It's not about earning respect, it's about having a functional society. Women's mating strategy is at odds with civilization. When sexuality is not controlled you end up in a situation where 20% of the men have access to 80% of the women (This is true in our genetic history as well as modern dating like OKCupid), this leaves a massive problem for those men. They have no reason to invest in a society that doesn't offer them a future stake in it (i.e. kids) so they opt out and productivity is lost, which is instead fueled into hedonism instead (video games and pornography currently, but it used to be riots and revolution). Since civilization is built on the backs of good men doing hard jobs for little to no thanks, making 60% of them have zero investment (who will also be the bottom 60% who do all the vital manual labour like garbage collection) is going to collapse your society.

And then we can get the way women use power VS men use power. Where women want "peace" where as men want "justice" as many psychology studies have shown and reproduced. When you give someone willing to sell their souls for peace, you end up with a society that has no freedom or peace. You end up with the nanny state and the police state, where no man can live free because false incrimination is better than someone being disruptive in that sort of society. You know, like the sort of society we now live in since women are the majority voters and are pushing for those policies.

It's clear that you have no idea about psychology or the human mating strategies and why you have to control both or your society collapses. you're still naive enough to think humans given complete freedom will work towards their own benefit instead of hedonistic pleasure seeking until they consume themselves. I would suggest you look at the obesity statistics and see what complete freedom of food has done to people and their health. Then come back and try and argue your an cap non-sense.