When a liberal says for 30 years that the world will cool, gets it wrong, then says for 20 years that the world will WARM, gets it wrong, then claims that the climate will "change" [something it's been doing for BILLIONS of years], and that the changes will result in "more violent storms" [wrong] and more "Extreme weather events" [wrong]....and when the DRAMATIC majority of scientific projections markedly overestimate climate shifts - and all in one direction - why are the people who STILL put blind faith into that system that has not produced reliable hypotheses considered the allies of science?

There is *NOTHING* more scientific than being skeptical of someone who can't prove their hypothesis. We've seen over a decade an a half of flat temperatures, more than 10 years without a Cat 3 or higher hurricane making landfall in the US, and pretty much every prediction from melting antarctic to "snowless winters" fall flat. At a certain point, the AGW folks should admit that they don't have models complex enough to deal with climate, have no clue how cloud patterns impact global temperature, and don't fully understand the impact of natural cycles such as El Nino oscillations and solar patterns.

But I wouldn't hold my CO2 - er, breath.