#transphobia

Like homophobia, but for transgender people

Show post

ZGuy0fSci #homophobia #transphobia youtube.com

"Human Rights" are just simply Human Rights, ya know like the things Red China are in grevious continuous violations of against? ^_>


There are no such things as "Gay Rights" or "Trans Rights" or other "Etc Rights" Etc, or so there should not be or need there be needs be there for nor of, rather that simply "People are People" just as Love is not Sex and Sex is not Love but rather simply "Love is Love" such without the issue of Sex til after or as a separated matter;


So no. "Shitty People" are not or aren't exclusively those who take issue with the LGBT-1000 going off about offshoot "rights" seeking to segregate people and humans into categories of varying kinds with each being less than equal and having or lacking their own sets of "rights."


But hey. I'm just some "Cyst"Gendered Straight White Guy of varied decents who greatly values Genuine Equality & Meritocratic Fairness over and in opposition against wrongful segregations based upon artificial bullshits.


/)' GLHF's to all and Good Gaming

Show post

Tobias Langdon #transphobia #wingnut #racist #pratt #dunning-kruger unz.com

image

Sex and race are, to the left, mere social constructs, abstract systems of delusion and injustice that can be overturned by human will and social engineering. It follows, then, that leftists will support and celebrate men who reject the social construct of sex and claim to be women. And leftists do support and celebrate such men.

Triumph of the Trannies

It also follows that leftists will support and celebrate Whites who reject the social construct of race and claim to be Blacks. But leftists don’t support and celebrate such Whites. Quite the contrary. While Bruce Jenner, a man claiming to be a woman, is worshipped and rewarded, Rachel Dolezal, a White claiming to be a Black, is ridiculed and punished. Steve Sailer and others have drawn attention to this contradiction, but I don’t think they’ve properly explained it.

Why do leftists cheer when men cross the border between the sexes, but jeer when Whites try to cross the border between the races?

I pose those questions deliberately in that form to draw out the links between the left’s love of transgenderism and the left’s love of open borders. The Jewish libertarian Murray Rothbard (1926–95) described this aspect of leftist ideology very well in this passage of an otherwise long-winded and boring essay:

The egalitarian revolt against biological reality, as significant as it is, is only a subset of a deeper revolt: against the ontological structure of reality itself, against the “very organization of nature”; against the universe as such. At the heart of the egalitarian left is the pathological belief that there is no structure of reality; that all the world is a tabula rasa that can be changed at any moment in any desired direction by the mere exercise of human will — in short, that reality can be instantly transformed by the mere wish or whim of human beings. (Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature, Modern Age, Fall 1973)

Rothbard was right in general about leftism, but failed to explain that highly significant exception: why does the “exercise of human will” allow Bruce Jenner and others to become women, but not allow Rachel Dolezal and others to become Blacks?

Sex and race are both aspects of reality, but the left believes that only one of those aspects “can be instantly transformed by the mere wish or whim of human beings.” Why so? I would explain it by supplementing Rothbard’s explanation. Yes, he’s right when he says the left have a magical belief in the reality-transforming power of “human will,” but he doesn’t discuss what happens when there is a clash of wills.

The high and the low

Let’s look at transgenderism first. Men like Bruce Jenner and Jonathan Yaniv (pictured) have “willed” that men can become women and must enjoy unrestricted access to all female spaces. At the same time, some women — the so-called Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists or TERFs — have “willed” that men can’t become women and must keep out of female spaces. There is a clash of wills that is settled, for the Left, by the status of the opposing sides. In leftist eyes, the men have higher status than the women, which is why the men’s will prevails and the women’s will is rejected. But hold on, you might be thinking: How can the men have higher status than the women in leftist eyes? It’s easy: the transgender men have cleverly aligned themselves not with men in general, who are indeed of lower status than women, but with homosexual men, who are of higher status than women.

Trangendered men are part of the “LBGTQ+ community,” which lifts them above women in the leftist hierarchy. Take Jonathan Yaniv, the perverted and probably Jewish male, who claims to be a woman and has been suing female cosmeticians in Canada for refusing to wax his fully intact male genitals. If Yaniv spoke the truth, he would admit that he is a heterosexual male who seeks perverted sexual pleasure by passing himself off as a woman and receiving Brazilian waxes or entering female toilets to share tampon tips with under-age girls, etc. Obviously, then, Yaniv can’t admit the truth. Heterosexual men are wicked in leftist eyes and are well below women in the leftist hierarchy. Heterosexual men definitely cannot pass themselves off as women in pursuit of perverted sexual thrills.

Actual authentic lesbians

Yaniv and other “trans-women” must therefore align themselves with homosexuals to pass leftist purity-tests. As trans-women they claim to be members of a sexual minority, which triggers the leftist love of minority-worship. Indeed, Yaniv and some others go further than simply claiming to be women: they claim to be actual authentic lesbians. A pinned tweet at Yaniv’s Twitter account states that he is “One proud lesbian. I’ll never give up fighting for human rights equality. #LGBTQoftwitter.” Yaniv isn’t a lesbian, of course. Real lesbians — that is, real women who are sexually attracted to other real women — quite rightly reject fake lesbians like him, so the fake lesbians exploit leftist ideology again and accuse real lesbians of bigotry and hate.

Feminism has the concept of the “glass ceiling,” whereby women are unjustly prevented by sexist men from reaching the highest positions in politics, business and academia. Inspired by this, the fake lesbians have invented the concept of the “cotton ceiling,” whereby men like Yaniv are unjustly prevented by real lesbians from removing the underwear of said lesbians and having sex with them. Here is a trans-lesbian activist lecturing a sceptical TERF (i.e. Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist for those not up on the latest jargon) on the injustices of the cotton ceiling:

Trans women are female. When our female-ness and womanhood is denied, as you keep doing repeatedly, that is transphobic and transmisogynist. As I said earlier, all people’s desires are influenced by an intersection of cultural messages that determine those desires. Cultural messages that code trans women’s bodies as male are transphobic, and those messages influence people’s desires. So cis queer women who are attracted to other queer women may not view trans women as viable sexual partners because they have internalized the message that trans women are somehow male.

The comparison to what cis males say also makes no sense. What trans women are saying is that we are women, and thus should be considered women sexually, and thus be considered viable partners for women who are attracted to women. What cis males are saying is that queer women shouldn’t be exclusively attracted to women, which is completely different. (The Cotton Ceiling? Really?, Femonade blog, 13th March 2012)

It’s not “completely different,” of course. In both cases, people with penises are “saying” (and willing) that real lesbians should have sex with them. In both cases, real lesbians would be encountering the male genitals of real men. But the trans-activist believes in an act of verbal transubstantiation whereby a trans-lesbian possesses a “female penis” that, despite all appearances, is “completely different” to the nasty and objectionable penis of a “cis male.”

Aspects of religious psychology

I use the term “transubstantiation” deliberately. It’s a term from Catholic theology that refers to the supernatural process whereby wafers and wine transform into the flesh and blood of Christ during the celebration of Holy Eucharist by a priest. No physical or scientific test can detect this transformation, and to all appearances the wafers and wine remain unchanged. But traditionalist Catholics will insist that the wafers and wine are now truly Christ’s flesh and blood. If you disagree, you’re probably safe nowadays, but you wouldn’t have been in the past. It was very unwise to openly deny, let alone ridicule, transubstantiation in Catholic nations during the Middle Ages. And disagreements over the concept were central to the murderous hatreds of the Reformation. Those who believed in transubstantiation got very angry when it was denied.

This anger, which is part of the odium theologicum, is an important aspect of religious psychology, whether overt or covert — leftism can in fact be explained as a mutation of Christianity and Judaism. Overt and covert religions gain power by demanding belief in things that defy everyday reality, because such belief is difficult and requires a greater emotional investment. When we invest more in a belief, we have more incentive to protect it more strongly. And it is precisely because concepts like transubstantiation and the “female penis” are absurd that they are powerful. When we have an emotional investment in something we can’t prove, we react strongly when it is denied or ridiculed. That applies even more when we ourselves are subconsciously aware or afraid that our beliefs are baseless or false. Crushing external heresies can be a way of stilling internal doubts.

The “female penis” vs the “unisex brain”

And so religion and other forms of ideology can gain power by their contradictions and absurdities. However, in the clash between transgenderism and feminism, both sides believe in absurdities: the trannies insist on the concept of the female penis, just as the feminists insist on the concept of the “unisex brain,” namely, that there is no genuine difference between male and female brains. These two concepts are both biologically absurd: there is no such thing as a female penis, but there is such a thing as a female brain. However, if transgenderism and feminism are both powered by absurdities, why have trannies been winning the battle over the TERFs? Well, it’s partly because the trannies have the bigger, and therefore better, absurdities. For example, the “female penis” is an obvious absurdity, the “unisex brain” is much less so. Penises are out in the open, after all, whereas brains are hidden behind the skull.

And there is a continuum between a typically male brain and a typically female brain that doesn’t exist between male genitals and female genitals in the vast majority of cases. The psychological differences between men and women are a question of averages and tendencies, but the physical differences are generally stark and obvious (inter-sex individuals are rare). A certain group of trannies also have the stronger male will-to-power and love of battle, which is another reason they are winning the battle with lesbians. All this explains why the left supports and celebrates trannies as they cross the border between male and female. As a sexual minority, they have higher status than ordinary women. As a novel and exhibitionist sexual minority, they also have higher status than lesbians, who also have less will-to-power.

Better than Black

Indeed, as I pointed out in “Power to the Perverts!,” transgenderism has allowed some White heterosexual men to leap above the Black-Jewish lesbian feminist Linda Bellos in the leftist hierarchy. The White men are “transgender” and Bellos, although Black, is a TERF. In current leftism, transgender trumps TERF. Leftists therefore support the border-abolishing White men and not the border-erecting Black woman.

However, leftists would instantly support Bellos if those White men were claiming to be Black rather than female. Leftists want the border between male and female abolished, but not the border between Black and White. Why so? Again I would argue that higher and lower status settle the clash of wills. Rachel Dolezal “willed” that she was Black, while Blacks “willed” that she wasn’t. Dolezal was trying to abolish a border, Blacks were trying to maintain one, so a naïve reading of leftism would say that leftists should support “trans-racialists” like Dolezal just as they support transgenderists like Bruce Jenner. But leftists didn’t support Dolezal, and Blacks easily won the battle of wills. The border between Black and White stayed up, and Dolezal was ridiculed and punished, despite being more convincing as a Black than most transgenderists ever are as women.

{Submitter’s note: Langdon rants on and on… see the source link if you’re really interested about the rest of it}

Show post

yourclairygodmother #transphobia #homophobia #sexist deviantart.com

Know what's cute? Nitpicky and rude SJWs who think I care about their petty insults about comments I made months! I don't know if I should even bother with a video on these pathetic souls. Like I said: a lion doesn't concern herself with the opinions of sheep. Call me a transphobic, homophobic, sexists whatever; it doesn't matter because I know and my friends know that I am none of those things. You SJW hacks can't even be bothered to get to know the real me. (Mainly because you lack basic social skills.) It's sad that you think lies taken out of context are somehow going to ruin my life.

Show post

tehgymcel420 #transphobia incels.co

[It's Over] Do people really expect us to fuck trannies?

I often walk around without my glasses because they make me look even uglier, so I can't always see things properly from a distance. One day on campus I saw what I thought was a really ugly female, but upon closer inspection it was a really ugly male pretending to be a female, it was gross. Are we really expected to fuck those things in western society? There's none of that degeneracy in my desert shithole.

Show post

yourclairygodmother #homophobia #transphobia #racist deviantart.com

A kid shouldn't be encouraged to see a movie because a certain ethnic group or whatever is in it! That's what SJWs do! If the minority was changed, the kids wouldn't be interested at all. Because it's SHALLOW! You want to make a movie with a gay or brown or trans lead? FINE! If it's important to the story or just how they are, FINE! But changing a character's skin tone for the sake of "inclusion", therefor erasing all the cultural significance and historical importance, is really disrespectful. Appearances shouldn't be a motivation. It DOESN'T "work", as you put it. They only fall in love with a character's looks, because you're saying that's all that matters to a child. That's treating kids like IDIOTS! Because, news flash lady, no kid gives a crap about these dumb race-baiting gender politics!

You want to have a black mermaid? Fine! But not ARIEL! Not The Little Mermaid, which has a specific ethnicity and specific time period and location. Changing the white mermaid to black would harm the story and suck you out of the fantasy, because it reminds you what your watching is fictional and inaccurate and then it doesn't invest you anymore, making you not enjoy the movie as much. Now, character design and appeal is important, but there's a difference between appealing designs and blatantly awful redesigns that aren't artistically motivated, but RACIALLY and POLITICALLY motivated. THIS mermaid, is the latter.

Show post

Chad Greene #transphobia thefederalist.com

Trans people are dying!” chanted a group of transgender protesters interrupting Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg during one of many CNN discussions on LGBT issues. Beto O’Rouke and Don Lemon were greeted by a passionate trans activist named Blossom Brown, who shouted, “Black trans woman are being killed in this country, and you have erased trans women for the last time.”
Kamala Harris responded compassionately to an audience member who interrupted her forum by shouting, “How do we get those men to stop killing us? How do we get those men to stop killing trans women of color? We are hunted. Systematically hunted. How can they do that?”

In response to these accusations, Buttigieg calmly assured the audience, “I would like to believe everyone here is committed to ending that epidemic.” Harris responded to the question of how she would address violence against transgender people by saying, “There has to be serious consequence and accountability when it happens.”
Sen. Cory Booker took the issue a step further when addressing more widespread accusations of anti-LGBT violence, referring to it as a national emergency and saying, “We live in a country where we still see regular, everyday violence and intimidation and bullying against Americans because of who they are.” He proposed an “Office of Hate Crimes and White Supremacy” to handle the issue.
The media alarm bells have been resonating on this topic for quite a while, and as each year passes, the ritual listing of transgender murder victims has become a staple of LGBT reporting. In fact, it is impossible to find any article detailing a particular murder without a paragraph or two devoted to discussing the “epidemic” of violence against transgender males dressing as females, specifically of color. It is clearly embedded in our collective consciousness despite the right’s efforts to shed light onto the issue with far more accurate and rational reporting.
Does the Data Show an ‘Epidemic’ of Hate?
I have spent much writing discussing how these stories are exploited and manipulated to create an impression of violence and hatred that rarely reflects reality. As such, I have become familiar with nearly all of the cases so often repeated, but I realized it was time to collect them together and analyze them as a whole.

The Human Rights Campaign has organized this information in packets starting in 2015 through the present. Using these resources, I independently researched each case to the best of my ability with the available information. The HRC reports can be found here: 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019.
In the HRC’s 2019 ongoing information page, the organization made this important statement:
Some of these cases involve clear anti-transgender bias. In others, the victim’s transgender status may have put them at risk in other ways, such as forcing them into unemployment, poverty, homelessness and/or survival sex work.
After years of simply declaring “hate” to be the core motivation, this comes as a refreshing admission of the realities surrounding these murders. However, the LGBT left’s bias toward victimhood still pushes them to place blame where no feasible solution could be found to resolve it.
……..

We Need Honesty About Crimes Against Trans People
Although LGBT advocates and media insist these cases do not represent a true picture of violence, as often the victim is identified as a different sex by the police until family or friends correct reports, we still have no evidence of a pattern or “epidemic” of violence. It is certainly false that trans women are being “systematically hunted” or that black trans women are specifically targeted.
What we do know from all available resources is that the violence these individuals experience occurs to a very broad range of people with diverse backgrounds and identities. It is clearly more an issue of high-risk environments than identity-based discrimination.
Another important element to recognize is that regardless of gender identity, local, state, and federal authorities take each case very seriously, and more than half of reported crimes have resolved in sentencing. No one is looking the other way or tolerating this violence, and certainly not because the victims are transgender.
The truth is there is very little our government or society could do to reduce these incidents. They result from cultural influences, dangerous environments, and high-risk engagements. The most powerful effects the left, LGBT advocacy and media, and Democratic leaders could have in protecting transgender people would be to tell the truth about prostitution, drugs, risky sex practices, and domestic violence. Continuing the narrative of fighting hatred and bigotry will do nothing more than win popularity points; it won’t save lives.

Show post

Guillaume Durocher #sexist #transphobia #racist #homophobia europereloaded.com

Any rational and fact-based discussion about gender equality and the right roles for the sexes is impossible in our society.

It is impossible because we cannot even bring ourselves to recognize the reality of biological sex – hence the increasingly-widespread insanity of allowing male-to-female transsexuals participate in, and thereby dominate, women’s sports. In the face of such insanity, all our ancestral wisdom and modern science – not to mention my own scribblings – are quite useless: there’s no helping people who are too dishonest or cowardly to see what is in front of their own nose.

However, for the sake of our young white boys – who are already being scapegoated for the inevitable failures to achieve equality and who need to take up their place in society as proud and confident men – I will provide a brief account of sex differences and what gender relations might look like in a healthy society.

Biological sex differences beyond the mere reproductive apparatus, known as sexual dimorphism, is the norm in much the Animal Kingdom. This reflects the differing evolutionary strategies of males and females. Almost every difference imaginable is possible, according to that particular species’ differing evolutionary strategies for males and females. Typically, while females carry and (where applicable) nurture offspring by default, males are more competitive and have to prove themselves in some way to get the female’s approval; whether this means rams battering their horns against one another or birds preparing elegant nests or showing off their spectacular plumage. (On which see David Attenborough’s innumerable nature documentaries, which typically boil down to animals struggling to get food, not get eaten, and find a mate.)

Sexual dimorphism can be non-existent or extreme. In the case of the deep sea angler fish, the small male bites in the female and gradually fuses with her, until all that remains is a pair of gonads attached to the female’s body. So far, there is no angler fish “masculinist movement” arguing for the interchangeability and equal rights of male and female angler fish.

The differences between men and women are certainly not as severe as among male and female angler fish, but they are not negligible. To be brief: men are competitive and achieve their highest reproductive potential through conquest, while women are consensual and achieve their highest reproductive potential through nurturing. A successful man might have dozens or even hundreds of children, a biological impossibility even for the most successful woman. Men’s evolutionary strategy is high-risk, high-reward. Women’s is low-risk, low-reward.

A successful man would be engaged in collective struggles with other men to seize resources, to build, to discover, while a successful woman would secure resources from her man! And Nature has equipped women with all the psychological traits and emotional skills to do so. A man is attracted to a healthy, beautiful woman. A woman is attracted to a socially successful, prestigious man with money, one who is at once a provider and a bad-boy (she is very torn on this), so as to provide for her and protect her. Hence, the media have breathlessly reported that the economic decline of men is a tragedy . . . for women’s marriage prospects!

In the prehistoric tribe, a successful man would have spent much time physically exerting himself, hunting animals or warring against other men, as part of a coalition of men. Women would have spent much of their adult life incapacitated in the home, pregnant or caring for small children. The psychological traits appropriate for these two modes of life are of course vastly different.

If you ever engage in any kind of physically difficult group endeavor – say you move to a different home with all your furniture – you will typically find that men and women revert to their traditional roles. The men will be literally doing the heavy lifting and building the furniture, while the women will be cleaning, cooking, and providing moral support (the value of which should not be underestimated).

Women also seem to be natural enforcers of social values. While men have historically controlled the priesthoods and the media, it is women who nag their menfolk to live up to the society’s established social norms and be respectable. (No doubt part of the reason why homosexuals have become so prominent in the far-Right since the latter has become heretical.) It is said that Spartan women would murder their own sons if these ever fled battle, and that it was Byzantine women who murdered the soldiers who had been ordered to destroy Christian icons. Across Europe today you will find that old women are virtually the only ones left going to the villages churches.

As we have become comfortable, so our societies and culture have become feminized and infantilized. Today, it seems that women project their mothering instincts upon all the approved “victim groups” of the world: homosexuals, migrants, and minorities all are their symbolic substitute children. Any measures which do not treat these groups as “equals” with heterosexual child-rearing European families – even if salutary for the common good – are then considered mere vicious “bullying.” In the United States, White Democratic women have driven most of the shift towards the demand there be equal racial outcomes, even if discrimination is required.

In my view, following Aristotle and Darwin, human ethics must be founded upon human nature. Humans are social and potentially rational beings, who exist through the creation of successive generations, passing on hereditary characteristics. To the extent that men and women differ biologically, this may imply that, ethically, there should be different social roles for them, in order to foster maximal individual and collective human flourishing.

The most obvious of these is military service. Men being physically much more powerful than women, societies have always discriminated against men by requiring them to serve in the military, while women stayed safe at home. (Hollywood has not yet attempted to show how strong, independent black women were central to the success of the D-Day landings, but there is still time.) The social expectation that women stay at home to take care of children is exactly analogous to this. An optimally-organized species will have sexually specialized roles, to some extent, for the benefit of the species.

The Spartans, the Aztecs, and Mussolini were all in agreement: childbirth – probably the most intense experience a typical postmodern may live today – is to women what war is to men. And so, it probably is not a coincidence that male authority has wholly collapsed at the same as peace has triumphed in our lands.

Even a couple of generations ago, every day our grandfathers had to show daily heroism: working in the fields, in mines, on fishing boats, or in the military, come rain or snow. By this effort, they secured their families’ livelihood and their own paternal authority, not to mention their own native toughness.

Show post

One Million Moms #homophobia #transphobia onemillionmoms.com

Kellogg’s has supported the homosexual community for a long time, and now it is obvious they are going after our children. As part of an effort to say "we're all in this together," Kellogg's has combined several of its popular cereals into one package to support an LGBTQ "anti-bullying" campaign called Spirit Day.

Kellogg’s calls it All Together Cereal, an exclusive, limited-time offer in which the cereal brand’s famous mascots are promoting their individual cereals packaged together in a purple box with rainbow colors.

[...]

Kellogg’s goal is to normalize the LGBTQ lifestyle by using cereal mascots to brainwash children. The company is also donating $50,000 to GLAAD to support its anti-bullying and LGBTQ advocacy work.

TAKE ACTION

Kellogg’s needs to hear from you. Supporting the homosexual agenda versus remaining neutral in the cultural war is just bad business. If Christians cannot find corporate neutrality with Kellogg’s, then they will vote with their pocketbook and support companies that are neutral. Sign our petition to Kellogg’s now!

Show post

Brian Matthews #fundie #transphobia #wingnut christiannews.net

Brian Matthews: It's sad that you are so delusional to think cutting the genitals off a little boy is a good thing.

And NO, you don't understand me at all. I have reached out to you several times trying to get you to understand, but you have ignored it all.

"Accept your biological gender, and get over it."

Those are your words, not mine. Mine were far more gracious, and beautiful, but you hate truth.

What one DOES have to ACCEPT is the truth. Rejecting truth keeps you from seeing greater truth. One who continually denies reality becomes more, and more delusional, until they can no longer see reality.

You say it doesn't work that way? You'd be surprised. Christ said the truth will set you free, but you'd rather go with what you feel rather than what you know.

Besides, I've shared the gospel with you. No one said you have to clean yourself up BEFORE you come to Christ. Christ will clean you up. That's what salvation is. That's what redemption is. That's what the GOOD NEWS is.

If I had to get my act together before I came to Christ, why would I need Him? Why would the Gospel be good news?

What you do have to do is admit the truth. Admit that God is right, and you are wrong. That you have a problem, and Christ is the solution, and that you sincerely want the solution. As long as you continue to justify, and defend sin, you will never be justified by God.

SFBruce: I thought I made myself clear about this, but apparently that's not the case. I can't tell you how much I don't want spiritual advice from you. The fact the you seem to think you know exactly what I need is both insulting and presumptious. We had this exchange before.

There really are people in the world who have the sense that their own sense of their gender doesn't match their physicality. From what I've read, psychotherapy alone, intended to resolve that conflict, just doesn't work. In the interest of looking to knowledge over feelings, consider reading some of the scientific material about the subject. When you inaccurately accuse me of thinking "cutting the genitals off a little boy is a good thing," you show how shallow your understanding of the issue is. Other reports of this case indicate Luna's mother has chosen not to do puberty blockers at this point, and there are many protocols that would be followed before the kind of surgery you mention would be entertained.

Brian Matthews: You are sick and twisted, and I'll not waste any more of my time on you.

You're a monster. God will deal with you.

Blocked

Canis Vulpes: This is what you do, block people when you can't take it anymore??? Why are you even here?

Brian Matthews: I'm fed up with you wicked, insane people. You can't be reasoned with, and you hate the truth.

You're arrogant, selfish, and self centered, thinking the whole world, and everyone in it has to change to suit your sick delusions. Instead of working on changing your wrong feelings to correspond with reality, you work feverishly to change reality to correspond with your wrong feelings.

Oh, but your feelings can't be wrong......but mine can. You can't change......but the rest of us must.

You are also self righteous. You're a bunch of virtue signalers. You do the easy thing by going along with the crowd. It takes no courage. It's popular. It's the path of least resistance. Yet, somehow, you're a hero.

No, what you really are is a doomed hypocrite, and I'm done interacting with you people. My blood pressure can't take it.

And, I'm on here as a witness to truth, and to speak out against evil. You haven't silenced me, not by a long shot. All you've done is silenced yourself as far as I'm concerned. I will still keep talking. I'm just done listening to you reprobates. I don't need to hear you constantly try to justify evil. That's certainly not why I'm here.

Blocked

Show post

yourclairygodmother #homophobia #transphobia deviantart.com

First off, only an SJW or someone of the like would use "cishet". Red flag right there. Now tell me, how can a gay person be homophobic? Homophobic to my understand is the fear of homosexuals. If I was homophobic, why would I be the very thing I fear?

I have trans friends myself and I have told them "You can't change your sex", but I have supported them by giving them things like shaving products and other gifts to help them feel accepted and comfortable. Because being trans isn't something they can help, it's a skin-crawling experience being trans, and I know that. So I do my best to make them feel like the person they wish to be, but even I won't hesitate to tell them basic biology and facts.

Show post

Guillaume Durocher #conspiracy #sexist #transphobia #racist europereloaded.com

The speed of social change in the modern era, and in particular in the contemporary West, is so rapid that we all are liable to feel a bit lost.

A recent example of this was provided by none other than Hillary Clinton, that most “progressive” representative of global oligarchy. You see, the 71-year-old Clinton, whose presidential campaign was premised on making history as the first female presidency, still believes in biological sex:

In an interview with The Sunday Times, journalist Decca Aitkenhead asked the Clintons if someone with a beard and a penis can ever be a woman, to which Chelsea replied emphatically, ‘Yes.’


However, as Aitkenhead describes it, Hillary looked ‘uneasy’, and blamed generational gaps for being less accepting.

‘Errr. I’m just learning about this,’ Hillary responded. ‘It’s a very big generational discussion, because this is not something I grew up with or ever saw. It’s going to take a lot more time and effort to understand what it means to be defining yourself differently.’

Hillary’s squirming on the topic caused visible glee in the foul-mouthed comic artists at The Daily Stormer. Meanwhile her daughter Chelsea also believes that men claiming to be women have a human right to play in women’s sports.

There’s something truly surreal about these kinds of developments. One wonders where to start.

This sort of insanity has been a long time coming. The truth is that Western civilization has been steadily feminizing for at least the last two centuries. The decline of men has become a topic of conversation on the outer edges of the mainstream media. Men’s decline has been at once biological, economic, social, and moral.

Witness the testosterone levels:

image

Source: “Generational decline in testosterone levels observed,” [b][i]Endocrine Today[/i][/b], February 2007
Sperm count:

image

Income:

image

In Western Europe, the decline of men has been systematized through the use of quotas in favor of women. In June 2000, France voted a law requiring political parties to have 50% female candidates. Today, the European Commission has a stated objective of having at least 40% female managers, an objective that can only be reached by systematically discriminating against men in promotions. The EU wants to impose a similar legal quota for publicly-traded European companies, to have 40% women on all corporate boards. This would also apply to fields, such as tech and sciences, where there are few female applicants to begin with.

At the risk of discouraging people, and I think we should always be realistic, I believe the decline of men has not bottomed out yet. In Western Europe certainly, the process of evicting excess “white males above 50” – a common phrase in France – has not been completed. While there are certain protections in the United States, I suspect that “woke capital” and pious H.R. departments will become more aggressive in discriminating against men, in the name of equal outcomes between the genders, itself tendentiously equated with equal opportunities.

image

The predominance of women is not without consequence for liberty and excellence. A 2015 Pew poll found that women were almost 50% more likely to support government censorship of “statements that are offensive to minority groups” than were men. Women, particularly left-wing women, are more politically intolerant: one survey found that 30% of Democratic women had blocked, unfriended or stopped following someone online for their politics, as against only 8% of Republican men. The London Times reported in May 2016 that female students overwhelmingly supported censorship of university publications if these were “considered offensive to certain groups.”

Naturally, any number of truthful statements may be painful or “considered offensive to certain groups.” Most pointedly, any suggestion that men and women have meaningful biological and psychological differences, and therefore to some degree should have different social roles, will be considered “offensive.”

This highlights the self-reinforcing nature of Western societies’ feminization.

Show post

Admin #transphobia #kinkshaming feministwiki.org

Transgender ideology

Transgender ideology is a loose catch-all term referring to philosophies, world views, and dogmatic statements adhered to by political activists who see themselves as trying to uphold the human rights of transgender people. The political movement of furthering these ideologies is called the transgender movement. Feminists tend to use these terms critically when pointing out sexist, homophobic, or otherwise problematic aspects of the movement. Those who support the transgender movement tend to oppose the term transgender ideology, likening it to phrases such as homosexual agenda which is used to ascribe a sinister intent to gay/lesbian/bisexual rights activists.

The practice of supporting transgender ideology is called transgender activism (often shortened trans activism) and a person who follows this practice is called a transgender activist (often shortened trans activist). The word "transgender" in the phrase "transgender activist" is not to be understood as an adjective for the person in question (i.e. "an activist who happens to be transgender") but as a reference to the activism they practice (i.e. "an activist supporting transgender ideology"). Many trans activists are not transgender themselves.

The term trans rights activist (shortened TRA) is sometimes used for its similarity to men's rights activist (shortened MRA). Just like so-called MRAs claim to support men's human rights but end up blaming everything on women and opposing feminism, TRAs claim to support transgender human rights but end up blaming everything on women and opposing feminism.

Aspects

Trans women are women

One of the core dogmata of the transgender movement is the statement that trans women are women (and the less often repeated trans men are men). Under this view it's important to write trans woman as two words (adjective and noun) and not transwoman, to stress the fact that so-called trans women are literally a subtype of women, just like white women, black women, short women, tall women, and so on. The statement "trans women are women" is not meant as a vague slogan of moral support, but in a literal sense.
Since the statement contradicts the dictionary definition of the word "woman" (adult human female), it implies that a different definition would be better. When asked about this, transgender activists usually avoid providing an actual definition. Most attempts tend to revolve around a circular definition, such as "anyone who identifies as a woman, is a woman." As such, the statement "trans women are women" is probably best described as a dogma.
The idea that transwomen are literally women is taken as the basis for many problematic conclusions, such as: transwomen deserve to partake in women's sports, transwomen should be seen as part of the natural dating pool of lesbians (see also cotton ceiling), transwomen deserve to use all female facilities, enter female-only spaces and events, speak on women's rights as women, and so on.

Gender identity

The idea that "trans women are women" is usually backed by a belief in an essential, inborn, and immutable "gender identity" that every person supposedly possesses.[6] Transwomen are said to be real women on the grounds that they possess a "female gender identity" which they are said to share with women. Likewise for transmen and a "male gender identity" that is supposedly shared by all men.
Just like transgender activists refuse to provide an objective definition of womanhood, they tend to refuse defining gender identity on any objective terms. Usually, when explaining how a person has discovered their gender identity, one hears references to sexist stereotypes ascribed to womanhood and manhood. When confronted directly however, transgender activists refuse the notion that gender identity is based entirely on those stereotypes. Since no objective measure exists at all, they are effectively forced to accept the claims of anyone and everyone regarding what their gender identity is. Thus we see transwomen with full beards and intact male anatomy, who are said to be literally real women like any other.
Transgender children
Since gender identity is said to be inborn, it follows that some children would be transgender, and only need to find this out. Once it's found out, the only way forward is to support the child in its transgender identification. This leads to the transgender activist "affirm-only" approach towards youth, where for instance a boy who says "I wish I was a girl" or "I'm actually a girl" is from that point on treated as if the child is literally a girl. (Given a female name, referred to by female pronouns, asked to be considered a girl by others, and so on.) Likewise for girls who express that they wish they were a boy, or claim that they are internally a boy. Trans activists are opposed to the alternative "watchful waiting" approach.
The trans activist affirm-only approach has been supported by the American Academy of Pediatrics.[7] Parents concerned over this model of treatment published a long criticism and launched a petition reaching 1,200 signatures.[8] Psychologist James Cantor also published a fact-check article criticizing the AAP's decision.
Trans activists usually support giving puberty blocking medication such as Lupron to children who think they are transgender.[7] These children may be as young as 10 years old.

Cisgender people oppress transgender people

Another core tenet of transgender ideology is the notion that cisgender people oppress transgender people, just like how men oppress women, white Americans oppress black Americans, or how straight people oppress gay men and lesbian women.[11][12] As such, when a man identifies as a transwoman, his position relative to that of a woman turns from being her oppressor to someone who is oppressed by her. His male privilege is denied as he is now considered a woman, and the fact that he is a transgender woman means that he is oppressed by so-called cisgender women. Further, being both a woman and transgender means he is considered to suffer under two axes of oppression, akin to how black women suffer both from racism and sexism. This way, a white man suddenly becomes comparable to a black woman with regards to oppressive power dynamics in society.
As per the principle of intersectionality (appropriated from black feminism), transgender activists often say that the feminist movement should not only include transwomen's concerns, but outright center them in many discussions, as otherwise the feminist movement might fail to sufficiently address their concerns.

Collusion with "sex work" activism

For reasons not entirely clear, many if not most transgender activists also seem to support the "sex work" movement.[13] Possible explanations for this collusion might be:
* Both movements stem from queer ideology, which is based on transgression of social norms without regard to ethical concerns
* The transgender movement being dominated by autogynephilic men who are interested in upholding a society in which women exist for male sexual pleasure
* Anti-feminists supporting both the transgender movement and the "sex work" movement, simply because they see both of them as weapons against women's liberation

Show post

Steven R. #fundie #wingnut #homophobia #transphobia simplychristian.fandom.com

Sermon 15: Voting the Bible

By Bro. Steven R.

“Take you wise men, and understanding, and known among your tribes, and I will make them rulers over you.”-Deuteronomy 1:13

In Canada, they just had an election where they essentially re-elected wacky socialist and racist Justin Trudeau. Trudeau did lose some seats to the “conservative” party but just like most Republicans most Canadian “conservatives” are pro-abortion and pro-sodomite “marriage.”

Canada’s got this weird sodomite predator named Jonathan “Jessica” Yaniv. Yaniv is an effeminate sodomite who wanted a local business to have a female employee wax his testicles. Closet sodomite Trudeau supports this nonsense. Even effeminate sodomite Blair White got in a spat with Yaniv over this. Yaniv is even more ridiculous than Charles Clymer who decides to call himself “Charlotte” and wear gaudy makeup like Ronald McDonald to earn “woke” points with leftists.

Here in the US, we have an election coming up in 2020 and the Republicans have a sick and demented incumbent president guilty of adultery, child abuse deceit, collusion with a hostile power, cocaine and Adderall and Sudafed abuse, as well as supporting sodomy and pornography and gambling as well as cannabis. The Democratic Party will nominate someone even more liberal who will promote socialized medicine, “non-binary” IDs, tuition free college, a stipend for doing nothing but sitting on your rear end, as well as promoting polygamy and bestiality.

Look, finding a biblically right candidate will be difficult, but it’s possible. There are still a few good Republicans who aren’t sellouts to the liberal RINO agenda promoted by Wicked Donny out there, who actually value life and religious liberty. We don’t need compromises like Ted Cruz or Gregg Abbott (a papist) in Texas. Sure they’re not insane looks like Gavin “free healthcare and orgies for illegal aliens” Newsom, but no compromise isn’t acceptable. The Constitution Party is full of solid biblically sound conservatives. Look at some independent candidates in your area as well! Live your faith and exercise your right to vote even if things seem bleak right now! We can save ourselves from liberal moral decadence, but we need a a revival!

Show post

Sensirr #transphobia reddit.com

If Gender Clinics actually followed TRA rhetoric in treating 'gender dysphoria'...
...this is how it would go!

APPOINTMENT:

Patient: Hello, I'm here because I'm dysphoric.

Doctor: Well, what are you dysphoric about?

Patient: Well, I'm a male--

Doctor: AMAB you mean. Go on.

Patient: -- y-yes, but I'm a woman inside --

Doctor: And outside. Transwomen are women.

Patient: -- o-of course! But basically I need tits to feel my true self.

Doctor: ...Why? Transwomen are women.

Patient: Yeahhh, but women have tits and I don't, so I'm dysphor--

Doctor: Women don't need to have tits to be women.

Patient: O-Okay true, but what about my dick? I at least want SRS--

Doctor: Women can have dicks. Also, men can get pregnant. Why are you dysphoric? It sounds like you don't understand what men and women are.

Patient: Well, true that women can have penises and men can have vaginas, but--

Doctor: Indeed, it is true. So your dysphoria is baseless. Now get out of my office.

Show post

vampyreking666 #transphobia reddit.com

For these guys, being a woman is basically living a porno fantasy. They need to not only be average women but become porn star quality women and are often sad and angry when they can't become that. To them, even passing as a normal every day woman is not enough. They wanna be hot and sexy because they believe women live on some kind of "easy mode" where the world bends over for women and pleases them no matter what.

And then these guys get encouraged by fellows in the same boat, all to increase delusion by accepting it in others. They all just wanna be porno sluts and sadly, they think women are one dimensional things - to them, everything women do is related to sex. Wouldn't put it past them to fetishize being an escort. Prostitution is an ugly business at times and very dangerous, yet some might fetishize it. Jack the Ripper killing them sold separately, though maybe some of them would enjoy that. Because to these guys, a woman is nothing but a living sexual thing. Doesn't have hopes, dreams, or thoughts, other than "Oh my god, need big black cock!". So they fetishize half the population and often marry it to some casual racist assumptions.

Women may love to wear a dress, but it making their pee pee hard isn't part of it. I mean she might feel beautiful in it and sexy but these guys probably start jizzing in their pants at the sight of themselves in lipstick and heels. And that's the problem. They're not really women just guys who love women so much, can't get one to date them, and want to become the thing they desire. So that way they don't need to consider another's feelings - for them, "they are the porn."

Show post

u/gemini1097 #transphobia #conspiracy reddit.com

I have always wondered how the trans movement had such a massive support within institutions like ministries and NGOs or the media. It really came out of nowhere in a decade.

I fear that the trans movement is actually just the spearhead of something much bigger and that actually does align with a lot of today's global elites ideology: transhumanism (see Get Out for an idea of where such ideology can lead to).

I think that the goal for these people is that if they can make the general population accept that a male can be a female just because he wants to, then whatever body enhancement and modification that technology will be able to provide would be completely ok: "If he can get a uterus implanted and a fake vagina because he feels like he is a woman, then there is no problem for my old body to get a fresh pair of lungs and legs." Cue the commodification of the body on an even bigger scale.

I feel like the acceptance of this charade that sex is not something that we are naturally born with but something that we can change at will is just the first step of something even more sinister. Any thoughts on that?

Show post

Billy D #homophobia #transphobia #wingnut oneangrygamer.net

Matt Makes Games’ Celeste was always suspected of being a game themed around Left-wing propaganda, but there was never any definitive proof. Well, the latest expansion makes it clear exactly what kind of politics the game’s developers are trying to promote, and it casts all doubts aside.

In the latest DLC update for Celeste there’s a short picture sequence that shows the main protagonist, Madeleine, at her computer. In the corner just behind the keyboard there are two flags, a gay pride flag and a trans pride flag. Keep in mind that this is a game for kids and it’s rated ‘E’ for Everyone by the ESRB.

This comes shortly after The Coalition added 19 Pride flags to [I]Gears 5[/I], which also removed all doubt about the agenda that the developers were trying to push.

The Social Justice arm of Twitter were quick to point out the presence of the flags, as noted in a tweet from September 10th, 2019, which claimed that the main character – who is a child, by the way – may be trans and/or gay.

A more thoroughly detailed image was highlighted by Twitter user sylvi, who circled the flags in the image and then followed up with a high resolution post from Lynn, showcasing exactly what you feared the flags would be: gay pride and trans pride flags.

If you’re unable to view the images, you can see an enlarged version of the image below.

image

What did I tell you all before? Celeste was a gateway that leads you down a road toward the destruction of Western civilization.

Then again, this should have been pretty obvious to anyone who was paying close attention to Matt Makes Games over the years, from banning discussion about their inclusion of Anita Sarkeesian in the game Towerfall, to their appearance at the 2018 Game Awards. The signs were always present.

So parents beware: you think your kid is playing a twitch-reflex platformer, but in reality they’re playing Communist Brainwashing Simulator 6.9. They’ll go into their bedroom saying their prayers and taking their vitamins before booting up Celeste, but after playing the game they’ll come out of their room vaping with a Che Guevara shirt on and tweeting #ImWithHer on their Failpad 7.

Just remember that it starts with pixels, but it ends with two soft nuts in a petri dish.

Show post

BenLewisWaddington #transphobia reddit.com

Ah yes, QueersAgainstHate. The most ironic people of them all listing subs like truelesbians as hate and demand they be shut down.

Because to them it is hatred for actual lesbians to have spaces on the internet without the TQ people transplaining their sexuality to them and reeking of homophobia. Get the message visitors from QueersAgainstHate, you are hateful, not us.

Show post

daughter_of_bilitis #transphobia reddit.com

TERF = trans exclusionary radical feminist. It's what trans rights activists call women who think that sex (as in, sex not gender) which causes the oppression of women worldwide. Naturally, radfems do not think a man can "become" a woman since women have vagina, uterus, labia, secondary-sex characteristics etc. and men cannot build those structures from regular skin. People often use the word TERF in the way people used to use the word "dyke."

Show post

06549r #transphobia reddit.com

[on trans men]

When it’s not a mentally ill lesbian who thinks she needs a penis to have sex with a woman, it’s a mentally ill straight girl fetishizing feminine gay men and using disgusting homophobic slurs to refer to herself.

Bottom line: it’s a fetish.

Show post

Miata667 #transphobia reddit.com

[Reacting to a picture of a pregnant transman.]

Ya'll need to fucking cool with the transphobia and bigot comments. That shit is not fucking cool, OKAY!!! This man is fucking brave and would put navy seals to shame with his courage!!!!!! You are all transphobic bigots!!!!!!!!!

Kidding, I wouldn't even consider this thing a human. I have no idea wtf it is but it's not a human. PERIOD. This is not the same species as me and I would appreciate it people would stop calling this a man or woman because it is neither and it's sure as fuck is not human.

Show post

Brian Niemeier #wingnut #transphobia brianniemeier.com

A Texas jury has sided with a witch who seeks to turn her son into a girl as revenge against her ex-husband.

"Jeff Younger said his son is happy being a boy and does not desire to be a girl, according to The Texan. James Younger’s pediatrician mother, Anne Georgulas, as well as counselors and therapists who testified on her behalf, told the court that the 7-year-old is transgender and had expressed to each of them that he wished he were a girl.
A Texas jury decided Monday that Jeff Younger cannot stop James Younger’s social gender transition to a girl. A social transition refers to when a person begins to publicly conform to the opposite gender, according to Planned Parenthood."

There it is. They're taking out kids and sterilizing them under color of law. If we submit to this ultimate humiliation ritual, Western civilization is done for, and it will deserve the coming oblivion.

A small white pill: Texas Governor Greg Abbott has taken an interest in the case.

If Abbott orders the arrests for child abuse of the witch, her attorneys, the butchers in scrubs who are facilitating the torture of her son, and the jury, we may have a chance to avoid plunging into the abyss.

In the meantime, pray for James.

UPDATE: The cultural doomsday clock has been moved back one minute from midnight.

"A judge ruled Thursday that Jeff Younger has a say in whether or not his 7-year-old son goes through a gender transition.
Judge Kim Cooks of Texas’s 255th district ruled Thursday that parents Younger and Anne Georgulas will have joint guardianship over James Younger, LifeSite News reported. This joint guardianship includes joint decision-making for medical decisions."

Praise God for delivering this boy from Moloch's claws. This is justice for him and more mercy than our sick society deserves.

Ideally, Abbott keeps his nerve, and the father be making all of his son's medical decisions because the mother will be behind bars.

Show post

Commentaryandthings #transphobia #kinkshaming reddit.com

I’m a 14 year old. I want to give a commentary on fetishes and how they’ve affected my friends.

I apologize if this post isn’t 100% about AGP. But it is relevant. This has been a point of concern for me for a while and I needed to get it off my chest.

I will say I do think actual trans people exist, I have met some who are normal and nice people. I just think they get over shrouded by all the fetishists out there.

I’ve noticed a lot of my friends and even myself develop fetishes. At first I thought it was normal at age since y’know... puberty but then I saw people like you talking about how it was concerning and I took a look into it.

I used to have a lot of fetishes when I was 12-13, I’ve gotten rid of a majority of them and am trying to get rid of the rest. I’ve noticed my friends are into things and it concerns me a bit.

A have a friend who’s into dragons, which honestly pretty tame when it comes to fetish standards but he’s also being into beaten. One of my other friends is into being tied up.

What really concerns me is my MtF friend. He’s into ABDL, petplay and BDSM... and like me he’s 14...

According to some people we should still have our innocence at this age, or at least have some of it. Out of the many friends I have only 1 has really maintained their innocence. I lost my innocence at age 11. It wasn’t due to anything sexual it was because when I entered middle school, I heard and saw everyone cussing at eachother, being mean to eachother, talking about sex. 5th grade was a happy and friendly enviroment. This wasn’t. I will say 7th grade was probably the best time of my life so far, but that’s a whole other topic.

I feel like we’re growing up a bit too fast. A lot of my friend’s friends have already lost their virginity.

It just feels like something is... wrong. I’m assuming that this kind of stuff isn’t normal. But if yall older folk could confirm or deny it that’d be great. I’d also like to hear your commentary on the situation as well.

EDIT: Aight it 100% not normal as I expected. I also get this weird feeling that people on this sub hate me now but hey that could just be my anxiety talking.

Show post

Kjartan Arnorsson #transphobia furaffinity.net

I've spent an embarrassing amount of time in my head. My brain pretty much runs on daydreams. In there, I've been a cunning detective, a flying superhero, a ruthless resistance fighter, a self-taught architect, a daring astronaut, a terraformer, a guttersnipe who breaks thru to prosperity by scamming the rich 'till they bleed money, a goldbricking soldier, an escaped slave, a guerilla, and let's not forget the most frequent fantasy, a handsome cocksman with all the work he can handle from a bevy of randy beauties.

And that's just fine and dandy. Reality would be much harder to bear if we couldn't escape into the endless fields of fantasy from time to time. If you're a fat, middle-aged guy who dreams of being a slim tween girl, there's nothing to stop you - you can be whoever you want in the privacy of your own head.

But OUTSIDE your head? Ah, there's the rub. The real-life people around you are under NO obligation to work as actors in your lil' brain-theater, no matter how passionately you believe in the production. In fact, if you interrupt their business with babble about your fantasies, they have every right to point a finger in your face and laugh loudly.
Dream as big/far/weird as you please. Call yourself whatever you want. In this, at least, we still are a free country. But the minute you want me to play along with your fantasies, you'd better hand me a clearly written script and pay me full Actor's Guild rates.

They've heard of the feminine penis!

But why is nobody talking about the mouthfeel?

Show post

kgreyy #transphobia reddit.com

There is NO SUCH THING as girl dick, lady dick, or feminine penis. Men are NOT lesbians, no matter what they feel like. HRT does not change ANY biological traits or characteristics, it just overdoses a person’s body with more hormones than they’re supposed to have. Feelings are not fact.

Ffs I need to go camping or something.

Show post

electronicoffee #transphobia reddit.com

WRONG. There were ZERO transgenders at Stonewall. Nice attempt to "Transwash" gay history and co-opt and STEAL gay heroes. Stonewall was the victory of DRAG QUEENS who are gay men who dress like women for FUN, CAMP, and PERFORMANCE. You don't get to steal OUR history because DQs look KIND OF like TGs.

Show post

hyeonmi #transphobia reddit.com

I, like many people my age grew up online, spending dozens of hours a week glued to my computer and phone. I spent a chunk of that time on twitter and tumblr, two TRA social justice strongholds since about 2012. And the TRA dogma has been so prevalent in my upbringing online that their terminology, gaslighting, malicious manipulation and just straight up lunacy is almost... normal to me.

I grew up hearing that lesbians need to unlearn their genital fetish or they’re bad people. I grew up hearing that “TERFs” are an evil subhuman sect of the population that deserves only the worst because their thoughts and words “literally kill trans women”.* I grew up being taught to never doubt that trans women are women and trans men are men, full stop. That I couldn’t even call them their correct sex because that would be literal violence. It’s horrifying that they have fostered an environment on these huge platforms (with many minors and impressionable young people) where there’s a constant threat of trans suicide, being ostracized by society and being considered a bad person if you don’t comply with the TRA ideology without criticism, without question and dissent? Dissent is not even an option for us. And... ugh. This was all on websites I used from age 13 til now, as a 21 year old. Surrounded by friends of the same age. Having our environment flooded with this fuckery, and our minds bent by malicious adult TRAs to submit to them accept these harmful lies.

I’m envious of older gender critical thinkers I’ve seen here on reddit who got to grow up normal, and not be exposed to all this and thus have an easier time smelling the bullshit and being critical.

After all though, I’m better off than some my peers. Despite being surrounded by it all I’ve always been more resistant and less into the TRA’s schtick. I never self described as cis, never put pronouns in my bios, never questioned my “gender identity”, hell I never thought much of it at all. Like I don’t even have one I’m just female. On the other hand though I have had many friends and knew tons of people who drank the TRA kool-aid, bottoms up with not a drop to spare. Every single one of them is suffering and mentally ill in some way, desperately in need of a positive life change and real help and coping skills, but what they got instead was all they knew. Fuck the trans cult.

*(It’s honestly jarring how much emphasis they have on hating feminists and lesbians but generally ignore misogynistic/oppressive men. And how there is no equivalent for the whole anti terf phenomenon for trans men. Reflecting on this was my peak trans moment.)

I could go more into it all but I’m tired atm. Sorry this is barely readable lol just wanted to get my thoughts out there and maybe others will feel the same and even if not, I’m interested to hear your opinion on what I’m thinking.

Show post

electronicoffee #transphobia #wingnut #sexist #dunning-kruger reddit.com

Hey dumbshit. How am I sexist for addressing the biological reality that girls prefer to play with dolls and boys prefer to play with trucks? Sorry you hate science or that gendersex is a binary that largely dictates much of behavioral reality. I don't give a fuck about your anecdotal life evidence. No one does. You don't even know what a regressive means because you ARE a literal regressive. Pathetic. Gender and sex were synonymous for most of history until redefined by a feminist asshat professor in the late 60s. We're reclaiming it. https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Gendersex

Show post

SaveAustraliaFromInvasion #transphobia #conspiracy stormfront.org

There are a lot of taller women in media compared with 50 years ago. Tall women tend to have more masculine bone structure.
Many fashion models for example.
Taylor Swift is 5'10 or so.

Sorry to break it to you but fashion models are trannies too. And would a tall woman sprout an Adam's Apple? Miley Cyrus and Daisy Ridley are quite a bit shorter than Taylor but both are trannies. Miley Cyrus has an Adam's Apple, which can be seen in certain pictures and as for Daisy Ridley, have you seen her giant head and forehead? She has completely male bone structure. I'm guessing you've never looked into Transvestigations. Do you know much about anatomy? I knew next to nothing until a few years ago. But now that I do, it all becomes obvious.

It is hard to believe just how many trannies are in our faces everyday but White Genocide is hard to believe yet it's so obvious to those of us who are awake. I'm not trying to derail this thread but her hidden gender ties in with everything. She's not only promoting race mixing but is basically advocating to not have children, despite the fact that she can't physically give birth. Both of these ideas are pushed towards young White women and encourages them to be like their idol. Here is a good transvestigation video on Taylor Swift.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGJBubU9q3Y

If you (and anyone else reading this) are even remotely interested in this topic, do your own research. Don't just take my word for it. Some people will say having one masculine feature doesn't make them a man. That's true. You need to look at the whole picture. Shoulder-to-hip ratio, trachea/Adam's Apple, position of belly button, limb length, brow ridge, etc. The only "out" trannies are the ones that look the most obvious. Believe me, trannies are nothing new. I'd love to post some convincing pictures of these celebrities but I can't seem to on this device. I can only post attachments and I doubt anyone looks at them.

Even though no one here can deny the Transgender Agenda going on right now, trying to convince some that celebrities are trannies and have been for a long time is akin to trying to convince them the Holocaust never happened.

And I'll now leave you of a video of Sandra Bullock before her Adam's Apple surgery (although it's still somewhat noticeable today). I urge everyone to watch just the first few seconds.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaFju7MJrDk

Show post

c0rbis1 #transphobia #homophobia #wingnut reddit.com

This way to Clown World!

image

[Image shows Honkler the Nazi clown frog riding in a mine cart down a slippery slope with NPCs inside it crying “Racist!”, “Slippery Slope Fallacy!”, “Bigot!”, and “Evil Frog!”. The slope is labeled in descending order:

1. Let us marry each other in peace
2. Accept me for who I am
3. Disagreement is hate speech
4. LGBTQ+ Pride Month
5. Bake my cake, bigot!
6. Dildo parades in public
7. Diversity is our strength
8. Desmond is Amazing!
9. Pedo-drag storytime!
10. Wax my balls, bigot!
11. Pedophilia is a sexual orientation
12. Teach 5th Graders Masturbation
13. Teach 6year olds self-touching

At the bottom of the slope is Hillary Clinton photoshopped as a demon sucking out a baby’s soul. There is also a (most likely fake) MailOnline article with the header “Children as young as SIX are to be given compulsory self-touching Lessons that critics say are sexualizing youngsters”.]

Show post

CL Moller & Taras Bulba #sexist #transphobia twitter.com

(CL Moller)

Across multiple topics and conditions, women were consistently more supportive of censorship than men. The one exception was for text that argued that women evolved to be better leaders than men. For this passage, women were equally as (non)supportive of censorship as men.

As a woman, I just don’t understand how other women think they are better than men when they want and accept less stringent benchmarks for themselves because they are women, and higher benchmarks for men - ie, more censorship of men. Doesn’t that signify men are more powerful?

(Taras Bulba)

It's one of those uni-direction phenomenon between the genders. In the current climate, it seems women covet male prestige, for example holding a high status job and making a lot of money. Yet there doesn't seem to be any desire for men to include themselves in women's spheres.

(CL Moller)

Except sports, where transgender people, from male to female, want to participate in women’s competitions, where they have physical advantage, rather than compete against men, where they are also-rans!

Show post

SilentMutationFactor #transphobia #conspiracy reddit.com

So I basically live under a rock, meaning I don't watch news and am not up to date on current events and politics, and have no friends to discuss things with. I'm not sure if what I'm about to write is in any way accurate or if I'm missing some big piece of the puzzle, so please feel free to correct me or enlighten me as you see fit (but please be nice!).

But even as far removed as I am, I am noticing that the 2 major political groups in the US have both adopted policies that are/will a have far reaching, negative impact on women's rights.

On the left we have the trans activists erasing women's biology, rights and spaces, and on the right we have the abortion abolishonists and Christian family hierarchy upholders, with the husband as the front and center, ruler of his domain, threatening female bodily autonomy.

Both are seriously detrimental to women's rights and advancements and it's starting to scare me. It seems like a huge deal to me but it doesn't seem to even be a topic of discussion outside of radfem spaces... I almost feel like it should be a topic for r/conspiracy TBH.

Historically, these 2 parties (Democrats and Republicans) have always held the majority votes. So it seems like regardless of the results of the 2020 election, women are just fucked?

Am I missing something here? How is no one seeing this as a calculated attack on women? Or even considering it questionable?

I'm at the point where I'm just baffled by the fact that people don't even acknowledge women's suffrage and the continuous threat and discrimination we face. People are denying that sexism and the gender wage gap even exist. Is this gaslighting on a major scale or am I just crazy? Lol.

I guess I just feel lost and alone and would really like some input from people I feel safe around and I'm thinking that's this subreddit.

Show post

Shv3ya #transphobia reddit.com

It's very telling that instead of making memes/signs/shirts about assaulting the men who beat up and kill trans people, their memes and signs are about violence towards women who don't see them the way they want to be seen. I fully believe that they hate women more than any MRA/MGTOW kinda guy.

Show post

kingjameswriter1965 #sexist #fundie #transphobia kjbisjesuschrist.blog

All you ladies who want to copycat and piggyback off of Joyce Meyer and all other feminists who need to get right with God, you need to get saved, go back to the kitchen, and do what God commands a woman should do. That goes for every woman police officer, every woman soldier, and all else who “wear the pants” (literally) and make people think they’re tough, strong and manlike.

My soul, I’ve seen pictures of women with huge muscles like Arnold Schwarzenegger who think that’s what strong women should look like. Let me say, that is nothing but disgusting and prideful. By the way, you’ll see these she-men in the Isagenix commercials and ads!! Ugh! SO gross!! And if they don’t have big muscles, they’re showing off everything they do have, clad only in skimpy underwear!! Isa-Body?? It should be called “Gag-Me-With-A-Spoon!!”

Here’s a powerful article by Bro. David Stewart on how women ought not act like men and quit their positions as pastors and ministers. They are really serving the Devil, not God. You can also look up in his website about how women in the military are being repeatedly raped, sodomized and molested by their male peers. Sound like the good life, ladies? You’re an imbecile if you think you can be a frontline soldier! God pities you!!

Ladies, you don’t have to be physically strong to be seen as authoritative, you need to obey God Who will strengthen you in mind and spirit to serve Him. You don’t need to dress like men or act like men. You need to be soft, sweet and loving. You need to dress like a lady, e.g., feminine, NOT a feminist. If you’re a lady, act like a lady, for goodness sake!

There’s nothing uglier than a woman who looks like a man, talks like a man, and wants everyone to think she’s a “he” and I won’t go any further than that. We have too many he-shes and transgenders in this nasty world to mention here. Do you think God approves of all that? NO!! And I don’t care if you don’t like what I just said, you can get mad at GOD because He said it first!!

Show post

Admin #transphobia #kinkshaming feministwiki.org

The word TERF (or terf) is a slur that is used predominantly by transgender activists and their allies against people who criticize the transgender movement on the basis of feminist concerns. Since the slur is used for people with feminist concerns, the main target tend to be women. As such, it's usually understood to be an anti-feminist, sexist and misogynist slur.

The word was invented as an acronym for Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist, where the "trans-exclusionary" part referred to those holding roughly the position that transwomen should not be included under a feminist definition of womanhood, and the "radical feminist" part was meant neutrally, i.e. for people who would indeed describe themselves as radical feminists in the true sense. Over time, the acronym pretty much became a four-letter word. Nowadays the capitalization is frequently omitted, and the already ambiguous original meaning ignored entirely. Still, users of the term tend to claim that it's a neutral description. The "trans-exclusionary" part may now refer to anyone who thinks transwomen should not have unfettered access to all female-only spaces (e.g. changing rooms), should not partake in women's sports where they have unfair advantages, should not be considered a natural part of the lesbian dating pool, etc. Although most members of the public would see these as rather sensible positions, considering a "transwoman" may have intact male anatomy, transgender activists nevertheless see all of these types of "exclusion" as unacceptable.

A closely associated term is SWERF, which is supposed to stand for Sex-Worker-Exclusionary Radical Feminist and is used for those who see the sex industry (prostitution, pornography, etc.) as highly exploitative and sexist. Like TERF, the term is almost always applied as a slur, and to misrepresent the political position of the person it's used against. Ironically, some of those who have to face the term most commonly are women who worked in prostitution and became anti-prostitution activists as a result of their own experiences as so-called sex workers.

Show post

Nuance Bro #transphobia youtube.com

The issue that I wanted to focus on is this narrative that trans people are dying. So I don't know if you guys have heard about this, but there's this big issue in the trans community or the LGBT community at large about transgenders being murdered. So when they talk about trans people are dying, do something, they are saying that trans people are being murdered in the streets and that this is a huge problem and that politicians need to do something. Now this issue always perplexed me because I always heard people talking about transgender murders but I never heard anybody use the stats. So, what are the stats behind transgender murders? Now, a great resource that I found is from the leftist publication Mic.... if we scroll down, we can see the number of documented trans homicides per year. So how many is it? We can see it. In the year 2010, there was a total of 9 homicides. Now I don't know about you, but 9 homicides in a year in a country of 330 million people, I don't know if I would consider that an epidemic. But the argument being made is that it is rising. As you can see here, we go from 9 homicides in 2010 to a peak of 24 homicides in 2015, and the most recent number they have is 2016 of 23 homicides. Now to be fair, 23 homicides might seem low, but we have to look at things per capita...….

(Nuance Bro goes on to claim that statistics show that there is no epidemic of trans people murdered specifically for being trans)

Armchair Psychologist Award

Show post

TheGuruLikes #transphobia reddit.com

Trans identifiers who claim to be homosexual on the basis of the sex they identify with are immaturely and pathologically focused on physical attributes at the expense of the substance of homosexuality.

Through spreading rhetoric of "genital preference", they're regressing the public debate back to a time when society framed the nature of our relationships only in shallow terms of sexual activity. It's a manipulative misappropriation of public sentiment via a childish form of retribution for an apparent lack of self esteem. What's most insidious is how their tactic sows confusion, misunderstanding, and self-doubt around the nature of our sexuality among naive homosexuals.

How many of us homosexuals have put much thought into considering what it truly means to be oriented to intimacy with a partner of the same sex?

I see the fundamental essence of homosexual attraction as an emotional connectivity with one other's biological sameness. External body parts and secondary sex characteristics merely touch the easily observable surface, but since that's the maximum extent by which a heterosexual trans identifier can relate, they are limited to a superficial and inadequate set of assumptions about the nature of homosexual orientation, much less heterosexual orientation. It's ignorance. Our easily manipulated gay brothers and lesbian sisters are also ignorant. Their minds are so consumed by underclass ideology that they've no capacity left for realizing that the alphabet diversity game is stripping us of our shared yet individually born identities.

Attraction to same sex physical features are an outer layer of our sexuality whereas desiring same sex romantic intimacy is fulfilling an innate psychological impulse to be unified with the same sex. Only same sex partners can provide the necessary relativity to each other's mutual homosexual desire. The same applies to heterosexuality in the inverse. Heterosexuality and homosexuality are opposite sides of a complex coin. It would be far more appropriate to place those two phenomena in a box together than it is to group either with sex identification. Gender theory further distorts and unnecessarily complicates the distinction.

Trans identifiers are at most a novelty in terms of sexual experience. It doesn't matter much that they approximate the look of the other sex. In the end, the state of knowing that person is biologically the same forms the fundamental basis of an emotional connection with a same sex partner.

Hopefully a silver lining to the the rise in trans theory lunacy is that it will catalyze more of us to better understand what defines our sexuality, thereby helping truth to ultimately contain this public mental health crisis.

Show post

Ben Carson #transphobia thehill.com

Ben Carson's remarks during San Francisco visit spark backlash

Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Secretary Ben Carson sparked backlash after he reportedly said "big, hairy men" were trying to enter homeless shelters for women during a meeting at the agency's San Fransisco office.

Three people at the meeting told The Washington Post that they interpreted his remark to refer to transgender women. Two agency staff members told the newspaper that he also complained that society did not know the difference between men and women anymore.

The staff members told the Post that the comment upset many people present at the Tuesday HUD meeting and at least one woman left in protest.

A government official also told the newspaper that Carson has made fun of transgender people during meetings in Washington.

"His overall tone is dismissive and joking about these people," the official said. "It's disrespectful of the people we are trying to serve."

“The Secretary does not use derogatory language to refer to transgendered individuals. Any reporting to the contrary is false," a senior HUD official told the Post in a statement after being asked about Carson's reported remarks.

The official, who was not in the meetings, told the newspaper that Carson was talking about men pretending to be women to get into battered women’s shelters rather than referring to transgender women as “big, hairy men.”

The Hill has reached out to HUD for comment.

One staffer who took notes during the meeting told The Post that Carson said "Transgender people should get the same rights as everyone else, but they don’t get to change things for everybody else.”

He reportedly followed the comment by saying that shelter operators and women's groups informed him that homeless women would be traumatized if “big, hairy men” enter shelters identifying themselves as women. He also reportedly said that single-sex shelters should be able to turn away transgender people.

“That was the first time any of us heard him use such derogatory language,” one staff member told the newspaper.“He’s more tactful when he’s talking before Congress, whereas this sounded like a slur to me.”

National Center for Transgender Equality spokeswoman Gillian Branstetter was quoted condemning Carson's comment in the Post.

“It’s gravely insulting to have the specter of violence from cis gender men used to restrict the rights of transgender people who are ordinarily the victims of that violence,” she said. “It’s a mythical notion that policies that are inclusive of transgender people somehow pose a threat."

"It’s frankly despicable that such a harmful notion would be used by someone charged with facilitating programs meant to help people in need, many of whom are transgender,” Branstetter added.

Following the Post's report, Rep. Jennifer Wexton (D-Va.) released a statement calling for Carson's resignation.

“Secretary Carson's remarks are revolting. These comments only affirm that his recent efforts to erase the Equal Access Rule are rooted in ignorance, not sound policy. By allowing shelters to discriminate against transgender Americans, the Secretary is putting lives in danger," she said.

The remarks were also met with criticism online.

Carson has previously sparked controversy over remarks used to refer to transgender people. He told The Hill in 2016 that being being transgender “doesn’t make any sense.” According to the Post, he has also said transgender people are "abnormal" and shouldn't be in the military.

Show post

Time_Barracuda #conspiracy #transphobia reddit.com

Its not a bug– its a feature. For anyone who’s the least bit conspiracy minded this result makes perfect sense.

The sudden prominence of trans rights in leftist discourse has neatly split the left, and confirmed for many people their beliefs about the worst aspects of leftism, IE an obsession with ‘special rights’ at other’s expense, a focus on minutiae and a lockstep group-think that disallows any dissent, even at the expense of a shared reality. If I were a machiavellian conservative activist looking to create a societal trope to hobble my enemies I could hardly do better than the propagation of gender ideology in leftist circles. Its entirely possible that what we’re experiencing here is a massive psy-op– that would explain why trans rights have gone from being a minor blip on the horizon to suddenly being the central defining tenet of leftism. Trans rights is an artificial wedge issue being pushed by people and groups seeking to marginalize the left.

If you’re skeptical about this, consider how much you supported planned parenthood 5 years ago as opposed to today, and what a massive victory that change in opinion is for those who have been trying to dismantle planned parenthood for 50 years. PP’s wholehearted buy in to the trans business has alienated those who have long fought for its continued existence and it very well may not survive the inevitable (and well deserved) backlash coming down the line in the future, when people realize how many lives have been destroyed by cross sex hormones provided so casually by entities like PP. What could not be accomplished from outside has instead been accomplished from within. Its impossible for me to believe that’s an accident.

Show post

evilterf69 #transphobia #sexist reddit.com

"You have no idea how it feels to be in the wrong body"

I usually hear this when seeing a gender defender debate about why feelings means he's actually a woman.

And are you fucking kidding me? No one on this earth knows what it means to be alienated from your own body more than "cis" women.

Growing up we're slowly and subtly taught that our body isn't ours. It belongs to that boy that likes you. It belongs to those grown men catcalling at you on the street. Your head is cut off and your body plastered on ads, movie posters, not fully human. We're parsed and cut up into separate cuts of meat all the time. Our legs are wrong, our breasts are wrong, our stomachs are wrong. Sometimes our body is so "wrong" we get implants or liposuction. Sometimes our bodies are so foreign we starve ourselves because we're never "skinny" enough. Have these people forgotten that the first people on earth to experience dysmorphia, which we call dysphoria today, were women who didn't see our bodies the way they actually were? Our bodies are literally treated like objects that are separate from the mind. The first time I felt like my body wasn't mine was when I was 12 wearing jeans and a t-shirt with a cartoon owl on it, walking down the side of the road with my friend and being honked at several times. That's when I know that there was something wrong, that I wasn't allowed to simply exist.

I and every fucking woman alive today have been made to feel alienated about our bodies. And not just externally. There have been so many times I wished I could either detach my female physical attributes or detach my female body as a whole.

Fuck you. You have no idea what it's like to be a woman. And when you say we don't know how it feels to be in the wrong body, you're proving me right.

Show post

William Rockwell #transphobia youtube.com

Contrapoints You can feel and think you're female. You can't help how you feel and think. But you can help whether or not you engage the delusion. A schizophrenic can engage his psychopathy by living a life reflecting it or he can seek helped through medication and counseling. By dressing as a woman you embrace the lie, and even worse, you teach others to embrace the lie. You are responsible for maintaining the sickness. Make a video about this issue, without the makeup and dress, and educate your viewers on how hard of a life this mental illness produces. Talk about removing it from the next generation using gene editing. Then we can talk about the redpill. You can be a force of good or bad in the world. Cheers.