“The existance of DNA alone is proof of Intelligent Design.”
But science doesn’t DO proof. We do evidence, we build a consensus, we have a working definition… But everything in science COULD be disproved tomorrow. Intelligent Design is not falsifiable.
"DNA is information (instructions) on how to build and operate every part of a CREATure.”
Well, not really. It’s not an instruction that someone (or something) has to interpret. It’s a chemical that drives chemical processes. I mean, you watch any pirate movie, someone has to interpret the information in a treasure map. ‘Twenty Paces Past The Big W.’ So they all search the island for ‘the Big W.’ There’s always at least two groups that can misinterpret the Big W for the Parrot called Wally, or the wreck of the ship named Wanda, or whatever. Until the hero stumbles across four palm trees growing crossways or something.
DNA is more like a Rube Goldberg machine. When the pot boils, the steam turns the wheel, which raises the brake, which releases the train, which pushes the egg, which fries on the pan… No interpretation anywhere, no intentional deviations.
“Information comes only from intelligence.”
Even if i thought that was true, it’s not a definitive trait of DNA.
"Nature doesn't produce information.”
There’s a river in Wyoming. It has 20 million annual layers of silt deposited under it. This information tells me the river has been in operation at that location for at least 20 million years.
