"While evolutionists argue that there are examples of "bad design" in the bodies of many organisms, such as "flaws" in the human spine and sinus system, evolutionists fail to realize that, by their own theory, natural selection should have removed these things!"
And you fail to realize that natural selection doesn't work that way. So long as something does not interfere with reproduction, it is likely to stay. If you're bright yellow and your environment is dark green, you'll be eaten before you reproduce until eventually there are only members of your species that are green. That's natural selection at work. If, on the other hand, you have some innocuous quirk--your sinus example--that doesn't actually affect your reproductive chances then it's likely to stay, even if it's not the most efficient way of doing things.
"The simpler explanation, that these represent degeneration from an original, created perfect form, is the superior one."
No, it's not. The simplest explanation is that what we see is exactly what we would expect to see from an entirely natural development.
"In other word, as CreationWiki notes, such 'flaws' are actually 'a result of deterioration, resulting from Man's Fall.'"
You people just really don't get it.
