The biggest problem with you is that you can't think with your brain, but only with your uterus. That is why you can only see situations through a very emotional standpoint. Try using your brain for something besides attacks and look at this logically.
53 comments
This isn't just a specific quote, but an idiom of political discussion and one of the major stumbling blocks to progress. This and a few other things, I'd give my left nut if it'd make them disappear.
"The biggest problem with you is that you can't think with your brain, but only with your uterus."OK, Bri Bri, why don't you show us all how that thinking thing is done. When you really get started thinking, you may realize that the brain is the only organ in which thinking takes place, even poor thinking such as yours.
"That is why you can only see situations through a very emotional standpoint."
Tell someone they think with their uterus implies that the thought processes of women are somehow defective. Bri, are you sure you're not trying to think with your ass?
"Try using your brain for something besides attacks and look at this logically."
That's good advice, Bri Bri. Why don't you follow it.
I read what I think was the discussion on myspace. Brian felt that women who raped men should be forced into an abortion because the man wouldn't want his DNA running around any more than a woman would want her DNA running around.
" read what I think was the discussion on myspace. Brian felt that women who raped men should be forced into an abortion because the man wouldn't want his DNA running around any more than a woman would want her DNA running around. "
whitewater55 wrote:
whitewater55:
@Nekhbet
I wonder what statistics are for the numbers of women who are raped versus the number of men who are raped in any given year.
Well, fundies don´t think with their brain and proud of. And let me tell you that rapers think with the penis, liars with the nose, .........what´s the point?
@Diet Coke
There are more complicated ways for a woman to rape a man which involve different kinds of drugs and ropes and such.
Suppose the woman is a giant and the man she wants to rape is a midget: Would she really need ropes and drugs to rape him?
@Lya Kahlo: I'm not saying you're wrong, but neither of your links contradict the notion that male rape victims make up a significant fraction of the total. The second doesn't address rape of men at all, and the first says that men make up more than a third of prison rape victims in New Jersey, which hardly suggests rape of men is of neglible frequency.
Lya:"Nope.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/P/PRISONER_ABUSE?SITE=RIPRJ&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT - women are far more likely to be abused in prison."
That's ignoring the fact that men make up a far greater percentage of inmates, by an order of magnitude.
"the number of women under the jurisdiction of State or Federal prison authorities increased 3.4% from midyear 2004, reaching 106,174 and the number of men rose 1.3%, totaling 1,406,649. "
Link
So, women only make about 3.4% of all prisoners, or 106,474. One out of three gives us 35,458 women sexually abused.
"A 1996 study of the Nebraska prison system produced similar findings, with 22 percent of male inmates reporting that they had been pressured or forced to have sexual contact against their will while incarcerated."
Link
So, that's 22 percent of male prisoners sexually abused.
And since the statistics listed 1,406,649.. That's approximately 309,000 male prisoners sexually abused.
"In 1997, 500 out of 100,000 men were in prison.
http://www.news24.com/News24/World/News/0 ,,2-10-1462_2011004,00.html - 1 in 3 women will suffer som form of abuse."
TDR - "what do you mean, you don't see the fundyness? Are you being sarcastic? This level of bone-deep misogyny sits just fine with you?"
PassingThrough: There are different kinds of fundies; religious fundies are by no means the only ones. We get political fundies, sexist fundies, racist fundies, pseudoscience fundies, and combination types, as well as some too bizarre to categorize. Fundyism is a "True Believer" state of mind; whether that fanaticism deals with religion or otherwise, the True Believer is still a fundie.
Pretty Good Satan #100833 IS another side to the issue. They haven't done it yet, and in spite of their complaints of being shut out, they rarely have ever even tried to do so.
Until they do, it is not fundyism to state that evolution is a fact and that evolutionary theory is provisionally correct; it is simply the "state of the art" of knowledge in biology until or unless something better displaces it. That's how science works.
~David D.G.
In some countries, women "seducing" men who allegedly didn't want to have sex is considered rape as well. I remember a case some years ago where a couple of guys that went to a religious school sued(and sadly, won) two women for raping them by seducing them.
The biggest problem with you is that you can't think with your brain... ...but only with your uterus.
Whereas you are a dick.
That is why you can only see situations through a very emotional standpoint.
Says the pouty insult-hurling whiner.
Try using your brain for something besides attacks and look at this logically.
Arg, would you quit talking to yourself?
@WowI'd go one step further and say that a woman who pokes holes in condoms or lies about birth control is a rapist because there is fraud in the inducement of sex.
I wouldn't call that rape. If a woman pokes holes in condoms or lies about birth control, the man should be exempted from all child care he would otherwise have to pay, be exempted from alimony if he's married and divorces over this (and is, perhaps, entitled to alimony himself), and she should be forced to reimburse him for any legal fees he faces from arguing for this exemption in court. She should not, however, be charged with rape or any other criminal charge.
@Pretty Good SatanYeah, like those damn biolgist fundies, with their 'True Belief' that evolutions is correct. They never give equal time coverage to the other side and they difenitely won't compromise. Wanker.
The "True Believer" label requires an unshakable belief that the believer will maintain no matter what evidence is presented against it. I don't think anyone has such an unshakable belief in evolution people from biologists to minimally informed laymen tentatively accept evolution since the evidence supports it, but will cease to do so if somebody manages to disprove it.
Get thee to a biology class, where thou shalt learn that 'tis the brain that performs the mental functions, not the uterus, not testosterone, and certainly not thy pitiable sexist ego.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
