Neither Creation nor evolution are science, both are religions. We who believe God created the world just as He says He did in His book the Bible are creationist. Those who believe the theory out forward by some worm eaten corpse named darwin are evolutionist. Nether believe is based upon science as science is defined, both are based upon a religious belief.
47 comments
Why can't fundies spell, use correct grammar, or finish their sentences? It wouldn't happen to have anything to do with ignorance in the Nth degree, would it?
If you understood the theory of evolution you wouldn't attempt to call it a religion.
If you understood how to create a sentence in the Enlish language, you would be taken more seriously.
Until then, get a little bit of an education and give it another shot,
"Those who believe the theory out forward by some worm eaten corpse named darwin are evolutionist."
Actually - and this isn't common knowledge - Darwin actually devised the theory of evolution before be died. Had he done so after his own death, I expect he would have been taken less seriously.
Just FYI.
You got the idea of creationism from the bible, and use the bible to prove creationism.
Cue the circular logic image.
"And I admit that it is my religious convictions and absolute believe in the word of God that leads me to that conclusison"
"Why is it that evolutionist can not be as honest"
And what's up with "theroys" anyways? Is it really that hard to spell basic words?
"Nether believe is based upon science as science is defined, both are based upon a religious belief."
Do you know how science is defined? If not, then STFU.
"Neither Creation nor evolution are science, both are religions"
No. Evolution is backed by evidence. Creationism is not.
"We who believe God created the world just as He says He did in His book the Bible are creationist. Those who believe the theory out forward by some worm eaten corpse named darwin are evolutionist. Nether believe is based upon science as science is defined, both are based upon a religious belief."
Did you do ANY research?
"As for me, I'll go with God's book after all, He was there at the beginning. And I admit that it is my religious convictions and absolute believe in the word of God that leads me to that conclusison. Why is it that evolutionist can not be as honest, for there is no science in evolution, just one changing theroy after an other, one misguide belief after another"
I guess you didn't.
[Neither Creation nor evolution are science, both are religions.]
Incorrect. Do I really need to explain this to you?
[Those who believe the theory out forward by some worm eaten corpse named darwin are evolutionist.]
Non Sequitur. What does the fact that Darwin is dead have to do with the ToE?
[Nether believe is based upon science as science is defined, both are based upon a religious belief.]
Incorrect.
[Why is it that evolutionist can not be as honest, for there is no science in evolution, just one changing theroy after an other, one misguide belief after another.]
Dishonest? Ad hominem.
That's two "incorrects", one "non sequitur", and an "ad hominem" for a total score of -400 points. You don't get the grand prize, but you will get ridiculed. Thanks for playing!
Our theory is based on evidence. It is science.
Your theory is based on an ancient book with no verifiable sources, no solid real-world evidence, and almost no credibility of its own.
You are a religion. We are not.
"by some worm eaten corpse named darwin are evolutionist"
Always with the petty insults...
But if WE describe Jesus as a worm-eaten corpse, woops, they get offended. Strange, that.
This guy is obvious fail, considering he spells the name of one of his precious books of the bible, "Deuteronomy", incorrectly in his name.
Speculating that this guy's weird, misspelled screen name refers to his fave-rave bible verse, I looked up the only two possibilities:
Deuteronomy 2:32 - Then Sihon came out against us, he and all his people, to fight at Jahaz.
Deuteronomy 23:2 - A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the LORD.
The first one doesn't seem particularly inspiring, so it could be the one wherein even Jesus was banned from the "congregation of the LORD."
Curious. But not worth wasting any more time on.
"Why is it that evolutionist can not be as honest, for there is no science in evolution,..."
- Well, you know, all those great benefit to humanity in medicine, agriculture and other fields which the study of evolution has brought about make it so gosh darn appealing. Creationism would probably have the same kind of appeal...if it wrought even one single tangible benefit to humanity.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
