(from a thread asking whether anyone should use the N-word)

GENERALLY speaking--repeat that: GENERALLY, because we all have to walk on egg shells and constantly provide disclaimers in this feminized, hyperindividualistic, PC age--blacks and other non-whites do not like white people--actually they GENERALLY hate white people--so I don't understand why whites feel the need to handle them with kid gloves, linguistically or otherwise.

(later in the same thread)

You don't understand why it's hard to understand the concept?

Maybe this will help: Blacks and non-whites, with the help of their liberal stooge enforcers, have been playing the semantics game for about a hundred years!

If I have it correct, the word ****** comes from the neutral word niger, that is, a word with not intended for any emotional effect. People used the word ****** simply as a term for black people, with no negative connotation at all. This offended blacks. So then they were referred to as Negros, another neutral word. Then this became insulting. Now they are called African Americans or blacks, but it might be a matter of time before they and the liberals deem these terms hostile.

Same goes for Asians. Once Orientals was simply a term for people of the Orient. Now that's offensive, so we must say Asian or Vietnamese or Chinese or Koreans or Japanese and so on.

Same goes for illegal aliens, criminals they are who we have to handle with kid gloves and pussyfoot around else we hurt their dear feelings. We once could call them what they are and hear nothing about it. Now we must refer to them as "undocumented persons" or "undocumented workers" (as if they're all working).

This type of semantic game is one of the hallmarks the Bolshevik-Clinton Coalition-Political Correctness-Liberal agenda, intended to confuse and morally exhaust the white public.