- That "Yankee ingenuity" (American inventions) far surpassed the rest of the world, and brought great wealth to it.
It is true Americans made many important discoveries. But so did many other countries. As many modern conveniences have their origin in France, Germany or Japan (amongst others) as they have in the US.
- That military battles are an essential part of history, and of preserving freedom.
Military battles don't always have to do with preserving freedom. Unless one thinks Nazi conquests where about perserving freedom. Seems to me though this is one of those people who is in denial about the current wars. (Which are about oil, plain and simple.)
- That there were valid reasons for past opposition to immigration which had nothing to do with racism; immigration did not enable the North to beat the South.
I dunno about this one. I suppose you can make non-racist arguments against immigration. Although on the other hand, racists are also a group who would likely automatically be against immigration. I think immigration is a pretty complex subject though, so blanket statements don't really say much either way.
- That unions caused great harm, including senseless violence and lost jobs.
Unions are at the core, there to protect workers rights and prevent workers from being exploited. Sometimes things go wrong, but that doesn't mean the idea of unions are automatically bad.
- That hard work was the key to the success of many Americans.
Maybe. But what really matters in life is who you know. How else do you think Dubya ever got any power?
- That most great Americans, from Abraham Lincoln to Thomas Edison, were homeschooled.
I don't know if they where or not. But even if they where, it doesn't mean all the 'homeskooled gud!' people are actually the least bit intelligent. (Nor that alot of normally schooled people are. Both have their share of idiots.) Perhaps an intelligent person with access to education can put their intelligence to good use, regardless of the source of the education? I don't think it really means one form of schooling is better. Although I do think schools are generally better equipped then parents for teaching. (Then again... US public schools....)
- That Abraham Lincoln's faith grew while he was President.
Debatable. But he most certainly was NOT a fundie. He wasn't in your camp kiddo, regardless of how religious he was or was not, he was NOT a fanatic evangelical.
- That Benjamin Franklin abandoned the Deism of his youth later in his life.
Maybe, who knows. Even so, he was not a fanatic evangelical (AKA Fundie.) If this is true at all.
- That Thomas Jefferson's religious beliefs were not representative of the other Founding Fathers.
Maybe, maybe not. They still weren't fundies. They still didn't agree with fundies, they still didn't found the US on religion. Regardless of their personal beliefs, which may have been deist or christian or whatever, they created a secular state. They did not create a state 'based on the bible' let alone 'judeochristian values.' (The word judeochristian is from the 80's.) They created a secular state. And they often expressed views on religion that where more philosophical then devoted. They where not fundies.
- That Rhode Island and Thomas Jefferson, and their view of a "separation of church and state," had no role in the formation of the Constitution.
Wrong.
- That there were conservative Presidents before Ronald Reagan, such as George Washington, James Monroe and Grover Cleveland.
Completely different era, completely different society, completely different issues. They where not like Ronnie Raygun. Its a whole different ballgame there.
- That "anti-imperialism" movements against the United States were really communist or Muslim movements against Christianity, as in denying the Islamic basis for the Philippine insurgency around 1900.
That tinfoil hat sure suits you, doesn't it?
[later...]
SPECIFIC TRUTHS THAT HISTORY BOOKS DENY
- American Indians are too different from Asians to have descended directly from them.
If so, this is relevant to?
- Rhode Island was the only state to separate church and state, and as a result it became the biggest importer of slaves.[1]
Wrong! F-- Read your own countries f'in constitution. Read what it says. Not what you THINK it says.
- Thomas Jefferson was not as successful or important as liberals claim;[2] he failed personally and as president, and little in the Declaration of Independence is attributable to him.
Wrong again!
- Chivalry was customary throughout most of American history.
So was dueling to the death.
- The greatest corruption in government during the Grant Administration was by the Democratic-controlled "Tammany Hall."
You do realize back then the Democrats where the conservative ones and the Republicans the progressive ones, right? That shifted about in the 40's or 60's I think...
- The misnamed "Gilded Age" generated tremendous prosperity for the world, thanks to an absence of stifling regulation.
Public school education in its current form is less than 100 years old.
So what do we have here? A fundie and a libertarian in one? Kill it dead.
- Atheist materialism lay behind the genocidal crimes of the Nazis.
Wrong. Hitler wasn't even an atheist. The Nazi's crimes had to do with nationalism primarily. But there where also secondary factors. Centuries of christian hatred against the Jews. (Which was very common even up to that time.) certainly didn't help.
- Martin Luther King was a Republican who preached Conservative values.
Yeah right.
- The so-called Dark Ages brought a revolution in science and learning from the spread of Christianity throughout Europe and the establishment of networks of monastic 'universities'.
More like a thousand years of stagnation and an actual LOSS of knowledge compared to the ancients.
- Lenin was a ruthless and violent dictator who oppressed the people of the Soviet Union as thoroughly as Stalin.
Nazism, with its insistence on the collective, was a left-wing doctrine.
Do left and right as we know them even actually apply to totalitarian dictatorships? I think those pretty much imply the absence of any 'wings'. And more of a 'do what I say or die' type of ruling. Either way, the Nazi's WHERE nationalistic. And if we have to put this in wings, guess which wing is more nationalistic. Honestly the America uber allesch types remind me alot of the Nazi's sometimes. Just they hate, torture and kill mid-easterners, instead of jews.
- The United States Immigration Service ran Ellis Island as a harsh, unwelcoming and discriminatory institution.
This puzzles me... apperent Libertarian economic beliefs, but OPPOSED to immigration?
Still this guy is a good example of people often having their own facts that justify whatever the crap they want to believe.
Also a good example of quibbling about details in the assumption that this justifies them. The way of thinking that goes; Important historical figure X believed in God = X was just like me and I am right!
Its that same horrible attempt at logic that suggest that if there is a God, whatever religion they follow must automatically be 100% right. Even if its quite possible for there to be a God and for ALL religions to be completely false, as all of them figured said God wrong.