profit.
Drivers pay tax so that they can have dependable roads.
City dwellers pay tax for schools so that the guy at the counter can do math and figure their bill.
Do you have any idea why we tax things or do you just see it as a form or revenge? ‘You has sex! That’s $20 in the kitty!’
“This tax would then be distributed towards incels to help alleviate disparity.”
The disparity you feel is that 80% of the women are fucking Chad because they’d rather fuck a St. Bernard than you.
Chad’s sex money goes to you to… What? Give you a sportscar? You can’t drive a car fast enough to make 80% of women want to fuck you. KNIGHTRIDER wouldn’t get you laid.
“Because it would be impractical to directly give Chad's pleasurable experiences to incels, this is how I propose it would be done.”
Where would you put the tax stamp on Chad’s sex, though?
“A dollar estimate would be made on Chad's experiences, which would be calculated by averaging the dollar amount that incels would pay to have these experiences.”
So, if NO AMOUNT OF MONEY could get you laid, Chad’s tax would be infinite money? I’m pretty sure he can’t pay that.
“How could anyone disagree with this? It sounds like a perfectly fair system and would help fix inequality.”
It wouldn’t fix inequality, though. Even if 20 Chad’s chipped in on buying you a whore, you’d still bitch that no woman cuddled, or initiated the sex, or stayed with you after the hour was up. WHATEVER is offered it won’t be enough unless and until you become the Chad.
And I still don’t see anything Chad gets for paying this tax.
