Actually I don't know much about the theory of evolution but i'm sure it's bogus. Come on people, can you really trust a guy like charles darwin?? Take a look at this pic and you'll see what i mean.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Charles_Darwin%2C_aged_51.jpg
My 2 cents on the subject.
56 comments
Holy Ralph, he's sitting down!
I suppose you can take a simian-looking creationist like Duane Gish more seriously?
Man, why should we trust anything that Jesus guy said? Just look at all those paintings and tell me he's not some kind of filthy hippy.
This guy is a troll. To begin with, who's that stupid to claim that he's not an expert on the subject?, and who's so idiot as judging something so key to our history just by a PHOTO?. His two cents go to the heater in his dog's house.
What am I supposed to be seeing in that picture? He looks like a typical Englishman of his time.
Actually, we don't trust him. We really don't trust anybody. That is why thousands of very gifted and skilled scientists have attempted to disprove his theories. Having tried their best and failed, we must come to the provisional conclusion that he was right. That is how science works.
Yeah, cause 150 years ago this guy looked like 30 year old bible-belt Americans, except not nearly so fat.
His looks don't mean much anyway, he was an ambitious intellegent man. Fundiopia will never produce one of his importance.
.....-facepalm-
You fucking moron.
So, the appearance of a person can tell you whether a theory, that he or she formulated, is bogus or not?
What about "pics" of Ken Ham, Kent Hovind, Rush Limbaugh, John McCain? They all look like sleazy used-car-salesmen.
So, you think something is bogus, because you don't know much about the said something, and the inventor of said something looks in someway repulsive in your eyes.
Nice work, you made the worst argument ever on the face of this planet.
Charles Darwin always looks so sad because he started the American Atheist Union, which provided abortions to communists. This began around 1882, and continued until his theory was made illegal by being proven false in a court of law.
After that, even Darwin began to see the flaws in his religion of evolution, and promptly converted to Christian and preached about the lies of science.
This is all documented, but nobody teaches it in college.
@Big Chicken Dinner:
Your trolling is unwelcome. Please stop it with the Blatant Lies.
Should you actually believe what you say, which I would prefer to not be the case, I refer you to the relevant pages on Wikipedia and the sources therein, and recommend to you reading On the Origin Of Species itself. If you want a more comphrensive primary source, every known piece of Darwin's writings and personal correspondence are available online: http://darwin-online.org.uk/ . You may then see for yourself that Darwin was both a religious thinker and a biologist.
Incidentally, it would be difficult for Darwin to have done anything after 1882, since he died in April of that year . Finally, should your claimed documentation be the story of Elizabeth Reid, Lady Hope (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Hope ), you may readily determine that Reid's claim of a deathbed conversion by Darwin was a fabrication.
Now, if you are trolling, you have had your fun by seeing the results of my typing for a couple of minutes. Please let that be enough to satisfy you, and stop. There is always the risk of someone believing your statements.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
