science IS a religion on its own merits....it takes more faith to believe the garbage th ey spew about evolution than it does to believe in a creator
45 comments
"science IS a religion on its own merits...."
Science is a method for determining the facts of our universe, it is not a religion.
"it takes more faith to believe the garbage th ey spew about evolution than it does to believe in a creator"
Basically wrong, but I'm glad you admit that one has to believe in garbage to believe in a creator.
It takes more effort to understand science than it does to believe in a creator, that's for sure. I find that faith is mostly required to believe wild assertions that fly in the face of observable reality...
Raggy: usually they believe that fossils are either a practical joke/test of faith from Gawd or a trick by Satan.
...not to mention the garbage they spew about the Internet and computers and electricity and cars and...
Let's stick to the creator, who just wants us to do nothing but worship HIM, right? What do we need heating and refrigerators and stoves and washing machines and dishwashers and garbage compactors and paved roads and sewer systems and plastics and cotton for? Let's just live in caves, covered in animal skins and heated by fires, living off animal carcases and the plants we can find around the caves.
You do know that science is more or less equal to knowledge, don't you, idiot?
Science, by definition, deals with the natural world.
Religions, by definition, deal with the supernatural world.
Science is, by definition, not a religion. The creator you mention is, we can assume, supernatural and thus, by definition, is grounded in religion.
I am sorry, but I cannot put it any more simply than that
Well, no, it doesn't take faith, not if you look at the evidence. We didn't just dream it up, you know. I suppose to the ignorant it looks like faith, but it really, really isn't.
“it takes more faith to believe the garbage th ey spew about evolution than it does to believe in a creator”
I can go see a fossil t-rex any time i want. A repeatable observation.
A bush that is burning but is not consumed? And talks? Not a repeatable observation.
I can breed beans to get evidence of recessive genes whenever i want to dedicate the time. A repeatable observation.
I cannot breed striped goats from monochrome goats by using striped sticks. Not a repeatable observation.
I can survey a large population and find the number of ribs in humans varies. Some women have more than some men. A repeatable observation.
You need to very, very carefully select test subjects to support the idea that women have more ribs because man lost one when they invented women. Not an observation that really stand up to scrutiny.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.