[With apologies to Doubting Thomas, whose responses earned this mishmash of nonsense from Oboehner]

"Then how do you think it got there" The fact you bring it up shows that you have no clue as to what procreating actually is.
"So now you're just ignoring facts. Our embryos do indeed have gill slits." Nope, they do not, that is a fraudulent fallacy debunked years ago when Haeckel's fraudulent embryo drawings were deemed to be a lie. Talk about ignoring the facts.
Even Darwin had to admit his finches reverted back when the need for longer beaks was eliminated. Now you can prove how an adaptation somehow creates more complex organisms - save the speculation.
"atavistic whale legs" are bones that anchor some of the whales organs, they are in no way "left over" legs, that is pure speculative fiction with no proof whatsoever.
You cake falls flat: "We SUGGEST that the ribosome MAY represent one important missing link..." "suggest" "may" speculation based on the religious belief the evolutionism has a grain of truth, it does not.
Feel free to try again.