I have now come to the conclusion that ZOG has well and truly done its work in mentally conditioning the English people into not only accepting but embracing its fate-biological extinction via mass immigration and race-mixing.
Those of us who do not embrace our racial and cultural destruction out of love for our race and folk are defined in Orwellian terms as haters. It is rare for a people to not only allow their land to be invaded by aliens-and aliens of the most racially diverse kind without fighting to resist and repel them but the English are either oblivious to what has happened or in all honesty do not care so long as they can afford their football match tickets,their alcohol and foreign holidays.
This makes the English people not worth saving as a collective organic body for a people who will not struggle for life deserves to perish. This is a cast iron law of nature.
The recent return of extreme weather with storms and flooding in England and the rest of the British Isles is a telling signal that the Gods are displeased as well.
[...]
This is the final outworking of England`s race treason and rejection of Adolf Hitler and the destruction of the Germanic fatherland.
21 comments
Ah, yes, Mr. Krieger again. The man who doesn't bathe, can't spell, can't tell the truth about anything, and can't understand why women avoid him.
Congratulations, Wotans Krieger! You have become the second person to be posted on FSTDT, CSTDT, and RSTDT on the same day! You've just won a date with Bane of Dumnonia!
I was about to say his idea that the English people are worthy of destruction for not buying into his racism sounded oddly familiar, but then I say the site name and him praising Hitler as an iconic figure, and felt it was redundant to point out the precedent.
Even so, notice how much modern Germans loathe Hitler and what he means to history? Gives me confidence England will go on and enjoy its warm beer and football and remain thankfully oblivious of this nut.
Some punctuation might help.
But most importantly: "biological extinction via mass immigration and race-mixing", is illogical. If these "aliens of the most racially diverse kind" are immigrating and race-mixing, then they are the English! So how can the "English" be made extinct by this process?
Ah...
It's Mr. "I want to be a smelly viking." again.
Let me tell you something Mr. Smelly Viking.
Hitler didn't like the old Gods
Hitler died a cowards death
You're not one of "My folk", so take your racism, misogyny, and whatever else and go away.
He used "Orwellian"...? I can't shake the feeling he's anti-socialism (unless he means National pseudo-Socialism...), given that poor word's track record of who it gets used by. (Why do people forget that "1984" and "Animal Farm" weren't condemnations of socialism, but warnings of the danger of revolutions being betrayed by false followers and false hierophants alike, loyal to no cause but their own comfort? Well, maybe more about false hierophants than false followers...)
@Skynight - It is ironic that a lot of people think "Animal Farm" and "1984" are condemnations of Socialism when in reality George Orwell WAS HIMSELF a Socialist and died as one. "Animal Farm" was a condemnation of Stalinism. The book implies that had Snowball (Trotsky) rather than Napoleon (Stalin) become the leader things might have turned out alright for the animal farm. If anything the book could be considered pro-"Left Communism" rather than anti-socialist.
"1984" was a condemnation of hierophants who use socialist causes and socialist revolutions to ride their coattails to positions of power and implement their own counter-socialist forms of government. 1984 was an allegory of how the Italian Fascists and German Nazis started out pretending to be socialists or syndicalists but instead used the support of the public to push a Corporatist/Oligarchical agenda. The Ingoc Party in the book even says, "[the party] rejects and vilifies every principle for which the Socialist movement originally stood, and it does so in the name of Socialism."
@Brendan Rizzo - I'd say it's a combination of ignorance (most Americans can't even properly define what "socialism" is, most just think it's anything relating to a government or anything that has to do with fairness or not being greedy), decades of programming and propaganda (the First and Second Red Scares and the Cold War), and plain ole stupidity and laziness. Laziness because even most poor people in the US now have Internet access but people are too lazy to look up things on the Internet other than what Kim Kardashian, Lil' Wayne and Justin Bieber are up to or what the latest celebrity Tweet is.
I'd say the stupidity part started becoming a problem in the 70s as Americans started praising the virtue of not knowing anything (the anti-intellectualism movement among conservatives) and/or praising materialism and consumerism over science and progress. A good heaping helping of "free market" worship also helps. Free marketism started becoming the new national religion (along with celebrity worship) in the 80s and has skyrocketed in popularity since the Bush Admin came to power.....
.......You'll have to excuse me, breaking news about the next season of "Dancing With The Stars"!
@Vox: {Skyknight doesn't even know who Little Wayne IS}
{Skyknight has barely any understanding of who the Kardashians are, other than celebrities of SOME sort with a swarm of marital issues}
That said, I still can't fathom how anti-intellectualism could be seen as a virtue. I think a case can be made for it being a subset of Sloth and/or Pride. And that it would LOOK THAT WAY to most people who laid eyes upon it.
...Then again, appealing TO Pride could explain the situation. But I don't see what those who fell prey to it thought knowledge was driving out, and HOW that something would get driven out. Consumerism is also a little odd to me in juxtaposition with materialism, to me--striving to have long-lasting artefacts seems MORE respectful to matter than just constant purchases.
@Wotans Krieger: ...You do realize that the gods can't do whatever they like, right? Good and evil, to be truly legitimate, cannot HAVE authors. Gods are properly champions of morality, not its authors, for what would stop them from altering the rules without care for how the alterations would affect non-gods? Being authors of morality ultimately reduces gods to beasts of chaos and whim--hardly worthy of respect, let alone adulation (not to mention indistinguishable from Satanel et al., save for power levels--and power is irrelevant here).
@Ebon
"Dude, I actually am English and we've been a mongrel nation ever since the Romans turned up."
And do you think the "Celtic" Britons were all so pure before that? No early Germanic, Gallic, and Nordic people ever visted and interbred with us before written history began? When the Celts came up from Iberia did they find Britain completely uninhabited?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.