The Apartheid analogy is wrong. Both Nazism and Liberalism are designed to exterminate a certain segment of the population. Nazism targeted certain races while Liberalism targets decent and intelligent people. Apartheid simply aims separation. I wish we had Apartheid where decent and intelligent people would be separated and put into our own ghettos. But Liberalism has no interest in separation of any kind. Liberalism is designed for the complete elimination of decent and intelligent people, giving us a pure Idiocracy.
There are some differences between Nazism and Liberalism. Nazism, coming from Germany, was more efficient and aimed for rapid extermination, while Liberal extermination is a slower process. This is why we have no death camps. Also, Nazism was intentional, the Germans being fairly intelligent people, while Liberalism is unintentional, since Liberals are fools. Liberals do not consciously want to eliminate anyone, but they are repulsed by decent people and, through Feminism, they have unintentionally managed to create a system that is highly effective at genetically eliminating decent people. And this is why all of you incels are here.
59 comments
Women *and* liberals ... fschmidt is an equal opportunity hater, it seems. No, wait, he likes "decent and intelligent people", presumably defined as misogynist ultra-conservative wannabe aristocrats who agree with him.
Nazi Germany outlawed abortion.
Conservatives want to outlaw abortion.
Nazi Germany outlawed the teaching of evolution.
Conservatives want to outlaw evolution.
Nazi Germany put gays in death camps.
Concervatives want to put gays in death camps.
Nazi Germany were white supremecists.
The conservative base is white supremecists.
Which is like nazis, liberals or concervatives?
...where decent and intelligent people would be separated and put into our own ghettos.
I don't think you really want this. Ghettos were usually over crowded, filty, unsanitary, unsafe and a haven for disease. Have you not seen "Schindler's List?"
they are repulsed by decent people and, through Feminism, they have unintentionally managed to create a system that is highly effective at genetically eliminating decent people
Damn that feminism! When a decent hatemonger can't club a woman over the head and force her to sleep with him you know something's gone awry! </sarcasm>
UGH, Love-Shy again huh?
Yes, women are all evil man-hating bitches who will destroy the human race by denying a braintrust like you from breeding.
It couldn't possibly be that you don't know how to approach, talk to, treat, respect, or judge the character of other people and therefore exude the reek of desperation that a tiny minority of women prey upon. That couldn't possibly be why you have bad experiences with the opposite sex; you're obviously perfect. ;p
Ugh, now my mouth tastes of sarcasm.
FUCK OFF AND DIE, FSCHMIDT.
AND TAKE EVERY OTHER AMERICAN IDIOT WITH YOU. I WANT A GENOCIDE OF THE WILLFULLY IGNORANT.
'decent and intelligent' ? fschmidt, dude, giving yourself the title doesn't get you into the group. You're still outside the tent, pissing in and you'll always be outside the tent, pissing in.
<<<Both Nazism and Liberalism are designed to exterminate a certain segment of the population.>>>
Huh?
<<<Liberalism targets decent and intelligent people.>>>
Huh?
<<<I wish we had Apartheid where decent and intelligent people would be separated and put into our own ghettos.>>>
Umm...you're free to move wherever you want...
If this is any indication of your inner dialogue, I'd get a second opinion as to whether or not the definitions, "decent and intelligent" apply to you. There are professionals out there who could help you, but you would probably prefer professional authoritarian scam artists to those "liberal" psychologists. So much simpler to find someone to reinforce your crazy beliefs than to challenge them.
@1378302: I imagine him more like the crazed closet-gay neighbor in American Beauty.
Stop fappin' and pull up your pants. Liberalism is not "designed" to kill anyone. First, Liberalism is to diverse to be considered designed at all. Second, nane a truley liberal regime which has exterminated a "certain segment of the population."
I am not repulsed by decent people. I'm repulsed by you, but then again...
South Africa: Those not White treated as second-class citizens. In every way.
fschit's 'Gor'-esque mind: Those without a 'Y' chromosome treated as second-class citizens In every way.
...nope, not seeing how sexism isn't an analogy equal with racism, fschit. Least of all how - in Australia - leader of the Labour Party [i]and[/i] Prime Minister Julia Gillard won her leadership battle against her rival Kevin Rudd in a 2/3rds majority vote.
Rudd resigned.
And there's me thinking that Australia was filled with sexists...? Well, I guess that liberal thinking annihilates stereotypes. Good.
PROTIP: In Australia, 'Liberal Democrats' are as right-wing as the Teabaggers in the US.
'Advance Australia Fair' indeed.
Here in the UK, Labour (who I vote for): centre left . Conservative: centre right . Liberal Democrat: 'middle of the road'. Geo-politically, and therefore educationally & intellectually inferior much, fshit? Ergo, misogyny is dying . Q.E. and D., bitch. Deal with it.
I wish we had Apartheid where decent and intelligent people would be separated and put into our own ghettos.
I don't think fschmidt knows what the definition of ghetto is.
ghetto [get-oh]
noun, plural ghet·tos, ghet·toes.
1.a section of a city, especially a thickly populated slum area, inhabited predominantly by members of an ethnic or other minority group, often as a result of social or economic restrictions, pressures, or hardships.
2.(formerly, in most European countries) a section of a city in which all Jews were required to live.
3. a section predominantly inhabited by Jews.
4.any mode of living, working, etc., that results from stereotyping or biased treatment: job ghettos for women; ghettos for the elderly.
Liberals do want to eliminate a class of people, by making the poor middle-class. Not the same as eliminating actual people.
Rick Santorum, in contrast, thinks "The poor are always with us" is just dandy.
The fact that you speak of Nazism in a positive light, as if it was a good thing, means you forfeit the right to criticize anyone for any reason, ever. STFU and DIAF.
"Ah, but Love-Shy is already a self-segregated ghetto of misogynists that don't understand why being an asshole to women doesn't get them laid."
After searching their quotes here, yeah you appear to be correct on the matter. Good grief how can people say things like this?...
"The Apartheid analogy is wrong. Both Nazism and Liberalism are designed to exterminate a certain segment of the population."
WRONG.
Neither Nazism nor Liberalism were designed to do any such thing.
Nazism was designed to appeal to a poorly educated public. Liberalism was designed to reflect the virtues of a well educated public.
"Nazism targeted certain races while Liberalism targets decent and intelligent people. Apartheid simply aims separation."
WRONG.
Nazism and apartheid both aim to preserve the privlege of a group who claim to be a superior "race", chosen by a god name Gott. They both rely on violence to enforce their notions of "race" since reality doesnt support them.
Liberalism points out the sheer absurdity of the idea of "race".
Let me explain why people like fschmidt here like to proclaim they are the bastions of intellectualism.
In Tehran after the fall of the Shah, Iranian torturers under the Ayatollah felt they were not being respected for their work, so they asked to be called "Doctor" as they use what they considered to be medical precision in their interrogations.
I trust I do not have to spell out the correlation any further?
Actually, I too, would like to separate intellectuals and rational people from the idiots who wish to stamp on others' rights. It would be very amusing to watch them rip each other to shreds.
@Anon e moose, being an Australian and a woman, I wanted Rudd to win.
Not being sexist, but she basically stole his job without a vote from the Australian (public) people. At least none I was aware of. Plus I'm not keen on the carbon tax being as high as it is. Though, I digress, I don't know anything about politics.
I would love to see a woman PM someday, but one elected by the people of Australia.
Now the choice is between ultra conservative Abbot from the Liberal party (blech!) and Gillard from the Labour party, who has lost the trust of the people. I worry for our next election.
My vote is for the Sex Party.
Yes, we have a political party called the Sex party.
Huh. Given the source, I was expecting a rape apologist. That usually seems to be the case.
Also, Loveshy isn't all that bad a place, sometimes. The idea is to give people bad at relationships for whatever reason (extreme social anxiety, autism, introversion, etc.) a community. Issue is that half the people there are giant assholes. >_>
Dude can't get laid, and blames the durn Liberals.
I'd call him a dick, but dicks are useful...
Nazism is basically a form of fascism, so of course it's bad news.
Fascism is also extremely far right-wing, so liberalism is on the wrong side of the political spectrum. Oops. Fail.
By the way, ever notice that liberty, liberate, and liberal have similar word roots? Yeah, didn't think you did.
Let's see...
Paranoid, conservative (fundy) argument: check.
Racist/misogynistic views: check
Conspiracy theories: check.
A trifecta! :: golf clapping :: Well done!
"Liberalism is designed for the complete elimination of decent and intelligent people, giving us a pure Idiocracy."
3 Words.
John. Stuart. Mill.
Read some.
(Mill advocated vigourous debate and discussion to ensure that people got as close to the truth, were as educated and developed as far as possible).
@Dr.Shrinker
well whatever name you choose to give it growing old watching the whole world form relationships, date, have sex, fool around, get married and settle down while you alone lack the basic inbuilt skills that make even the first steps possible IS a real problem that makes your life hell.
Attention everyone bashing the love-shy guys! Here is some reading material for you:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2736399/posts
Yes, I know it's free republic but that is actually the top link when I google "married by 40"- pretty much every other link from every forum liberal or conservative expresses exactly the same disgusting opinion. Now do you idiots begin to understand why someone (male or female) over 40 who has never had a relationship might be just a teensy weensy bit pissed off? Because he or she is powerless. No matter how well they follow all your helpful advice "just ask someone out!", no matter how well they overcome any personality flaws they may have, no matter what they do in life, it will never be enough. No one ever told them there was a sell by date when it comes to love but apparently their is. Our fucked up society believes in giving murderers a second chance but not people who were late to the dating game.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.