Maybe Hilter has less crimes than Darwin.
17 comments
This is a reply to an article saying that 1000 scientists all agree to dissent with Darwinism.
Seems to be suggesting that they'd rather be Nazis than evolutionary scientists.
Whatever, 1K is about .013 percent of the world's scientists.
That's kind like if about one half of one knuckle on my little finger decided it wasn't Keith any more.
"Okay, whatever you say, that hand is still wiping Keith's ass, with or without you."
Hitler is generally seen as one of the worst people who have ever existed. Using him as example usually negates the issue, as comparing something with him is futile. See "Godwin".
Darwin described a natural process, that's all. He wasn't the only one thinking along those lines, he wasn't even the first. He was just the first to put it into writing, to formulate a theory.
Describing something is not a crime.
Ordering the industrial-scale rounding up, transporting and extermination of millions of people for the "crime" of being born by Jewish parents IS a crime against humanity.
But what do I know; perhaps Darwin had a lot of speeding tickets and parking violations...
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.