They already have the religion of Evolution taught in the public schools.
Creation Science should be taught as well to balance this.
Evolution is faith masquerading as Science. It is unobservable and unable to be replicated, therefore at odds with the scientific method.
43 comments
Perfect fail.
There is no such thing as creation science . Creation is a myth for morons. We don't teach creationism for the same reason we don't teach astrology, alchemy, phrenology, and psychic healing. They're not science either, they're bullshit.
"Evolution is faith masquerading as Science. It is unobservable and unable to be replicated, therefore at odds with the scientific method."
...except that it has been observed, and has been replicated (case in point: nylon-eating bacteria).
As others have already pointed out, you fail. Hard.
They already have the religion of Evolution taught in the public schools.
Evolution is not religion, it is science.
Creation Science should be taught as well to balance this.
Creationism is not science, it is religion.
Evolution is faith masquerading as Science. It is unobservable and unable to be replicated, therefore at odds with the scientific method.
Evolution has been observed, both in the lab, and in the numerous fossils scientists have discovered all over the world.
TRIPLE FAIL
Even if there was any science behind "creation", isn't it, also, unobservable and unable to be replicated? ><
The creation STORY IS taught in many public schools. Of course, it doesn't change what you believed when you walked into the classroom.
Perhaps, Tallyman, you should attend one - a classroom I mean - sometime?
Evolution is a scientific theory.
Creation Science is an biblical oxymoron.
You can call evolution a religion all you want, but that doesn't make your idiotic statements true.
We have observed and replicated the process of evolution using fruit flies.
Edit: Panz, i see you have never heard of Carico.
aaa
"Edit: Panz, i see you have never heard of Carico."
Up till now, it's been my privilege not to
Evolution is not a religion, it is a science, which is why it is taught in science classes.
Creationism is not a science, it is a religion, which is why it isn't tauught in science classes. There's nothing to stop people teaching it in religious studies classes.
Face if fundies need the ToE to be wrong if its not wrong then their religion and their faith is misplace No Jesus no after life no god No heaven . it all big lie...
Because if dino exsited a million year ago that means their was no Garden of Eden (Paradise) no snake no haeven no Adam No Eve no first sin.
NO Fall + NO attonment + NO resurrection =.No Jesus = No fundies
They already have the religion of Evolution
False
Creation Science
False
Evolution is faith
False
It is unobservable
False
and unable to be replicated
False
Score: 0 points
Grade: F-
Yep, I wake up every morning, face towards the Galapagos Islands, and pray to Charles Darwin to-
Wait, no, evolution is just a scientific theory. Never mind.
They already have the religion of Evolution taught in the public schools.
Creation Science should be taught as well to balance this.
Evolution is faith masquerading as Science. It is unobservable and unable to be replicated, therefore at odds with the scientific method.
Tallyman
Heh heh, shut up troll.
[They already have the religion of Evolution taught in the public schools...Evolution is faith masquerading as Science. It is unobservable and unable to be replicated, therefore at odds with the scientific method.]
It's not "unobservable". There's more than enough evidence to support it. Open any Biology textbook. Hell, you can go to your local library and look at the biology books there FOR FREE.
[Creation Science should be taught as well to balance this.]
You just said that Evolution was "at odds with the scientific method" because it was unobservable and unable to be replicated. Now you're crowing about teaching Creationism in the same classroom? Hypocrite.
Religion of Evolution...Creation Science.
I do not think these words mean what you think they mean.
Now, come, Mr. Tallyman, tally me banana. Daylight come and me wan' go home.
What he should have said is
"Creation "Science" is faith masquerading as Science. It is unobservable and unable to be replicated, therefore at odds with the scientific method."
DERP DE DER! HERPYDERPY DIDELIDUM!
Why teach creation science to balance it out? Why not teach the creation myths of good old norse mythology? By this guys definition, that would be balanced too! Unless, of course, he has some reason that would validate creation science above other creation myths? :o
Bullshit doesn't balance out fact. Why teach that water flows uphill to balance out the fact that it flows downhill?
And, yet one more time (and please read carefully) evolution is NOT a fucking religion any more than not believing in Santa Claus is a fucking religion.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.