Royce E. Van Blaricome #fundie christiannews.net

Royce continues to insist that Jesus is named in the U.S. Constitution, but refuses to show where.

MarkSebree:
"Ever watch Bill O'Reilly when he gives the "Word of the Day"? If so, you'll be familiar with "Go look it up. If someone gives you the answers you don't learn anything and you don't remember it.""

No, I do not watch Bill O'Reilly, or any similar show. And I have looked it up. I have read through the US Constitution and its Amendments numerous times. Your claim is unsupported.

"Thank you for posting the website address for all to go to. I appreciate that. I actually went there and I appreciate you proving yourself wrong."

Actually, that site proves that you are the one that is wrong.

"It's right there on that very site you gave in black & white, MUCH APPRECIATED!!"

Then state the Article or Amendment, Section, and paragraph. You made the positive assertion, so you need to support it. Or do I need to post the entire text of the US Constitution to show that you are wrong? Nobody else sees what you claim is there.

You are the only one that is showing himself to be blind. Or more likely, dishonest.

Royce E. Van Blaricome:
"No, I do not watch Bill O'Reilly, or any similar show. And I have looked it up. I have read through the US Constitution and its Amendments numerous times. Your claim is unsupported."

Well, maybe you should. Might learn something. And thanks for showing that you're just as blind as the other yahoo's on here who deny what's right there in black & white.

"Actually, that site proves that you are the one that is wrong."

Nope. Just proves your either outright lying, too ignorant to read, or so steeped in your own delusion and denial that you can't see what's right before your very eyes. But hey, take comfort. There have been many others who were in the same boat and ALL have been proven wrong as well. So you're not alone.

"Then state the Article or Amendment, Section, and paragraph. You made the positive assertion, so you need to support it. Or do I need to post the entire text of the US Constitution to show that you are wrong? Nobody else sees what you claim is there."

I don't need prove squat to you. As I've repeated said here, you people can't read black & white right before your eyes so cutting and pasting it here isn't gonna help you!

You wanna post the "entire Constitution" to show me I'm wrong - have at buddy. I look forward to seeing you prove yourself a Liar and deceptive in public. Just as you did with your false statement that nobody else sees it. Others most certainly have.

"You are the only one that is showing himself to be blind. Or more likely, dishonest."

Take a chainsaw to that Giant Sequoia Tree sticking outta your eye socket and maybe you'll see better and not be so blind.

MarkSebree:
Sorry, but I am not the one that is blind. Unlike you, I do not need talk show hosts to learn things. I can research the subject on my own. And despite your claims, I am extremely literate, honest, grounded in reality, not in denial, and I can easily see what is in front of me.

You have not proven me wrong. You have been committing logical fallacies right an left. You have been trying to shift the burden of proof, probably because you cannot support your claims. You have been engaging in ad hominems for the same reason. You have also engaged in a few more logical fallacies.

Unlike you, I am not delusional. I cannot see what is not there.

You have made the assertion that the USA Constitution contains multiple references to "God", "Jesus", and "Christ" in its text. That is a positive assertion, and you have been challenged to support your claims. You have not even been asked to post the exact text, just the location of it. You have refused to do so repeatedly. Therefore, the only reasonable conclusion is that you are a liar. You cannot support your claims, and thus you have been defeated.

Royce E. Van Blaricome:
You're sorry, alright. And you are blind - spiritually-blind.

If you're so doggone literate, honest, and grounded in reality, then STOP telling lies and do the honest thing - cite the WHOLE Constitution right here so everyone can see you're lying!!

And now you lie openly. I never made the assertion that the USA Constitution contains 'multiple references to "God", "Jesus", and "Christ" in its text. Anyone can go back and see exactly what I said. Nice attempt at the typical Liberal tactic of Distraction & Diversion.

" You have refused to do so repeatedly. Therefore, the only reasonable conclusion is that you are a liar. You cannot support your claims, and thus you have been defeated."

ROTFLMBO!!!! So you think that's a reasonable conclusion? LOL When what I've said and maintained all along is 1) Go read the Constitution yourself, and 2) It would do me NO good whatsoever to actually copy & paste it here because it would still be in Black & White which you EVIDENTLY can NOT read!! LOL

I have supported my claims and you have NOT. Because you CAN'T!! The B&W text proves you wrong EVERY time!!!!!!!!! LOL

Defeated? Ha ha ha LOLOLOLOLOL It's easy to see who's been defeated. YOU and all the others who can't read and understand plain English! LOL

MarkSebree:
"You're sorry, alright. And you are blind - spiritually-blind."

Actually, I see very clearly. I removed the blinders that you wear decades ago.

"If you're so doggone literate, honest, and grounded in reality, then STOP telling lies and do the honest thing - cite the WHOLE Constitution right here so everyone can see you're lying!!"

I have not been telling any lies. And I have cited the entire Constitution and shown everyone that you have been lying.

"And now you lie openly. I never made the assertion that the USA Constitution contains 'multiple references to "God", "Jesus", and "Christ" in its text. Anyone can go back and see exactly what I said. Nice attempt at the typical Liberal tactic of Distraction & Diversion."

Actually, I have been telling the truth all along. It is usually a Conservative tactic to Distract and Divert the conversation, since you have been the one that has been engaging in that tactic, not me.

As far as when you claimed that the US Constitution contained multiple references to "God", "Jesus", and "Christ" in the text, you should really review your own posting history before making such a challenge. Its child's play to show that you are lying again.

[Reposts the conversation so far.]

Royce E. Van Blaricome:
[Calls each post dishonest, or lies, but offers no refutation.]

9 comments

Confused?

So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!

To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register. Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.