And what is that difference? Interestingly I'm actually discussing rape with another new poster as well. . . since the difference between rape and domination is 'consent', what gives consent? Attraction, just with animals and their mating rituals of sexual display - if you are attractive, good sperm, then it's not rape.
My concern for level of pain of rape would be greater if it weren't for the fact that most American women deserve to raped because they oppose prostitution as a sexual outlet for men. Since they deserve to raped, I cannot concern myself with the pain rape causes them.
Do you have any RELEVANT prove that all women arent part of an evil hive mind? They are out to get men because they know men need sex, and they go out tease guys and withhold sex. They reject them in cruel ways, and are very
egocentric and sociopathic if you look at the way modern bitches act. It doesnt matter if women in general dont fit those descriptors; all that matters is the individuals experiences; have enough bad ones, and they represent REALITY....
Oh and FYI killing women, and making a political statemnt can be very effective, its something called terrorism, and it has brought major nations to their knees. Kill enough women, make it clear why, and then maybe then society will take you seriously. Im not saying i would do that; i have no desire to go to prison, but i would enthusiastically root for a person or group that would. Sometimes when one is hopeless, HATE is the only thing left going for a person; thats the way it is for me; ive replaced my desire to get a woman, which i know will never happen, with hatred...its not a bad substitute let me tell you that.
RANT:
You're over the hill by your late 20s, especially if you look your age. You're now THE oldest guy who still goes to nightclubs. You can't get girls in their LOOKS, FERTILITY and YOUTH PRIME anymore. And even if you can snag the odd one, you have nothing in common with them.
By 30, you should be settling down and ready to have kids. If you have a kid at 30, you'll be in your 40s when it's 10. You won't even be able to play sports with the kid soon after that.
All of your sexual adventures and sowing of your wild oats should be out of your system by now.
But as an INCEL, you're teens and 20s were crap. The PEAK of your YOUTH was spent getting rejected by girls, playing videogames and scraping pass grades in school, only just. So, you didn't even enjoy your youth. Now that you're older, more bitter, slightly balding on the temples, your skin has lost its youthful suppleness, and now you're developing nasolabial folds, what good is to come?
By 30, you've come to realize that your life is now split between working and commuting (70%) and being exhausted from working (30%). If the "good times" weren't even good, why do you think the 30s will be any good? Being an incel in your 20s looks like you were unlucky to a woman. Being an incel in your 30s is a sign that something is wrong.
No one - who doesn't share some of your DNA - loves you. All that's ahead is work, and bills. So what does an incel have to look forward to after 35? Balding? Prostate cancer? Dying alone and getting eaten by his cats?
I'm not 35, but I'm heading there soon enough. Time flies. Now, the only reason why I am "still trying" even though I'm LATE, is because I'm not brave enough to "check out" / visit god / come eat Sue. E. Side. So I'm only making an effort coz I'm trapped here.
How can you even fucking stand to get out of bed, being 38, and INCEL? Having to work just to keep a roof over your head, so you can work, so you can keep a roof over your head, so you can work....?
LOL@being 44 years old and incel. Biology's Chinese water torture.
There's a divorced programmer where I work. He's about 55yo, bald, 0/10. He's divorced, meaning he lucked out in the early feminism era, but after the divorce, feminism being in full swing, he remained INCEL. This guy programs at home as well as work. We can see that he checks in programming code in New Years Eve evening. While reasonably goodlooking men are boning chicks, he's writing routines so that the cash balance of one account can be concatenated with some other fucking value.
Even if you reach 36 and snag a 32 year old woman, she'll look awful. People look revolting as they age. I honestly have no idea how anyone can fuck a woman over the age of 40. With her wrinkles and vagina that looks like corned beef. Think of how many cocks passed through there in her 20s while you were playing videogames in yours. Now you get her when she looks haggered. Well done. If we're programmed to be attracted to signs of youth and fertility, how do men become aroused for 45 year old women who are about as fertile as a shoe? No wonder old men need viagra. Women start to look subhuman after 35. I'd rather thrust into a DVD drive. Compare pics of non Hollywood celeb women at 16 and age 48. The difference is night and day.
At least if you meet a girl in her 20s, you can gradually accustom to her face disintegrating. But meeting her at 43, after her cock caroussel marathon? Lucky me.
If only I knew how I'd feel now. That's the thing about aging. No matter how wise you become, it's always TOO LATE. You can't go back.
I just can't take aging.
/rant
Been pushing myself to hit the nightlife for the first time in 11 years over the last few weeks and I'm seeing the most ridiculous shit ever.
The average women don't have to do anything remotely pro-active to attract a man and they'll have streams of above average looking guys approach them, and even these good looking guys will intimidate each other to have access to these average girls. These very plain women can demand tall, handsome, lean and fit men at a whim and they'll be at their call. All the hot girls were crowded in or near the VIP area hoping to get a famous footballer, musician or rugby player (this was a Manchester Nighclub). Just lol if your not a celebrity male and think you can get a chance with these hottest women in a club. They literally want a FAMOUS HANDSOME guy, not just some regular good looking guy that works as an electrician. They are off limits, forbidden to 99.8% of men.
The ugliest, obese women who squeeze their 200lbs, 250lbs, 300lbs disgusting shapeless bodies into tight dresses are still able to get dances and hook-ups with non-fat men. Even though some men turn their noses up and walk away from these flirtatious hamplanets, some will accept thats all there gonna get tonight and take them home. Their male equivalents are 2/10 incels and wouldn't even have the option to get sex & intimacy throughout their lives unless they had riches or paid escorts.
It seriously depressed me I'm not going out at night again unless its necessity.
[Love-shy.com FAQ on the friendzone]
Love-shys are sensitive people. They can get very enamored with those they fall for, but tragically, the objects of their affection don't usually like them back. Love-shys are often treated with the phrases "oh, you're such a nice guy, but I don't see you that way," or "sorry, I have a boyfriend" or the classic "I wouldn't want to ruin our friendship." The unaware, naive guy will stay stuck to the girl as a satellite, or "friend" if you will, in the vain hope that she will change her mind. Meanwhile, the girl has several relationships with other guys, and relays her sob stories to the friendzoned guy while giving him no sex.
So, what to do about friendzoning? Well, there's an entire forum on this site devoted to help, but if you believe you're in this predicament, we're going to give you one piece of advice right here: Break your "friendship" off now! You will only suffer more emotional devastation and hardship in the long run. Do not pander any more to the girl, do not do extra, unwarranted things for her, in fact, it is best to cut off all contact with the girl and move on. Above all else, do not not not listen to the advice out there that the girl might "change her mind!" There's a 99% chance she won't and you'll be stuck in the cold while you could have been eyeing other prospects.
Friendzoning is good for no one, really. It ruins the friendzoned guy, teaches the friendzoning girl that she can always have bootlickers serve her in return for nothing, and harms society by making it seem like love-shys are these bootlicking pushovers who don't deserve respect. Do not give a girl unwarranted reward treatment! She has enough friends to yap about how bad her boyfriend is behind his back.
The important thing to understand is that the friendzone is an abusive relationship for both parties involved, but it hurts the friendzoned guy worse, because he gets nothing out of it. If a girl turns you down, it will always hurt, no matter what. But you must move on or else even more humiliation. This is problematic in an environment where there is a scarcity of options, which encourages this behavior, but you must avoid this behvior, no matter how bad it feels or how scarce your options are.
[Bolding from original]
Today I would like to expose buddhism.
buddhism pretends to be a moral ideology but it is not. It is evil due to its worshipping of idols and hence becomes an enemy of YHVH . Although this is the reason I as one of YHVH 's servants oppose buddhism, buddhism also has very severe evolutionary problems.
The reason that buddhism is a Satanic tool to destroy any sense of morality is its complete ban of marriage and sexual activities. In a buddhist society buddhism is indoctrinated to the population through schools. Everyone gets indoctrinated with buddhism. Not everyone is the same, so different people responds to buddhist indoctrination differently. People adopt the buddhist anti-sexual anti-marriage moral system, but not everyone practises it in real life. Actually if everyone does so buddhist countries such as Thailand will not even exist. There is another requirement in buddhism, namely to refrain from meat. Of course people in even the most buddhist countries do consume meat. Actually most buddhists are in name only. Few buddhists take their buddhism seriously which is actually a good thing, since otherwise many parts of Asia will be voluntarily depopulated. But there are people who take buddhism seriously. Who? Moral people. They actually take buddhist morality seriously and become buddhist monks and nuns, who do not participate in the society any more and do not reproduce.
The result?
In buddhist societies moral people are systematically removed from the society. Only people who are immoral enough to marry despite marriage be outlawed in buddhism have children. That's why buddhist countries have nearly the worst moral records in the world, even worse than athe-ist states.
I am talking about the anti-Christian, anti-white, anti-man, pro-gay, pro-immigrant mentality that we are seeing today. Lately I have seen young people talk (aged like 17-20 years old), and they scare me to death. These kids were heavily brainwashed by liberal propaganda since a young age, and they really seem to believe this crap. Not only that, but they are extremely intolerant and they have a propensity for violence. If you say anything they consider not acceptable by their cultural marxist standards, they will call their 200 friends and intimidate you. Also, they constantly make protests and harass people. Luckily, these people have not real power, but it might be coming soon. They are able to restrict freedom of speech more and more every day, by making protests and complaining each time someone in the medias say something they don't like, and everyone is bending over to their demands. It's ridiculous now.
This is getting out of control. Personal attacks, bullying, intimidation from cultural marxists is a daily occurrence. I can see how these people will try to gain power and make a bunch of restrictive laws to restrict speech and opinions. Are we going to soon live into some sort of cultural marxist dictatorship?
What do you think?
There is a vast conspiracy(Illuminati) that aims at destruction of Judeo-Christianity as well as (ironically) Islam and Atheism altogether since Islam is at least a perverted version of Judeo-Christianity which is also dangerous to them and Atheism is at least some form of absolutism.They want to promote (literally) ancient Baal worship, Hinduism, Buddhism as well as all other kinds of idolatry. They want to reverse the world into a world that doesn't worship the only true God and promote polytheism. They know that God and His laws are too dangerous for them. Results of Judeo-Christianity: Equality, Fairness, Law, Charity, Moral absolutism, universalism in Jesus as opposed to tribalism(racism).
I also like Thomas Sowell's articles, which are full of wisdom, especially the article "Depending on dependency".
I am currently reading Mein Kampf. I wondered why Hitler is held up as the ultimate evil. I personally have good reason to hate him since he exterminated most of my family. But this doesn't explain why people who have no such connection hate him. A far as being a murderer goes, Stalin ties Hitler and Mao far exceeds him, yet neither is nearly so hated. Mein Kampf makes it clear why Hitler was so hated, it is because he told the truth about Liberalism (which he called Marxism) and he told the truth about international bankers. Hitler was the last significant force in the West to oppose Liberalism, and this is why he is so hated. Of course Hitler had many flaws. One was his lack of humanity which allowed him to be a mass murderer, but others were worse. His other major flaw was his racism. But in this he is tied by every Jew who defines a Jew as one who has Jewish mother. So Hitler was no more racist than most Jews are. In many ways Hitler was much like an Orthodox rabbi, struggling to save his race from Liberalism while ignoring the fate of people of other races. I now see the Holocaust as a far greater tragedy than I did before, the biggest tragedy not being those who died, but rather the tragedy being that if Hitler had allied with conservative Jews, he would have won the war and saved Western civilization from the death spiral of Liberalism, and the tragedy is that Hitler's racism prevented this from happening.
Yeah, and the sad part is that most muricans cant see through the bullshit that all the events of 9/11 were.
Building #7 falls into its own footprint, long after the twin towers fell? Bull-fucking-shit.
The Pentagon, with cameras all over the place and all we see is a few seconds of a non-passenger jet hitting it.
United Airlines Flight 93 hits a dirt field in PA and there is almost no indication that an aircraft of that size ever hit
the place since there is so little debris that was found.
I will be putting my flag out upside down on the 11th of September, like I have for a few years now.
Women are not men with a different shape. Women are different from men. They don't think like us at all. We men have more in common with male chimpanzees than we do with women. Women cannot conceive original ideas, aren't capable of independent thought, are not self-aware, and have no sense of fairness. This isn't to say that women can't be good. Women can be good, but in a different way from men. Women are good when they are guided to form the right emotional connections. And this happens when men form a society that causes this to happen. Of course this can't happen in societies where women vote. If you feel a strong compulsion for equality, I suggest you redirect it to other male primates. I would much rather have male chimps vote than women.
The Apartheid analogy is wrong. Both Nazism and Liberalism are designed to exterminate a certain segment of the population. Nazism targeted certain races while Liberalism targets decent and intelligent people. Apartheid simply aims separation. I wish we had Apartheid where decent and intelligent people would be separated and put into our own ghettos. But Liberalism has no interest in separation of any kind. Liberalism is designed for the complete elimination of decent and intelligent people, giving us a pure Idiocracy.
There are some differences between Nazism and Liberalism. Nazism, coming from Germany, was more efficient and aimed for rapid extermination, while Liberal extermination is a slower process. This is why we have no death camps. Also, Nazism was intentional, the Germans being fairly intelligent people, while Liberalism is unintentional, since Liberals are fools. Liberals do not consciously want to eliminate anyone, but they are repulsed by decent people and, through Feminism, they have unintentionally managed to create a system that is highly effective at genetically eliminating decent people. And this is why all of you incels are here.
So the raped person can never be responsible for the rape? They can never be at fault it seems. No matter how much they seem to desire being truly dominated and no matter how much they 'let it happen', they are never the one to blame? You can never say she was 'asking for it'. . . but to be raped, that's the gift of ulitmate control, complete dominance and complete submission.
Jerusalem is dominated by Orthodox Jews with a large Muslim minority. Both of these cultures are patriarchal and anti-feminist. For example, in Jerusalem, there are many sex-segregated buses where men sit in front and women sit in the back. This is enforced by Orthodox Jews who, rightly, believe in segregating the sexes. My family rode on one of these buses and it was very pleasant. How is this enforced? Read how a stupid American bitch was beaten for failing to comply. Go Orthodox Jews!
It would seem justifiable from this understanding that a natural law exists, where women should never make more than men. We cannot encourage a healthy dating environment, or in fact any dating whatsoever if a woman's status is institutionally raised above a man's. I remember my mother telling me when she worked for a Japanese accounting firm that all the males were paid far more than women, because management knew men had to support families, while women just blew their own money on shopping. Sadly businesses like these are a thing of the past. We live in an era that doesn't acknowledge the natural role of hypergamy.
It's for this reason that I think women should be paid less. In reality I'd speculate many women want to be paid less and have a breadwinner take care of them. But women just wanna have their cake and eat it too. They want to be infinitely successful, yet only date men who are more successful than them. If someone was to force lower pay on them and increase their male co-workers pay overnight, I imagine many lonely suitors would suddenly be swarming in attractive signals from their formerly equally paid female co-workers. It's almost as though monetary status can change a man from a "3" to a "7".
[An answer to the question, "what exactly is wrong with being a slut?"]
Well, sluts are bad for men, women, and children. Did I miss anything? Oh yes, sluts destroy civilization.
Sluts are bad for men because they only have sex with the "top" men. Most men have much less sex in a slut culture than in a monogamous culture where every man gets a woman.
In a slut culture, men are trained to behave in whatever way attracts women. Sluts are attracted to jerks, so men are trained to be jerks. So the quality of men declines in a slut culture.
In a slut culture, men constantly hit on women. This causes women to become hostile, rude, and obnoxious. Because men are desperate and will take anything, women lose any motivation to care about their appearance. So sluts become ugly hostile creatures.
As sluts age, they lose their ability to attract the "top" men, but still reject all other men. So they become spinsters. So now, not only are they ugly and hostile, but they are also miserable.
In a slut culture, illegitimacy rates go way up. Children are raised without fathers. This usually makes for a less happy childhood. So children are less happy in a slut culture.
In the book "Sex and Culture", Unwin showed that civilization depends on female chastity and that a civilized culture cannot survive more than three generations of sluts without collapsing. We can see this process before our eyes.
Any more questions?
really sad that womyn got to be this way, it was better a few decades ago... at this point I honestly think a husband needs to be legally allowed to hit his wife once in a while when she misbehaves, it's hard coded in womyn's DNA that a strong man worthy of respect will hit her and severely scold her whenever she tries messing with him, in the end they love their husband a lot more for it... they subconsciously want to be hit and be told to shut up... sad that feminists have screwed this up because it only means that womyn will do all kind of nasty shit that will go completely unchecked and they think they're entitled to it
this is what happens in every third world country, and marriages are really stable there, because the man is the true chief of the family and he is allowed to be a man... this is the un-politically correct truth
That said I would also like to clarify a few things. Yes, I did encourage Alexius to go buy a
gun and kill his crush. Yes, in fact I do admire Cho, The Columbine Duo, George Sodini and any
other individual who has found the courage to do what they did and both deliver a warning to
society and at the same time challenge our collective morality. I will neither retract,
apologize or somehow make my opinion more palatable. I have stood by my comments and I will
continue to do so. If you have a problem with that somehow ruining the forums for you, then
tough shit. I'm the owner and I say what I want whereas at a moments notice I can restrict
your right to do the same.
"Untill i took courses in womens studies, i had never though about things like women being paid less than men for the same jobs, or women being objectified by the media, or how the word guys excludes women. The readings and discussion in classes helped me see these things and start to challenge a lot of ways women are seen and treated"
Fucking kill me know if this is the type of woman thats left to date. If this is the case id rather go gay. Stuff like this makes me want to kill all women and replace them with female type androids complete with realistic vaginas; then we wont have to worry about women turning men into second class citizens as revenge for all the years of percieved "oppression" which is what feminism is; revenge.
Women are not free thinkers.
Women are not creative.
Women do not innovate.
QUICK! (without looking something up) Name 3 famous female inventors.
Too hard? name ONE.
Give up? Yeah,....thats what I fuckin thought.
Women are fucking worthless cunts. Almost everything that was invented was invented by MEN... even fucking tampons!!! Man you women are so fucking worthless. Women are so stupid many companies have had to completely discard advancement tests because NO women would otherwise qualify. Fuck you all, I hate each and every one of you.
As restraint on female sexuality has been removed, wealth inequality has increased. This is a natural outcome of the breakdown of morality caused by lack of restraint on women. As men are forced to compete with each other for sex, the bonds and trust between men in a society are broken and men feel free to screw each other over for their own benefit. It is no accident that the wealth disparity in America began increasing immediately after the sexual revolution and has been steadily increasing since.
You miss the real reason women oppose prostitution. They oppose it because prostitutes are competition. American women are utterly repulsive human beings. The only reason that a man pursues an American women is for sex. American women have nothing else to offer, certainly not their horrible personalities. If prostitution were legal, American women would not be able to find husbands and thereby get alimony and child support. The European system is different. While in America, women are supported by enslaving a husband, in Europe women are supported through taxation and forcing companies to hire incompetent women. Since women can suck men's money via the government in Europe, they don't depend on a husband, so prostitution poses less of a threat. This is why women tolerate prostitution in Europe.
Before I gave up on voting, I voted libertarian. I do not think people should have the right to harm each other. My libertarian solution to enforcing modesty of dress in women would be to only make rape illegal if it is unprovoked based on local community standards. Voting itself isn't really a right as much as a privilege that should be reserved for intelligent men.
[After all, there are a lot studies about the rapist striving for the humiliation of the victim and demonstrating his or her power over the victim.]
This is simply liberal feminist propaganda. Feminist cannot except the truth that rape is quite simply about filling a biological need. Feminists much prefer this myth which is designed to demonize rapists.
It is true that in some instances, men do abuse women and children. But this is the exception, not the rule. I oppose abuse generally and support laws against abuse. But I certainly do not want to give women the power to abuse men by giving them the vote because women have no instinct to restrain their abuse of men.
So why do women despise me?
I have done nothing to any woman. I have ALWAYS treated them with respect.
So why don't I get some back?
[A few posts later in the same thread.]
I'll leave you with this thought;
One day, a loveshy man will not be content with gunning down a few women.
One day, a man will take A THOUSAND of you bitches with him.
Then, maybe the world will sit up and take notice.
Considering the hell men have to go through in the feminised world today where everything is skewed to favour women in all areas of life, but especially in the dating scene, then the new system would have to be one which would quickly and swiftly reverse the damage done to our societies by the incessant terrorism of men by feminism and it's policies propped p by governments and institutions. So I'd propose of system of male choice in the dating game. All I'd recommend is one law and one law only with regards to male-female relationships. No matter what a man says to or asks of a woman, a woman cannot say no. A no from a woman could be reported as easily to the Police as a current day rape, and would also be punishable by a jail sentence.
Call me a misogynist, or call me angry from perceived mistreatment of ordinary men under the hammer of feminism, but it's the only way for society to make up for years of torment and give ordinary men not only the chance to date a woman without the fear of ever hearing a no, but also the chance to date out of their league and the chance to produce better-looking offspring.
A woman saying no to a man under the new system could be classed as equivalent to raping the man. You may think this is misoginist and harsh, but wake up guys, ugly men are going to prison daily in feminised countries for even looking at women, when the women will claim is that she was raped, only in actual fact to only be looked at by the wrong type of guy for her in the wrong way.
The only system that would work is one where the dating minefield would be pushed to the female side of the battleground.
I have often thought of this; and at this point i no longer have any qualms about doing it, except for the legal consequences, assault, and battery, possibly agrivated felony assualt. If there were some way to to that with out geting in trouble and being labled a woman beater i would more than gladly physically hurt any woman who hurt me emotionally or rejected me in a mean way. Becoming a serial killer is better, if you do it right, youll have time to flee the country, and then leave a note saying why you killed all the bitches as you leave to a non extradition nation.Women need to learn that being crul to men will have physical consequences.
Sex changes shouldn't be permitted by a society, and it's the sign that our current society is sick beyond belief. Any surgeon who engages in this should immediately lose his license and serve time, and society should NEVER consider a person to belong to any other gender than the one nature gave her.
If nature has made you a man or a woman, you will stay one. If you transgress this, you've just commited an aberration, and you've become an aberration yourself. You should be treated as such.