When some evidence of creationism is scientifically presented, then I'm sure the body of science will be happy to review it. So far, this hasn't happened. Meanwhile, the primordial ooze is known to have existed. Not true for god.
Creation has nothing to do with evolutionism being a religion, it is only brought up by those who have nothing as some sort of pathetic straw man attempt.
10 comments
Evolution is a science, not a religion, but I know you've been told that many, many times before. And as the only alternative I've ever heard mentioned is creationism, it is appropriate to demand some evidence. I take it from your response that you don't have any such evidence, right?
The more this ass discusses abortion, evolution, religion and anything else, the less doubt there is he doesn't understand the words he uses.
Creation has nothing to do with evolutionism being a religion, it is only brought up by those who have nothing as some sort of pathetic straw man attempt.
Did Bonehead just admit that creationism is religion based?
Nobody seriously believes the theory of evolution is a religion, even creationists. In the US, the "evolution is a religion" was a frivolous argument for banning it in public schools. It was shot down in the 9th District by Peloza v. Capistrano School District. SCOTUS declined to review the case. Some creationists still try to beat that dead horse.
"evolutionism being a religion"
You're right, it is. I regularly attend services at the local First Church of Charles Darwin, Evolutionist. I've often been moved to tears when we sing the opening hymn, "All hail the power of Darwin's name," although "Onward, Darwin's soldiers" is a little too militaristic for my taste.
“Creation has nothing to do with evolutionism being a religion,”
That’s EVERYTHING to do with evolution being framed as a religion.
Creationists insist on taking Genesis literally.
Creationists have to reject some science to do so.
They can’t show any faults in the science itself (not the methodology, not the evidence, not the peer review), so they attack the scientists.
They attack everyone who supports any findings that disagree with a literal reading of Genesis.
And for some reason they portray these people as propping up a religion of deep time, evolutionary theory, the Big Bang, beneficial mutations, and everything else they can’t handle.
“it is only brought up by those who have nothing as some sort of pathetic straw man attempt.”
But you can’t dismiss the evidence for evolution EXCEPT by pretending there’s none and no reason to listen to the people who keep pointing to it.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.