Questioning today’s Holy Bible is just as rebellious as questioning ones gender. God did it right the first time. A man-made makeover brings “confusion” and defaces and mutilates God’s creation. Only pride and perversion would propel men to presume that they could improve upon God’s own handiwork. This book will bring Greek and Hebrew study out of the closet for the first time. Tumbling out come the starving skeletons of the authors of Greek and Hebrew study tools, lexicons and editions, the sordid sources from which new versions, such as the NIV, TNIV, NKJV, ESV, NASB, and HCSB take their corrupt words. These are the very same study ’aids’ which kill a sermon or Bible study when used to ‘define’ a word in the Holy Bible. Lexicon and Bible dictionary authors dug down into the depths of pagan lore, then ransacked the English dictionary to find a match which could burn the Bible word-by-word. The smoke darkens the directing light of the holy scriptures. This book will document that men who want to change and redefine the Holy Bible are likely to want to change anything — even Bible doctrine, their own gender, and their god. For example, Luciferian connections shadow Trench’s New Testament Synonyms and Ginsburg’s TBS Hebrew Masoretic text.
69 comments
In a weird, twisted way, there's a point to be made here. If you're going to live by 2000 year old Middle Eastern standards, at least have the respect to read about them in the original 2000 year old Middle Eastern languages.
What do you mean you don't understand ancient Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic? Are you questioning the Word?
>> Questioning today’s Holy Bible is just as rebellious as questioning ones gender.
I don't question my gender- I know it's female-what I do question is the wisdom of putting a female gendered person in a male body.
>> God did it right the first time.
Oh, Really? So if you need glasses, have a cleft palate, develop diabetes, how DARE you question God's Wisdom by wearing glasses, getting surgery, or taking diabetic meds. You will surely go to Hell for trying to make your life better!!
Some may consider getting a sex change to be a little extreme, but for someone born in the wrong body, it's a lifesaving surgery.
You're cherry picking what you're comfortable with- LASIK is A-OK, but a sex change makes you go EEEWWWW!! Tough Shit- walk a mile in someone else's shoes before you pass summary judgement on someone else- it just might make you a better person.
>> Questioning today’s Holy Bible is just as rebellious as questioning ones gender.
I don't question my gender- I know it's female-what I do question is the wisdom of putting a female gendered person in a male body.
>> God did it right the first time.
Oh, Really? So if you need glasses, have a cleft palate, develop diabetes, how DARE you question God's Wisdom by wearing glasses, getting surgery, or taking diabetic meds. You will surely go to Hell for trying to make your life better!!
Some may consider getting a sex change to be a little extreme, but for someone born in the wrong body, it's a lifesaving surgery.
You're cherry picking what you're comfortable with- LASIK is A-OK, but a sex change makes you go EEEWWWW!! Tough Shit- walk a mile in someone else's shoes before you pass summary judgement on someone else- it just might make you a better person.
Questioning today’s Holy Bible is just as rebellious as questioning ones gender.
So, considering the fact that I don´t think that people who question their gender are rebellious, I assume that questioning todays holy bible also isn´t rebellious.
Oh and as someone already said:
Please learn hebrew, greek and aramaic.
[Fundy Mode]
If god had wanted the bible to be written in english, he would have written it in english first hand.
--> All english translations are the work of Satan, even the KJV
[/Fundy Mode]
;)
Yeah, all those early translations of the Bible in Britain before the KJV standardized edition were hilarious. Like the "Thou shalt commit adultery" bible. Or the "Bugger all this Bible" which contained a rant by a very disgruntled typesetter, "Buggre Alle this for a Larke I amme sick to mye Hart of typefettinge. Master Biltonn if no Gentelmann, and Master Scagges noe more than a tighte fisted Southwarke Knobbefticke."
You know what, since every edition of the Bible EVER was reworked by humans, I don't think you should trust ANY of them.
A man-made makeover brings “confusion” and defaces and mutilates God’s creation.
So I'll take that as a NO for the life-saving triple heart bypass surgery?
And for what it's worth, the Bible is completely a man-made document. Warts and all.
EDIT: Sheesh! I just read the web page this gem was culled from. These idiots actually think studying the Bible documents in their original languages is heresy. It's KJV or nothing.
Fucking retards.
I've never understood why a translation team chosen by that well known fundamentalist organisation the Church of England, and commissioned by a man from a family of crypto-Catholics, should be regarded by fundagelicals as the purveyors of the One True Word.
*theatrical shrug* Goyischer kop, innit.
If your book was so fucking perfect, you wouldn't have to spew this terrible word soup.
If your book was so fucking perfect, a young child could comprehend it all with a single read, and apologists like you would need to find another hobby.
Questioning today’s Holy Bible is just as rebellious as questioning ones gender.
So, is questioning yesterday's holy bible ok? Does that mean we have a different bible now then they did previously? Wouldn't that mean that the bible is not inerrant, as it has changed?
I'm confused.
I intend to devote the rest of my life to finding a situation in which I can use the word 'Masoretic'.
I've always loved words and I've managed to live very nearly fifty years without discovering that one :-) 'Luciferian' is an everyday word in comparison.
All right, turns out Berny was talking about the order page itself, not another part of the larger site. {sigh} I'd love to see the chapters which claim that all available Hebrew and Greek texts are faulty, and the one that proves (well, attempts to prove, at least) the inspired nature of the KJV. Combined together, it sounds a little redolent of choosing a conclusion and testing evidence in its light.
Sadly, I googled 'Dr. Norris Belcher', the author of this tripe:
RingtonesSend "Why Do We Need To Pray?" Ringtone to your CellRingtones
Artist: Dr Norris Belcher
Song: Why Do We Need To Pray?
Album: -
Year: 2004
Genre: Gospel
Duration: 00:52:48
Bitrate: 16000
Frequency: 8000
Downloads: 0
Format: Mp3 file
This mp3 file was found at: fundamentalpreaching.org
The zero downloads is encouraging. Although I'm minded to give it a try, at least I'd have a unique ringtone.
The first visitors arrive at Jesus' tomb on the day of his resurrection.
Matthew 28: 2-5 - An angel comes to greet them.
Which is true until...
Mark 16: 5 - Now, it's a young man.
Of course, that's just fine until...
Luke 24:4 - Because of which, it's two men.
And that is perfectly accurate until we read...
John 20:1-2 - Thanks to which we know that nobody was there.
And God got it right the first time?
@JJonnyTruant - I love that book ;)
Sooo, if Gawd got it right the first time, does it mean that I should quit fighting the crippling OCD that keeps me basically unemployable, because he intended me to be that way?
"Yeah, all those early translations of the Bible in Britain before the KJV standardized edition were hilarious. Like the "Thou shalt commit adultery" bible. Or the "Bugger all this Bible" which contained a rant by a very disgruntled typesetter, "Buggre Alle this for a Larke I amme sick to mye Hart of typefettinge. Master Biltonn if no Gentelmann, and Master Scagges noe more than a tighte fisted Southwarke Knobbefticke."
Are these for real, JonnyTruant? It sounds like a Terry Pratchett reference ^^"
And speaking about printing pranks and buggering... :P
[IMG]http://i82.photobucket.com/albums/j243/neko421/Babble/ghastly20060423.jpg[/IMG]
tl;dr:
I don't have an argument to refute modern bible translations that undercut my narrow, superstitious, misogynistic flavor of Christianity, so now I'm going to smear the authors of those translations.
Why would god make transexualism in the first placE? God gave them that urge. How is that rebellion? Believe me transexual people feel awful and suffer depression, horrible horrible depression.
Didn't your God create both good and evil?
"...the sordid sources from which new versions, such as the NIV, TNIV, NKJV, ESV, NASB, and HCSB take their corrupt words."
Yes, because you should totally base your entire life & belief system around a book written in archaic English. Or does the KJV make it easier to twist meanings of selected passages around to get them to mean what you want them to say?
Let me guess, you prefer to stick to a translation anyway, in an English you understand............well, you don´t understand.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.