[in response to someone who explained him that the Big Bang and Abiogenesis have nothing to do with evolution]

How can we have a productive conversation when you insist on a silly and irrelevant definition of Evolution?

[later in the same post regarding his idea of what evolution is]

Document the transition of a chimp into a human through natural selection and mutation. I understand that this would take to long or maybe not happen at all. So, feel free to identify any emperical example of anything else that would meet Darwin's definition of Darwinism.

[in response to the poster saying new species and new genera has been observed]

Mere speciation has nothing to do with Evolution. Read Darwin's Origin of Species for the correct definition of Darwinism.