There is no gap between the haves and the have-nots. There are no haves and have-nots. This is not an intelligent concept. There is you. And there is what you have. If what you have is not enough for you, it is YOUR PROBLEM and will require YOUR SOLUTION, depending upon your talent, energy, and drive.
Keep it simple. Keep it free. Poverty is a personal problem. Society should do NOTHING for the poor. Being poor is a personal choice. It should be easily remedied by making intelligent personal decisions to make oneself more valuable to other people. By being more valuable, you will have more stuff. By being less valuable, you should have less stuff. It's a simple, rational, and moral equation. Without victims, and without compulsion.
69 comments
Being poor is a personal choice.
If we have unlimited resources and everyone has the same opportunities then... maybe.
But we have neither of these and in fact, neither is even possible. So you are just looking for a self-righteous excuse to be a greedy asshole.
To quote Stephen Colbert;
“If this is going to be a Christian nation that doesn't help the poor, either we have to pretend that Jesus was just as selfish as we are, or we've got to acknowledge that He commanded us to love the poor and serve the needy without condition and then admit that we just don't want to do it.” ~Stephen Colbert
Now, whether or not we are a Christian nation is a completely different subject, one I won't get into right now, but many Christians try very hard to make this a Christian nation, so Colbert's sentiment still applies to those people.
I'm middle class and although I'm by no means rich, I don't struggle to get by.
Even if I leave all my empathy out of it and think in the most selfish way possible, I find it good that the society takes care of its poorer citizens. I live in a country that traditionally has had one of the smallest gaps between the rich and the poor. The people who are better-off don't need to buy guns and build high walls to protect their homes, families and property. The government takes care of the poor with the taxes from the rich - to everyone's benefit. We also have free education and nearly free health care - and a state church :)
Fuck me!!! Being poor is a choice now too??
Why do these fuckwits think that the most vilified people in society (vilified by by supposedly "nice" people) want to choose to be in that position??
The biggest haters are ConChristians (pun intended) they are the loudest, most absurd, nast idiots - and they actually do choose to be that way.
Sounds like you're a fan of George Pullman. The guy who got away with paying his employees fake fucking money that was only redeemable in a single town he owned. Now there was a real man of industry, a firm believer that anyone too lazy to work for sub-minimum wage paid in monopoly money and live their personal lives to his standards after they clocked out of work could starve to death in a damned alley. Want to buy nice things, retire, or have savings worth the paper it's printed on? Tough shit communist, the Boss don't owe you nuthin' and neither does anybody else. Want to move or find a new job? Good luck paying travel expenses or rent in Pullman Scrip.
Being poor is a personal choice.
Yes, I'm sure people choose to be born into poor families with few opportunities, or choose to get laid off, or choose to get sick to the point where they can't work and have massive medical bills.
When your body doesn't want to move and your condition almost drives your family into bankruptcy and you're not even an adult yet let's face it, the state needs to help. Families who go through that are shunned. The workers who help out don't even get paid for all the hours they have to work to make it happen. It's vital we overcome this Randroid bullshit, but the middle class has no clue how bad it is.
Many people are poor because they don't have the physical ability, intelligence or education to be anything else. Education can be remedied, though you need money for education. So how is a paraplegic going to make himself more "valuable" to other people? This is the sort of thinking most people grow out of when they're about twelve years old.
"Keep it free" = do exactly as I want.
Anyone looked at this guy's City-Data profile ? I'm sure it won't surprise anyone to see Ayn Rand listed under the "Heroes" section.
"By being more valuable, you will have more stuff. By being less valuable, you should have less stuff."
And how much stuff do you have as an oh so useful real estate agent? You're profession isn't exactly the most important one there is, you know. What exactly do you do that makes you more inherently valuable to society than someone who actually does do something worthwhile, such as researchers attempting to cure diseases and save lives yet get paid probably a fraction of what you make per year?
Man A is born in the ghetto. Man B is born to the Buffett family. Where is the choice there?
By being more valuable, you will have more stuff. By being less valuable, you should have less stuff.
If that were true then Bill O'Reilly and you would be the poorest men on Earth and teachers, hospital workers, police, and scientists would be the richest. Unfortunately, people don't get paid based on their value to society but based on how well their product is marketed and what connections they have. Without Fox News Glenn Beck would be indistinguishable from a schizophrenic on the subway.
Fuck you, Marc. Everyone is one chronic illness away from poverty. It happened to me and countless others. If it were not for social security and Medicare I would have starved in the dark screaming in pain. I'm sure that would make you happy but, just to show you that I'm basically a kind person, I will allow you to reap the same benefit, assuming you have been paying into the system, should some disaster befall you and you are stripped of the assets you worked a lifetime for.
Farmers are some of the hardest working, undeniably valuable people in civilised society. Without them, nobody eats. Yet they are the poorest, least respected, most abused people in history. Without significant subsidies most would ironically starve. The stock market on the other hand is pure gambling that generates millions for some.
Explain that in a way that doesn't make the 'free' market look like a sucker's game for people that work themselves to the bone.
@Horsefeathers
I looked at the profile. He also has:
"HERITAGE: American"
(Not 'Italian' or whatever 'Paolella' is)
"ETHNICITY: American"
(Not 'White' or 'Caucasian')
So basically, he not only licks Ayn Rand's unholy yoni, he's an ethnicist, too! I'll bet he's a blast to be around...NOT!
Strangely enough, he loves the films Schindler's List (A guy defies his Nazi employers and rescues a bunch of Jews) & Shawshank Redemption (Something about enduring getting out of prison, I don't know the plot exactly).
Either the former flick is an example of Even Evil Has Standards* or this guy has a fun time watching Amon Goeth's psychopathic antics.
However, Ms. Rand was of ethnically Jewish heritage. Mr. Evil Real Estate Guy may be a more orthodox Randroid rather than a "Christian" one.
*http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/EvenEvilHasStandards
Of course, the only reason you can "think" this way is because you ARE a have.
It's not about having more and more, it's having what's required to survive in a minimally dignified manner. We're not talking about having a 1000 sqft home but lusting after that 3000 sqft one, it's about HAVING a home. We're not talking about having a complete body scan with your annual physical, we're talking about being able to get one's insulin. Not steaks, but beans. A$$hole.
"Who would dare deny him there and say it isn't so
Must claim there's no walkway at night they wouldn't dare to go,
That charity or righteousness will keep them safe from harm,
And if their own front door is shut the whole, wide world is warm."
-Leslie Fish, "Guardian"
It is your problem when the poor in your city start forming gangs and robbing people at gun point. Is that "personal solution" acceptable? I mean they get more stuff, so they must be more valuable, right?
"Being poor is a personal choice."
Only if you're single and rich.
I can proudly say I live in social democracy, a social market economy actually. I come from a comfortable lower middle class environment. Thanks to the state here I received a free education and health care. Thanks to the state I was able to go from the third tier of our education system to the second tier, the third tier and than to a university. I'm especially thankful to have gone to a university, because on my own I could not have afforded that. The state had the audacity to mangle in my freedom and give me a loan from somebody else's taxes, which I'm currently paying back. Without such education I would not even be able to write this, as would not have been able to learn a second language to near perfection (I know full well that I will probably never be perfect, but I will try to get as close as I can), because my parents can't speak English that well, neither can any of my relatives and we never had money for a private tutor I simply would not have gotten anywhere if the state hadn't provided me free stuff.
Nobody is arguing that you have to give up all your things and give it to the poor - or, well, at leat liberals and progressives don't, actual socialists might, but those are neither mainstream nor anywhere near powerful. What liberals and progressives in the US want is for everybody to have a fair shot, to truly let that persons work ethic and character decide. Make no mistake I don't fully attribute my relative success to the state, it also was me; my willingness to work my ass off and go somewhere - at least somewhere that I could chose my profession over my need for money. If my parents would have been just a bit poorer and lived in a libertarian society, I would not have been able to go to school and get that education, instead I would have had to take a job, spend less time with school and more trying to get food on the table. Because sometimes, the jobs that a person can get simply don't offer enough payment or enough free time to get anywhere else.
I just want for the next generation of Americans to have the same chance as I did, what's so bad about that?
@SpukiKitty :
Hold your horses about the ethnicist part, that might be your bias showing there. It's also possible that he doesn't think only white people are Americans, but that he denies the concept of ethnicity as a defining characteristic of a person - given that he's libertarian that's actually quite possible.
"There is you. And there is what you have". But some people have simply got inherited wealth. They didn't do a damn thing to acquire it. They're already at an advantage.
I honestly don't know why people like this consent to live in societies at all. Why don't they take their individualism to its logical conclusion and go and live in a shack somewhere, only living off what they can grow? Never buy anything that was made in a factory, by groups of people working together, for isn't that "collectivism", and a horrible sin?
It's a complete and utter myth that our system rewards "talent, energy and drive". It might do but only coincidentally. What it also might reward is cunning, exploitation, taking advantage of people's stupidity.
Does he have any idea how much of the world's population is in poverty? How can it possibly be "a personal choice" to starve to death, or watch your children starve?
"Make oneself more valuable to other people". That is a slave rationale. That is the same as reducing oneself to an object, to be sold. You've reified yourself, you've become an object even to yourself. What happened to the old-fashioned idea that people have inherent value, just by being human?
To measure your value by the dictates of the market is not rational or moral, for the simple reason that a lot of wicked and harmful things are potentially profitable.
The idea that there is "no compulsion" in capitalism is also a complete myth. What else is it that compels someone to do something they don't want to do?
"There is you. And there is what you have. If what you have is not enough for you, it is YOUR PROBLEM and will require YOUR SOLUTION, depending upon your talent, energy, and drive."
I agree. EAT THE RICH!
"Being poor is a personal choice"
Except when everyone around you thinks you're less than human because you're not white, straight, rich, Christian, and male.
It's assholes like you that make "eat the rich! " sound so appealing, Marc...
Go die in a ditch. Slowly.
If poverty is a personal problem, then so are freakin' taxes. You should have the talent, energy, and drive to not pay your taxes and fight the government from taking care of its own citizens. You being of no value, the government will take all your stuff. It's simple, rational, and moral. And I will laugh at you.
For starters, you have to make the personal decision to be born to the right parents in a first world nation. And it will help if you also decide to be born the right race and gender, raised in the right neighborhood, assigned to the right public school, etc.
Oh! And whatever else, decide to be born when the economy is booming and jobs are easy to come by.
> Being poor is a personal choice.
100% of poor people disagree with you.
Go home, you spoiled rich princess.
@#1504499, pick one, etc.:
This is not a blog, nor is it a site solely about religious fundies. It also deals with ideological & political fundies.
Please read the site description to avoid making yourself look foolish. And please, stop trying to dictate how we use our site; since you're not an admin (or even a poster with a name), it makes you come off as a jerk.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.