Richard "Dick" Dawkins is the world's leading Darwinian Evangelist and he's been caught with his pants down committing the ultimate evolutionism no-no by admitting to Intelligent Design. It's hilarious how all Dawkins disciples are obsessed with blaming clever editing when the film was in constant motion.
The fact is that Dawkins has officially be busted for Felonious Cock Sucking while attempting to Swallow the Evidence!
Even Stein's critics agree Dawkins has forever disgraced himself!
48 comments
It's hilarious how all Dawkins disciples are obsessed with blaming clever editing when the film was in constant motion.
Here's a clue: it wasn't edited in real-time while it was shown.
Are people really this stupid?
I believe he said that the only conceivable way life could be intelligently designed would be if aliens (which had themselves evolved by natural selection) did it, and did it to mimic their own life processes.
That is not admitting to intelligent design so much as calling it stupid, which it is. Of course, you'd know that if you weren't such a tool yourself.
@James:
Is that what Dawkins said in Expelled? It hasn't been released in Australia (to my knowledge) so I haven't seen it...
What on earth is this Curtus on about? It sounds really un-like Dawkins to admit intelligent design >.<
(needless to say, even if he did, that wouldn't sway my belief in evolution one bit.)
Do you believe everything you see at the movies? You're such a pleasant fellow, CurtusLove, I can't imagine you'd intentionally misunderstand - well, everything.
@LexKitten: Haven't seen it myself, but apparently Dawkins obliged the filmmakers when they asked him under what circumstances Intelligent Design could have actually taken place. In Dawkin's scenario, the "unknown agent" of ID was not God but regular, non-divine extraterrestrials. He then made the point that those extraterrestrials themselves would have had to evolve without any design to begin with. Dawkins intended it to be presented as a mere thought exercise to illustrate ID's primary failings (i.e. "We don't say it's God," and "Who designed the designer?") without any claims that it was remotely likely, let alone an acutal belief of his.
I'm not sure how they sliced that one up, but appparently that sequence is followed with Stein saying, "You've got that right. Richard Dawkin's believes in aliens!" or some such crap.
Dawkins wrote an article all about that in his blog .
Cutus love...is...caught with his pants down...while...cock sucking...he's...been...busted...by...admitting to...swallowing.
It's hilarious how fundies are obsessed with blaming clever editing when the string of characters is continuous.
If there is such a thing as Intelligent Design, why do Americans hold so much to circumcising baby boys? Intelligence would dictate that the Design would be perfect. So, what's wrong that boys in America are being surgically abused as infants. This seems to fly in the face of reason and logic, not to mention the need to protect the child from abuse.
It's kind of telling that IDists vocally claim that their "nameless intelligent agent" is not God, but whenever someone proposes a scenario where the intelligent agent is represented as anything other than God, they immediately ridicule it.
"The fact is that Dawkins has officially be busted for Felonious Cock Sucking while attempting to Swallow the Evidence! "
Okay the rest of this is the usual drivel, but this made me laugh.
He's the Dick to the Dawk to the PhD, he's smarter than you, he's got a science degree!
Oh, Dick to the Dawk to the PhD, he's still smarter than you, he studied biology!
Oh.
Well, since our 'faith' doesn't depend on unchanging truth or a single magic person, we'll just pick another representative.
Except you're probably making that all up.
Hello Curtus, uh you do know that all films are edited to fit scenes together, and some scenes may be shot twenty times and different lines used from each shoot? You really should look into things before you make a really stupid remark that shows your ignorance about movie-making as well as what Dawkins really did say.PS Stein and his producers won the official "cock sucking while attempting to swallow evidence" award by putting out a "blacklist" to EXPELL people from seeing the movie preview, including people who were IN THE MOVIE!!!!
@ Wandering Discordian
I can't find the clip (it's on an old post from last month). But in a radio interview he called himself a "foolish old man who needed to pay his bills".
I guess he's decided that the fundies will pay him better than the real world.
"It's hilarious how all Dawkins disciples are obsessed with blaming clever editing when the film was in constant motion. "
Perhaps CurtusBlowJob is confusing Expelled with Hitchcock's movie Rope. As far as I know it was the only movie filmed to appear as a single continuous shot.
Seeing as he is a repressed homosexual I can see how he might have made this error as Rope had a subtle homoerotic undertone. Also both were filmed in colour and had men talking in them.
Um no- every one of Stein's critics that I know think it was Stein who was disgraceful and disgraced.
So even if you did know critics who think as you claim, that would just show that Stein's critics are NOT in agreement the way you allege.
I generally like word-play, but your scurrilous allegations say much more about you than they do about Dawkins.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.