GOP only party protecting family values
And that's why it's such an abnormality and unorthodox anomaly that a sodomite actually comes out of the closet running in a GOP primary. Demoncrats usually are the party of freaks, geeks and all-around weirdos which tolerates these unnatural and ungodly freaks of nature, so Koering (the sodomite) can expect to probably lose the GOP primary to Goedker. If Koering the Sodomite loses the primary for councilman to Goedker, it won't be because the GOP is a party which is "intolerant," as commonly derogated by the narrow-minded and simplistic imbeciles called leftards. Rather, if Koering the Sodomite is refused in the GOP primary, it will be because of GOP voters exercising their moral clarity and superior values, virtues and religious conviction. Sodomites like Koering are anathema in the sense that they offend religion, offend nature since they can't reproduce, and offend the family values the GOP is known for. Another hazardous precedent of treating sodomites like a demographic is that after you legitimate them, you'll have to do the same for all other "alternative" lifestyles--like NAMBLA sex with kids. Still, it's of note to point out that gay as Koering is, his stand against abortion, for veterans, and for gun rights makes him more macho than any "heterosexual" lib male.
20 comments
You have the same ignorant and wrong view as a lot of other halfwits do. You are filled with hate because of your lack of penis size, the fact that you jack off to the mail carrier each morning as you lounge around the house in a ratty bathrobe watching Jerry Springer and cutting letters out of magazines for your animal kidnap ransom notes since you were fired at your janitorial job for rubbing up against the volleyball trophies and collecting used kleenex's in a maxi-pad box you stole from the garage of your invalid neighbor when she was out of town filing a restraining order against you for molesting her scottish terrier with a barbeque fork you usually use to scrape at the infected boils on your doughlike and ample ass.
Still, it's of note to point out that gay as Koering is, his stand against abortion, for veterans, and for gun rights makes him more macho than any "heterosexual" lib male."
Yeah, it's a twat when people don't fit your lazy stereotypes, innit?
Koering the Sodomite!
Didn't Lin Carter write a series of sword and sorcery novels about him in the sixties, after discovering some unused story ideas among the late Robert E Howard's papers? Definitely some distant relation of Conan's (probably the uncle that no one in his family liked to talk about).
Wow.. just.. wow. 'Demoncrats', 'libtards', 'leftards', sodomites.. its the carnival of ad hominems! Not to mention the old canard gays = pedos.. Someone needs to visit a cluehammer upon this boys head.
New drinking game! Drink every time adamgadahnarouseslibtardstreason says any form of the word "sodomite."
Make sure you have a lot of lager on hand first, though, the guy seems obsessed with the concept.
"Sodomites like Koering are anathema in the sense that they offend religion,"
Translation: offend small-minded cretins like you who use religion as an excuse for why your "eew" reaction should carry any legal weight whatsoever?
"offend nature since they can't reproduce,"
How exactly does one offend "nature"? Do sterile heterosexuals likewise offend nature? How about heterosexuals who simply choose not to reproduce? And what if a gay person does choose to have children?
"and offend the family values the GOP is known for."
Funny--I'd never thought of unthinking hatred as a value, but certain wings of the GOP are known for it, so maybe you have a point.
"Another hazardous precedent of treating sodomites like a demographic is that after you legitimate them, you'll have to do the same for all other "alternative" lifestyles--like NAMBLA sex with kids."
I think that's a pretty slippery slope you've got there -- but then again, I'm just another godless sodomite libtard(/atheist bisexual liberal...same thing, eh?).
Another hazardous precedent of treating sodomites like a demographic is that after you legitimate them, you'll have to do the same for all other "alternative" lifestyles--like NAMBLA sex with kids.
Why do you weirdos always bring up the kiddie sex card when complaining about homosexual relationships? One involves two consenting adults, the other does not. They are leagues apart and any halfwit should be able to see the difference - Sex with a same sex partner over 18 hurts nobody, sex with an innocent child, hurts the child. That's like comparing heterosexual sex to child predators who go after a child of the opposite sex. I don't see anyone running to treat those people as a demographic just because heterosexuals exist.
You must be of legal age to consent to sex, and NAMBLA will never get off the ground because of that. Maybe if we repeat it enough, subliminal-message-like, it'll get into their heads... consent, consent, consent, consent, consent...
Redhunter: Funny. I wish I hadn't been eating breakfast when I read it though.
NAMBLA does not represent the entire homosexual population. Please get that into your heads. I know it's fun to jump on bandwagons, but there is a difference - one represents a consenting adult relationship and the other does not.
Legitimizing homosexuality does not mean you have to legitimize sex with children. You are an idiot if you think this. I don't think you, or most people who spew this crap, really do believe it though. I think you just use it like scare tactics so that you can point your fingers at people who disagree with you and make sweeping generalizations. That way you can get sheeple to jump on your bandwagon lest they be proclaimed a "sodomite" or child molestor.
Oh, and fuck you.
Wow, I had a rant all built up in me this morning. I need a nap now.
And then he voted.
*shudder*
This is why I wish someone would come up with a better form of government than democracy. Unfortunately, most of them seem to rely on assuming the leader is entirely benevolent, informed, and intelligent. You'd be lucky to hit that trifecta once, much less several dictators in a row.
GOP = Family Values? Oh, you mean like starting immoral wars, reducing social and educational programs, gutting environmental laws, reducing taxes of the super-rich and allowing 41-million people to go without health insurance? Those family values?
Hmmm....let's see.....
“What did Liberals do that was so offensive
I’ll tell you what they did. Liberals got women the right to vote. Liberals got African-American the right to vote. We created Social Security and lifted millions of elderly people out of poverty. Liberals ended segregation, Liberals passed the Civil Rights Act, the Voting Rights Act. Liberals created Medicare, passed the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act.
"What did Conservatives do? They opposed every single one of those things, every one."
Yeah, I know it's from "The West Wing," but it's so damn appropriate.
Let's see...where to begin?
GWB is an admitted alcoholic and drug abuser and your poster boy Guiliani committed adultry. Family values eh? And WTF about "offend nature because they [homosexuals] can't reproduce"? What about traditionally married couples that are unable to have children for whatever medical reasons - are they an offense as well? I stand for veterans too - afterall I am one, so does that make me more masculine than my liberal husband (who btw did 10 years on active duty in the Army)? I'll bet you're a closet case, it's okay to come out, gays only bite if you ask them to.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.