There are commonalities in monotheism so the issue there is in interpretation of the unitary God as it is in the interpretation of the unitary self. Pixies or the man in the moon do not fall into monotheism unless you are prepared to give them divine properties to make them equivalent to the unitary God but I think that has always defeated your intent when you have used it before.

I have no beef with methodological naturalism until you change it into philosophical naturalism. In other words your opening paragraph contains no actual argument against God.

There is no way I can make fabricate seriousness in respect of the possibility of the divine or our need for reconciliation thereof but that is an existential matter between you and God and not me because the contest between your ego and it's conception of Vlad is always going to be a foregone conclusion I would have thought.