Fucking King Edward I married a 13-year-old and managed to rule Britain. He doesn’t have problems like this these days. He was a sane man and people didn’t have the uncontrollable urge to throw him off the ledge. He wasn’t ashamed of being a man or of his sexuality.
I agree with the idea of the Sexual Trade Union. It is blatantly punishing the natural male heterosexuality.
As the trend continues, I think we’ll become increasingly asexual— and the population would drop— due to unnatural circumstances.
24 comments
No, you've got it all wrong. King Edward I ruled Britain and managed to marry a 13-year-old. He wouldn't have gotten away with it - he wouldn't have done it, he wouldn't have had any reason to do it, and he wouldn't have wanted to do it - if he hadn't been king.
Edit: In light of Citizen Justin's post, consider a find-and-replace of "king" for "prince". It's not like I know English monarchs by name. The point is, monarchy.
Yes but he was only 15 or 16 when he married her, and it was part of a political pact anyway, done way before he was even King. Neither he or she had much say in the matter.
As far as I know her first kid was years later.
You think we will become increasingly asexual? If that's so, it's only because people are substituting television, iPhones, and the internet in which to get their kicks, and find by the time they finally go to bed, their partners are sound asleep.
Diddling underaged girls is not "manly" and...like the others said....Edward was a boy, himself! Why you used him as an example I have no idea.
A young teen boy and teen girl in an arranged marriage where both had no real say in the matter does not equal "Big powerful old adult guy choose a teen girl against her will to marry him".
Nice try. You lose. Women are men's equal. Women have a choice. You are an idiot. STFU!
Nice try but with the way things worked back then, he was probably only three ot four years older than her and the marriage was likely arranged by their parents without their input. He was also the fucking king . He could have razed a village just for shits and giggles and got away with it with similar ease.
First, we should be reproducing less. It's the humane way to reduce our population. We're in no danger of dying out.
Second, an asexual lifestyle for a pedophile, etc. would be the best possible outcome. Therapy, medicine, chemical castration, whatever it takes.
So please, you and men like you, continue not having sex.
"Sexual Trade Union"
Everybody out!
Royalty have always married as children, nitwit. It's not about love or sexuality. It's about procuring an heir and a spare. Even kings and queens who happened to be gay (like many fundies' semi-god "Queen" James; he was at least bisexual) were forced to marry and have sex with a person of the other gender.
Natural male sexuality is not what you have, silly. You're a hebephile, which is UN-natural.
The world population NEEDS to drop, and the most humane way is to have fewer children.
1. Not only was Edward I a teenager himself, as others here have said, it was most likely a political marriage as many noble marriages were. Just because you're shacked up with a child bride it doesn't mean you're supposed to consummate the union, not until you're both of age at least.
2. This is the same Edward I who violently subjugated Wales and Scotland. A strong king, but not exactly a heroic figure.
A better example of this sort of marriage would have been John (Lackland).
However he was an arsehole, so probably not good for the whinge
Fucking King Edward
image
Puncess Carlostia: 'You want to rape a potato ?!
You must think you're quite the spud muffin!
But not even Maris Piper would find you apeel ing.
Due to your tiny protuber ance. '
X3
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.