RobertBlake #racist

RobertBlake #racist youtube.com

Regarding the Negro race;

We cannot consider him a member of the ape species, but a species in his own right; while some would argue for his clasification in the genus "homo," I disagree with this. God demonstrably shows that the Negro is a higher form of ape. He started with the cat, then the couger, and finally the lion. Again we see the pattern in the ass, the mule, the donkey and the horse. And finally in the gibbon, the chimpanzee, the gorilla and the negro.

Their IQ is, on average, 40 points lower than the average White, suggesting severe retardation. The skull of the Negro is a full tenth smaller than that of a white, and their teeth are aligned so much as to be a carnivorous animal. The Bible refers to the "beasts of the field" as carnivorous, Africa being the only continent in the world where this be practiced.

There is much evidence to suggest that the cross between Blacks and Whites is a hybrid. They are weaker, less intelligent and more suseptible to disease.

The Negro was created in the garden to serve Adam and be a friend to him. He was not created to be given equal rights and become unleashed on society.

194 comments

old comment by RobertBlake

To address a pair of the comments here;

"Adam has no idea what negro is. He is supposed to be the child of Ham, like four generations later"

This is incorrect. I'm curious, how do you explain the presence of the Negro when he is not mentioned as a son of Noah?

Noah had three children. Shem, Ham and Japheth. We know Shem to be white because David and Soloman are described along the lines of milky white and ruddy. Japheth was white because his descendants head west; one of his sons, for example, "Javan," means Greece.

Ham is where most people blunter; slandered Ham, who is thought to be Negro in origin. His son Mizriam formed Egypt, known to be a white society. His other sons formed White cities such as Carthage, Tyre, Thebes, Phonecia, et cetera.

Therefore - Negroes are not mentioned in the Bible. Summing them up as a "beast" accounts for their low intelligence, ape-like features and general physiology. The Negro is closer to an ape than a human, anatomically speaking.

"Funny, the Bible never mentions a third human in the Garden of Eden"

Precisely. The Negro was created after the animals as a "beast of the field." The White race has never partaken of flesh, but the "beasts" - Negroes - regularly practiced cannibalism in native Africa. The evidence is abundant for this fact. Sodom was destroyed because the denizens "went after strange flesh." Noah was spared because he was "perfect in his generation." I have no doubt that the one unforgivable sin is the mixing of the races.

old comment by POSW

"Ham is where most people blunter; slandered Ham, who is thought to be Negro in origin. His son Mizriam formed Egypt, known to be a white society. His other sons formed White cities such as Carthage, Tyre, Thebes, Phonecia, et cetera."

Ancient Egypt was most definitely not white (source), and you know that most of us repudiate the Bible anyway, right?

"Therefore - Negroes are not mentioned in the Bible. Summing them up as a "beast" accounts for their low intelligence, ape-like features and general physiology. The Negro is closer to an ape than a human, anatomically speaking."

Have you read "The Mismeasure of Man" by Stephen Jay Gould? It tears your bad craniometry to pieces - I'm talking about the skull measurements you mentioned in the original quote.

"Precisely. The Negro was created after the animals as a "beast of the field." The White race has never partaken of flesh, but the "beasts" - Negroes - regularly practiced cannibalism in native Africa."

Actually, there is evidence that cannibalism was practiced in ancient England around 500 BC. (source)

Oh, and ask Barack Obama whether interracial people are "weaker, less intelligent, and more susceptible to disease". He sort of graduated from Harvard Law School.

FMG: He's all yours.

old comment by

Robbie, Robbie, Robbie, my husband is Greek speaking and he's laughing his ass off your stupid "Javan" theory(such a place DOESN'T exist. The closest he can think is IAVEA and is something far different. And those negroes are mentioned three and four times in the Bible. One is Ziphora, Moses's wife. Second, one of the first converted to Phillip was Ethiopian. Queen Makeda of Sheeba was half Yemeni half Ethiopian. And don't blame me for the Ham issue. According to the Bible, he is the father of Kush, which is nowadays Somalia. Argue with God over the topic NOT ME. And we have evidence CALLED DNA, called study and data that indicates that 25% of the White Sourtheners have black ancestors...................You have only a ridiculous book written in 1901 called "a negro, a beast" known for such "highly accurate scientific arguments" such as "look at the features of the the noble knight of the South and the Negro" and a couple of comic like pictures. Wonder why KKK and Neo Nazis haven't reprinted it.............

old comment by FMG

Fine since you are reading this...

You show no grasp of speciation whatsoever. Cougars and Lions are related quite distantly when compared to say "lions and tigers". And chimpanzees are "more intelligent" than gorilla since they are "hunter gatherers". As for Ass, Mule, Donkey and Horse...

Ass = Donkey
Mule = cross breed between donkeys and horses and is indeed superior to both combining the donkey's stamina to the horse's power. They are the sum of their parents abilities.

Black people are genetically similar to white people. White people are basically from the caspian region. They started out probably looking like indians and iranians who are the closest relatives to the original aryans. In colder climates a white skin is necessary to use the more diffuse light into vitamin D with limited skin exposure unlike warmer climes. Hence the closer to the equator the darker the skin colour tends to be. A point in case is Dravidans who are "white" genetically except they have black skin to tolerate the sun.

I call shennanigans on the basis of you are talking crap. The maximum difference in IQ is between Ashkenazi jews and Australian aborigines which is a difference of around 8 points between medians... Put it this way. MY IQ is around 162... 40 points above the ashkenazi average of 113... 8 points of IQ is nothing.

There is much evidence to suggest that the cross between Blacks and Whites is a hybrid. They are weaker, less intelligent and more suseptible to disease.

I would like to see this evidence. Cause genetically speaking the offspring tend to be superior than their parents. Particularly in half castes since it is the two sets of alleles where dominant alleles tend to be expressed (dominant alleles are normally better for the body) between two groups. You have no grasp of how human genetics and inheritance works. Hell even the Nazis had some vague inkling unlike your hamfisted inbred approach.

The Negro was created in the garden to serve Adam and be a friend to him. He was not created to be given equal rights and become unleashed on society.

What about chinese people. Was the white adam made to serve them? They do have a higher IQ. How about Dravidan Indians? Again Higher IQ averages.

Adam has no idea what negro is. He is supposed to be the child of Ham, like four generations later"

Now now you are assuming that Adam is indeed "white".

This is incorrect. I'm curious, how do you explain the presence of the Negro when he is not mentioned as a son of Noah?

Noah did not exist. If he did his flood was very very local and not a global thing since no one else mentions this "Noah" blokey.

By the process of genetics we would have died out had this been true. And I don't even know how this would work since the Greeks had a thriving culture that somehow "missed" this whole flood malarky. As did those egyptians who somehow were not affected at all by these shennanigans.

Indeed those pesky chinese and indian civilisations are obviously created by the devil. You do realise the world is not "white and black". Remember while "biblical people" were struggling to deal with "chariots of iron" the egyptians were making massive pyramids and the people of Indus were making cities that had closed sewers and the people of china were doing funky things with massive empires...

Neither are bacteria, the US, electricity, cars, and indeed the internet. The bible is kind of lax in pointing out a lot of stuff. May I point out that this logic puts the chinese in the same section as well as the indians... AND since they possess on average a higher IQ so are more intelligent.

Oh anatomically speaking you have no clue what you are talking about.

"Funny, the Bible never mentions a third human in the Garden of Eden"

There were three humans who lived in the garden of eden... Go read your Bible...

Cannibalism is reported in the Bible during the siege of Samaria (2 Kings 6:25-30). Two women made a pact to eat their children, but after the first mother cooked her child, the second mother ate it but refused to reciprocate by cooking her own child. Almost exactly the same story is reported by Flavius Josephus during the siege of Jerusalem by Rome in 70AD.

So you basically have not read the bible.

old comment by RobertBlake

“Robbie, Robbie, Robbie, my husband is Greek speaking and he's laughing his ass off your stupid "Javan" theory(such a place DOESN'T exist. The closest he can think is IAVEA and is something far different.”
Your husband needs to work on his Greek! This is common knowledge.
“The Biblical character Javan (Hebrew ?????, Standard Hebrew Yavan, Tiberian Hebrew Yawan) was the fourth son of Noah's son Japheth. He was believed to have been the progenitor of the Greeks through his sons Elishah, Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim.
The Hebrew name of Greece, Yavan or (Tiberian) Yawan (?????), is originally the name of the eastern Greeks, the Ionians (Greek Iones, earlier Ia(w)ones); the Greek race has been known by cognate names in the rest of the Eastern Mediterranean and the entire region, even in Sanskrit (yavana). In Greek mythology, the forefather of the Ionians is called Ion, a son of Apollo.” - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Javan
“And those negroes are mentioned three and four times in the Bible. One is Ziphora, Moses's wife. Second, one of the first converted to Phillip was Ethiopian. Queen Makeda of Sheeba was half Yemeni half Ethiopian. And don't blame me for the Ham issue. According to the Bible, he is the father of Kush, which is nowadays Somalia.”
Firstly I’m curious as to how on earth you think a white man can give birth to two pure white sons in Japheth and Shem give birth to a pure white son in Ham, who would have to be to give birth to those who founded Carthage, Tyre, Phonecia, Thebes, Egypt et cetera and somehow find a Negro in this equation! A white man cannot give birth to a Negro. It is physiologically impossible.

Honestly, Cush was not black. Search for “can the Cushite change his skin?” A book written which smashes the Black Cushites myth.

I don’t believe in the curse of Ham because it is so obvious that the Hamites were white. The only way to explain the inferiority of the Negro race is that they were created as “beasts,” and all the evidence reflects this.

Now -- On to Egypt!

To the fellow who thinks there was a black pharoah, go here. This will explain it to you. The black pharoah was in the 25th Dynasty, and he was also the last. In the words of Arthur Kemp, "It is thus very ironic that the Black supremacists use the 25th dynasty - which represents the final fall of the White Egyptian civilization - to try and prove that the Egyptians were Black! If it were not so tragic, it would be funny. The very thing which destroyed the White Egyptians, being used to try and prove they were not White!"

http://www.white-history.com/egypt.htm

It is without a doubt that Egypt was white. Mediterranean phenotype. Read the page. Fascinating evidence there. Every Egyptologist and Historian in the world knows that Egypt was white.

Carleton Coon´s skeletal analysis (of 4000 skeletons) concludes they were racially Mediterranean types. Go here - http://www.snpa.nordish.net/chapter-IV4.htm

old comment by RobertBlake

We are speaking here of increase in nobility and refinement of the animals in question. The Bible states that all animals are made after their kind -- we find at the bottom of the animal kingdom the monkey, increasing in refinement in the plan of the creator to chimpanzee, to gorilla, to orangutan, to negro, the noblest of these beasts.

Ass = Donkey
Mule = cross breed between donkeys and horses and is indeed superior to both combining the donkey's stamina to the horse's power. They are the sum of their parents abilities.

All the evidence shows that a cross between a Negro and a White is a hybrid of two species.

Laughable! The current evolutionary "Out of Africa" theory requires a mere 50,000 years for the Negro race to turn into the White race.

http://eatliver.com/i.php?n=1297

These are typical Negro features, bare for the eye to see through albinism. I assume you believe that a cold climate would, within 50,000 years, flatten their features, make them more beautiful, lighten their skin, and increase their IQ points by 40? This is one of the main evidences AGAINST evolution! Such a change could not happen within such a short time frame.

Regardless, we are not discussing evolution here -- we are discussing the Negro race within the Biblical account of things.

Ah, yes. The internet! Where every boy claims he has a 160 IQ (higher than that of Einstein).

This is the ironic thing about you. You acknowledge the intellectual superiority of the Ashkenazi Jews -- and by the way, the fact most nobel prize winners have been of this race shows that average IQ of a race has a huge impact -- yet you refuse to accept the thousands upon thousands of studies showing the inferiority of the Negro race.

They have an IQ of 40 points lower when pure blooded, and 20 points lower when white blood is infused in their system (ie most "African Americans" today).

Firstly, a Mulatto cannot have an organ transplant; his sytem rejects it, showing that he is a cross between two species.

"African Americans," all of which are mulattoes (nearly all African Americans have about 30% white blood) have a seriously shortened lifespan and suffer from all kinds of health problems, which is what we would expect from a hybrid. Of note is that the Goat and the Ewe among various other species can propagate perfectly and produce a hyrbid that can, in turn, propagaate with those of the same hybrid, and so forth.

What about chinese people. Was the white adam made to serve them? They do have a higher IQ. How about Dravidan Indians? Again Higher IQ averages.

This is a common myth. The "Amerindians" are actually the typical mongoloid phenotype -- ie, "Chinese" -- without an infusion of White blood. The Chinese have a considerable infusion of White blood due to their proximity to Europe; we see, with the "Native American" Mongols, who never came into contact with whites, an example of their true nature.

All IQ tests showing yellow "superiority" are done with asian americans. The fact is if you are smart and successful enough to get to America, you are going to score very high.

Now now you are assuming that Adam is indeed "white".

There is no other explanation for the fact that all three of the sons of Noah are indisputably white.

Adam's name in Hebrew translates to "to blush," or turn rosy.

old comment by FMG

Which I do not get since you were talking about lions... Are we talking about the same lions right? The ones that mooch of the females and never do a days work. Indeed the ones that scavenge... Oh wait just like "nobles". Read up on your "behaviour" of animals. Atleast pick tigers, they prefer their prey to be "alive".

All the evidence shows that a cross between a Negro and a White is a hybrid of two species.

So they are sterile... Which is "not the case". I would like this "evidence" at some point.

Laughable! The current evolutionary "Out of Africa" theory requires a mere 50,000 years for the Negro race to turn into the White race.

That is "sufficient" time. Remember evolution goes at its own pace. After all its just "one mutation".

Hehe... You are talking to someone who is a "dark caucasian". The Dravida are the probable ancestors of the white people... They look like this

image

Note our blue eyes...

image

Now imagine them without the sexy tan. Infact we are not born with the tans. We acquire them with exposure to the sun. Its a hot weather adaptation.

Regardless, we are not discussing evolution here -- we are discussing the Negro race within the Biblical account of things.

The bible is incorrect on that aspect since biblically speaking chinese people are animals who are whipping "god's creation" every step of the way.

Ah, yes. The internet! Where every boy claims he has a 160 IQ (higher than that of Einstein).

Ah the Internet where idiots still exist who put stock into IQ as a source of intelligence. Remember this. IQ is the ability to solve problems. You can academically force your IQ up the ranks. I am a human geneticist. I know how IQ works. You can boost your IQ quite handily using games such as chess and non linear puzzles to improve your scores by stimulating your mind.

Nope. I will point out the academical bias that the Nobel prize committee had towards non white ethnicities until recently. Remember Gandhi did not win a "nobel peace prize" despite his achievements. No one before or since can match him. Indeed it is regarded as the greatest regret of the Nobel Peace Prize committee. Not to mention the structure of DNA prize should have gone to a woman...

They have an IQ of 40 points lower when pure blooded, and 20 points lower when white blood is infused in their system (ie most "African Americans" today).

Bullshit. As I said. The highest are the ashkenazi jews who if left to their own devices would kill themselves off via Tay Sacchs disease. The lowest are Australian Aborigines. The difference is 8. The vast majority of white people turn up between them. The difference between individuals changes as much as 40 from high end of the spectrum to the low end of the spectrum... So there are australian aborigines who are more intelligent than ashkenazi jews. Remembering a 8 point difference may as well not exist.

Firstly, a Mulatto cannot have an organ transplant; his sytem rejects it, showing that he is a cross between two species.

Wow. I did not know this... And I am a qualified geneticist at medical school. Somehow no one mentioned this to me. I mean what do all those south americans do... Oh wait! Evidence or GTFO.

Because they were treated as second class citizens till the 60s and are still recovering from their prior treatment in a country which still contains racist morons... And no, the offspring of goats and sheep are generally "stillborn" and indeed those that do survive such as the "toast of botswana" are crazy mad sex machines with superior growth and strength but are sterile... So I do not know what you are on about since I have never witnessed such an event. Infact no one seems to.

Er... Native americans tend to rank quite highly on the scale. They are "above" white average. And I am pointing out the other kind of Indians. The ones who invented mathematics and probably the software on your PC. You know, brown skinned.

All IQ tests showing yellow "superiority" are done with asian americans. The fact is if you are smart and successful enough to get to America, you are going to score very high.

Actually the tests done in China do produce higher results than the americans. And as I pointed out, chimpanzees can regularly outsmart humans despite our "obvious superiority". Intelligence is not merely the ability to solve problems but the application there of.

There is no other explanation for the fact that all three of the sons of Noah are indisputably white.

There are others.

Adam's name in Hebrew translates to "to blush," or turn rosy.

Which all human beings can do. Its not a white only thing. Infact dark skinned people tend to blush more vividly since they have more developed blood systems to the skin since the darker skin helps cool them down acting as a radiation surface for sweat. Hence we darkies do not overheat in the sun as much. It also means we show a larger blush response.

old comment by RobertBlake

Irrelevent discussion here -- This is not of zoology, but race. Generally speaking God created the animals after their own kind with increasing levels of refinement, and the Negro is most certainly a higher form of the ape category.

So they are sterile... Which is "not the case". I would like this "evidence" at some point.

This has been mentioned already. "Firstly, a Mulatto cannot have an organ transplant; his system rejects it, showing that he is a cross between two species."

You show yourself ignorant of the facts! There are a great variety of hybrids. Some hybrids produce sterile offspring, while other hybrids -- such as the Goat and Ewe - the Goldfinch and Canary bird - when bred together, propagate perfectly. They share characteristics from both parents, but are weak and susceptible to disease.

We see this in the majority of the "African American" society in America. Most of them are short lived and very prone to countless numbers of diseases. Look these statistics up yourself. They also share characteristics from both parent races (for example -- the average IQ of the sub saharan Negro is 60. The average IQ of a white is 100. The average IQ of a mulatto is between 80 and 90. Mulattoes share various physiological characteristics with their parent races, proving them to be a hybrid).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheep-goat_hybrid
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheep-goat_chimera
http://www.petcraft.com/docs/cangal28.shtml

That is "sufficient" time. Remember evolution goes at its own pace. After all its just "one mutation".

50,000 years makes the difference between this;

image

And this?

image

Hmmm..

Hehe... You are talking to someone who is a "dark caucasian". The Dravida are the probable ancestors of the white people... They look like this

Check your facts. Most evolutionists believe the Bushmen are the ancestors of the Caucasian race; either way it is patently false.

Both your pictures show typical Negro features, with broad, flat noses and ape-like characteristics.

You can make excuses for IQ all you wish -- the facts remain.

http://www.davidduke.com/library/race/african101facts.html

Read the first part of this, which studies the effects of IQ and the averages amongst Africans. Fascinating statistics.

Replying to the rest of your message in one moment.

old comment by RobertBlake

To expand upon your Dravidian claim -- It is a matter of fact that the white phenotypes found within Dravidians are due to the original aryan conquest of the regions in which they dwell - India, Pakistan, Iran and so on. More on that here.

http://www.white-history.com/hwr5c.htm

Now imagine them without the sexy tan. Infact we are not born with the tans. We acquire them with exposure to the sun. Its a hot weather adaptation.

If any Dravidian should consider himself attractive, he must thank God for the white blood that flows within his veins.

The bible is incorrect on that aspect since biblically speaking chinese people are animals who are whipping "god's creation" every step of the way.

Here again you show your ignorance! The actual the IQ of the asiatic Mongoloid (which is only high in those intelligent enough to find their way to America it is extremely low among those in their homeland) says nothing about morals, compassion for other human beings or cleanliness. In their homeland of Asia, particularly in the case of the darker Philippines and Vietnamese, the yellow men have no respect for human life. It is a brutal culture.

Only the lighter skinned Chinese are capable of intelligent thought, though even this is lacking; that the “economy” of China is catching up with America is often proudly stated, pushing back the fact that China has ONE BILLION PEOPLE with which to disperse on cruel sweatshops and manual labour! Any reasonable man knows that a nation of one billion whites would demolish China in every respect. The fact America, with its 300 million population and great internal problems is still able to remain ahead of China - for the time being - is a testament to Aryan ingenuity.

More excuses.

You do realize Ghandi was, by your definition, "racist?" He hated both blacks and whites. Read up on it.

It doesn't take an intellectual mind to win a Nobel "peace" prize. It is a sham anyway -- reminds me of the laughable fact Henry Kissinger won one.

Bullshit. As I said. The highest are the ashkenazi jews who if left to their own devices would kill themselves off via Tay Sacchs disease. The lowest are Australian Aborigines. The difference is 8.

Wrong. The Aborigines have an average IQ of around 60, while the Ashkenazi Jews have an IQ of around 115. Once again, go here for information on IQ and read up on this.

http://www.davidduke.com/library/race/african101facts.html

So there are australian aborigines who are more intelligent than ashkenazi jews. Remembering a 8 point difference may as well not exist.

Definitely. We see a mass of aborigines inventions in all forms of life. Great aboriginal mathematicians, scientists and philosophers in abundance!

They can still breed together on occasion. Even a Mule has given birth in the past. The fact these hybrids are so poorly attested shows the genetic difference between them; and we see a similarity in this when the Black and White races cross with each other.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,973848,00.html

"Why Do Blacks Die Young?

A white baby stands a 70% better chance of reaching its fourth birthday than a black child. And the average life expectancy of African Americans is 70.3 years, much less than the 76 years that white Americans can expect.

The life-spans of both races have lengthened over the decades, but the gap between white and black has remained stubbornly wide, and it increased sharply during the Reagan years, when many social programs that helped minorities were slashed. The gap has since begun to narrow, but it is just as large now as it was in 1982. This lack of progress has become one of the most studied issues of public health and one of the greatest challenges facing government policymakers. Why are blacks dying so much younger than whites?"

African Americans are hybrids.

old comment by POSW

"Irrelevent discussion here -- This is not of zoology, but race. Generally speaking God created the animals after their own kind with increasing levels of refinement, and the Negro is most certainly a higher form of the ape category."

His point was that, for an animal that you called "noble", lions certainly do not act noble.

"We see this in the majority of the "African American" society in America. Most of them are short lived and very prone to countless numbers of diseases. Look these statistics up yourself."

They are the results of the racist environment of this country, and decidedly NOT the product of genetics.

"They also share characteristics from both parent races (for example -- the average IQ of the sub saharan Negro is 60. The average IQ of a white is 100. The average IQ of a mulatto is between 80 and 90. Mulattoes share various physiological characteristics with their parent races, proving them to be a hybrid)."

The thing is, whites and blacks are so genetically similar that they are not even classed as different subspecies. The IQ, as FMG and I have noted, is a product of environment and not genetics.

"Check your facts. Most evolutionists believe the Bushmen are the ancestors of the Caucasian race; either way it is patently false.

Both your pictures show typical Negro features, with broad, flat noses and ape-like characteristics."

Evolution is as close to a proven fact as the Second Law of Thermodynamics that creationists love so much - that is, both are proven by evidence. The first picture, I might agree with you that the boy looks somewhat black, but the second picture looks like tanned white people to me.

And David Duke is a Holocaust denier, so as an Ashkenazi Jew, I don't trust anything he says.

old comment by antichrist

Apes aren't a species. A Gorilla is a species, a Human is a species. Apes are the family that includes humans.

A black man is a homo sapien, no mater what you think.

Their IQ is, on average, 40 points lower than the average White
[citation needed]. Anyway, even if it was true. The IQ test has some strong cultural biases in it. and poor kids do have lower IQ's.

we see the pattern in the ass, the mule, the donkey and the horse
An ass is a donkey. and a mule is a cross between a donkey and a horse. Please go brush up on your biology.

their teeth are aligned so much as to be a carnivorous animal
Funny, my dentist said the exact opposite thing. Scandinavians have thinner, sharper teeth because they were more carnivorous (hard for an ancient viking to be a vegetarian). People from Africa have stronger enamel (ergo whiter teeth) because they're more developed for chewing plants. (Note: my dentist was not being racist, he's just obsessed with genetic differences in teeth). Of course these differences are averages, and you will find exceptions.

Africa being the only continent in the world where this be practiced
So only Africans eat meat? I think members of the American Cattle Industry would like a word with you.

There is much evidence to suggest that the cross between Blacks and Whites is a hybrid. They are weaker, less intelligent and more suseptible to disease.
Prove it. And what about Tiger Woods? He's basically the all American mutt of the human race.

The Negro was created in the garden to serve Adam and be a friend to him
Would you people make up your mind! It's the mark of Cain, they're the descendants of Ham. Just pick a fucking story and stick to it.

Edit: And this is why we should read the posts before we post our response.

old comment by plue

"Here again you show your ignorance! The actual the IQ of the asiatic Mongoloid (which is only high in those intelligent enough to find their way to America it is extremely low among those in their homeland) says nothing about morals, compassion for other human beings or cleanliness. In their homeland of Asia, particularly in the case of the darker Philippines and Vietnamese, the yellow men have no respect for human life. It is a brutal culture."

WTF???!! i am very much offended!!! Being a "full" Vietnamese i can tell you we got more COMPASSION TO THE HUMAN LIFE THAN WHAT YOU EVER HAD!!!! and YOU MR ROBERT BLAKE coming from a country that

1) lost a some wars and ruining countries that has NO CONCERN AGAINST YOU!! (Vietnam, Iraq and im sure that people in this site can throw in some more... and you were saying the males in my parents home land have no compassion?? look at yourselves and your history before making RASH comments)

2) Thinks there are the Center of the world

3) people who cant point out where their own country or even the states that are in their country... and i even took the time to cite it: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12591413/

4) have a history of killing their own people, Salem witch trails, loss of human lives in shootings that we constantly hear from OZ

You dont have to have intelligence to go to America or even anywhere for that matter... when war is over or poverty strikes many people just find the sheer inner strength to find a better place to live and make their adopted country as their own! thats why i admire the refugees in any race... Its people like you that kill humanity on this planet...

now in terms of the post that your original post...

you are racist pig that has no sence of humanity... i dont care what pseudo-science you pulled out... the fact is you are racist... end of story

In terms of facts and logic i whole heartedly agree with FMG, POSW... you keep ripping this guy!!

Ps: i think Africa is an interesting and beautiful country.. esp in terms of their cultural arts like ritual dancing and music... one of my fav is in Civilization IV where the Swahili Choir sang Baba Yet (The Our Father's Prayer) THAT is multiculturalism at its finest!!! damn i love that song!

Pss: I am deeply sorry if i offended the more nicer and intelligent people of America i know you're a nice group of people in general but people like him wound me up... forgive me please

old comment by Pickle

You know, I could really come on here and rip into his "Egyptology" lesson and his actual sources, not to mention his woefully ignorant view of African history, but I'll just leave that to FMG because this "negroid" has midterms to study for.

By the way, since my IQ isn't as "low" as you claim blacks are, I'll thank your god in advance for making us blacks better at dancing and my nice sized penis. Thanks for getting me tested into gifted education all throughout grade school as well, G-mang.

Condi Rice, the inventor of the super soaker, the inventor of the gas mask and the Tuskegee Airmen would like to thank your god as well.

For some subhuman apes, we sure aren't doing that shabby I must say.

old comment by FMG

Actually it has everything to do with zoology. We are an animal and are subject to the same rules... And you pulled out some crap about nobility and you picked one of the least noble of cats. For some obscure reason "lions" became a royal animal because people did not know of their habits. The Negro is homo sapien. Genetically. 100%...

This has been mentioned already. "Firstly, a Mulatto cannot have an organ transplant; his system rejects it, showing that he is a cross between two species."

That is not evidence. Because I have evidence from south america. Brazil where most of the black people are mullattos and their transplants seem to work. Must be an ENTIRE COUNTRY OF LIARS. And repeat experiments seem to confirm this. I do not know what "science" you are using but it does not work at all.

Goddamnit man! I am a freaking Geneticist. Hybridisation is a known thing in animals. There is a genetic reason for this. If they have evolved from the same close ancestor they can produce non sterile offspring. When they do produce offspring they are sterile offspring but are superior to the sum of their counterparts.

No its not. I have "sub saharan" kids in uni here. They are the smarter kids. They are Medical Students. They cannot have an IQ lower than 107 in any case... Did you even read the IQ point I made?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheep-goat_hybrid

Which is sterile and superior to both sheep and goats... It grows faster is tougher but is sterile.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheep-goat_chimera

Which is a chimera made by the fusing of two eggs. Not a natural species. Its made in a lab.

http://www.petcraft.com/docs/cangal28.shtml

Its sterile. And again superior to the sum of its parents. In any case if you crossed it with another one you would get a combination of offspring which are goldfinches, crosses and canaries.

As for architecture.

Hmmm..

image

This is Djenne in Mali. Pretty neat eh?

And may I point out it took nearly 2000 years for white people to realise the benefits of boiling water and showers.

Check your facts. Most evolutionists believe the Bushmen are the ancestors of the Caucasian race; either way it is patently false.

They are our ancestors. We were the last large outflux of people. The bushmen have similar characteristics to the chinese. And the caucasian race is a misnomer since arabs are caucasian and so are norwegians.

Both your pictures show typical Negro features, with broad, flat noses and ape-like characteristics.

And blue eyes?

You can make excuses for IQ all you wish -- the facts remain.

http://www.davidduke.com/library/race/african101facts.html

I would call shennanigans on account of it not being "true". He is just as big a dick as you are and just as incorrect.

Read the first part of this, which studies the effects of IQ and the averages amongst Africans. Fascinating statistics.

Haha... He quotes stuff from the 1960s. Oh wait let me laugh even harder... His sources are all disproved. Goddamnit man, in the 60s they were still discovering how DNA works. The science of genetics moves so freaking fast. Since I have not read my journals for the week, I am technically out of date until they arrive tomorrow. We know the maximum difference between IQs is 8 to 12 points between medians. And remember Those with the high end of IQs suffer from stupid crazy diseases because they are so inbred. It makes no difference to your IQ if you start dying out. Look at the Farsis of India. High IQs, but dying out spectacularly.

Apart from the Dravidans of South India who were never conquered by the Aryans since they were a more war like group of people. You know. People like the tamils who are not White... The oddity of India is that its the Dravidans who are more intelligent than their "aryan" counterparts. The kids you see dying in India, are not in the south of India. We have technology and stuff like free internet and awesome architecture.

If any Dravidian should consider himself attractive, he must thank God for the white blood that flows within his veins.

You moron... Your website has dravidans in there as "evidence of white people in India". As pointed out. The India migration event probably gave the world white people since dravidans are born white. We tan because I know what happens white guys under the sun. You guys burn and die. We turn black. Aishwaria Rai is from Mangalore... Her family have lived there for ever. Its in the south of India... Its Dravidan... So the most beautiful woman in India is dravidan. AS I pointed out. We tan under the sun. If you took that "black" child I posted.and gave him a job indoors that kept him out of the sun he would lose his tan. I for example currently look portugese. When the sun comes out I will take on a darker tan. At this point I am actually fairer than many north Indian aryans because I am a med student and spend all my time indoors in a cold country while wrapped up...

The Nazis were white. So were the Russians. So was Slobodan Milosevic. One may point out Black people have no History of Genocide.

In their homeland of Asia, particularly in the case of the darker Philippines and Vietnamese, the yellow men have no respect for human life. It is a brutal culture.

Really? Its the chinese who have no respect for human life. Not the Vietnamese. Oh and the Phillipines are fucked up because of american catholic intervention in their country and a prime reason for the separation of church and state.

*cough* Japan *cough* Moron... And remember, India and China are on the same growth scale. We do not use the sweat shop culture. Not unless you want massive fines. Oh and most of Indian heavy goods are manufactured in the south. And actually China's production ability is growing as its population falls. More people does not mean more production. Thats video game logic.

More excuses.

Discover of structure of DNA was Rosalind Franklin. Gandhi is the greatest peacemaker in the History of the world. Even Jesus's Godlike powers quails in front of a man who can tell millions of people to stop rioting and have them listen

You do realize Ghandi was, by your definition, "racist?" He hated both blacks and whites. Read up on it.

He was a product of English Education. And he hated white people because of what they did. The british killed innocent people. 4 million of them during the famine of bengal and incidents such as the Jallianwallah Bagh Massacre. And his hatred was different. He hated what they did not who they were.

It doesn't take an intellectual mind to win a Nobel "peace" prize. It is a sham anyway -- reminds me of the laughable fact Henry Kissinger won one.

Its a peace prize. I agree the man should not get one because he let a genocide happen when General Zhia Hindus and Intellectuals in response to the liberation of Bangladesh while arming the man. He provided US support to a genocidal dictator. One may argue this is not the behaviour of Nobel Peace prize winner.

Wrong. The Aborigines have an average IQ of around 60, while the Ashkenazi Jews have an IQ of around 115. Once again, go here for information on IQ and read up on this.

http://www.davidduke.com/library/race/african101facts.html

David Duke with his 60 year old information? An IQ of 60 means you cannot feed yourself. The aborigines live in the outback... A place that is inhospitable. So inhospitable that wood is a rare resource. A testament to their ingenuity to make functioning weapons out of sticks and survive in an inhospitable climate. White people die out there. Yet they thrived.

Definitely. We see a mass of aborigines inventions in all forms of life. Great aboriginal mathematicians, scientists and philosophers in abundance!

May I point out that they considered the world round and to rotate around the sun. You do realise the west had a crazy period where they never considered another cultures achievements. Hence those idiot spaniards destroying mayan solar instruments which plotted the world's age in centuries and hell plotted star movements because they did not understand how they worked. Just like the reason why you do not know any inventors from India such as Sushuratha (Arguably the Father of Surgery) or Aryabhatta (first solar centric theory written down) or the chinese inventors or the inventor of steel. Not all inventors write down their inventions.

Yet no one has seen one except you. Give us proof of such a breed.

Read your whole goddamn article... It goes into the economic despondancy of Africans due to the inherrant racism in the system.

1. They are poor. Poor people tend to not be healthy because they can only afford. Hence trailer park white people have just as bad a health care status.

2. They are poor so their food habits are poor. Since crap food is cheap in the US.

3. Their education is poor because the US education system is shambolic at its best. And dire at its best.

4. The lack of socialist medicine in the US leaves people in the US who do not have money with inferior care.

5. You need money to make money. Affirmative action does less to help than say an education system that was based on ability rather than money providing these people an opportunity to achieve.

African Americans are hybrids.

1. They produce healthy offspring
2. White people in parts of the balkans such as Moldova live in such conditions also have poor life expectancies due to poor health care.
3. They are genetically exactly similar to white people. Except for a preponderance to Sickle Cell Anaemia. White people are more likely to get Cystic Fibrosis...
4. You have no proof otherwise while I have crazy good medicine!

old comment by ArmandT

Only the lighter skinned Chinese are capable of intelligent thought, though even this is lacking; that the “economy” of China is catching up with America is often proudly stated, pushing back the fact that China has ONE BILLION PEOPLE with which to disperse on cruel sweatshops and manual labour! Any reasonable man knows that a nation of one billion whites would demolish China in every respect. The fact America, with its 300 million population and great internal problems is still able to remain ahead of China - for the time being - is a testament to Aryan ingenuity.

You're an idiot Blake. If any race is superior it's us Chinese. While you white people were screaming for God in the Dark ages, we managed to create one of the greatest civilisations of the country, and keep it upright for 2000 years. We made so many things that you probably think were made by white Europeans and Americans 1000 years after they were truly invented. (inb4Poe)

But to hell with what we say right? The evil seed of racism is implanted in your head, you were told the lie that you are superior because you have white skin.

My ancestors were lied to as well. They and others were cheated with the prospect of jobs, and when they came here they were pushed down because of racism. Even today, Blake, I stand as an immigrant in your country because in part I ran away from racism in my own state. And this is what I get, some half-witted asshole telling me I'm stupid because I'm yellow? Well FUCK YOU!

You justify other culture's degradation by saying we're inferior to you, not realising that it was you white who degraded us in the first place. It is your kind, with your racist mentality, then led to the kind of suffering that we still feel today. I live in a quarter-million dollar home; there are black millionares. Yet we still feel the effects of discrimination upon us.

old comment by

Robert, you're not going to convince us. All your theories come from pure speculation and science is not based on that. That you think that skulls from blacks are different or more small and, therefore, less intelligent, is irrelevant. The question is, is really like that?. Because, you know, you'd be unable to explain, following your logic, why elephants are less intelligent than humans, having a much bigger brain.
You've been unable to demonstrate anything. Referring to books that follow no scientific criteria whatsoever and look like written by a five years old kid, are not going to convince us. Making defective ad hoc interpretations of the Bible is not science either.
After all, Noah can be white but remember that HE CAN'T BEAR CHILDREN. So, what if Ham was born from a Negress and Noah(and I'm not going to explain you biology at this level of discussion)?. It wouldn't be the first time, look Moses. If Black people were animals, the offsprings of such unions wouldn't produce further children and it's not the case.
Third, the Bible, archaeology and the same ancient Egyptian, Sumerian and Greek and Roman sources speak of BLACK CIVILISATIONS, such as Punt, Nubia or Kush. And the Black Pharaos came from Nubia so, draw your own conclusions. Even if Blacks in Africa form tribes to live, it is still a complex form of life which animals can't attain. So, they can't be animals.
And the case of Halle Berry serves. She's pregnant and being the daughter of a black man and a white woman, she should be sterile, like a mule. And she's pregnant, by a white man, nonetheless.
Until you present logic, and not books based on ridiculous best-sellers of the XIX century, you won't convince us.

old comment by

Robert, what we're telling you, and that's why you will never convince us, has two important things:
a)what you're doing is not science at all. Science is based in a method called Hypothetic and Inductive, developed in the Renaissance. What you're doing is speculation and wishful thinking. What scientists do is observing nature. By this observation they formulate a theory and make experiments and test to CONFIRM or REFUTE their theory.
In other words, science doesn't make laws to change reality, it observes reality and draws conclusions that LATER ON can have practical applications.
b)Nature doesn't equate with nurture. What we humans do is adapt nature to our necessities and yes, we can modify several aspects of our life, but those modifications have to follow the rules that nature, which is static, states. For example, we can invent anti-biotics to combat bacteriae but we can't prevent bacteriae to become resistent to our anti-biotics, because it's something nature has provided it with.
In the case of the Black race. If blacks are animals and have a lower IQ, it should be evident because IT'S NATURE. No matter how much I teach a dog or a dolphin, they would never make civilisations or be secretaries of state. You can't make a scientific theory to prevent Condolezzas Rice or Obama to exist. That's not science. If they exist, it means that your theory is false. Condolezza Rice and Obama exist and science explains that it's so BECAUSE BOTH THEY BELONG TO THE HOMO SAPIENS SAPIENS species, not the other way round, that they exist because some "race traitor" invented an alternative reality.

old comment by FMG

And by the way, if Asians have a lower IQ in the homeland(wtf has location to do with intelligence?), how is it that China, Japan and India were far more advanced civilisations than Europeans in the Second Millenium and are very advanced nowadays?, how is it that Pre-Columbus America had host 2 major civilisations without any European intervention?. And just for the sake of laugh, why the craddle of our civilisation comes from Middle East and Africa?

He is using the excuse that these races are not "pure". In one instance he is saying that mixed races are not superior (because marrying your own genetic stock will eventually give you crazy diseases) and the next he is saying that these countries have civilisation because somehow they have acquired white blood. He is swapping within his argument that both mixed races are somehow superior and inferior at the same time. They are superior in terms of genetic healthy thats all. I mean just look at him and Dravidan history (Indus valley) claiming that they are somehow ugly unless they have Aryan blood then they magically become beautiful... (Like Aishwariya Rai who was a Miss World. Who is from the south of India so is Dravidan more than anything) His argument is based of research 50 years old in a subject that is going forward at an unimaginable rate. Its insanity at its highest since it fails to realise that a lot of white traits are not unique to white people (I myself have grey green eyes despite being from India)

old comment by RobertBlake

Replying to a few of these before I head out.

You need yet more proof the Egyptians were a mediterranean people? An analysis of 4000 skulls stll isn't good enough, eh? Well, boy, you asked for it.

image
image
image
image

image

Egyptian slave market - note Negroes kneeling, waiting to be sold. Bologna Museum.

image

A bound and kneeling Nubian, a prisoner of the Egyptians.

image

An Egyptian wall painting showing Black Nubians bringing gold offerings - showing how the White Egyptians depicted their Black neighbors circa 1850 BC.

image

Pharaoh Sesostris II, 12th Dynasty, circa 1845 BC, who forbade Negroes from entering Egypt. Egyptian Museum, Cairo.

image
image

First: the White Egyptian Pharaoh Tuthmosis III circa 1450 BC, and last, the Black Nubian Pharaoh Shabako, circa 710 BC. The last White Egyptians had vanished prior to 800 BC, physically integrated into the mass of Nubian and Semitic peoples who had come to dominate that land. The resultant mixed race population was unable to withstand new invaders, some Semitic and some Black.

The most prominent of the Black Nubian invaders then set themselves up as new Egyptian kings, later called the 25th Dynasty, dated from 746 - 655 BC. As can be seen from the racial features of the statue of Shabako, above right, the 25th dynasty was clearly non-White. Compare Shabako's features to the unmistakably White visage of pharaoh Tuthmosis III (1490-1436 BC).

Unable to maintain the originally White civilization they had inherited, the 25th Dynasty sputtered out of its own accord and was finally destroyed by an Assyrian invasion. Although the fall of Egypt is officially dated as from the end of the 25th Dynasty, in reality the true ancient Egyptians had vanished more than 200 years earlier.

image
image

Above: A mural from the palace of Ramses II in Memphis, circa 1279 BC, shows the pharaoh grasping enemies of Egypt by the hair - two Semites and a Black Nubian.

image
image

Above: Yuya, Egyptian nobleman from 1400 BC, father of Tiy, the wife of Pharaoh Amenhotep III. Yuya's blond hair and Nordic facial structure have been well preserved by the embalming process; Alongside, his equally blond haired wife, Thuya, great grandmother of Tutankhamen.

old comment by RobertBlake

image

image
Blond-haired attendants, from the tomb of Djehutihotpe, Deir el-Bersha, Middle Kingdom Period. T. G. H. James, Ancient Egypt: The Land and its Legacy (London: British Museum Publications, 1988), p. 90

image
Red-haired goddesses, from the tomb of Pharaoh Merneptah (1213-1204 BC). Alberto Siliotti, Guide to the Valley of the Kings (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1996), p. 59

image
This coffin, dating from the 12th Dynasty (1976-1947 BC) belongs to a nobleman named Khui, who was wealthy enough to have a decorated casket, something which only the upper classes could afford. Note his blond hair coloring.

image
Above: Racial imagery from Tutankhamen's tomb: bound Semitic and Black prisoners decorating the curved end of Tutankhamen's walking stick: when the Egyptian king went for a walk, he would hold the enemies of Egypt in his palm.

image

By Tutankhamen's time then, the Egyptians were clearly aware of the growing numbers of their racial enemies creeping up on them. These graphic and stunning references to clearly identifiable racial enemies of Egypt are all the more remarkable when it is born in mind that the population make-up of Egypt had, by the reign of Tutankhamen, already started to swing heavily against the original White Egyptians, with Black and Semitic slaves being commonplace within that civilization.

In addition to this, a significant number of Egyptians themselves were now of mixed race, the Hyksos occupation having left behind a number of Egyptian/Semitic mixes. Significantly, Tutankhamen's widow attempted to strike an alliance with the Indo-European Hittites who had in the interim became the leading power in the Near East, by arranging her marriage to a Hittite prince. (The marriage never took place, as the husband to be was killed just prior to the ceremony).

Now really -- If anyone has the audacity to claim a black Egypt after this, I will direct you to this page.

old comment by RobertBlake

Condi Rice, the inventor of the super soaker, the inventor of the gas mask and the Tuskegee Airmen would like to thank your god as well.

Condi Rice Probably the worst thing to ever happen to America next to George Bush.
Gas mask and super soaker Both LIES! Go here;
http://www33.brinkster.com/iiiii/inventions/

If anyone else wants to cite black inventions, I direct you to this page and it will likely clear things up. Blacks have never invented anything, it is a fact of life. The negroid race is a ball and chain to western civilization. It has never contributed anything to civilization and never will.

For some subhuman apes, we sure aren't doing that shabby I must say.

I tend to disagree with that assessment. For example, among other things;

You score 80 points lower than whites on IQ tests, consistently, even when the NAACP has designed tests specifically for blacks.

You commit 50% of all crime in the United States despite composing only 12% of the population. This means if you were wished off the face of the earth, we would lose hundreds of thousands of rapes, murders and robberies.

Your people have never invented anything or done anything.

It was a mistake to treat the Negro as a human being; he is not an entity that can be Christianized and brought into civilized society. The darker the skin, the darker the soul. I fully believe he deserves to be categorized under a separate species. All learned men throughout history knew this, including Thomas Huxley, Charles Darwin and Josiah Nott.

You only need view Negro "societies" in the modern day and throughout history to show that the Negro race are a higher form of ape, as all the evidence shows.

The Negro is homo sapien. Genetically. 100%...
This is incorrect. I will quote Josiah Clark Nott here, who studied the Negro extensively before the anti-racist Jewish propaganda of the 1960s.

PHYSICAL DIFFERENCES. The Anatomical and Physiological differences, between the Caucasian, the Malay, Mongol, Indian and Negro races, have elicited a great deal of scientific research, and I might very well write an octavo on these points alone. Time, however compels me to restrict my lecture to a parallel between the Caucasian and Negro races. 1 wish it farther to be understood, that my parallel will be limited to the race of Negroes which we see in this country, and which I shall presently describe. There are many other tribes in Africa, which differ widely in color, physical and intellectual characters.
When the Caucasian and Negro are compared, one of the most striking and important points of difference is seen in the conformation of the head. The head of the Negro is smaller by a full tenth the forehead is narrower and more receding, in consequence of which the anterior or intellectual portion of the brain is defective. The upper jaw is broader and more projecting the under jaw inclines out, and is deficient in chin; the lips are larger and correspond with the bony structure; the teeth point obliquely forward and resemble in shape those of Carnivorous animals; the bones of the head are thicker, more dense and heavy, and the same, fact exists with regard to the other bones of the skeleton.

Dr. Gall, in his laborious researches, has established the important fact, which is now conceded, that there is in the animal kingdom, a regular gradation in the form of the brain, from the Caucasian down to the lowest order of animals, and that the intellectual faculties and instincts are commensurate with the size and form.

In animals where the senses and sensual faculties predominate, the nerves coming off from the brain are large, and we find the nerves of the Negro larger than those of the Caucasian. In other portions of the skeleton, differences not less marked, are presented. The arm of the African is much longer than in the Caucasian a Negro of 5 feet 6 has an arm as long as a white man of 6 feet. The arm from the elbow to the hand is much longer in proportion, than in the white man hishand is longer, more bony and tendinous the nails more projecting and stronger.

The chest of the negro is more compressed laterally, and deeper through from before backwards the bones of the pelvis in the male are more slender and narrow ; the muscles on the sides of the pelvis are less full, but more full posteriorly. In the two races the lower limbs are in their relative proportion reversed in their entire measurement, the legs of the African are shorter, but the thigh longer and flatter the bones at the knee joint instead of being straight, are joined at an obtuse angle, pointing forward. The shape of the shin bone, calf, foot and heel, are familiar to you all.

Now it will be seen from this hasty sketch, how many points of resemblance Anatomists have established between the Negro and Ape. It is seen in the head and face, the arms and hands, the compressed chest, the bones and muscles of the pelvis, the flat long thighs, the forward bend of the knee, in the leg, foot and toes. In short, place beside each other av- arage specimens of the Caucasian, Negro and Ourang Outang, and you will perceive a regular and striking gradation substitute for the Negro a Bushman or Hottentot from the Cape of Good Hope, and the contrast is still stronger.”

FACT #17: Among human races numerous studies have been made of the comparative weight of White and Negro brains with results that fell within the range of about an 8-12 percent lower weight for the Negro brain. Such studies have been conducted by Bean, Pearl, Vint, Tilney, Gordon, Todd, and others. (23) (27)

FACT #18: In addition to the difference in brain weight, the Negro brain grows less after puberty than the white. Though the Negro brain and nervous system mature faster than the white brain, its development is arrested at an earlier age which limits further intellectual advancement. (22) (27)

FACT #19: The thickness of the supragranular layer (the outside layer) of the Negro brain is about 15 percent thinner, and its convolutions are fewer and more simple, on average, than that of the White brain. (9)

FACT #20: The frontal lobes of the Negro brain, responsible for abstract conceptional reasoning, are smaller relative to body weight, less fissured, and less complex than those of the White brain.

Hmmm..

This is Djenne in Mali. Pretty neat eh?
Why are you quoting Mali? The Mali/Igbo/Benin empires in Western Africa are not actual creations of the Negro race. I would like to think it was a creation of the Gaunches from the Canary Islands, or from the remnants of the Carthaginians or Romans. There is no evidence for Guache involvement, though there was trans-Saharan influence by Arabs for hundreds of years before the formation of these states and many people in the area of the south fringes of the sahara have Arab blood. The Arabic people have shown themselves able of minor accomplishes such as this; they have, after all, a great infusion of white blood, along with the Caucasian phenotype.

And may I point out it took nearly 2000 years for white people to realise the benefits of boiling water and showers.

A silly myth, they used a rag and bucket in those days and were always clean. I find this amusing coming from a Negroe who’s ancestors dwelled in mudhuts butchering and cannibalizing each other for thousands of years.

image
image

image
image
image
image

The fact that the Negro race have shown themselves unable to match the civilization of the White race to any degree, nor show anything but crime and violence when unleashed as an equal within the society of whites is yet more proof they deserve classification under a different species
You hold laughable delusions of grandeur about your species. The only reason you have the intelligence to correspond with me is because you are both Dravidian (with a considerable infusion of white blood) and on the higher end of the bell curve. I suggest you go live in Africa for a few weeks, or a majority black city in the United States. Assuming you are neither shot nor raped nor attacked, come back to me and tell me how it was.

It is better for both the White race and the Negro race to live separately. Malcolm X was wise enough to see this; though only for the considerable white blood in his body. (Ironically, he was killed by a Negro).

image

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_intelligence

old comment by RobertBlake

Robbie, are you telling us that a block in stone is going to reveal the racial features of a person?. Moreover, are you telling me that Yuya had BLOND HAIR, just because the hair was found so in the tomb(did somebody tell you that hair colour varies with the age and the climatological conditions AND that the colour of that hair was because of the chemicals they added?. I will call it, argumentum ad superficialis.

There are Negro features and Caucasian features. You're naive to deny this. I will illustrate to you a few examples.

image

So indeed -- we can discern their race through facial features. Any reasonable man who looks at the pictures I've supplied on page 2 will agree the Egyptians were white.

image

Explain the Malinese Empire please? Perhaps the richest civilization on Earth in the Middle Ages. It was home to vast trading centers like Timbuktu, large mosques on par with the cathedrals of medieval Europe. It was also home to centers of learning, like the University of Sankore which held the largest collection of books on Earth?

The “Mali” “Empire” is covered on page 2. Needless to say this “Empire” was Arabic with the Negro race used for slave labour, and it’s structures pale in comparison to those of Europe. Of note is that the Arabic people have a great deal of White admixture in their blood. As a general rule; as a civilization becomes whiter, the more they accomplish.

image

Typical building of the arabic Mali empire.

image
image
image

Typical castles and cathedrals of the Medieval Ages.

image

The typical aqueducts found in most Roman cities, built over 2000 years before the Mali "Empire."

image

Ancient Greek temple, built many thousands of years prior.

image

Even a casual glance at the ingenius Greek phalanx utterly blows the Mali "Empire," which is Circa 1400 AD, out of the water.

And by the way, have you been lately in Zimbabwe?, you'd see in the great Zimbabwe how "backwards" they were. And anyway, if they're so stupid, why is it that they have survived in such difficult life conditions?. The Horn of Africa, for example, is not a Paradise. Neither is Kalahari dessert or the Affar territory(however, I laugh at the stupid "achievements" that he superficially attributes to the white race. Probably the landing of the man on the moon had some to do with the black people, bearing in mind that the staff in NASA is composed with a fairly amount of black people).

This is the funniest argument I’ve heard in a long time for black equality.

Zimbabwe was formerly known as Rhodesia, a white country! Rhodesia is a good example of whites coming into a territory, offering jobs, food, and medicine to non-whites which decreases their mortality rate and increases their population. Unfortunately, non-whites begin to outnumber the whites and eventually rise up to slit the throats of their benefactors. Zimbabwe went from one of the best countries in the region under white rule to a wreck of a country indiscernible from any other in Africa.

South Africa is a similar example. Originally a White colony and the richest in Africa, since Black government took over it is now the worst in the world.

image

We see in South Africa and Zimbabwe a future America.

old comment by

Ok, if Condie is one of the worst disgraces that it can happen to you, it reinforces our thesis. Again, science doesn't mean that you have to invent a theory in order to change reality. It's the observation of reality. So, don't complain about the "Jewish propaganda" before the sixties, you're not impressing us. If the Jewish propaganda were not right, there wouldn't have turned things the way they are, in other words, people like Condolezza Rice, Obama, Wentworth Miller or Halle Berry wouldn't exist. No matter how you push it, you'll never have to regret that Flipper is secretary of state, no matter how many activists try to empower dolphins, for example.Similarly, neither you nor the racists who were able to disfranchise blacks feared that mules or dogs or cats would provoke an upheaval, or would rape their ladies. Neither did those animals asked for the right to vote or, moreover, it is not known any brothel who was full of female dogs, cats or donkeys. It is not known that Jefferson had any hybrid bastard with a horse. Nobody lynched animals for a supposed wrongdoing to humans. And beware, black people have invented a lot of things. In fact, many of them have registered patents. That you don't know them or are not known to the public, doesn't mean that they don't exist. Bear in mind that they didn't start to get better education and life conditions until very recently.
And the thesis of the Carthaginese people as an explanation for civilisations in Mali and West Africa is utterly ridiculous. For a person who has translated their cronicles, I laugh. They didn't stay there for long and they actually TRADED with the already established kingdoms.
Besides, collecting samples of the worst and the best of the two worlds is not relevant. All those castles and cathedrals were like a hut for the madrassas, mosques and imperial castles of the East Asia. And there were in some European places "huts" like the African ones you showed. On the other hand, in many places in Africa, there are, as they have pointed out, inmense temples in Sudan or Ethiopia and other monuments like the ruins of Great Zimbabwe, so?. You can't pick and choose and say, presto, now I have demonstrated my thesis. That's not evidence. Following your logic, the Phoenicians and the Celts never left a signal of their great achievements and their "huts" looked more or less like the African one you showed,so it means that they were a totally underdevoloped society. Nothing further from the truth. Thanks to the Phoenicians, the coins with which we pay and the letters in this comp exist. And the Celts invented many things, like central heat or the plough, that the Romans borrowed.

old comment by

Zimbabwe was not a white country. It was a country where a white elite lived very well and a black majority lived enslaved. That, and a disastrous management of their president Robert Mugabe, your namesake, did the rest. But what's the problem?, Albania, a white nation, and many other in the eastern Europe suffered the same luck. Spain or Greece were in a similar situation 60 years ago. And what's wrong with South Africa?, it's the most advanced nation in Africa(UN data and I, who I have lived there), they lived better than in Serbia, for example, or Lithuania(again, data from UN).And Africa, overal, is growing quicker than Europe or United States(9% v/s 2% & 4%). Moreover, the Vikings and the Celts lived similarly to say, the Morroccian or the Senegalese today.

old comment by RobertBlake

Again, science doesn't mean that you have to invent a theory in order to change reality. It's the observation of reality.

Nearly every scientist before the 1950s recognized the Negro race as a different species. The comments here that attack me on the basis of creation being wrong are the most amusing. Even from the perspective of evolution the Negro should be considered a beast. For example;

"[Man has] diverged into distinct races, or as they may be more fitly called, sub-species" and that "some of these, such as the Negro and European, are so distinct that, if specimens had been brought to a naturalist without any further information, they would undoubtedly have been considered by him as good and true species." - Charles Darwin

The reason the Negro should be considered a beast by Biblical standards is covered in an earlier post. To sum things up, the Bible clearly shows that all three sons - Japheth, Shem and Ham - were white.

So, don't complain about the "Jewish propaganda" before the sixties, you're not impressing us. If the Jewish propaganda were not right, there wouldn't have turned things the way they are, in other words, people like Condolezza Rice, Obama, Wentworth Miller or Halle Berry wouldn't exist.

image

Obama pictured with his full-blooded Kenyan relatives. Note the drastic contrast. I think both you and I know Obama is only getting votes due to the colour of his skin - the only reason he won his seat as a senator is due to some kind of scandal. Something like 90% of blacks are voting for Obama. Racism truly is alive, but not in the way you think.

image
image

Halle Berry has obvious nordic facial features. I'd guess her blood at over 70% white.

This is a typical Negro woman, with Negro features (though even this girl has a large propotion of white and arabic blood -- about 40%, I'd guess)

image

This is what the more pure blooded Negro looks like;

image

Finally, you cite Wentworth Miller! He is so white that you can hardly distinguish him as having any kind of Negro ancestry, whatsoever!

image

Hilarious! Of all the Negroes you cite, all are at least half white!

Nobody lynched animals for a supposed wrongdoing to humans.

The KKK was organized to protect white people, especially white women, from the newly freed black slaves. After the slaves were freed, chaos errupted in many areas, including blacks raping whites. The Klan was formed as a way to apprehend these criminals and protect white people. The Klan never lynched a single Negro. Zero. Never happened.

They did, however, lynch several criminals. This is why you'll see all the Whites standing around the Negro in question in photographs. Whenever a criminal was punished back then people would want to be included in the memory of the judgement.

Think of it this way. Around 4,750 people were lynched between 1882 and 1968.

In 2005 there were about 34,460 white women raped by black men, which comes out to 94 per day, or 4 per hour.

Know how many black women were raped by white men?

Between 0 and 10.

And beware, black people have invented a lot of things. In fact, many of them have registered patents.

A lie. Blacks have never invented anything. Go here and check the patents yourself.

http://www33.brinkster.com/iiiii/inventions/

old comment by

Obama got his post as senator because he's got a doctorate in Harvard, he worked for 11 years for his community and he got good results there. So, what type of "scandal" that you don't even know was..........isn't it wishful thinking and a convenient excuse because it debunks your theory?. Show evidence or shut up. And that until 1950 people thought that Black people were inferior, didn't mean that it had to be true. The question is, without Crow laws, segregation and giving them the same opportunities, have black people attained the same opportunities as white people?, yes, to a extent, Condolezza Rice, Obama, Colin Powel, Ralph Ellison or Kofi Annan are the evidence. So, case closed. Don't confuse, again, nature with nurture. By the way, I don't find any difference between his Kenyan relatives except the suit. Well, that and the fact that he has a Doctorate in Law in Harvard and the fact that he's half white and half black because his daddy got a scholarship to study in the University of Hawaii..................well, maybe there are far more diffences if we compare the relatives between themselves. By the way, have you heard of a civilisation, no matter how weird and bizarro was the scenario, were people were afraid of animals taking power, raping(really or not)their women, comitting crimes(wait, which society considers animals criminals and has taken them into trial?), provoking chaos or fearing, in definitive, that they had any kind of initiative?. What it demonstrates is that BLACKS ARE NOT ANIMALS, of course, and, deep down, they knew they weren't. Otherwise, they wouldn't be able to provoke all that. No matter how violents prey dogs turn, we know that they won't organise a pack an disenfranchise us. No matter how much we mistreat them, we know that they won't rebel. No matter how much violence we use to tame bulls and how savage they are, nobody fears them raping women. And of course, if an animals caused damage, they never brought him to trial. If they did with the blacks, and lynching were organised because they were "criminals"(and they didn't do the same with dogs or domestic animals for a similar offense. They brought the owner to trial), they owe us an explanation of whether they're humans or not and how they saw them. Only humans are accountable for morality and are responsible beings, and it's something that it's accepted since ever, even in the fifties.
And I don't know what's wrong with miss Ethiopia, or with the black 50 years old woman you show. The former is cute and the latter surely was so in her youth. I saw Miss Nigeria four years ago. I thought she was the most beautiful woman in the world and apparently most of the people thought so, she was Miss World. And I find Denzel Washington really hot(a pity he's married)

old comment by

I don't find Pat Buchannan or the late Jerry Falwel attractive, for example, and I don't post their photos on internet to show to the world how ugly rednecks are..........after all, what's beauty, after all?. That they were Mister Universe wouldn't change their low IQ and their bigotry a bit.
Concerning intelligence, it's funny. In the twenties, it was regarded as gospel that bilinguals weren't less intelligent than the average joe because of some "tests" they did to them. Fourty years later, the same tests were made and, magic, the scores varied. Of course, this revision was motivated by the fact that Canadian bilinguals in French-English and German bilinguals were, on average, more intelligent than monolinguals, with tests and with common sense(they have jumped in the social scale a lot). The reasons were that the tests of the twenties were bad designed, biased and therefore, not very reliable. With a more neutral tone and improvements that research had developed, the opposite of the scope varied. Research after research shows the same results.
I don't know if Robbie is aware of the fact that science is not inmutable. The object of study is, but the limited capacity of the humans makes science self-corrective. Condolezza Rice shouldn't have existed, I repeat, if the beliefs in the fifties were true. As she exists, it's the methodology that led to that conclusion what has to be revised.
If the Jewish propaganda, as he calls him, were wrong, no matter how much they had worked, it simply wouldn't have turned that way.

old comment by

Robbie, have you realised that the same argument can be used against you?. If we can choose non-representatives of a race(whatever it means), it means that you might be doing the same with your pics. After all, do you know that albinism is something that affects ALL RACES(it's lack of melanine), all humans, being them black, white or Asian?. We may suspect that you're choosing SOME albinos you found ugly, but that they don't represent the majority of albinos(and bear in mind that a genetic defect is not likely to make you look like Miss America). Melanine doesn't hide anyting, it's part of the race itself. Without melanine, you are lacking something intrinsical to the human being. And anyway, we're dealing with a very subjective topic(DNA analysis demonstrates that what a pity that slave owners didn't agree with you!!)

old comment by RobertBlake

Generally speaking, you will find the Negro race in national geographic and Whites in playboy.

image

image
image

image

If anyone here can cite me a single Black inventor or attractive Black who has 100% Negro ancestry, I will be very impressed! It should be patently obvious to anyone who reads through all my posts here with an open mind that the Negro is closer to an ape than a human, and Whites are the only true "humans."

We may suspect that you're choosing SOME albinos you found ugly, but that they don't represent the majority of albinos

My challenge to you above.

Here are many more Albinos, highlighting the ape-like features of the Negro race.

http://eatliver.com/i.php?n=1297

old comment by RobertBlake

To recap on everything so far;

1) I have demonstrated that the physiological structure of the Negro resembles that of an ape, not a man, both graphically and with evidence. See page 2.

2) I have demonstrated that every civilization throughout history has been White, and even the lesser "civilizations" such as Mali were the product of Arabs, who are themselves greatly white.

3) I have demonstrated that pure-blooded Negroes have 40 IQ points below whites, while African Americans have 20 IQ points below whites.

4) I have demonstrated the appauling crime rates of the Negro race. In America, Negroes commit a shocking 50% of all crime, and 60% of all rapes and robberies.

5) I have demonstrated that even when given a society, the Negro race has trashed it (eg: Egypt, South Africa, Zimbabwe)

6) I have demonstrated the Biblical basis for the Negro race is as a beast, not a man. (Though I could provide far more evidence, the fact all three sons of Noah are provably white speaks for itself).

image
image
Beast or man? The Negro race.

Christians - consider the Negro not a brother in Christ but a beast!

Evolutionists, accept the Negro race is inferior and a separate species - just as Darwin did!

old comment by

I think that Jessica Biel has 1/4 of black blood. And I think that Robin Givens, Tyson's wife and Miss Zambia featured in Playboy.............and anyway, I think that Jaimie Lee Curtis looks like a monkey, and that Jerry Falwell too but, again, it's all subjective.
And anyway, bearing in mind that the patents register has some Kenyan and South African ones and that 1/3 of the research staff of Boots is black..........pretty much invention, I think. However, with an open mind, not a shallow analysis, we have reached two conclusions:
a)that racial features and beauty are very subjective and we could disscuss that nonsense for ages. Some blacks look like apes, and some blacks too, but we don't agree because we have different tastes. Why?, well, remember the common ancestor.
b)That there are black inventors. You debunk a list of black inventors that has been made with a criteria because it doesn't show you what you want to hear and is biased and you use another one, much more biased than the other, without peer review. Ok, whatever. Of course, we understand that there are no black inventors before the nineteenth century but that doesn't mean anything. We say that there are more than 1500 patents registered by black people per year and you don't accept it because a white supremacist group has an article that says that there aren't. Do you think that it leads ANYWHERE?
And of course, like 2/3 of your data is biased, is outdated and inconsistent with reality. Do you think you're impressing us?. How much should we open our mind without having our grey matter flowing out?

old comment by RobertBlake

Mmmm, Jewish conspiracy for dessert after a racist main course.

Conspiracy eh? Even the mild Wikipedia will tell you this.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_Rights_Movement_(1896-1954)

"Many from the American Jewish community tacitly or actively supported the civil rights movement. Several of the co-founders of the NAACP were Jewish. Many of its white members and leading activists came from within the Jewish community. The great majority of American Jews who were active in promoting civil rights were secular Jews, Reform Jews and Conservative Jews, especially during the later years.

Jewish philanthropists actively supported the NAACP and various civil rights group, and schools for African-Americans. The Jewish philanthropist Julius Rosenwald funded the creation of dozens of primary schools, secondary schools and colleges for disenfranchised black youth. He created a fund which provided seed money for building 5,000 schools for black Americans, mostly in the rural South. What is most remarkable is that black communities essentially taxed themselves twice to pay for such schools, which required community matching funds. Often blacks comprised most of the residents. Public funds were committed for the schools, and they raised additional funds by community events, and sometimes by members' getting second mortgages on their homes. At one time some forty percent of rural southern blacks were learning at Rosenwald elementary schools.

Rosenwald also contributed to historically black colleges such as Howard, Dillard and Fisk universities.

The PBS television show From Swastika to Jim Crow discussed Jewish involvement in the civil rights movement. It demonstrated that Jewish survivors of the Holocaust came to teach at many Southern schools, where they reached out to black students

Thus, in the 1930s and '40s when Jewish refugee professors arrived at Southern Black Colleges, there was a history of overt empathy between Blacks and Jews, and the possibility of truly effective collaboration. Professor Ernst Borinski organized dinners at which Blacks and Whites would have to sit next to each other - a simple yet revolutionary act. Black students empathized with the cruelty these scholars had endured in Europe and trusted them more than other Whites. In fact, often Black students - as well as members of the Southern White community - saw these refugees as "some kind of colored folk."

Source - PBS website From Swastika to Jim Crow
The American Jewish Committee, American Jewish Congress, and Anti-Defamation League became active in promoting civil rights."

old comment by RobertBlake

Well Blake, you are right in one thing.

There are differences in brain sizes and IQ alright, especially between racist and non-racist.

We'll feed you no more, please quote unverified and debunked data from the 60s all you like.

Curious, how do you explain the following facts;

- The fact all three sons of Noah were white?

- The fact the Bible refers to both men and beasts that wear clothing (sack-cloth) as we read in Jonah 3:8?

- The fact the Negro race has never invented anything, nor built a civilization?

- The disgusting state of Africa, even with billions of dollars of white aid?

- The fact Negroes commit 50% of all crime in America? (US Justice department statistics)

- The fact the Negro race scores 20 points lower in IQ among African Americans (with 30% white blood) and 40 points lower in native Africa?

Hardly "outdated data!" Go here

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_intelligence

Even James Watson, co-discoverer of the DNA Double Helix and winner of a nobel prize admitted the inferiority of blacks very recently, as did William Shockley. If you could find me even one study that shows equal intelligence among blacks and whites, I would be gobsmacked.

- The uncanny resemblance between blacks and apes?

image
image

- The massive difference between blacks and whites, physically? (more of these covered on page 2, but pictures speak a thousand words)

image
image

image
image
image

old comment by

No, Robert, you haven't demonstrated a damn thing.

Your argument "the black man is ugly, so he's inferior" is nothing more than your subjective opinion. "Ugly" and "apelike" are statements of opinion and have nothing to do with anything. There is not a single set of attractive features.

You post those photos of African albinos and laugh and point. Hoo-hoo, so ugly, nyuk nyuk nyuk. Well--yes. Albinism is a genetic mutation that in nature is very harmful. It makes anyone look less attractive than they otherwise would.

The white/black dichotomy is false. Across the world you have whites, blacks, Indians, Chinese, Native Americans, Aborigines, and many others, with substantial variation within a "race." The native civilizations of Central and South America, for instance, had beautiful architecture, science, technology, astronomy, and a well developed religion, when the Spaniards committed genocide against them -- and they had NEVER had any contact with Whitey before then. Their ancestors were Asiatic people who crossed the land bridge 10,000 or more years ago.

You use ancient Egyptian art portraying some of them as blond to prove that Egypt was white. Funny, if they were white, why would they color themselves with the exact same shade that they use for their "negro" slaves? And you are, I hope, aware that Egyptians had these little things called cosmetics? Yes, like most ancient cultures, they dyed their hair and wore wigs and makeup. In Egypt it was fashionable to wear vivid hues of nail polish. Doesn't mean they actually had red nails. In ancient Greece, blond hair was the ideal, and they bleached their hair to achieve the look, but it wasn't the color they were born with. Ancient art often depicts an idealized version of people. (But the Egyptians in the art you showed us still painted their portraits black. Evidently they didn't see pale skin as an ideal that they should portray in their art.)

You cite works by scientists who agree with your views. A cursory search for the proponents of your theory shows that every one of them is associated with racist controversy. It's like the people who cite scientists with ties to the oil industry -- yeah, their work goes against the consensus of global warming (a phenomenon caused by white and Asian countries). It's insulting to everyone's intelligence to use such a selective approach to scientific findings.

And then you have the sheer gall to include the Bible alongside your selective "science." The Bible is a book with a little history and a lot of myth, and I hate to break it to you, but Noah and Adam are myth. Much of the Bible's alleged history has been utterly disproved by archeology. And I am not a "godless atheist"; I am a Neo-Pagan, so don't try it. It's just ridiculous to cite the flood story as historical evidence.

old comment by RobertBlake

Firstly -- your belief that my views on the Negro species are summed up as "blacks are ugly, thus inferior" is laughable. I cite that only to show their similarity to apes. If you put three specimins side by side - a gorilla, a negro and a man, you will see a striking progression.

You've clearly never had to live around Negroes. Your idea of them comes from the television.

The crime statistics speak for themselves. Go to the US Justice Department website and look them up yourself.

Blacks commit 50% of all crime in the United States.
Of all interracial crime, 90% is black on white.
35,000 women are raped each year by Blacks.

This is repulsive.

This is disgusting.

Allowing a race of apes who never developed a civlization of their own; and ruined one when given it (as is the case with South Africa and Zimbabwe) is sheer madness.

Consider the fact America is to be majority non-white by 2050, and you see a serious problem on the horizon.

I post pictures of African Albinos because melanin tends to hide their facial features.

What culture? Sacrifices of people for an imaginary god? Instead of a doctor they had a witch. Stealing and murder was their life. Tribes fighting each other, while they have a lot more potential than europeans? A patent lie. The "native Americans" had a savage and brutal culture. It was so terrible that the natives flocked to Cortez when he arrived, seeking liberation from their Aztec and Mayan masters.

image

Above: a detail from the Codex, illustrating the cannibalism which shocked the White explorers. According to the Aztecs, the flesh of the palm of humans was the choicest delicacy: it was a treat reserved only for the nobles. The rest of Aztec society had to quite literally make do with the bones.

image

Above: This original Aztec drawing shows the practice of human sacrifice which was central to their religion.

There is much evidence to show that Whites built the rudiments of what "civilization" the "Native Americans" had. Look up Kennewick Man.

when the Spaniards committed genocide against them -- and they had NEVER had any contact with Whitey before then. Their ancestors were Asiatic people who crossed the land bridge 10,000 or more years ago.

Laughable! "The spaniards committed genocide against them!" You call a small band of 500 men fighting against hundreds of thousands of brutes "genocidal!" They were brave adventurers. What the Aztecs and Incas had in place was nothing compared to what Europe had. The fact that 500 men conquered this empire is a testament to the strength, courage, and fortitude of whites.

image

Above: The battle of Cholula - Spanish prisoners unfortunate enough to be captured by the Amerinds were eaten (top center) and decapitated, with their heads being thrown at the remaining Spanish soldiers (bottom center).

image

The Spanish finally conquer the savage Aztecs with a band of only 500 men.

They didn't. Look at these pictures.

image

White Egyptians with Negro slaves.

image

A bound and tied Nubian, slave to the Egyptians.

image

Negro slaves taking offerings to the Egyptians.

image
image

Above: A mural from the palace of Ramses II in Memphis, circa 1279 BC, shows the pharaoh grasping enemies of Egypt by the hair - two Semites and a Black Nubian.

image

Who are the racial enemies of Egypt in this picture, hmmm?

image
image

Above: Racial imagery from Tutankhamen's tomb: the ecclesiastical throne, shown assembled, and a full view of the footrest. Bound Semitic and Black prisoners appear on the footstool: the Egyptian king would rest his feet on his foes.

image

Above: Racial imagery from Tutankhamen's tomb: the Egyptian king's sandals have bound Black and Semitic prisoners inlaid into the soles: when the king walked in these shoes, he would crush the enemies of Egypt underfoot.

image

When the Egyptian king went for a walk, he would hold the enemies of Egypt in his palm. Left; A semite. Right: a nubian.

image

Above: Semites, clearly identified as racially foreign with distinctive "Jewish" noses, present tributes to the Egyptian pharaoh, a painted scene from the tomb of Sobkhotep at Thebes.

Pharoahs of Egypt, indisputably of the White race;

image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image

You cite works by scientists who agree with your views.

You cite views by scientists that agree with your views. Shock horror!

If you don't like the Biblical account of things, do you want to hear what Darwin said?

old comment by

You've clearly never had to live around Negroes. Your idea of them comes from the television.

I lived for 20 years in the American South, idiot, and somehow I was never raped, or stolen from, or otherwise threatened by a black man. Is this how you argue, spout crap with zero evidence whatsoever?

The crime statistics speak for themselves. Go to the US Justice Department website and look them up yourself.

Blacks commit 50% of all crime in the United States.
Of all interracial crime, 90% is black on white.
35,000 women are raped each year by Blacks.

This is repulsive.

This is disgusting.

Correction -- 50 percent of CONVICTIONS are of blacks, most of whom had a public defender, while wealthier people could afford a good lawyer who got them off. It is a fact that if a white man and a black man both commit murder in a death penalty state, the black is far likelier to be executed for it.

The crime problem is POVERTY not RACE. Have you ever been poor? Have you ever felt that it was hopeless, that you would never get anywhere? That is the mindset that fosters most street crime -- desperation. Check out a criminal psychology book if you don't believe me.

And have you ever considered how 99 percent of psychopathic serial killers in America have been white men? By your logic, the white man must be genetically predisposed to being a psychopath.

I post pictures of African Albinos because melanin tends to hide their facial features.

No, heavy melanin is a natural, expected addition to the set of features recognized as African, and the absence of it is jarring. The sense of ugliness comes from seeing a face that is out of harmony. If you think African features are inherently ugly or apelike, you're entitled to that opinion, but that's all it is, an opinion.

What culture? Sacrifices of people for an imaginary god?

Who is to say what god is imaginary?

Does it not count as human sacrifice when people are burned at the stake, tortured, and crucified upside down, as the Europeans did not only to their own people in the Inquisition, but to the natives as well?

Oh, by the way -- the ancient Druids did human sacrifice as well. So did the Chinese and the Indians.

Your Bible contains many passages that speak of human sacrifice, cannibalism, and even coprophilia. The story of Yahveh commanding Abraham to sacrifice his son is just the tip of the iceberg. Human sacrifice was a part of every culture.

Instead of a doctor they had a witch.

Right, and modern medicine was invented in the 1500s.

Get a clue. EVERY DOCTOR EVERYWHERE USED SUPERSTITION IN THAT ERA.

Stealing and murder was their life. Tribes fighting each other, while they have a lot more potential than europeans? A patent lie.

Yep, and Europe was peaceful and war-free. No witch burnings, no Inquisition, no empire wars, no Protestant vs. Catholic bloodshed.

Oh wait.....

You idiot, you are using the worst creations of the HUMAN race and claiming that white people somehow never perpetrated them.

They didn't. Look at these pictures.

I don't see any group of people that could be considered white. They all have dark brown skin. The Egyptian war leader is portrayed in bronze because it is art, and in ancient art, color was used to indicate the importance of elements in a composition. The Egyptian leaders are the focus of it; so the artists used pigments to make them stand out. But not Caucasian colored pigments. Maybe your monitor is out of focus.

If you don't like the Biblical account of things, do you want to hear what Darwin said?

And Freud thought that women were inherently amoral because they didn't have penises. He wrote that. It doesn't mean that everything else he did was incorrect. People reflect the common social opinions of their era, and those who think critically do not make anyone into a god.

old comment by RobertBlake

a) You obviously did not live in a majority black area.

b) Personal experience means nothing. The statistics speak for themselves. For every white like you, I can find ten others who were victimized at the hand of a Negro.

Texas is one example of a state in the south ruined. Texas has increased in Population 122% from 9 million in 1960 to 20 million in 2000.

Their violent crime rate has risen over 700% during the same time

http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/txcrime.htm

*sighs* Yes, that is the reason. The reason Blacks are convicted 50% of the time is not because the evidence clearly shows it. It is because they are “poorer” and cannot afford a lawyer. Despite the fact in the US everyone is entitled to a free lawyer. Obviously poor oppressed blacks are not committing these crimes.

I’m going to ignore the stupid simplicity of this argument putting aside the fact that the poverty line between Blacks and Whites is very close, and that the fact that my grandfather, along with millions of other elderly white people today, who were once as poor as church mice, did not go around committing pointless crimes and making excuses for them. I will refute you statistically.

West Virginia, which has the nation's lowest crime rate, suffers from chronic poverty and has the highest unemployment in the U.S. It also has the fewest police per capita. West Virginia is over 96% White. The District of Columbia, which enjoys the highest average annual salaries and is second only to Alaska in personal income per capita, leads the nation in just about every category of crime including murder, robbery, aggravated assault, and vehicle theft. D.C. also has the country's strictest gun control, highest police costs per capita, highest ration of police and correctional officers per citizen, and highest rate of incarceration. Its permanent population is over 80% Black. (http://tinyurl.com/8k52o)

This is just one example. The amount of blacks in a city is the single best indication for how dangerous it will be, not “poverty.”

And have you ever considered how 99 percent of psychopathic serial killers in America have been white men? By your logic, the white man must be genetically predisposed to being a psychopath.

Another lie. The reason most serial killers is white is because America is mostly white! Just look at the murder statistics for South Africa 50 murders a day ! That is the number of murders committed in white New Zealand in a whole year.

22% of Blacks are serial killers in the United States, despite being only 12% of the population.

http://www.lagriffedulion.f2s.com/serial.htm

Who is to say what god is imaginary?

This is a myth.

http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/madden200406181026.asp

“In recent years the Inquisition has been subject to greater investigation. In preparation for the Jubilee in 2000, Pope John Paul II wanted to find out just what happened during the time of the Inquisition's (the institution's) existence. In 1998 the Vatican opened the archives of the Holy Office (the modern successor to the Inquisition) to a team of 30 scholars from around the world.
Now at last the scholars have made their report, an 800-page tome that was unveiled at a press conference in Rome on Tuesday. Its most startling conclusion is that the Inquisition was not so bad after all. Torture was rare and only about 1 percent of those brought before the Spanish Inquisition were actually executed. As one headline read "Vatican Downsizes Inquisition."

Oh, by the way -- the ancient Druids did human sacrifice as well. So did the Chinese and the Indians.
It only happened with the Celts, and it was foretold in the Bible. These people were not with the Lord.
"The Lord will drive you and the king set over you (the pure line of Judah) to a nation unkown to you or your fathers. There you will worship other gods, gods of wood and stone" Deut. 28:36.

Human sacrifice in the Bible? What a laugh! You’ll notice that God did not sacrifice Issac! Some example! Nor does the Bible include “cannibalism.” You’re being silly.

Right, and modern medicine was invented in the 1500s. Get a clue. EVERY DOCTOR EVERYWHERE USED SUPERSTITION IN THAT ERA.

Wrong. Medicine goes back to Hippocrates, and then even further back to the ancient Egyptians in 3500 BC. Their medical knowledge was extremely advanced. Go google the Romans and medicine. Really fascinating how much they knew.

Yep, and Europe was peaceful and war-free. No witch burnings, no Inquisition, no empire wars, no Protestant vs. Catholic bloodshed.
Already covered above. The “inquisition” and witch burnings are a myth.

I don't see any group of people that could be considered white. They all have dark brown skin.
That’d be because they were in the desert! Their facial features are clearly white. The skull analysis (of 4000 skulls) that I posted earlier proves without a shadow of a doubt they were White.

image

There is a very clear difference between apes and men. The Negro can be demonstrated as a higher form of ape in every conceivable way.

image

According to you, this tanned woman must be an arab because she isn’t snow white.
The Egyptian war leader is portrayed in bronze because it is art, and in ancient art, color was used to indicate the importance of elements in a composition.

*rolls eyes* Clearly the fact all the enemies are black is just a coincidence.

Freud was a Jew, so I’m not too interested in what he had to say.

old comment by

I lived in a majoritary black area, I worked with black people. Apart from the fact that they're like you and me, nothing happened. Robert and William, can you provide REAL data?. Uglyness isn't a synonym of lack of intelligence. Otherwise, Margharet Tatcher, Abe Lincoln or Adrianus emperor of Rome would have never got there. Your arguments are superficial, to say the least. We show data, it's false, because you say so. Demonstrate means with reliable data, not with impression from artistic expression or isolated cases of albinism. If we say that China, Sumer, Egypt, the Khmer and the Ethiopian empire were not white, we're telling the truth, with contrasted data from all sources, not stretching like a gum the concept of white or black and backpedaling from "no mixing" to "well, they're part white".
If we show updated data about DNA analysis, IQ tests and sociological studies which have been put in practice, we're not using Jewish propaganda. Thanks to that "Jewish propaganda", the percentage of blacks that go to university has double the past 20 years(and whites don't go much there,anyway). There is delincuency in the black community?, of course. Maybe POVERTY has something to do with it. I was in Senegal, in Seychelles and Reunion Island, and nothing happened to me. Moreover, I feel safer than in Birgminghan, for example.

old comment by Pickle

"Condi Rice Probably the worst thing to ever happen to America next to George Bush."
I thought we were talking about "IQ" here? Take a look at her qualifications, and try again. She sure as hell is smarter than David Duke will ever be.

"Gas mask and super soaker Both LIES! Go here;
http://www33.brinkster.com/iiiii/inventions/

Robert, I don't believe you have a firm grasp of what inventing means. In that case, if we use your same logic, then whites never invented paper presses or writing, since they didn't "invent" them first. Your application of the term "invention" is patently wrong and incorrect.

Now for the Yes and No part:
Yes or No:

Was the Super Soaker(TM) not invented by a black man named Lonnie Johnson?

Was the Gas Mask (as designed by Garrett Morgan) as well as the Traffic light invented by a black man?

Say no and you are a liar.

See, the thing is, is that whites may have invented these things before hand, but they were crude and unrefined, not to mention costly.

Notice how many people attempted to design airplanes and how many of them were crap before someone got it right. For all practical purposes, these two inventions (the first very good versions of them that led to later improvements) were made by black men.

"I tend to disagree with that assessment. For example, among other things;

You score 80 points lower than whites on IQ tests, consistently, even when the NAACP has designed tests specifically for blacks."

When was the NAACP ever in the psychometrics business? Did you just not say earlier that "full blooded" blacks scored 40 points lower instead of the 80 that you just pulled out of your ass now?

"You commit 50% of all crime in the United States despite composing only 12% of the population. This means if you were wished off the face of the earth, we would lose hundreds of thousands of rapes, murders and robberies."

Wrong. Take a look at this study, and the data concludes that when in similar economic conditions, blacks and whites commit the same amount of crime and are no more dangerous than each other.

(L.J. Krivo and R.D. Peterson, "Extremely Disadvantaged Neighborhoods and Urban Crime," Social Forces 75(2) (December 1996); Barbara Chasin. Inequality and Violence in the United States. (NJ: Humanities Press International, 1997)

"Your people have never invented anything or done anything."

Jazz music, Mark Dean's work in streamlining plug and play technologies, Jude Igwemezie's Norfast Tie Plate and Clip Assembly railroad technologies, Eliah McCoy's work on railroad technologies, http://www.edofolks.com/html/pub138.htm <- that guy, not to mention tons of other things.

By using your same standard, white people have never invented anything seeing as the methods and tools they used to build upon foreign inventions were not strictly theirs.

"It was a mistake to treat the Negro as a human being; he is not an entity that can be Christianized and brought into civilized society. The darker the skin, the darker the soul. I fully believe he deserves to be categorized under a separate species."

We have voodoo, which is mega cooler than Christianity. Please explain then, if blacks are a separate species, how they are able to interbreed with other humans with no side effects?

Before you answer about how hybridization destroys the health of a human being born from it, please take a look at the people who wind up with Tay Sachs the most and an inbred Dalmatian.

"All learned men throughout history knew this, including Thomas Huxley, Charles Darwin and Josiah Nott."

They are outmoded.

"You only need view Negro "societies" in the modern day and throughout history to show that the Negro race are a higher form of ape, as all the evidence shows."

The "evidence" you present shows nothing of the sort and if it were valid; all of the women who go on the Maury Povich show and say "Well, the baby looks like him!", the man would always be the father of the child, but this is not the case always.

old comment by

Robert, his supposed bro and others who have posted here are not aware of the art of trolling. The art of trolling is complicated and requires practice. They don't realise that repeating like a parrot what people say in Stormfront and their buddies is not convenient. In those places, they don't wave their real opinion in front of profanes. No way sir!, they have two speeches, one when they think they're among those in their white brotherhood colleagues and other for the pariah from outside. It's a rule you have to learn, that is, to treat the subjects as if they were universal and EVIDENT and keep on that, even if it doesn't sound true.
Second, nobody admits, even unintentionally, his ignorance and bigotry on the subject. You have to say that you have three PhDs, that you've been to Africa ten times and you have been raped, smugged and punched in the South, which is not true, of course, and that you speak ten languages,including spoken Aramaic. Don't fool guys who probably have lived in multicultural towns, have university degrees and have traveled all around the world with your redneck and white trash pride, let alone correct Greek husbands who have lived there and know what they're talking about. And, of course, never admit that your sources are biased. Try to pretend a little. If you don't, It ends the fun too soon.
And finally, change the focus of your argument. Insisting on argument that hold on social stereotypes, subjective features or stereotyping in general, as well as too much bad languages, parody and repeating like a parrot the same things all over, are too obvious and they're not even funny to demolish. And give up with dignity. Don't say "I win", if people don't reply. To begin with, because it's a lie. They give up because it's impossible to argue with trolls that have such an alternative reality. Second, because they will chant victory and you'll have run out of arguments to start all over again.

old comment by POSW

OK, Robert. I'm going to try to be civil here, but all the ignorant things you've posted are going to make it hard.This is my last post responding to you, because, frankly, I find your views disgusting, ugly, and unfair.

- The fact all three sons of Noah were white?

Prove that Noah existed without using the Bible. You can't. There is no objective evidence for a flood, or a Noah, for that matter.

- The fact the Negro race has never invented anything, nor built a civilization?

How about the pacemaker and the Songhai Empire, a giant civilization centered in what is now Mali?

- The disgusting state of Africa, even with billions of dollars of white aid?

There are a few countries doing fairly well in Africa. Botswana, Nigeria, South Africa, I can go right on down the list. So, yes, there is a lot of poverty, backwardsness, and AIDS in Africa, but those billions of dollars are starting to pay off.

- The fact Negroes commit 50% of all crime in America? (US Justice department statistics)

Has more to do with racist police, white lenience on other whites, and the environment that poor blacks are basically forced to live in. Plus, 86% of all violent criminals are male. Does this mean men are bad?

- The fact the Negro race scores 20 points lower in IQ among African Americans (with 30% white blood) and 40 points lower in native Africa?

That has more to do with the relatively high levels of education in the US, and less with "white blood".

If we really wanted to test your crackpot theory, we'd have to use students who all go to the same school and grew up in the same neighborhood. The way you dismiss the power of a person's environment is baffling. Oh, and James Watson doesn't believe in the Bible, either. There goes your belief about Noah's sons.

- The uncanny resemblance between blacks and apes?

Humans, whether black or white, are apes. This has been pointed out. And that white woman whose picture you posted doesn't exactly have the prettiest face.

No, not really. The white and black man look like the same species to me, just in different colors. People who originate from the upper northern hemisphere are very likely to have lighter skin. That is all.

You've clearly never had to live around Negroes. Your idea of them comes from the television.

There are several of them in my mostly white and/or Jewish school, including the librarian.

The "native Americans" had a savage and brutal culture.

And the Europeans didn't? Crusades, constant wars during the Dark Ages, the attempted genocide of the native Americans... The European continent was a violent and lawless place until the Romans attempted to bring order to it.

*carvings of ancient Egyptians*

So? Ancient Egyptians had a variety of skin colors. Personally, I could see them as a mixture of Semites and Africans.

If you don't like the Biblical account of things, do you want to hear what Darwin said?

So Darwin was a racist. We don't worship him, if that's what you think.

Did you even read what he wrote? Yes, in the US everyone is entitled to a free lawyer. Thing is, if you do use one of these overworked and uncompetent public defenders, you have a good chance of being convicted

Who did the first cataract removals? Indians. And go look up Ayurveda - the Indians were remarkably advanced for their time.

There is a very clear difference between apes and men. The Negro can be demonstrated as a higher form of ape in every conceivable way.

Except that they have the genetic characteristics of humans?

Freud was a Jew, so I’m not too interested in what he had to say.

First you claim that us Jews are very intelligent, and now you dismiss Freud?

Hey, Frank.

Every "pornstar" in that link is a man.

Something you need to tell us?

Heather, Vanessa, and Diana are men's names now? Looks like you only glanced at it for a moment.

old comment by RobertBlake

I come back and yet again see no refutation! Come now, instead of ad hominem, try to back your points up lads.

To get this back on track, I will accept your viewpoint if you prove the following;

1) That Negroes are mentioned as one of the three sons of Ham.

2) That Negroes do not commit a disproportionate amount of crime because of genetics.

3) That Negroes are not inferior in terms of intelligence.

4) If you explain the extraordinary resemblance between Negroes and apes.

My argument is as thus;

1) Thousands upon thousands of IQ tests show that the Negro race has an IQ 40 points below Whites when he is pure-blooded, and 20 points below Whites when he has a great portion of white blood (ie African Americans -- who have about 30%).

2) The shocking crime rates of Negroes worldwide show them to be beasts - In every country. In the UK they commit 5 times the crime of whites. In America they commit 8 times the crime of whites. Everywhere in the world the Negro commits huge numbers of rapes and murders. This is in disproportion to the Asian peoples, who commit far lower forms of crime -- showing it is a racial issue. Generally speaking, the whiter the skin, the less crime is committed.

3) The primitive technology of the Negro shows he is a beast. While the White race was crossing the oceans, building mighty cathedrals and dwelling on the greatest philosophical concepts, the Negro was living a primitive existence in Africa, spearing and raping to his heart's content.

4) The fact the Negro has always been enslaved is proof he is a beast. Even from the days of Egypt the Negro has been slave to the White race. From Portugal to South Africa to America, their race has always been described as perverse and barbarian, and thusly enslaved.

5) The physiology of the Negro shows he is a beast. The brain is poorly constructed, the skull is broad and flat, the features are ape-like, the hair is kinky, the skin is black, the frontal lobe is thinner, the brain weighs over 200 grammes less than that of a white, the skull is one tenth smaller, the jaw is protruding. There are many points of resemblance between Negroes and Apes, as discussed on page 2.

What kind of a beast do you know that wears clothing (sack-cloth) as we read in Jonah 3:8?

What kind of a beast has hands as reported in Exodus 19:13?

What kind of a male beast could a woman lust after and "lie down thereto" and cause God to have them executed in righteous judgment? Leviticus 20:16

What type of beast is capable of mixing or "sowing" his seed with the "seed of Adam" as described in Jeremiah 31:27?

What kind of a female beast could a man lust after and cause a penalty of death to be decreed by God? Leviticus 20:15

What kind of beast would have the ability to "keep the vineyard" as we find in the Song of Solomon, Chapter 1, who incidentally was Black?
What kind of beast loves to riot in the daytime? 2 Peter 2:12-14

What kind of a beast can talk or speak? 2 Peter 2:12

old comment by

Human sacrifice in the Bible? What a laugh! You’ll notice that God did not sacrifice Issac! Some example!

Okay, you want another example of human sacrifice in the Bible? Here it is.

In the Book of Judges 11:21-40, Jephthah promised God that if the sky-daddy helped win a battle against the Ammonites he would give God a burnt offering of the first thing that came out of his house when he returned. Then it shall be, that whatsoever cometh forth of the doors of my house to meet me, when I return in peace from the children of Ammon, shall surely be the LORD's, and I will offer it up for a burnt offering. Judges 11:31 Of course Jephthah did win the battle and the first person to come out of his door to greet him was his only child, a daughter. When he sees that it is his only child that was the first thing out of his house he tears at his clothes but also says, “Alas, my daughter! thou hast brought me very low, and thou art one of them that trouble me: for I have opened my mouth unto the LORD, and I cannot go back.” Judges 11: 35 Jephthah then allows his daughter to travel to the mountains with some companions for two months to “bewail” her virginity. “And it came to pass at the end of two months, that she returned unto her father, who did with her according to his vow which he had vowed” Judges 11:39

So there it is, an example where human sacrifice was actually carried out, in the Bible.

old comment by

Robert, stop backpedalling, redefining or outright lying. We have refuted your claims all the time. It's just that you, for some reason that varies in every reply, you don't consider it "valid". We show you sources that indicate that Egypt was not white, and you show us some ambiguous pictoric representation(or outright sculptures)to say no. We insist with more data, well, it's Jewish propaganda. We present you studies that show that crime in any community is connected to social conditions.............and you insist that is Jewish propaganda, or outright ignore it. That recent, modern, updated IQ tests since the 60s have showed that there is no diference between Blacks and Whites, NO(see reasons above), we show you that Kush and Ham were referred as blacks in the Bible and that they are referred as any regular joe(example, Ziphora, one of the first converted by Phillip, Makeda Queen of Sheeba, etc.......), that there were ancient African civilisations(Punt, Nubia, Napata, Shongai in Mali, etc.........), and you reject it and invent falses ethymologies around. Or worse, you discredit NATIVE SPEAKERS and REAL EXPERTS because some Aryan redneck has been spining his brain and has produced some bullshit in a moment of boredom(and probably he only speaks a very faulty Minnesotan English, with luck, and has gone no further than highschool). We show you a list with Black American inventions, NO IT'S BIASED, we show you that GERMANIC PEOPLE AND VIKINGS were enslaved too, and so were Middle Eastern, Hispanic, Celts, etc.......................we have refuted you thousands times, and we'll insist all over again if necessary. However, what's the point?, whatever we say, you'll find something stupid to say, even if that contradicts your previous assertions or show us some webpages, that you conveniently copy and paste, from White supremacists, with no sources or peer review and which don't quote anybody outside their fringe world. If we complain that they're biased, you say that it's doesn't matter because it's the truth and they're valid(well, basically it's reduced to a "my sources have a bigger dick than yours") We can go on for ages, but it demonstrates that you are not interested in the answer. The only logical explanation is that you're an attention-whore.

old comment by RobertBlake

Robert, stop backpedalling, redefining or outright lying.

Don't be a clown, kid. Everything I've said here is true.

We have refuted your claims all the time. It's just that you, for some reason that varies in every reply, you don't consider it "valid". We show you sources that indicate that Egypt was not white, and you show us some ambiguous pictoric representation(or outright sculptures)to say no. We insist with more data, well, it's Jewish propaganda.

After showing you that every single Pharoah up until the later 25th Dynasty was white, and a study of 4000 skulls that shows they were a mediterranean phenotype, alongside shocking racial imagery that shows just how they viewed their black neighbours, you think you have the evidence here?

We present you studies that show that crime in any community is connected to social conditions.............

Wrong. You didn't. I showed you that poverty is not a factor in crime with the example of 96% White West Virginia, the poorest state in the USA, with one of the lowest crime rates. Eastern Europe is poor in comparison to Western Europe but it's crime rates are even lower. Using poverty as an excuse for Blacks committing 50% of all crime -- that is, real crime, murders rapes and robberies -- is the kind of argument a fool would use.

Just recently two girls were mudered by Black savages.

image

"Black crime rates against White people are many times greater than White crimes against Blacks. You wouldn’t know it by reading or listening to America’s mass media. Saturation national and international news coverage is given to the very few White cross-race crimes against Blacks such as the James Byrd dragging case in Texas, as well as the media-hyped Tawana Brawley case in New Jersey and the alleged rape of a Black stripper by White lacrosse team members at Duke University. Both of those latter cases, after months of front-page, sensationalized coverage decrying “White racism,” turned out to be complete hoaxes.

There is an incredible disproportionate rate of Black crimes against Whites in contrast to White crimes against Blacks. Per capita Black cross racial crimes of 50 or even 100 percent greater than Whites would be bad enough, but the Black crime rates against Whites are actually many times greater than White on Black crimes. Blacks are an estimated 57 (that is 5,700 percent!) times more likely to commit violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times (13,600 percent!) more likely to commit robbery. (see the color of crime report published by the New Century Foundation an analysis of crime figures taken from official Justice Department crime reports) http://www.nc-f.org/

Perhaps the most shocking of all the crime data dealing with cross-race crime is the incredible rate of crime by Black males against White women. According to U.S. Justice Department figures over 34,460 White women are sexually assaulted or raped by Black men each year, and most authorities believe that the actual rape figures are at least twice the reported number. In perhaps the most shocking crime figure of all is the number of White rapes against Black women. Statistically, it is 0! Because they have fewer than 10 cases nationally.

According to murder figures released by the Justice Department in 2002, , Black predators are at least 22 times (2,200 percent) more likely to murder White women than the reverse. In regard to gang attacks including the horrible specter of gang rape, the figures are literally off the charts, with at least a 200 times (that’s 20,000 percent!) greater chance of Blacks committing gang assaults and that includes both White men and women victims!

The staggering personal tragedies connected with these huge crime numbers should be a national scandal. Yet, the facts go largely unreported. How many times have the public seen media portrayals of historical or contemporary racial discrimination against Black people. But, the question is, “In the terms of the most important of human rights, how does the discrimination of racially segregated water fountains or neighborhoods or schools compare with the racially born crimes of black slaughter and physical attacks levied against thousands of White people each year?"

image

0 white on black rapes a year.

37,500 black on white rapes a year.

You people just don't live in the real world.

Next time the media does its usual sob stories about Black people who suffered from White violence, think about the fact that in just one year, more woman are brutalized by Black males than all the Black males and Black females brutalized by White males in the last 150 years. And remember, that most of the brutalizations against Black males, such as lynching, were in response to heinous crimes of murder or rape they had committed against innocent White men, women and children.

old comment by Pickle

What of Megan Wilson? Funny how she got no real media coverage after being gang raped by a group of whites. Also, refer to the study I posted earlier in regards to your assertion of black on white crime, that when you control for pover and economic conditions, blacks and whites commit the SAME amount of crime

(posting the study AGAIN ->L.J. Krivo and R.D. Peterson, "Extremely Disadvantaged Neighborhoods and Urban Crime," Social Forces 75(2) (December 1996); Barbara Chasin. Inequality and Violence in the United States. (NJ: Humanities Press International, 1997)

"(see the color of crime report published by the New Century Foundation an analysis of crime figures taken from official Justice Department crime reports) http://www.nc-f.org/"

Color of crime has been debunked, and throughly by Tim Wise -> (http://www.lipmagazine.org/~timwise/colorofdeception.html)
and wouldn't it make sense that whites would be more victims of black crime if there are more white targets in the country anyways?

But my friend, I'm going to let you look at the real stats.

I want you to go here: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/cvusst.htm

And look under victims and offenders from 1996 to 2005 under table 42 in all the reports. All of the stats from the other years are vastly different from 2005, for example, in 2004 only 8.3% of white rape victims were assaulted by black men. And that 8.3% has a star after it meaning it was based on fewer than 10 cases. Then in 2002, it says 13.1% of white rape victims were assaulted by blacks, but 14.2% of black rape victims were assaulted by whites.

Also, the notion that black men prefer white women to rape is false.

Take a look at this article, where it was concluded that black men prefer, GASP, black victims for rape!

"Using data on 1,396 rapes reported in the National Crime Survey, we examine various explanations for interracial (black offender-white victim) rape. We find little support for the hypothesis, derived from conflict theory, that interracial rape reflects black economic deprivation and politicalization. Interracial, as opposed to intraracial, rapes were no more frequent in cities with high black poverty, unemployment, or racial inequality. Nor does interracial rape appear to result from blacks' limited sexual to white women; we do not find the expected relationship between a city's interracial marriage rate and the racial composition of rape. Rather, in support of Blau's macrostructural theory, the racial patterning of rape is most strongly influenced by opportunities for interpersonal contact between whites and blacks. Both the racial composition of a city, representing the pool of rape victims or offenders of a particular race, and the degree of black-white residential segregation emerged as significant predictors of the racial patterning of rape. Finally, we find no evidence that black rapists, given equivalent opportunities to rape a white or a black woman, prefer white victims. In fact, during the course of robberies involving strangers, black men are slightly more likely to rape a black woman than a white woman."(1)
(1)http://www.jstor.org/view/00377732/di010930/01p01502/0

"Wrong. You didn't. I showed you that poverty is not a factor in crime with the example of 96% White West Virginia, the poorest state in the USA, with one of the lowest crime rates. Eastern Europe is poor in comparison to Western Europe but it's crime rates are even lower."

You seem not to note that:

1. Eastern European nations have notorious human trafficking, arms dealing and drug trafficking rings with all of the associated crime that comes with it

2. Reports to the police might be brushed off by corrupt officials(corruption is a big time problem in those parts) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_Perceptions_Index<- Look at Eastern Europe on the map

3. Crimes might not be widely reported

As for West Virginia? It's pretty hard to commit crimes in rural areas, especially when your neighbors are armed and castle law is valid.

old comment by

One of the most amusing things of the art of trolling is that the guy has to insist on a strategy. For example, he's incapable of offering a neutral source for anything. He just offers KKK statistics, which have no sources. We show numbers by the department of justice and FBI and he says that it's anti-racist propaganda. Well, I've heard that "my sources have a bigger dick than yours" before, but he's not very convincing. The second is cynically insisting on the same strategy because he thinks, "if I sound convincing, and repeat and repeat, they will believe me[or, at least, I'll believe it myself]). He shows us stylised representation in stones of guys in the third millenium BC(or better, he uses data which has not been updated in 30 years ignoring DNA studies that indicate that, in fact, some Pharaos had black African ancestry). He says they are white. Whatever you wanna see in it, man.

old comment by Frank

I think it is important to note that if you go to the actual Department of Justice and get their statistics, instead of going to David Duke and his almighty photoshop, you get directed here:
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/ascii/soo.txt

But here's the key part:
"Victims of rape were about evenly divided between whites and blacks; in about 88% of forcible rapes, the victim and offender were of the same race."

Yes. Whites are arrested for more rapes than blacks (not proportionately, but whatever), and the number of Black Victims is roughly even steven. And yes, that means that a lot more White Men are raping Black Women than Black Men raping White Women. Black Men are less than half of the arrested perpetrators, and Black Women are half the victims. Do the math!

And yes, we can pull up specific and grisly accounts if you want:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20737211/from/ET/

Frankly, with the amount of black women getting raped by white men on a daily basis I am shocked that whites are allowed to wander free without being forced to register as sex offenders.

-Frank

old comment by RobertBlake

I think it is important to note that if you go to the actual Department of Justice and get their statistics, instead of going to David Duke and his almighty photoshop, you get directed here:
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/ascii/soo.txt

Frank - You clown. The screenshot is an image directly from the website. Go here and read it yousrelf.

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cvus0502.pdf

As you can see, Black offenders committed 37,460 rapes or sexual assaults against White women (shown by simply taking the percentage from the total). The same chart shows that Whites committed 0 (zero to less than ten) sexual attacks against Black women. (The number of reported White sexual attacks on Blacks is so low it is statistically 0)

"Victims of rape were about evenly divided between whites and blacks; in about 88% of forcible rapes, the victim and offender were of the same race."

Yes. Whites are arrested for more rapes than blacks (not proportionately, but whatever), and the number of Black Victims is roughly even steven. And yes, that means that a lot more White Men are raping Black Women than Black Men raping White Women.

Re-read the statistics. 0 black women were raped by white men. 37,500 white women were raped by black men.

The reason it is "even steven" as you put it is because 100% of black women are raped by black men. These Negroes also rape an additional 37,500 white women alongside their own women.

44% of rapes are committed by whites, and 33% by blacks. Whites are 80% of the population while Blacks are 12%. This means that Blacks are 8 times more likely to commit a rape than whites are. If the US population was 100% Black and we inflated the statistics to resemble this, we would see a similar number rapes to the number in South Africa (150 a day).

Black Women are half the victims.

Black women are raped in 36,620 cases. This is an equal number to the number of White women raped.

In total, Blacks rape double the number of women that White men do, despite being only 12% of the population.

Try to fathom that. Try to understand it.

About 35,000 rapes committed by the 80% White majority.
About 70,000 rapes committed by the 12% Black minority.

Frankly, with the amount of black women getting raped by white men on a daily basis I am shocked that whites are allowed to wander free without being forced to register as sex offenders.

0 black women are raped by Whites, you dolt.

image

old comment by POSW

Well, I'm just going to do what you're doing, Robert. I'm going to ignore all your arguments and just post about all the awful things that whites have done.

For one thing, guess who started the bloodiest war in human history?

image
image
image
image

I see three white men out of four.

image

Genghis Khan, not white, but certainly light-skinned.

World War I was started by Gavrilo Princip
image
and his assassination of Franz Ferdinand. He was an ethnic Serb, that is to say, white.

image

Lenin, who had mostly white heritage with a little bit of Jewish blood. Millions died in his Russian Revolution.

Another conflict which killed millions, the Taiping Rebellion, was started by Hong Xiuquan and Yang Xiuqing, two Chinese Christians. Therefore, Christianity is EVIL. It is a DEVIL religion made by white people for the purpose... you see how easy this is?

I could use statistics like this to "demonstrate" that whites and Chinese are "inherently" violent, but that would be bullshit.

"Re-read the statistics. 0 black women were raped by white men. 37,500 white women were raped by black men. "

Then the statistics are wrong. They are false, skewed, biased, and just plain wrong. Especially since we have brought up SPECIFIC CASES in which black women were raped by white men.

Oh, and

"The racial distribution of arrestees for rape is similar to the
racial distribution for all violent UCR arrests--56% of
arrestees for rape in 1995 were white, 42% were black, and 2%
were of other races. White arrestees accounted for a
substantially larger share of those arrested for other sex
offenses, composing 75% of those arrested for these types of
offenses in 1995."

Directly from the same US department of Justice you are citing. Conclusion: Blacks are more likely to be rapists, whites are more likely to be perverts.

old comment by

Honestly, we provide him with data of the department of justice, that eliminates the myth of "black men rape white women". I mean, in which other way can we read those statistics?. There are far more possibilities that a white woman is raped by a white man than a black man. Black men don't necessarily rape more than white men. And the so called "disproportion", apart from the fact that it's not that high(it only starts to be taken into account when the percentage exceeds by 1/3 of the total), can be explained because of sociological causes(and anyway, more than 80% of their victims were black women, so?). Moreover, regarding data of the life conditions, income and other important sociological factors, whites are overrepresented. They may be 80% of the population, but bearing in mind that they live in conditions where crime is not expected to occur, the percentage is elevated. The proportion of the blacks being delinquents is explained perfectly by their environment(the percentage of criminality in Harlem, for example, has plumeted since a middle class of black people have installed there). Isn't it suprising that it doesn't match the statistics that the Klan provides?

old comment by CT

About this...

image

Everyone noticed that really little * next to some of the numbers? Anyone want to take a guess at what it's there for?

Well, from the fucking pdf ol' bobby here gave us the url for...

*Estimate is based on about 10 or fewer sample cases.

So, they are basing this set of statistics on 10 or less cases, which results in statistics that are completely invalid...

"Your Honour... we checked out 10 cases of rape and not a single one was of a white man raping a non-white woman... therefore we move that out of the millions of cases throughout history, a white man has never raped a non-white woman. Well, apart from the ones that are down as history, including all the raped slaves... but they can't have happened or the statistics we've given would be a lie"

Robert, you're a fucking gullible idiot to not realise you've had the wool pulled over your eyes.

old comment by RobertBlake

*Estimate is based on about 10 or fewer sample cases.

So, they are basing this set of statistics on 10 or less cases, which results in statistics that are completely invalid...

Robert, you're a fucking gullible idiot to not realise you've had the wool pulled over your eyes.

Just had to refute this piece of shit. The cases of rape are based on all rapes in the United States. So the fact that there are less than 10 cases of white-on-black rape is of ALL rapes, not a "sample of 10 rapes." Cheers.

old comment by RobertBlake

Well, I'm just going to do what you're doing, Robert. I'm going to ignore all your arguments and just post about all the awful things that whites have done.

For one thing, guess who started the bloodiest war in human history?

Hitler never started any "wars." He was a good man and towers over you in every way.

Genghis Khan, not white, but certainly light-skinned.

What the fuck? You're citing an asian as an example of an "evil white?!" Oh my.

World War I was started by Gavrilo Princip. and his assassination of Franz Ferdinand. He was an ethnic Serb, that is to say, white.

The Jewish serb.

Lenin, who had mostly white heritage with a little bit of Jewish blood. Millions died in his Russian Revolution.

Nice how you brush off the "little bit of Jewish blood" there, kiddo. Lenin was a Jew.

Chinks cannot be Christians, they are beasts. This is hilarious. You are citing non-white massacres as evidence of whites being "evil."

Then the statistics are wrong. They are false, skewed, biased, and just plain wrong.

Apart from the fact they're from the most reliable source on earth, the US Justice Department. You stupid cunt.

old comment by Anti-Goth

Hitler never started any "wars." He was a good man and towers over you in every way.

Oh. My fucking. GOD.
How stupid are you, Robbie? What, were the Nazis just going over to have tea when they invaded Poland and the Sudetenland?
And the Blitz, the British just misunderstood that, right?
Oh yeah, and let's not forget that the millions people who were thrown into concentration camps--the Roma, homosexuals, Jews, Poles, and dissidents--were obviously all LYING about it.

You are a fucking douche. I'm part German and Austrian, and lemme tell you, no one except you Neo-Nazi dickheads admires Hitler. He was a Grade-A psychopath in every sense of the word.

Chinks cannot be Christians, they are beasts.

I'm guessing the inevitable 'Jesus was white!!!11!!!111eleventy!!!111' is up next.

Everyone who's not white is an animal now? Wow, that only goes against years of genetic studies that prove otherwise. And what about the fact that MANY Americans have Native or African American blood in them, despite appearing Caucasian?

Don't even get me started on that tired old, 'it was the Jews!' screed you got a hard-on for, Blakey. No one's gonna believe that every white person you deem 'evil' was actually 'ONE OF TEH JOOS!!!11!!11 ZOMG!!!!1'. That's bullshit. Do even KNOW any Jewish people? I thought not.

old comment by

The only conexion Lenin had with Jewishness was his great grandfather, who was a CONVERT JEWISH. And since both your parents have to be Jews, was Lenin a Jew(by the way, Serbs are 98% Slavic, i.e. WHITE. Are you saying that Jew is now everybody who hasn't agree with you?. And by the way, sorry Robbie, I have checked statistics and it is true what CT says. The statistics were made in 1995 and, in the case of white people on black people, they just examined ten cases. The study was disregarded for bias and new data from the Justice Departmen.............well, doesn't leave white rapists very well(and by the way, if there are no Chinese Christians, why has China FORBADE some sects of Christianity and forced the Catholic Church to have a "patriotic" version?. Are they making laws for something that doesn't exist?

old comment by Skyknight

Someone, it seems, hasn't heard about the *black* Jews and Christians of Ethiopia...Those whose kings were regarded as descending from Solomon and the Queen of Sheba. Judaism and Christianity thrived there for a LONG time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solomonic_dynasty

Besides, if God was so worried about race mixing, and if whites and non-whites are distinct species, why didn't he just make them even more distinct, to the point that interbreeding would be impossible? Quandary avoided. Not that I can tell why he'd want humanity to be strictly white without divergence...We're not just a kind of flower garden for his viewing pleasure and naught else. Free will more than slightly gets in the way of that. (And no, God does NOT have a humanoid form--or any other physical form. References to God's hands, eyes, etc. are strict metaphor. What reason is there to believe otherwise?)

Never mind that if Adam existed, he probably looked very much like an African, gene dominance being what it is. Coiled hair dominant over straight, dark skin dominant over light...As a general rule, the dominant gene is the one that causes a presence of something, rather than an absence. In the case of dark skin dominant, the something is melanin--that which supplies the human body with armor against solar radiation. Doesn't that mean that dark skin is SUPERIOR to light skin?

old comment by

One of the most curious things I've learnt over miscegenetation, is that it's not as "traditional" as we might think. Some countries such as France, Portugal or Spain, permitted the slave owners to marry one of their slaves(as long as they were not married)at the beginning. They forbade it afterwards when they discovered that it could serve as a way to empower slaves. And in America, the only time it was totally forbidden, was when the Civil war ended, and only in the South.
And funny enough, that argument was often mixed with a blatant sexism. In fact, the only thing they wanted to avoid was white women to marry black men(hence, the obssesion with supposed rapings of white women. It doesn't mean that they were raped, it just meant that they couldn't conceive that a white woman would have consented sex without her family's approval, let alone with a black man). In fact, in the arguments for disenfranching black men lied in the fact that "a black man can ask your daughter in marriage" or "can break your bread with you". Notice that they NEVER mention a white gentleman asking for a black man's daughter in marriage or breaking the bread with them. Why?, because Loving v/s Virginia State was not an issue then. In fact, the brothels in the South were plenty of black prostitutes that were visited by white men, a good number of men who lynched poor black people had black mistress and numerous children with them and many white men raped black women.
At the time, and before the syphillis were a real issue, nobody gave a danm if a white man didn't keep his marriage vows or "pure" before marriage. And the fact that black people were considered inferior wasn't an issue either. In fact, if Jefferson or his brother, or his father in law(Sally Hemmings's father)were caught having sex with, say, a goat or a dog, they would have been even tried. So, Black people were not considered animals or at the same level as them.
The same argument with the law. A master could even kill a slave(they did it rarely, because they were their investment)because they were considered their property but, funny enough, if a slave did a wrong to another person, he could be tried as any white citizen, not his owner.
What I mean by all this, it's that the argument of "black people are inferior to white and like animals" was not widely believed with the same intensity in every single stage of the slave time in America. In fact, the latter(to characterise black people as savage, animal-like creatures)is a recent invention, when black people could actually end the unfair statu quo which only benefitted a minority.

old comment by FMG

Hitler never started any "wars." He was a good man and towers over you in every way.

Er. Are you some sort of moron. Europe wants to have a word with you. By word I mean wants to kick you square in the nuts for being such a moron. Hitler butchered nearly 120 million people due to his war.

What the fuck? You're citing an asian as an example of an "evil white?!" Oh my.

Ghengis was small fry compared to Hitler.

The Jewish serb.

One cannot blame Gavrilo Princep for the war. War was inevitable, it needed the spark. The freedom of Yugoslavia was it. And he was not "jewish".

Nice how you brush off the "little bit of Jewish blood" there, kiddo. Lenin was a Jew.

Oi IQ boy. Jews if not white are then they are the "superior race" because Ashkenazi's have the highest IQs as a "group of people". Dumbass.

Chinks cannot be Christians, they are beasts. This is hilarious. You are citing non-white massacres as evidence of whites being "evil."

The two things that can be seen from space are the great wall of china and the amount of money the US owes China... So those beasts of china are kicking your white country's ass. Its a shame when you are being beaten by animals.

Apart from the fact they're from the most reliable source on earth, the US Justice Department. You stupid cunt.

They are from a website of your chosing. Not from the Justice department. I would prefer the actual link to the information rather than a photoshopped piece of evidence. Source is vital.

old comment by POSW

Hitler never started any "wars." He was a good man and towers over you in every way.

ROFL. No, he only invaded a few sovereign European countries, started the bloodiest war in human history, and massacred 12 million people in death camps. Good man my ass.

Chinks cannot be Christians, they are beasts. This is hilarious. You are citing non-white massacres as evidence of whites being 'evil.'

1. No, I was citing massacres carried out by non-white Christians in a sarcastic effort to prove that Christianity is evil.

2. Wait a fucking minute here, "Only the lighter skinned Chinese are capable of intelligent thought." Guess who I'm quoting? You. And then I give you an example of a light-skinned Asian who killed millions of people, and suddenly, he's a "beast".

Nice how you brush off the "little bit of Jewish blood" there, kiddo. Lenin was a Jew.

First of all, if you're not my mother, don't call me "kiddo". Secondly, and to the point, Lenin was born Russian Orthodox, and he looked like this at the age of 17.

image
If I showed you this picture without telling you it was Lenin, would you still say he was a Jew?

Apart from the fact they're from the most reliable source on earth, the US Justice Department. You stupid cunt.

"*Estimate is based on about 10 or fewer sample cases." You don't seem to know what that means, retard. I also love how you ignore my next sentence. "Especially since we have brought up SPECIFIC CASES in which black women were raped by white men."

Now, it's time to have some fun and point out all the times throughout this discussion you've contradicted yourself.

"You acknowledge the intellectual superiority of the Ashkenazi Jews -- and by the way, the fact most nobel prize winners have been of this race shows that average IQ of a race has a huge impact"

and

"Freud was a Jew, so I’m not too interested in what he had to say."

"There is much evidence to suggest that the cross between Blacks and Whites is a hybrid. They are weaker, less intelligent and more suseptible to disease."

and

"Thousands upon thousands of IQ tests show that the Negro race has an IQ 40 points below Whites when he is pure-blooded, and 20 points below Whites when he has a great portion of white blood (ie African Americans -- who have about 30%)."

"The Chinese have a considerable infusion of White blood due to their proximity to Europe"

and

"Chinks cannot be Christians, they are beasts."

HYPOCRITE.

old comment by CT

Just had to refute this piece of shit. The cases of rape are based on all rapes in the United States. So the fact that there are less than 10 cases of white-on-black rape is of ALL rapes, not a "sample of 10 rapes." Cheers.

Right, so when they say it's based on a sample of cases, that means they actually checked every single rape case that year.

There were, according to that list, 36,620 black women raped that year, and they asked 10 OR LESS for a sample size. The list itself shows they DID NOT ask all the victims, just a very small sample of them. That means the statistics of that list are not valid for any kind of statistical analysis and anyone who is fucking stupid enough to use them as such needs a serious talk with an instructor with a large clue-bat.

old comment by sydnytt

Attractiveness has nothing to do with race, it is based on opinion. Of course people of all different cultures may have one or any number of ideal looks, etc etc, but that doesn't make it THE ideal look. And in any case, you posting random poverty stricken black people and comparing them with white super models is as stupid as compairing the hut of one family and then showing of a national wonder that took LOADS of people and time to build. I really hope you might understand that your comparison is very flawed.

To try and make this clear: I'm pretty certain that the family that built THAT hut didn't really require a HUGE cathedral to live in.

The reason for the lower average iq in africa is not that the population is mostly black. it is because they live with things like poverty, starvation and disease.

Also when dealing with atheists, you can't really use "God said" to prove a point. Of course you'll believe it, but you're not trying to convince yourself.

old comment by That One Guy

Wow, your probably the most: ignorant, stupid, annoying, racist asshole I have ever seen... All your comments say that other peoples facts are rumors yet you have not given ONE reliable source for any of you half minded racist comments. If I ever met you I would womp your ass until you need medical care. Oh and if you wanna say that I wouldn't actually do that or hasn't actually done it before, ask the other idiots in your racist, (poser) christian, moron, cult about Adam Nelson from Seattle!

But if you REALLY want to know, there is no completely true facts proving anything about Adam and Eve's skin color. But I wouldn't care cause I am an atheist. So for my closure statement, I hope soon that you will realize that your wrong and have been wrong for the intire time before you get killed by someone like me.

old comment by fuckyourobertblake

............./´¯/)............ (\¯`\
............/....//........... ...\\....\
.........../....//............ ....\\....\
...../´¯/..../´¯\.........../¯ `\....\¯`\
.././.../..../..../.|_......_| .\....\....\...\.\..
(.(....(....(..../.)..)..(..(. \....)....)....).)
.\................\/.../....\. ..\/................/
..\................. /........\................../
....\..............(.......... ..)............../
............./´¯/)............ (\¯`\
............/....//........... ...\\....\
.........../....//............ ....\\....\
...../´¯/..../´¯\.........../¯ `\....\¯`\
.././.../..../..../.|_......_| .\....\....\...\.\..
(.(....(....(..../.)..)..(..(. \....)....)....).)
.\................\/.../....\. ..\/................/
..\................. /........\................../
....\..............(.......... ..)............../
............./´¯/)............ (\¯`\
............/....//........... ...\\....\
.........../....//............ ....\\....\
...../´¯/..../´¯\.........../¯ `\....\¯`\
.././.../..../..../.|_......_| .\....\....\...\.\..
(.(....(....(..../.)..)..(..(. \....)....)....).)
.\................\/.../....\. ..\/................/
..\................. /........\................../
....\..............(.......... ..)............../

old comment by Spitfire

Hello there Robert,

I have to say in my own opinion; you are a genius.

As much as I did not want to get sucked into this racist bullshit you find so ammusing; I guess you got me and a whole lot of other folks hooked, line and sinker.

I must begin by stating that I am of "None of your F***ing business" desent, and that I hold nothing but a simple Associates degree in which I majored in computer networking.

Science was never one of my better subjects, so I can't dispute a lot of the mumbo jumbo you speak about.

As far as the horse/ donkey/ mule thing is concerned; all I can say is, "You're an ASS!"

As far as your references to the bible...all I can say there is that I know the bible does mention demons..."Tag--you're definately one of them".

All I can basically offer here is this:

While you are under your white sheet with the holes in it, do you notice your skin looks a whole lot darker.

As far as the negros you obviously hate...get over it!
If you can't, then I would suggest the car in the garage, closed doors-open windows, full tank of gas, foot on the excellerator, breathe in and relax.

If you like science so much then here's another suggestion. Fill a bathtub with water and test the following hypothesis...If you try to toast bagels under water, does the actual toasting make a sound under water. Just don't put your ear too close to the toaster; wouldn't want you to burn yourself. Burns darken the skin.

In closing...you really need to get a life. All this time you spend intertaining yourself with such racist crap could be spent better by making sure you stay as healthy as possible. You surely wouldn't want to end up waking up in a recovery room to find out that a "Negro" master surgeon was the one that saved your life.

Sad thing here is...you will probably continue in your racist ways, but keep in mind...what will also continue is...

We've got a Negro for a president, that will ultimately be one of the best presidents we've had ever.

Michael Jordon will always be one of the best Negro basketball players.

Some of the best; Doctors, teachers, scientist, writers, singers, etc. will always be Negros.

Hey, you are such a dumb fuck. You may end up doing something against the law some day and end up in a cell with one of the biggest, badest, well endowed Negros to call you his wife.

Then, and maybe only then...you---Robert Blake will utter those famous words..."Once you go black, you..."

old comment by Paradox

I know this is an old quote and Robert has rightfully fucked off by now, but you guys didn't completely debunk his crime arguments.

His claim that blacks commit "50% of crime" was clearly pulled out of his arse. Recent FBI arrest tables show them to be responsible for 28% of crime including 39% of violent crime, including 32% of rapes which he distorts stats to lie about. Sure it's disproportionate, but it's likely a large number of those crimes are committed against other blacks.

Many NCVS reports (in which the numbers are just estimates from a survey, not actual crime reports) also show the vast majority of rapes (and other crimes) to be between victims and offenders of the same race, yet Robert can only cherry-pick the 2005 publication which shows a large number of black-on-white rapes and no white-on-black rapes which have been recorded in some past years.

And his "blacks are apes" argument fails. Blacks can still produce offspring with whites and have similar bone/skull structures that don't even vaguely resemble that of apes. Don't give me the dogs/wolves argument either because dogs and wolves are considered the same species (canis lupis).

I could use links to back up what I said but I'm too lazy. I think I proved a point.

RobertBlake #racist youtube.com

194 comments

Confused?